Guidebook For Road Construction and Maintenance Management-DPWH
Guidebook For Road Construction and Maintenance Management-DPWH
Guidebook For Road Construction and Maintenance Management-DPWH
GUIDEBOOK FOR
ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
2014
SEPTEMBER 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................
ii
vi
vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ...................................................................................
xii
ACRONYMS .................................................................................................
xiii
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................
1- 1
1.1
Background ..................................................................................................
1- 1
1.2
Purpose ........................................................................................................
1- 2
Chapter 2
2- 1
2.1
2- 1
2.2
2- 2
2.3
2- 4
Chapter 3
3- 1
3- 1
3.1.1
3- 1
3.1.2
3- 4
3.1.3
3- 5
3- 7
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3- 7
3.2.2
Headwalls ...............................................................................................
3- 7
3- 8
3.3
3.3.1
3- 8
3.3.2
3- 9
3.3.3
3- 9
3.3.4
3-10
Chapter 4
4.1
PAVEMENT ...............................................................................
4- 1
Types of Pavement.......................................................................................
4- 1
ii
4.1.1
Rigid Pavement.......................................................................................
4- 1
4.1.2
4- 2
4- 2
4.2
4.2.1
4- 2
4.2.2
4- 2
4.2.3
Admixture/Additive ..................................................................................
4- 3
4.2.4
4- 3
4.2.5
Types of Formworks................................................................................
4- 4
4.2.6
4- 4
4.2.7
4- 6
4.2.8
4- 7
4.2.9
4- 7
4- 8
4- 8
4- 8
4.3
4.3.1
Instapave ................................................................................................
4- 9
4.3.2
4- 9
4.3.3
4-10
4.3.4
4-10
Chapter 5
5.1
5- 1
5- 1
5.1.1
5- 1
5.1.2
Embankment Slope.................................................................................
5- 3
5- 4
5.2
5.2.1
5- 4
5.2.2
5- 5
5.2.3
Landslide.................................................................................................
5- 6
5.2.4
5- 7
5.2.5
5- 9
5-10
5.3
iii
4- 9
5.3.1
5-10
5.3.2
5-11
5.4
5-11
5.4.1
5-12
5.4.2
5-13
5.4.3
5-16
5-21
5.5
5.5.1
5-22
5.5.2
5-23
5.5.3
Cribwall ...................................................................................................
5-24
5.5.4
5-26
5.5.5
5-27
5-28
5.6
5.6.1
5-28
5.6.2
Shotcrete ................................................................................................
5-28
5.6.3
Rocknet...................................................................................................
5-29
5.6.4
5-30
5.6.5
5-30
5.7
5-30
5.8
5-30
5.9
5-32
Chapter 6
6.1
6-1
6- 1
6.1.1
6- 2
6.1.2
6- 2
6-13
6.2
6.2.1
6-13
6.2.2
6-15
6.2.3
6-17
6.2.4
6-18
Chapter 7
7.1
7- 1
Road Signs...................................................................................................
7- 1
7.1.1
Classifications .........................................................................................
7- 1
7.1.2
7- 3
iv
7.1.3
Design .....................................................................................................
7- 4
7.2
7- 4
7.3
7- 6
Chapter 8
8.1
8- 1
8- 1
8.1.1
8- 1
8.1.2
8- 2
8- 2
8.2
8.2.1
ROCOND ................................................................................................
8- 2
8.2.2
8- 2
8- 8
8.3
8.3.1
Measurement ..........................................................................................
8- 8
8.3.2
8- 9
8.3.3
8-11
8-16
8.4
8.4.1
8-16
8.4.2
8-16
Soil Investigations.........................................................................................
8-17
8.5
8.5.1
8-17
8.5.2
8-18
8-21
8.6
8.6.1
8-21
8.6.2
8-23
8-24
8.7
8.7.1
8-24
8.7.2
8-24
8.7.3
8-24
8.7.4
8-27
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1
2- 1
Table 2.2
2- 2
Table 2.3
2- 3
Table 2.4
2- 4
Table 2.5
2- 4
Table 3.1
Drainage Area....................................................................................
3- 1
Table 3.2
3- 2
Table 3.3
3- 3
Table 3.4
3- 4
Table 3.5
3- 5
Table 3.6
3- 7
Table 4.1
4- 3
Table 4.2
4- 5
Table 4.3
4- 6
Table 4.4
4- 9
Table 4.5
4-10
Table 5.1
5- 1
Table 5.2
5- 2
Table 5.3
5- 4
Table 5.4
5-14
Table 5.5
5-16
Table 5.6
5-17
Table 5.7
5-24
Table 5.8
5-33
Table 6.1
6- 3
Table 6.2
6-10
Table 6.3
6-18
Table 7.1
7- 5
Table 8.1
8- 4
Table 8.2
8- 5
Table 8.3
8- 5
Table 8.4
8-20
Table 8.5
8-22
Table 8.6
8-23
Table 8.7
8-25
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
3- 3
3- 3
Figure 3.3
3- 5
Figure 3.4
3- 6
Figure 3.5
3- 6
Figure 3.6
3- 6
Figure 3.7
3- 7
Figure 3.8
3- 8
Figure 3.9
3- 8
3- 9
3- 9
Figure 3.12 Typical Underground Road Drainage for Mountainous Terrain ..........
3- 9
3- 10
3- 10
Figure 4.1
4- 1
Figure 4.2
4- 2
Figure 4.3
4- 3
Figure 4.4
4- 4
Figure 4.5
4- 5
Figure 4.6
4- 6
Figure 4.7
PCCP Widening.................................................................................
4- 7
Figure 4.8
4- 7
Figure 4.9
Thermometer .....................................................................................
4- 7
4- 8
Figure 4.11 Laying of Base Materials by Means of Road Grader and Paver ........
4- 8
Figure 5.1
5- 3
Figure 5.2
5- 5
Figure 5.3
5- 5
Figure 5.4
5- 6
Figure 5.5
5- 7
Figure 5.6
5- 7
Figure 5.7
5- 7
vii
Figure 5.8
5- 8
Figure 5.9
5- 8
5- 9
Figure 5.11 Road Slip caused by Leakage from Pipe Culvert ..............................
