Performance For The Last 5 Years Versus Target
Performance For The Last 5 Years Versus Target
Performance For The Last 5 Years Versus Target
GROSS ENROLLMENT RATIO (GER) is the total enrollment in the elementary level or
the secondary level, regardless of age, as a percentage of the population who,
according to national regulations, should be enrolled in elementary schools or
secondary schools (PSA, 2017). GER shows the participation rate in the elementary
level or the secondary level and is also used together with the net enrollment ratio to
measure the extent of over-aged and under-aged enrollment.
Table 1. Gross Enrollment Ratio in Public and Private Elementary School from School
Year 2016-2017 to 2020-2021
140.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
It is clear that the gross enrollment ratio (or overall level of participation) at the
elementary level is declining, falling from 109.37 percent in 2016–2017 to 94.45
percent in 2020–2021. The percentage of students participating in basic education
decreased by 14.92 percent.
The EBEIS data shows that GER is below the Division target with a decrease of 14.92
percentage point from the set uniformed target.
Table 2. Gross Enrollment Ratio in Public and Private Junior High School from School
Year 2016-2017 to 2020-2021
140.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
In contrast, the Gross Enrollment Ratio in Junior High School, has increased for four
years in a row, from 90.48 percent in 2016–2017 to 118.07 percent in 2019–2020. It
somewhat decreased to 114.37 percent in 2021–2022. However, the decline in Junior
High School was observed during S.Y. 2021-2022 when schools was temporarily
closed due to global pandemic.
Furthermore, several variables, such as a loss of motivation since the learners are
conducting independent learning during the pandemic, the necessity to work to
supplement the family finances, or caring for other siblings, are contributory reasons
for the decline. Similar criteria such as insufficient funds to send them to school, lack
of personal interest, seeking for job, already married or working, and caring for
children are identified in FLEMMS (2019).
Table 3. Gross Enrollment Ratio in Public and Private Senior High School from School
Year 2016-2017 to 2020-2021
120.00% 112.25%
100.00% 95.67%
84.51% 87.48%
85.00% 85.50% 86.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
The Senior High School Gross Enrollment Ratio is on the rise, going up from 84.51
percent in 2018–2019 to 112.25 percent in 2021–2022. The overall amount of
participation at this level has grown by 27.74 percent, as demonstrated. Also, the
actual values for the past five (5) years are above the set Division target. Generally,
NER in the Senior High School level in the past 5 years are more than 100% which
means that Junior High School completers are in school.
NET ENROLLMENT RATIO (NER) also called participation rate, is the total
enrollment for the age group corresponding to the official school age in the elementary
level or the secondary level to the population of the same age group in a given year
(PSA, 2017). NER provides a more precise measurement of the extent of participation
in the elementary level or the secondary level belonging to the official school age.
Table 4. Actual Net Enrollment Rate in the Public and Private Elementary Level from
School Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2021-2022
102.00%
100.00%
100.00% 98.90%
98.10% 98.29% 98.50%
97.65% 97.86%
98.00% 97.43% 97.34%
95.92%
96.00%
94.00% 92.89%
92.00%
90.20%
90.00%
88.00%
86.00%
84.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
From 2016–17 to 2021–22, the Net Enrollment Ratio in Elementary Education has an
erratic trend, as seen in Table 4. It decreased to 90.20 percent from the base value of
98.90 percent.
Table 5. Actual Net Enrollment Rate in the Public and Private Junior High School from
School Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2021-2022
120.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Conversely, the measurement of the eligible population's access to Junior High School
education is rising, going from 71.74 percent in 2016–2017 to 98.02 percent in 2021–
2022.
Table 6. Actual Net Enrollment Rate in the Public and Private Senior High School from
School Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2021-2022
80.00%
71.21%
70.00%
58.00% 59.01%
59.00% 60.00%
57.45%
60.00%
51.04%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
There was a 6.41 percent drop in Senior High School enrollment from 57.45 percent in
2018–2019 to 51.04 percent in 2019–2020, but then increased from by 12.02 percent
in 2021-2022.
