dev-cpp-users Mailing List for Dev-C++
Open Source C & C++ IDE for Windows
Brought to you by:
claplace
Menu
▾
▴
dev-cpp-users — Dev-C++ users discussion list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(258) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(377) |
Feb
(260) |
Mar
(249) |
Apr
(188) |
May
(152) |
Jun
(150) |
Jul
(195) |
Aug
(202) |
Sep
(200) |
Oct
(286) |
Nov
(242) |
Dec
(165) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(245) |
Feb
(241) |
Mar
(239) |
Apr
(346) |
May
(406) |
Jun
(369) |
Jul
(418) |
Aug
(357) |
Sep
(362) |
Oct
(597) |
Nov
(455) |
Dec
(344) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(446) |
Feb
(397) |
Mar
(515) |
Apr
(524) |
May
(377) |
Jun
(387) |
Jul
(532) |
Aug
(364) |
Sep
(294) |
Oct
(352) |
Nov
(295) |
Dec
(327) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(416) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(324) |
Apr
(249) |
May
(259) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(212) |
Aug
(259) |
Sep
(158) |
Oct
(162) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(169) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(165) |
Mar
(199) |
Apr
(147) |
May
(131) |
Jun
(163) |
Jul
(235) |
Aug
(136) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(88) |
Nov
(113) |
Dec
(100) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(85) |
Feb
(119) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(40) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(49) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(116) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(86) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(106) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(4) |
2
(10) |
3
(11) |
4
(8) |
5
(3) |
|
6
(1) |
7
(7) |
8
(5) |
9
(10) |
10
(4) |
11
(5) |
12
(3) |
|
13
(4) |
14
(7) |
15
(8) |
16
(11) |
17
(5) |
18
(3) |
19
(4) |
|
20
(8) |
21
(25) |
22
(9) |
23
(6) |
24
(8) |
25
(13) |
26
(11) |
|
27
(12) |
28
(3) |
29
(7) |
30
(3) |
|
|
|
|
From: Daniel K. O. <dan...@ya...> - 2004-06-14 21:53:36
|
Brian Wallace wrote:
> Couple questions about C++ compilers. Do they all have the ability to
> plugin assembly?
> IE: With VC++ 6.0
>
> __asm{
> -insert assembly here-
> }
IIRC, a C++ compiler doesn't have to support inline assembly. But almost
all C++ compilers support some way to write inline assembly.
> Will this work with all compilers.
Each compiler can have its own syntax for inlining assembly in the code;
and each one can have its own assembly syntax; and each different
architecture will have its own assembly syntax. So no, it won't work
with all compilers.
> I mainly want this for Linux programming. If anyone knows of a C++
> compiler for Linux that has easy assembly plugin context, please tell.
Ever heard of GCC? http://gcc.gnu.org :)
Also, a useful document about assembly in GCC:
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/brennan/brennan_att_inline_djgpp.html
(this doc is a little outdated; GCC now supports both AT&T and Intel
syntax, you just have to use the directive ".intel_syntax" or
".att_syntax", or compile with "-masm=att" or "-masm=intel")
> I want to do this to have complete control over video.
You mean you want to control your video hardware directly? The operating
system is in charge of the hardware handling, you can only use the
provided API. Inside an OS, you'll have as much control over your video
hardware with assembly as with C++ or almost every other language. If
you want to access the hardware directly you can't have an OS in your way.
> Thanks for time, please respond soon.
Quoting a popular writting from 'someone known by the "ESR" acronym':
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#urgent
Danmiel K. O.
|
|
From: Brian W. <nig...@ho...> - 2004-06-14 21:20:45
|
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>Couple questions about C++ compilers. Do they all have the ability to plugin assembly?</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>IE: With VC++ 6.0 </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>__asm{</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> -insert assembly here- </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> }</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Will this work with all compilers. I mainly want this for Linux programming. If anyone knows of a C++ compiler for Linux that has easy assembly plugin context, please tell. I want to do this to have complete control over video. I also have questions about networking through code but i'll get to that later. Thanks for time, please respond soon. Time is sacred while exams are here(High School).</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr> <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMAENUS/2755??PS=47575">Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security.</a> </html>
|
|
From: <jto...@ut...> - 2004-06-14 16:48:02
|
Hi, I have a class template (let's say List <class T>) and other class which inherits from first one(let's say company :public List <character *>. = Just to try I made a project with the first class and all went well (no = memory losses, no computer hanging, well, you know).=20 But when I made the project with the two classes , beginning the = company.h with #include "List.h" I have a lot of undefined link error. If I change = the include into #include "List.cpp" everything goes all right. What may be wrong with my .h file? Thanks in advance, Jes=FAs Torrecilla |
|
From: <wa...@wa...> - 2004-06-14 16:26:59
|
On 14 Jun 2004 at 16:35, Bruce jjs wrote: > I have used inportb( ) and outportb( ) write a serial > communication' program.But this two functions is provided by > Borland C 3.1 and they are not standard C functions.Does ANSI C > has some functions can do the similar jobs like inportb( ) and > outportb( )?In my impression,the standard C doesn't support > functions to direct operate hardware,isn't it? Whenever you deal directly with the hardware, you're going to be non- standard. Watson Davis |
|
From: <eng...@ju...> - 2004-06-14 15:24:11
|
Hi, Does anyone have a link to an SSH API for C/C++ and Linux. Something I can use to build a custom client and server. James E. Smith ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! |
|
From: Ewald H. <in...@ho...> - 2004-06-14 09:42:48
|
Hi, Would this be for Windows ? Because then you would need to use the Win32 = API as Windows does not allow direct control of the hardware anymore. I = remember there was an example on the C/C++ User's Journal website. Try = to Google win32 serial communication for some hints Ciao Ewald Horn Proprietor/Eienaar : Horn Labs Cell/Sel : 083 519 1615 Website : http://www.hornlabs.co.za Email/E-pos : in...@ho... |
|
From: <per...@ya...> - 2004-06-14 08:35:28
|
I have used inportb( ) and outportb( ) write a serial communication' program.But this two functions is provided by Borland C 3.1 and they are not standard C functions.Does ANSI C has some functions can do the similar jobs like inportb( ) and outportb( )?In my impression,the standard C doesn't support functions to direct operate hardware,isn't it? --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? 嫌邮箱太小？雅虎电邮自助扩容！ |