5- 9
5-10
5-10
5-11
5-11
5-12
5-12
5-13
5-14
5-14
5-15
5-15
5-17
5-17
5-17
5-18
5-18
5-19
5-20
5-20
5-21
5-21
5-21
5-22
5-22
5-23
5-23
5-24
5-25
5-25
5-26
5-26
5-27
viii
5-27
5-27
Figure 5.46 Relation between Rock Slope Height and Height of Bounce of Stone
5-28
5-28
5-29
5-29
5-30
5-30
5-31
5-31
5-32
Figure 6.1
6- 1
Figure 6.2
6- 2
Figure 6.3
6- 2
Figure 6.4
6- 2
Figure 6.5
6- 3
Figure 6.6
6- 4
Figure 6.7
6- 5
Figure 6.8
6- 5
Figure 6.9
6- 6
6- 7
6- 7
6- 8
6- 9
6- 9
6-10
Figure 6.16 Rechanneling Concept for Riverbank and Riverbed Protections .......
6-11
6-11
6-12
6-13
6-14
6-14
6-15
6-16
6-16
Figure 6.25 Collapse of Coastal Revetment due to Washed out Backfill Material
6-16
6-17
ix
6-17
6-18
6-19
6-20
6-21
6-22
Figure 7.1
7- 2
Figure 7.2
7- 2
Figure 7.3
7- 2
Figure 7.4
7- 3
Figure 7.5
7- 3
Figure 7.6
7- 4
Figure 7.7
7- 6
Figure 8.1
8- 1
Figure 8.2
8- 1
Figure 8.3
8- 1
Figure 8.4
8- 2
Figure 8.5
8- 3
Figure 8.6
8- 3
Figure 8.7
8- 3
Figure 8.8
8- 4
Figure 8.9
8- 6
8- 7
8- 8
8- 8
8- 8
8- 9
8- 9
8-10
8-10
Figure 8.18 Important Locations for Slope Investigation on Cut Slope .................
8-10
8-11
8-11
8-12
8-12
8-16
8-16
8-17
8-17
8-18
8-18
8-19
8-19
Figure 8.32 Friction Loss on Simplified Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test ..........
8-20
8-21
8-22
8-22
8-24
8-25
8-26
8-27
8-29
8-29
xi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In behalf of the CWG on Road Manuals Improvement, the Group Leader acknowledges the
TWG members and the regional project managers of pilot regions for their patience,
guidance, words of encouragement and useful critiques which really helped us a lot in
accomplishing this undertaking.
TWG Members:
Dr. Judy F. SESE, Chairperson, OIC-Director, Bureau of Research and Standards
Ms. Carolina S. CANUEL, Fmr. Vice Chairperson, Fmr. Div. Chief, DPD, P/S
Mr. Adriano M. DOROY, Asst. Director, Bureau of Design
Mr. Aristarco M. DOROY, OIC-Asst. Director, Bureau of Construction
Ms. Edna F. MEEZ, OIC-DE, Negros Occidental 4th DEO, DPWH-Region VII
Mr. Felipe S. RAMOS, Fmr. Chief, Technical Services and Evaluation Div., BRS
Mr. Nestor B. CAOILE, OIC-Division Chief, Materials Testing Division, BRS
Regional Project Managers:
Ms. Elsa T. NABOYE, Regional Project Manager, Asst. Chief, QAD, DPWH-CAR
Ms. Ramie B. DOROY, Regional Project Manager, DE, Negros Oriental 1st DEO,
DPWH-Region VII
Ms. Rowena P. JAMITO, Regional Project Manager, Engr. V, MD, RO-XI
Thank you also to CWG Members for their efforts and collaborations.
CWG Members:
Mr. Jay Jenner R. BIARES, Engr. III, CAR ; Group Leader
Mr. Elmer R. FIGUEROA, Engr. III, BOC
Mr. Ernante S. ANTONIO, Engr. III, BOM
Ms. Carina B. DIAZ, Engr. III, BOD
Ms. Nenita R. VALENCIA, Former Engr. III, BRS
Mr. Vicente R. VALLE, JR., Engr. IV, DPWH-Region VII
Ms. Aurora M. LACASANDILE, Engr. III, CD, DPWH-Region XI
Finally, we wish to thank our Expert, Mr. Ryoichi Yamasaki, Co-Team Leader, JICA TCP II
and his Asst. Engineer, Mr. Feliciano P. Carpio, for their support and encouragement
throughout this activity.
xii
ACRONYMS
A
AASHTO
AC
Asphalt Concrete
ACP
ASTM
B
BOC
Bureau of Construction
BOD
Bureau of Design
BOE
Bureau of Equipment
BOM
Bureau of Maintenance
BRS
BST
C
CAR
CBR
CSB
CWG
D
DCP
DE
District Engineer
DENR
DEO
DO
Department Order
DPWH
F
FCSEC
FWD
xiii
G
GIS
GOJ
Government of Japan
GOP
GPS
GVW
H
HDM-4
HE
Highway Engineer
I
IRI
J
JICA
JCC
L
LAAV
M
ME
Materials Engineer
MO
Memorandum Order
MSE
N
NEDA
P
PAGASA
PCC
PCCP
PDC
PMB
PMS
xiv
PS
Planning Service
Q
QA
Quality Assurance
QC
Quality Control
R
RCBC
RCP
RCPC
RIDF
RMMS
RO
Regional Office
ROCOND
ROW
Right-of-Way
RS
Road Safety
S
SDCP
SMA
SPT
T
TARAS
TCP
TOR
Terms of Reference
TWG
V
VCI
xv
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Background
The Department of Public Works and Highways, hereinafter referred to as DPWH and
Japan International Cooperation Agency, hereinafter referred to as JICA, agreed in 2006 to
implement the project for Improvement of Quality Management for Highway and Bridge
Construction and Maintenance, hereinafter called as " Phase I", aiming to enhance the
engineering knowledge of the engineers of DPWH.