COHORT SURVIVAL RATE (CSR) is the percentage of enrollees at the beginning of a
grade level in a given school year who reached the final grade level of the elementary
level or the secondary level (PSA, 2017). CSR assesses the “wastage” and internal
efficiency in education and computes the percentage of a cohort of pupils or students
who are able to reach Grade 6 or Grade 10, respectively.
Table 7. Cohort Survival Rate in the Public and Private Elementary Level from School
Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
102.00%
100.00% 99.80%
100.00% 99.40% 99.60%
99.18% 99.20%
98.09%
98.00%
96.11% 95.92%
96.00%
93.78%
94.00%
92.00%
90.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
The numbers in the table represent the percentage of learners who completed Grade 6
in Elementary school.
Based on the table, the elementary level's cohort survival rate rose from 98.09 percent
in 2016-2017 to 100 percent in 2017-2018 before dropping to 93.78 percent in 2020-
2021. From the starting point of 98.09 percent, it dropped to 93.78 percent. Generally,
Cohort Survival Rate for elementary level is below 100% for the past five years.
Table 8. Cohort Survival Rate in the Public and Private Junior High School Level from
School Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
98.00%
96.85%
96.15%
95.76%
96.00%
94.00%
92.31%
92.00% 91.30% 91.30%
90.58%
89.77%
90.00% 89.17%
88.47%
88.00%
86.00%
84.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
70.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
The rate for Senior High School dropped from 57.45 percent in the 2018–19 school
year to 51.04 percent in the 2019–2020 school year, but it then rose to 59.01 percent
in the 2020–21 school year.
SCHOOL LEAVER RATE (SLR) is the percentage of pupils or students who were not
able to finish a particular grade level and those who finish but fail to enroll in the next
grade level in the following year. SLR is computed every grade level except for Grade 1
in the elementary level and Grade 7 in the secondary level.
Table 10. School Leaver Rate in the Public Elementary Level from School Year 2016-
2017 to School Year 2020-2021
1.60%
1.40%
1.40% 1.27%
1.17%
1.20%
0.96%
1.00%
0.80%
0.80% 0.70%
0.65%
0.60%
0.60% 0.50%
0.41%
0.40%
0.20%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
The table demonstrates that while the leaver rate in primary school decreased from
2016–2017 with.70% to 2017–2018 with.41%, it grew from there in to 2020–2021 with
1.17%.
Table 11. School Leaver Rate in the Public and Private Junior High School from School
Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
3.50%
2.97% 2.99%
3.00% 2.84%
2.50%
2.50%
2.08%
1.95%
2.00%
1.50% 1.21%
0.97%
1.00% 0.73%
0.48%
0.50% 0.25% 0.20%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
The leaver rate in Junior High School, however, is on the rise, increasing from 1.95
percent in 2016–2017 to 2. 99% in the years 2021–2022.
Table 12. School Leaver Rate in the Public and Private Senior High School from School
Year 2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
4.00%
3.45%
3.50%
3.00% 2.80%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.03%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Based on the table, the Senior High School leaver rate marginally decreased from 3.45
percent in 2019–2020 to 1.03 percent in 2021–22.
