Programming Lab 4
Programming Lab 4
Fundamental Programming
NO
NAME
MATRIX NUMBER
1.
2.
NO. LAB
:4
TITLE
case statement
PROGRAM
: DTK2A
LECTURER
N
O
ASPECT
SCORE
0-5
1.
2.
3.
Procedure
4.
5.
6.
7.
Documentation (Neatness/Spelling/Plagarism)
8.
Delivery
TOTAL
6-10
/100
11-20
DEC2012
STUDENTS NAME
1
2
3
4
COURSE NAME
LECTURERS NAME
FUNDAMENT
REGISTRATION
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DATE
COMPONENT
COVER PAGE
(5% of total score)
PURPOSE &
EQUIPMENT
(10% of total score)
PROCEDURE
(10% of total score)
SOURCE CODE
(ACTIVITY &
EXERCISES)
(20% of total score)
RUBRICS
Missing mor
than two ste
of procedur
(0)
(5-1)
The programs The programs
are mostly
are minimally
functional and
functional
respond
with
The program
are not
functional,
meeting no
COMPONENT
RUBRICS
correctly
producing the
correct outputs.
correctly
producing the
correct
outputs. There
are minor
problems with
the program
implementatio
n
(20-16)
(15-11)
OUTPUT (ACTIVITY &
EXERCISES)
(20% of total score)
DOCUMENTATION
(NEATNESS/SPELLING/
PLAGARISM
(20% of total score)
DISCUSSION &
CONCLUSION
(10% of total score)
Produce the
correct outputs.
All the data
have been
tested.
(20-16)
Very neat and
well organized.
All
grammar/spelli
ng correct and
very wellwritten.
Report is
authentic.
Only one
output not
correct.
significant
portions of the
program
missing or
incomplete.
The program
is largely
nonresponsive
to most test
cases and/or
inputs.
(10-6)
significant
design
specification
or was not
attempted
Lack neatness
and
organization.
More than 2
grammar/spell
ing errors,
generally
readable with
some rough
spots in
writing style.
More than one
part of report
been copied
from others.
(10-6)
Some of the
results have
been correctly
interpreted
and
discussed;
partial but
incomplete
understanding
of results is
still evident.
Missing two
key elements
Sloppy and
unorganized
Frequent
grammar and
spelling erro
writing style
rough and
immature.
All the repo
been copie
from others
(5-0)
(5-0)
(15-11)
(20-16)
All program
have been
interpreted
correctly and
discussed,
good
understanding
of results is
conveyed.
Written in
paragraph
form; includes
why done, what
Almost all of
the results
have been
correctly
interpreted
and discussed;
only minor
improvements
are needed.
Missing one
key element of
the conclusion
(eg; what
Very incompl
or incorrec
interpretation
program
indicating a l
of
understandi
of results.
Missing mor
than two
elements of t
conclusion
COMPONENT
RUBRICS
done, what
learned,
including %
error, sources
of error.
DELIVERY
(4% of total score)
(10-9)
The report was
delivered on
time.
(5)
done or why
done or what
learned)
(8-7)
The report
was delivered
within a week
of the due
date.
(4)
of the
conclusion; or
no results; or
no sources of
error.
(6-4)
The report
was delivered
within 2
weeks of the
due date.
(3)
TOTAL
REMARKS
:_________________________________________________________________________________
_________
CHECKED BY
: ___________________________________________
NAME
: ___________________________________________
DATE :
: _______________________________________
(3-0)
The report w
delivered mo
than 2 week
overdue.
(2)
SCORE / 10
Purpose
i.
ii.
Equipment
i.
ii.
Computer
C programming
LAB 4
ACTIVITY 4A
Activity 4B
Exercise
Discussion
In activity 4A we have learn to contruct programs that
use simple switch case statement in case A, B,C ,D
AND F. In activity 4B, we have learnt to apply
programs that use simple switch statement.
Conclusion
At the end of this practical, we have learnt to apply
programs that use simple switch statement in
programming. Besides that, we have also learnt to
Construct programs that use simple switch case
statement using our C++ software as we were
instructed by our lecturer. By doing this practical work