For implementation of the said project, the DPWH organized the Joint Coordinating
Committee, hereinafter called as JCC, Technical Working Group, hereinafter called as TWG
and Counterpart Working group, hereinafter called as CWG and the JICA dispatched the JICA
Technical Cooperation Project Team, hereinafter referred to as "JICA TCP Team" from
February 2007 to February 2010.
Under Phase I, the following manuals/guidelines were prepared and issued for road
construction and maintenance through the CWG's activities.
*
Road Project Management and Supervision Manual, Volume I: Main Text and
Road Project Management and Supervision Manual, Volume II: Appendices (Standard
Forms, Examples and References)
From October 2011 to September 2014, the DPWH and JICA TCP Team -newly
dispatched by JICA - implemented the project for Improvement of Quality Management for
Highway and Bridge Construction and Maintenance, Phase II, hereinafter called as Phase II to
aim further enhancement.
This manual, Guidebook for Road Construction and Maintenance was prepared under
Phase II through the revision work done by CWG based on the Guidebook mentioned above.
The Guidebook was made through consolidations of seminars and On-the-Job-Training
materials, texts, presentations and is mainly focused on the engineering knowledge necessary
for road and slope management.
1-1
1.2 Purpose
Engineers of the DPWH concerned with road and slope construction and maintenance
are the main targets of this Manual. The CWG made efforts to make this Reference easy to
understand by the young Engineers, especially beginners, hence, it would be an effective tool
related to the above areas.
1-2
Chapter 2
Clean sand
(little or fines)
Clean gravel
(little or fines)
Gravels
More than half of coarse
Fraction is smaller than no.4 sieve size
Sands
More than half of coarse fraction is smaller
than no.4 sieve size
(for visual classification, the 1/4" size may
be used as equivalent to the no.4 sieve size)
Table 2.1
Group
Symbols
Typical Names
GW
GP
GM
GC
SW
SP
SM
SC
2-1
Table 2.2
Dry strength
(Crushing
characteristics)
Dilitancy
(Reaction to
shaking)
Toughness
(Consisten
cy near
plastic
limit)
Group
Symbols
None to slight
Quick to
slow
None
ML
Medium to
high
None to
very slow
Medium
CL
Slight to
Midium
Slow
Slight
OL
Slight to
medium
Slow to
none
Slight to
Medium
MH
High to very
high
None to
very slow
High
CH
Medium to
high
None to
very slow
Slight to
Medium
OH
P+
Typical Names
2-2
Table 2.3
Embankment Material
Soil Type
Gravely soil
or
Sand with
some gravel
Sand
Sand
Sand and
Gravel
Fine grained
sand
Well grained
Compacted
Poor grained
Compacted
Compacted
Compacted
20
40
GW, GP
20
35
SW
19
30
SP
19
25
30 or less
SM, SC
18
15
50 or less
ML, CL
MH, CH
Gravel
Dense, or well
grained
20
40
GW
Gravel
Not dense, or
poor grained
18
35
GP
Dense
21
40
SW
Not dense
19
35
SP
Sand
Dense or well
grained
20
35
--
Sand
Loose or poor
grained
18
30
--
Silty Sand
Dense
19
30
30 or less
SM, SC
Silty Sand
Loose
17
25
SM, SC
Cray
Stiff, N-value is
8-15
18
25
50
ML,CL
Cray
Moderate,
N-value is 4-8
17
20
30
ML,CL
Cray
Soft, N-value is
2-4
16
15
15
ML,CL
Silt
Stiff, N-value is
8-15
17
25
50
CH,MH,ML
Silt
Moderate,
N-value is 4-8
16
15
30
CH,MH,ML
Silt
Soft, N-value is
2-4.
14
10
15
CH,MH,ML
Sand and
Gravel
Sand and
Gravel
Undisturved Material
2-3
N-value
Density
0 to 4
Very loose
4 to10
Loose
28.5 to 30
10 to30
Medium
30 to 36
30 to50
Dense
36 to 41
More than 50
Very dense
More than 41
(Degree)
Table 2.5 shows the relation between unconfined compressive strength and N-value
(Reference: Terzaghi and Peck).
Table 2.5
0 to2
Very soft
Unconfined
Compressive
Strength
kN/m2
less than 25
2 to4
Soft
25 to 50
12.5 to 25
4 to8
Medium
50 to 100
25 to 50
8 to15
Stiff
100 to 200
50 to 100
15 to30
Very Stiff
200 to 400
100 to 200
30 or more
Hard
400 or more
200 or more
N-value
2-4
Consistency
Cohesion
(for short-time load)
kN/m3
less than 12.5
Chapter 3
3.1
Road Drainage
Design of Drainage
Qd =
where:
1
C I A
3.6
Qd =
C=
runoff coefficient
I=
A=
3.1.1.1
Drainage Area
The drainage area (catchment area) shall be identified or estimated through field survey
and utilization of topographic map. Each type of road drainage has its designated drainage
area as shown in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1
Type of Drainage
Drainage Area
Drainage Area (Catchment Area)
Cross Drain
3.1.1.2
Runoff Coefficient
The runoff coefficient, C, represents runoff rate of rainfall. The value is provided as
shown in Table 3.2.
3-1
Table 3.2
Type of Surface
Factor C
0.9 to 1.0
0.7 to 0.9
Gravel Surface
0.3 to 0.6
Residential Area/City
0.3 to 0.6
0.2 to 0.5
Rocky Surface
0.7 to 0.9
0.7 to 0.9
0.3 to 0.5
0.3 to 0.5
0.5 to 0.7
0.7 to 0.8
Rainfall Intensity
The rainfall intensity, "I", is derived from the maximum estimated rainfall for the design
flow return period and time of concentration.
Time of concentration, "Tc", is the time required for runoff from the farthest point of the
drainage area (catchment area) to reach the design target point. Generally, concentration time
can be estimated by the following formula:
Tc =
where:
L1.15
51H 0.385
Tc =
L=
H=
The design flow return period for the rainfall intensity is provided in Table 3.3.