EQUITY
Table 13. Actual Number of Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSENs) in SPED
Centers/Classes
SCHOOLS WITH SPED
CENTER/CLASS SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020 SY 2020-2021 SY 2021-2022
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
1 Altavas ES 19 16 35 21 12 33 17 9 26 28 12 40 30 12 42
2 Balete IS 9 3 12 13 15 28
3 Banga ES 31 19 50 36 22 58 38 24 62 39 26 65 40 27 70
4 Kalibo Pilot ES 30 26 56 35 30 65 29 32 61 35 33 68 45 37 82
Kalibo Integrated Special
5 Education 55 38 93 67 40 107 69 44 113 69 42 111 72 42 114
6 Numancia IS 19 11 30 13 15 28 9 12 21 9 9 18 9 8 196
7 Tamalagon IS 5 4 9 5 4 9 10 8 18 10 10 20
8 Ibajay CS 3 17 20 14 14 28 16 27 43 16 27 43 18 32 50
9 Malay ES 13 19 32 16 20 36 17 21 38 17 21 38 21 23 70
10 Buruanga ES 8 7 15 9 7 16 12 7 19 14 7 21 12 16 28
TOTAL 178 153 331 216 164 380 212 180 392 246 188 434 270 222 492
From SY 2017–18 with 331 enrolled students to SY 2021–2022 with 492 enrolled
students, Table 5 illustrates the growth of Learners with Special Educational Needs
(LSENs) enrolled in SPED Centers/schools. In the SDO Aklan, 10 out of 19 districts
have SPED classes and centers.
The exact number of schools with ALIVE is displayed in the table. From SY
2017–18 with 162 enrolled students to SY 2020–21 with 251 enrolled students, there
is a rising trend in enrolment, then a downward trend from there until SY 2020–21
with 240 enrolled students.
The opening of an additional three (3) schools offering ALIVE programs in the
SY 2020–2021 is a contributing element in the rise in program enrolment.
QUALITY
Table 15. Report on the Tracking of 2021 Grade 12 Graduates
Table 16. Completion Rate in the Public and Private Elementary Level from School Year
2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
102.00%
99.84%
100.00% 98.97%
98.60%
98.00% 96.97% 97.20%
95.80%
95.74%
96.00%
94.40%
94.00% 93.00% 93.30%
92.00%
90.00%
88.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
The table demonstrates the varying pattern in the Elementary Level's real completion
rate, which dropped from 96.97 percent in 2016–2017 to 93.30 percent in 2020–21.
Table 17. Completion Rate in the Public and Private Junior High School from School Year
2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
100.00% 93.88%
89.48% 88.77% 89.94% 90.46%
90.00% 86.51%
83.02%
80.00% 76.04% 75.53%
72.55%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
The Junior High School level, on the other hand, fluctuates from base data of 89.48
percent in 2016–17, although a growth was noticed to 90.46 percent in 2020–21.
Table 18. Completion Rate in the Public and Private Senior High School from School Year
2016-2017 to School Year 2020-2021
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00%
2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021
The percentage for Senior High School increased slightly from 83.37 percent in 2019–
2020 to 83.96 percent in 2020–21.
NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST SY 2017-2018
Table 19. Performance of SDO Aklan in National Achievement Test in Elementary
Education SY 2017-2018
Nearly Proficient
Elementary Level
Filipino 46.52%
Math 16.05%
English 16.31%
Science 7.27%
HEKASI 14.80%
Overall 16.18%
The table shows that the overall score for the NAT Proficiency Level in Elementary
Level is 16.18 percent. Science has the lowest Proficiency Level (7.27%) and Filipino
has the highest Proficiency Level (46.52%).
Table 20. Performance of SDO Aklan in National Achievement Test in Junior High School
SY 2017-2018
The table reveals that the overall score for the Junior High School NAT Proficiency
Level is 31.83 percent. Filipino has the highest proficiency level (62.02%), and
mathematics has the lowest (8.61%).
Table 21. Performance of SDO Aklan in National Achievement Test in Senior High School
SY 2017-2018
The table reveals that 14.44% of students in Senior High School's NAT are at the
Nearly Proficient Level. The highest proficiency level is in Media with 38.70%, while the
lowest is in Science with 4.46%.
Table 22. Actual Number of Enrollment and Passers
The number of students enrolled in the School Based Feeding Program who are
significantly wasted and wasted is shown in Table 13 below. According to the data, the
number of severely wasted and wasted learners during the 2017–2018 school year fell
to 4875 following feeding. With 13434 extremely wasted and wasted students in 2018–
2019, the number of students fell to 3559 after feeding.