3-2
Table 3.3
Structure Type
Bridges
50 years
Box Culverts
25 years
Pipe Culverts
15 years
Side Drainage
5 years
Surface Drainage
2 years
200
100y
400
50y
350
25y
180
Return Period
100 years
50 years
160
25 years
10 years
300
10y
Rainfall R (mm/hr)
Rainfall R (mm/hr)
450
5 years
250
2 years
140
120
100
5y
200
80
150
60
2y
100
40
50
20
0
0
10
20
40
30
50
60
380
Figure 3.1
720
1050
1440
Duration t (min)
Duration t (min)
250
120
Return Period
100 years
100y
50y
25 years
10 years
25y
Rainfall R (mm/hr)
Rainfall R (mm/hr)
100
50 years
200
5 years
150
10y
2 years
5y
80
60
100
2y
40
50
20
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
360
Duration t (min)
Figure 3.2
720
1030
1440
Duration t (min)
3-3
Qc = a v
1
R 2 / 3 i1 / 2
n
1
Qc = a R 2 / 3 i1 / 2
n
v=
where:
3.1.2.1
a=
v=
flow velocity,m/s
n=
i=
hydraulic radius, m
R=
Type of Channel
Good
Fair
Bad
.012
.013
.015
.017
.010
.011
.012
.013
Concrete pipe
.012
.013
.015
.016
.012
.014
.016
.017
.020
.025
.030
.025
.027
.030
.033
.025
.030
.035
.040
.028
.030
.033
.035
.025
.027
.030
.033
Winding
.033
.035
.040
.045
.050
.060
.070
.080
.075
.100
.125
.150
Natural Stream
Best
Hydraulic Radius
3-4
1:m(=H:L)
mH
H = r (1 cos )
R = 0.5r (1
a = r 2 (
R=
sin 2
)
2
BH
B + 2 H
m1 + m2
H sin(1 + 2 )
2 sin 1 + sin 2
R=
H
2
a=
H2
H2
( m1 + m2 )or =
(cot 1 + cot 2 )
2
2
1 + m12 + 1 + m22
or
H (B + m H )
B + 2 H 1 + m2
H ( B + H c o )t
o r
B + 2 H c o e s
c
1
sin( 2 ))
2
Figure 3.3
3.1.2.3
R=
R=
H
2 1+
a =
H2
m
2
m
1 + m2
mH
or
or =
H
cos
2 1 + sin
H2
cot
2
Flow Velocity
Table 3.5 shows appropriate range of flow velocity by type of drainage structure and type
of drainage surface. In case the computed actual flow velocity is higher or lower than the
ranges, the structure should be redesigned.
Table 3.5
Structure
Drainage Surface
Type of
Type of
Types
0.5 to 1.0
0.6 to 1.0
0.8 to 2.0
Cement Concrete
0.6 to 3.0
Asphalt Concrete
0.6 to 1.5
Stone/Brick
0.6 to 1.8
Gravel
0.6 to 1.0
Coarse Sand
0.3 to 0.6
Silt
0.1 to 0.2
3-5
peak discharge as shown in Figures 3.4 to 3.6 used by DPWH FCSEC and JICA in March,
2003 under the Project for the Enhancement of Capabilities on Flood Control and Sabo
Engineering.
100
Luzon
Return Period
100 years
50 years
25 years
10 years
5 years
10
2 years
0.1
1
10
100
10,000
1000
100,000
Figure 3.4
100
Visayas
Return Period
100 years
50 years
25 years
10 years
5 years
10
2 years
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10,000
100,000
Figure 3.5
100
Mindanao
10
Return Period
100 years
50 years
25 years
10 years
5 years
2 years
1
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10,000
100,000
Figure 3.6
3-6
Alternative-1
Alternative-2
Alternative-3
Figure
Advantages
Disadvantages
3.2.2 Headwalls
Basically, inlet/outlet headwalls for cross drainage should be provided to prevent
scouring and erosion as shown in Figure 3.7.
Figure 3.7
3-7
Dumped Stone
with grouted
surface
Skirt (toe)
Figure 3.8
Structure of Headwall
CBR (%)
0
60
Figure 3.9
3-8
80
100
120
Water Content (%)
140
160
Figure 3.10
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.12
3-9
Bench Cut
Figure 3.13
Embankment
Under-drain
Cut Slope
Under-drain
Figure 3.14
3 - 10
Chapter 4
Pavement
Figure 4.1
Subbase
Subgrade
4-1
Base Course
Subbase
Subgrade
Figure 4.2
4-2
Design Mix
and Trial Mix
Trial Paving
Approval of
Design Mix and
Methodology
Start
Paving
4.2.3 Admixture/Additive
Admixture/additive shall be added only to the concrete mix to produce some desired
modifications to the properties of concrete whenever necessary, but not as partial replacement
of cement. The admixtures shall conform to the requirements as tabulated below:
Table 4.1
Type
Air-entraining admixture
Chemical admixture
Fly Ash
Remarks
Moistening prior to
placing
Transport of concrete
(for slipform paver)
Placing of Concrete
Checking of temperature
of the mix
Finishing by means of a
floater
Finishing by means of a
screeder
Spraying of curing
compound
Provision of protective
cover sheets
Figure 4.3
4-3
Figure 4.4
Paving Works
4-4
Table 4.2
Transverse Joints**
Longitudinal Joints
Contraction
Joint/
Weakened
Plane Joint
Expansion
Joints
Construction
Joints
Formed
Joints
Formed
Joints
Sawed
Contrac
tion
Joint
Formed
Joints
Formed
Joints
Function
Shrinkage Crack
Prevention
Construction by lane
Shrinkage Crack
Prevention
At every 4.5m
Shrinkage Crack
Prevention
At every 4.5m
Expansion Force
Release
Joint for interruption of
work and end of days
construction
Dowel Bar(Round)
Tie Bar(Deformed)
Figure 4.5
4-5
Tie bars are installed across longitudinal joints to hold the two slabs in close contact or to
prevent them for separating. Tie bars are located at mid-depth of the pavement.
Dowel bars are placed in contraction joints and in some construction joints when it falls
at full block (4.5m) to transfer a portion of the load across the joint and to hold the two slab
ends at the same elevation. To function properly, dowels must be parallel to the surface and to
the centerline of the pavement.
Length and size of bars vary depending on pavement thickness as shown in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3
Type
Tie
Bar(Deformed)
Dowel
Bar(Round)*
PCCP
Thickness
(mm)
200
230
200
230
250
280
Size*
(mm)
Length
(mm)
12
16
25
28
32
36
Spacing
(mm)
1,000
600
600
600
600
600
600
750
300
300
300
300
4-6
Deteriorated PCCP
Figure 4.7
PCCP Widening
Placing Concrete
Figure 4.8
*
The provision for widening blocks at curves shall be poured simultaneously with the
adjoining lane.
b)
c)
d)
e)
Figure 4.9
Thermometer
4-7
Figure 4.10
4.2.11 Subbase
The subbase materials shall be spread on the prepared subgrade and compacted to the
required thickness.
Figure 4.11
4-8
Table 4.4
Types
Methods
Aggregate
Intermediate
Required
Laying of aggregate base materials
Layer
Asphalt
Concrete Crack
Relief Layer
Remarks
minimum
thickness is 15cm.
Required
minimum
thickness is 9 cm.
4-9
Materials
1. Refined Coal-tar (Gravel RH2)
2. Light aromatic solvent
3. Naphtha or coal-tar solvent naphtha
4. Blend of tar oils
5. Elastomer
Remarks
30% to 40%
30% to 40%
30% to 40%
15% to 40%
0.01% to 13%
4 - 10
Chapter 5
Slope Protection
Works
Soil
Slope (Ratio)
(H:V)
Hard Rock
7.0 m
0.25:1 to0.5:1
Soft Rock
7.0 m (max)
0.5:1 to 1:1
2.0 m or less
2:1
Over 2.0 m
1.5:1
2.0 m or less
2:1 to 4:1
Over 2.0 m
1.5:1 to2:1
a. cohesive
b. less cohesive
Note:
1.
2.
3.
(Source: DPWH FCSEC Technical Standards and Guidelines for Planning and Design Vol. IV)
5-1
For reference, shown below is Japans standard gradient for cut slope.
Table 5.2
Materials of Ground
Slope (Ratio)
(H:V)
Hard rock
0.3:1 to 0.8:1
Soft rock
Loose and poor grain
Sand
Unconditional
0.5:1 to 1.2:1
1.5:1
size distribution.
5 m or less
0.8:1 to 1.0:1
5 to 10 m
1.0:1 to 1.2:1
5 m or less
1.0:1 to 1.2:1
5 to 10 m
1.2:1 to 1.5:1
10 m or less
0.8:1 to 1.0:1
size distribution
10 to 15 m
1.0:1 to 1.2:1
gravel or rock
10 m or less
1.0:1 to 1.2:1
distribution.
10 to 15 m
1.2:1 to 1.5:1
Silt, clay
10 m or less
0.8:1 to 1.2:1
5 m or less
1.0:1 to 1.2:1
5 to 10 m
1.2:1 to 1.5:1
Dense
Sandy soil
Loose
Fine-grained soil
considerations:
The cut slope height to the relevant slope gradient means the total cut slope height
including all cut slopes above the relevant cut slope.
5-2
Figure 5.1
On cut slopes, berms 1.0 to 2.0 m. wide are generally provided for every 5.0 to 7.0 m. in
height for the following purposes:
*
To reduce the speed of surface water flow thereby decreasing the scouring force on cut
slope.
5-3
For reference, shown below is Japans standard gradient for road embankment slopes.
Table 5.3
Slope (Ratio)
(m)
(H:V)
5 m or less
1.5:1 to 1.8:1
distribution
5 to 15 m
1.8:1 to 1.20:1
10 m or less
1.8:1 to 2.0:1
10 m or less
0.8:1 to 1.0:1
10 to 20 m
1.8:1 to 2.0:1
5 m or less
0.8:1 to 1.0:1
soil
5 to 10 m
1.0:1 to 1.2:1
Volcanic clay
5 m or less
1.8:1 to 2.0:1
Materials of Embankment
Slope toe
It is required that there is enough bearing capacity of embankment base and no expected
inundation.
(Source: Highway Earthwork Guideline, Japan Road Association, March 1999)
5-4
Figure 5.2
Falls occur due to gravity and are controlled by the distribution of joints. Materials are
hard, jointed rocks.
Figure 5.3
5-5
5.2.3 Landslide
Landslide refers to all types of slope failures and defined as movement of a large mass of
soil and/or rocks.
Charateristics of a landslide are as follows:
*
Figure 5.4
5-6
Typical Landslide
Road
slip
occurs
because
of
the
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.6
Road Slip
Expansion
Sliding/displacement
Figure 5.7
Compression
5-7
Road
Road
Drain
Swelling
Road
Slide
Road
(Source: Japan Highway Public Cooperation 1982, Slope Inspection Guide 1)
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.9
5-8
Also, concentration of surface water triggers road slip therefore, proper drainage
facilities shall be instituted to address such condition.
Figure 5.10
Figure 5.11
Gradient of stream bed is more than 15 degrees (debris flow stops if less than 10
degrees).
5-9
Figure 5.12
Cribwall
Vegetation Works
Mechanically
Retaining Wall
Stabilized
Embankment
Wall(MSE Wall)
*
Gabion Wall
START
YES
NO
Is there seepage
from slope?
Or do you assume
high water table?
YES
NO
YES
NO
Removal of unstable mass,
Retaining wall,
Masonry works,,
Catch wall for collapsed soil,
Slope drainage and/or
Combination of above.
Figure 5.13
5 - 10
Retaining Wall
Shotcrete
Rocks
Rocknet
Cribwall
START
YES
NO
Is there seepage
from slope?
Or is the slope
weathered?
YES
NO
YES
NO
Removal of unstable mass,
Retaining wall,
Masonry works,,
Catch wall for rolling stones,
and/or
Combination of above.
Figure 5.14
condition, erosion countermeasures such as slope drainage, vegetation, etc. are required.
Slope (o)
Figure 5.15
5 - 11
There are many slope failures due to erosion after construction because cut slopes are left
bare and are not provided with necessary slope protection works. The countermeasure to be
provided shall be vegetation works as much as possible.
Figure 5.16
a slope drainage.
Sample
Stable slope
Unstable slope
80
Unstable
60
40
Stable
20
Stable
0
20
40
60
80
100
5 - 12
The vertical and horizontal alignment of slope drainage shall be smooth curve without
sharp bends as shown in Figure 5.18.
Slope Drainage
(Vertical and Horizontal)
Sharp
Bend
Overtopping
Overtopping
Slope Erosion
Figure 5.18
5 - 13
Table 5.4
Geology
Soft rock, fine grained
soil
Coarse grained soils
Gradient
Horizontal: Vertical
1.0 to 1.2:1 or less
(45 or 40 degrees or
less)
1.5:1 or less
(35 degrees or less)
Applicability
and
wicker
works
is
recommended.
In Figure 5.10, Coconet was installed
with vegetation work but collapsed due to
slope erosion.
Figure 5.19
Figure 5.20
5 - 14
Figure 5.21
Vetiver Grass
5 - 15
Coconet
Cocolog/Fascine
5.4.3.1 Material
(1)
Coconut Coir
Coconut coir fiber materials for use in fabrication of coconut geonets shall be a
multi-cellular fiber with 12 to 24 microns in diameter and the ratio of length to diameter
shall be 35. The fiber shall also be hygroscopic, with moisture content of 10% to 12% at
65% humidity and 22% to 55% at 95% relative humidity.
(2)
Average Number of
Average Number of
Twines at Crosswise
Twines at
Direction
Lenghtwise Direction
Coconet 400
40
40
400
Coconet 700
40
70
700
Coconet 900
70
70
900
Type of Coconet
5 - 16
Table 5.6
Weight (min)
(cm)
(Kg/m)
Cocolog 100
10
2.0
Cocolog 200
20
4.5
Cocolog 300
30
10
Cocolog 400
40
20
Cocolog 500
50
30
Type of Cocolog/Fascine
Figure 5.23
Figure 5.24
(3)
Bamboo Stakes
Bamboo stakes shall be mature and shall be 3 to 4 cm. wide and 25 to 30 cm. long.
(4)
Bamboo Stakes
Installation
Stakes
5 - 17
(5)
Figure 5.26
(6)
Ropes
Nylon rope or equivalent is used to tie cocologs to the stakes.
Figure 5.27
5 - 18
Ropes
5.4.3.2 Anchoring
(1)
Common Soil
The coconets shall be secured to the ground using bamboo pegs. An average of 3
pegs per square meter shall be used to ensure uniform contact and firm hold to the
ground.
(2)
Compacted Soil
A combination of bamboo pegs and U-shaped wire staples may be used for
compacted, hard to penetrate soil. An average of 3 pegs/staples per square meter shall be
used to ensure uniform contact of coco-net to the ground surface.
5.4.3.3 Vegetation
(1)
(2)
Grass cover
Fast growing leguminous creeping grass shall be used on slope surfaces requiring
immediate vegetation cover. It shall be applied to the soil at a rate depending on the
desired density and the calculated on-site mortality rate of the plants.
(3)
Trees
If trees shall be used to stabilize a slope, species that have sturdy, long and
deep-penetrating roots shall be selected.
Figure 5.28
5 - 19
Site Preparation
-
Any water runoff control such as diversions, berms or dikes shall be completed
prior to installation.
The face of the slope shall be smoothened and rocks, clods, vegetation (deemed
detrimental to the erosion control system to be installed), and other obstructions
shall be removed to ensure complete contact of the net with the soil.
In most cases, existing vegetation shall be retained, but shall be trimmed down to
facilitate the installation of the coconet.
Installation shall begin at the top of the slope with the net laid down and securely
anchored 1 m. from the edge.
The net shall be unrolled downslope in the direction of the water flow.
The edges of adjacent rolls of coir fiber nets must be spliced together using coir
fiber twine ropes.
The coconet shall be laid loosely-not stretched- on the ground. Direct contact with
the soil shall be maintained at all times.
Figure 5.29
(3)
Site Preparation
Figure 5.30
Laying of Nets
Anchoring
The coir fiber net shall be secured to the ground using bamboo pegs 25 to 30 cm
long. An average of 3 pegs per square meter shall be used to ensure uniform contact of
net to the ground surface. For loose soils, longer pegs may be used to have sufficient
ground penetration to resist pullout. U-shaped wire staples may be used for compacted,
hard to penetrate soil.
(4)
Sewing
There are many ways of connecting the nets together to cover the slopes but sewing
5 - 20
them together is the best and most economical way of installing the nets.
Figure 5.31
Anchoring
Figure 5.32
Sewing
Figure 5.33
Hydroseeding
5.4.3.7 Watering
Watering is very important especially during the early days of germination of seeds,
when the roots are not established yet or when newly replanted. Upon seed germination, daily
watering is necessary for a month and fifteen days for transplanted grass.
5 - 21
Figure 5.34
where:
Wc
Wc = Weight of Concrete
Ws
Figure 5.35
Ws = Weight of Soil
The advantages in adopting stone masonry over concrete are that the gradient, length and
horizontal alignment could be done easily to match the profile of an existing section and it is
more economical. Moreover, if it will function as catch wall (with steel-framed catch fence),
reinforced concrete retaining wall is advisable.
Stone Masonry consists of stones with sizes as shown in Table 5.7 laid in accordance
with the lines and grades as shown in the plans or as directed by the Engineer, jointed by
cement mortar of 1 (cement) : 2 (sand) at trowel consistency.
5 - 22
shall
be
Figure 5.36
(c)
Figure 5.37
(d)
(e)
Surfacing
5 - 23
moistened
as
per
with
specifications.
(b) Lay 5-10 cm thick 1:3 mortar mixture
(cement 1: sand 3).
(c) Embed slightly moistened stones of
specified sizes into the fresh mortar.
(d) Fill the voids in between the stones with
mortar.
(e) Repeat the above steps a until the
Figure 5.38
Grouted Riprap
Stones
Mortar
Stone masonry
(Item 506)
Thickness: 150 mm or more
Width: 150% of respective
thickness or more
Length; 150% of respective width
or more
Cement (1): Sand (2)
5.5.3 Cribwall
5.5.3.1 Stone Masonry and/or Reinforced Concrete Cribwall
It is a type of retaining wall particularly made up of concrete or stone masonry (or a
combination of both) and supported with reinforced concrete frame. Generally, a double frame
type is adopted for a 3.5 to 5.5 m. height of slope.
On rock slopes with many joints or loose talus and where concrete spraying is
inappropriate, concrete cribwall is advisable.
5 - 24
Figure 5.39
Figure 5.40
5 - 25
Figure 5.41
Source: DPWH/JICA Technical Standards and Guidelines for Planning and Design Vol. IV,
2002 Natural Slope Failure Countermeasures
Figure 5.42
Gabion Wall
5 - 26
Figure 5.43
Figure 5.44
Road
Embackment
Work
Embankment
Front View
9.0 m
Bedrock
Rear View
Slip Bars
5 - 27
Figure 5.46
Figure 5.47
5.6.2 Shotcrete
To prevent further weathering of the rock slope, shotcreting is one of the applicable
measures.
The following are the specified requirements for shotcreting:
5 - 28
Weepholes shall be installed at least one for every 4 m.2 in a staggered manner.
Before shotcreting, wire mesh shall be laid and anchored over the face of the slope.
The standard number of anchor pin is 1 to 2 per square meter. Main anchor pin shall be
16 mm diameter of 1.0 m. length, sub-anchor pins shall be 10 mm diameter of 0.3 m.
length.
The spraying thickness of concrete is 10-15 cm. (Mortar spraying of 8-10 cm. thick is
adopted as per Japan Standards.)
The standard mix proportion by weight of cement and aggregates shall be 1:3:1 to
1:5:2 (C: S: G) for concrete spraying. The water-cement ratio shall be 40 to 45% for
concrete spraying.
Notes:
*
To avoid clogging the weepholes, the exposed end should be capped/covered during
the operation.
Spraying by two layers should be adopted where a lot of ruggedness exist on the
surface. Wire mesh should be spread on each layer. The concrete for the second layer
should be sprayed within one hour after the first layer was sprayed.
Figure 5.48
Shotcrete
5.6.3 Rocknet
Figure 5.49
Rocknet
5 - 29
Figure 5.50
Rock Catcher
Figure 5.51
Rock Shed
Pile Works
Shaft Works
Anchor Works
5 - 30
Landslide Mass
level of
water-table
Sliding plane
Figure 5.52
Figure 5.53
5 - 31
Fellenius Method
The stability of the existing slope which has a potential to slide can be analyzed by the
Fs
Fr
Fd
N U tan c L
T
where:
Fs=
safety factor
Fr=
Fd=
W=
A=
soil density
N=
T=
L=
U=
c=
N
W
Sliding Plane
Figure 5.52
Fellenius Method
In case the output, Fs, is less than 1.0, the slope is evaluated as unstable. And if it is
equal or greater than 1.0, the slope is evaluated as stable.
5 - 32
(2)
the landslide, necessary resisting force to be added can be estimated by the following formula.
PFs Fs
Pr
N U tan c L P
T
where:
Fs=
Pr=
Pr PFs T ( N U ) tan c L
Shown in Table 5.8 are the required safety factors that were established and being adopted by
Japan as their design criteria in designing landslide countermeasures.
Table 5.8
Required Safety
Factor PFs
1.20
1.15
1.12
1.05 to 1.10
5 - 33
Chapter 6
Figure 6.1
6-1
Riverbank Erosion
River
Road
Deposit
Affected area
Figure 6.2
(2)
Over flow
Road
Debris Flow
Deposit
River Bed
Figure 6.3
6.1.1.2
Riverbed Erosion
Scouring of river
bed
Collapse of Gabion
Wall
Insufficient depth
of embedment
Note)
Figure 6.4
Riverbed Erosion
Riverbank Protection
Table 6.1 shows applicable works to protect the riverbank and/or bed from damages due
6-2
to river erosions. Also, shown in Figure 6.5 is a flowchart for the selection of appropriate
countermeasures against river erosion.
Table 6.1
Countermeasure
Types of Work
Slope Pitching Work (Boulder/Riprap, Brick, Conrete, Concrete Block)
Gabion (Cylinder, Mattress)
Riverbank Revetment
Works
Stone Masonry
Concrete Retaining Wall
Piling (Steel ,Concrete)
Bed Pitching Work (Boulder/Riprap, Brick, Concrete, Concrete Block)
Riverbed Protection
Works
Block Pitching
Gabion (Cylinder,Mattress)
Groundsill/Check Dam
Floodway, Dredging
Rechanneling
Spur Dike
START
Small (>5.0m)
Large (5.0m)
Location of erosion
Temporary work
Both of riverbank/riverbed
Riverbank
- Wire cylinder
- Gabion revetment
- Wicker revetment
- Timber crib consolidation
Figure 6.5
- Masonry revetment
- Concrete revetment
- Concrete block revetment
- M asonry revetment
- Concrete revetment
- Concrete block revetment
- Check dam
- Concrete consolidation
- Concrete spur dike
Riverbed
- Check dam
- Concrete consolidation
- Concrete spur dike
6-3
Road
Road
Soil slope
Rock slope
Rock slope
Backfill
River erosion
a) Section View of River Erosion
Road
Road
Backfill
Road
Backfill
Wire cylinder
Figure 6.6
In order to protect the river and road slope from erosion by water infiltration and/or
scouring, revetment works shall be provided.
Prior to planning and designing, preliminary investigations covering the following;
river erosion, history, longitudinal and cross sections, gradient,slope, bank geology and
proximity locations should be conducted to determine the exact location and appropriate
type of revetment.
Figure 6.7 shows a flowchart of design procedures for river revetments. The
following parameters such as roughness of the riverbed, velocity of river flow and
slope/gradient of the riverbank are important factors to consider in the design.
6-4
START
Preliminary planning:
- Location, cross and longitudinal sectional details
- Alignment of river and revetment
- Height of revetments
Selection :
- Flow velocity and slope gradient.
Design
Design of foundation
- Consolidation ,settlement and scouring analysis of foundation
- Footing protection works
END
Figure 6.7
Road
Road
Weep hole
H: V=0.5:1
a=0.20m
Design riverbed
b=0.35m
H: V=0.4:1
a=0.20m
b=0.10m
b
a c
Body
filling
H: V=0.3:1
concrete
Design riverbed
b=0.35m
H: V=0.2:1
Backfill
2.0 m
Backfill
Stone masonry
Figure 6.8
2.0 m
6-5
Figure 6.9
6-6
6.1.2.2
Although there are different types of riverbed protection works, groundsill (head and/or
non-head type) is popularly used.
Sample arrangement of groundsills is shown in Figure 6.10.
River flow
River flow
Road
Road
Riverbed erosion
Potential bank collapse
due to riverbed erosion
Groundsills
Figure 6.10
Figure 6.11 shows a typical section of groundsill. Groundsills regulate the flow of water
to prevent the occurrence of scouring velocity that would damage the riverbed.
Head Type
Non-head Type
Flow direction
Design flood level
Existing riverbed
Figure 6.11
Decrease the scouring force of water flow for the stabilization of the riverbed in the
upstream side (Head Type).
2.
3.
Its right location and arrangement should be determined taking into consideration,
6-7
2.
Sections immediately downstream and on the same side of the collapsed riverbank.
3.
In case the damaged portions and banks or scoured areas are vast, several groundsills
should be installed.
Figure 6.12 shows a flowchart of design procedures for groundsill. The following
parameters such as roughness of the riverbed, velocity of river flow and slope/gradient of the
river are important factors to consider in the design.
START
Preliminary planning:
- Location, cross and longitudinal sectional details
- Alignment of groundsills
- Height of groundsills
Selection of type:
- Consider flow velocity and slope gradient
Design:
-Design load computation
-Stability Analysis of groudsills (overturning, tensile
stress, sliding, bearing capacity of foundation)
-Structural design computation
END
Figure 6.12
The position of groundsill should be linear and at right angle to the direction of the water
flow as shown in Figure 6.13.
6-8
Flow
Flowingdirection
direction
Figure 6.13
H1
H
Height of groundsill
1:m
1:0.2
h1
Figure 6.14
Details of Groundsill
The depth of embedment is the most important factor for the stability of groundsill (refer
to the table below).
6-9
Table 6.2
Part of Groundsill
(See
Condition of Foundation
Sand and gravel
Soft rock
Hard rock
1.5 to 2.0 m
1.5 to 2.0 m
1.5 to 2.0 m
b1
2.0 m or more
1.5 m or more
1.0 m or more
b2
2.0 m or more
1.5 to 2.0 m
1.0 m or more
b3
2.0 m or more
1.0 m or more
0.5 m or more
b4
1.0 m or more
0.5 m or more
0.5 m or more
Depends on
1.0 : 2.0
1.0 : 2.0
Excavation Line
(H : V)
(H : V)
Fig.)
Figure 6.15
6.1.2.3
Rechanneling
6 - 10
River flow
Road
River flow
Road
Figure 6.16
b) Relocation of channel
Figure 6.17
6 - 11
W: river width
Lspur: Length of spur dike
Flow Deflector
Figure 6.18
6 - 12
Figure 6.19
6.2.1
Figure 6.20 illustrates the collapse of coastal revetment due to the scouring of the
foundation bed. Waves and surges scour the foundation bed which triggers the collapse of the
revetment.
6 - 13
Over Flow
Erosion
Over Flow
Road
Wave
Wave
Road
Erosion
Figure 6.20
(a) Road Body Collapse
Collapse of Coastal
Revetment
(b) Slope
Revetmentdue
Slip to Scouring of Foundation
Bed
Road
Roadside
Figure
6.21out of Backfilling
Conceptual
Diagram of Scouring of Foundation Bed
(c) Wash
Material
6 - 14
Figure 6.22
6 - 15
Figure 6.23
RoadsideRoad
Figure 6.24
Figure 6.25
The water overtopping the revetment accelerates the displacement of backfill materials as
explained below:
6 - 16
1.
Wave surge overtops the revetment and then scours the road shoulder.
2.
3.
lower portions.
6 - 17
Cause of Damage
Countermeasure
Washout of backfill
materials
sealed.
Collapse of mainbody
Coastal slope revetments are provided to prevent road bank erosion from the impacts of
waves, flood tides and tsunami. Figure 6.30 illustrates a conceptual design for coastal slope
revetment commonly and widely used. The revetment shall be designed for the following
purposes:
6 - 18
ROAD
Wave Breaking
Side Drain Ditch
Foot
Protection
Waterside Slope
Revetment
Foundation
Figure 6.29
6 - 19
START
Not Large
Large
Damage level
(Impact to road body)
Serious Impact
Caused of damage
Not Serious
Impact
- Repairing Work
- Restoration of damage section
- Regular inspection and
maintenance
- Revetment work
- Foundation work
- Wave breaking work
Scouring at
slope toe portion
Washing out
backfilling material
Overflowing wave
Figure 6.30
- Revetment work
- Foundation work
- Water cut-off work
Install wave breakers to reduce wave force that will act on the surface of the slope
revetment.
b)
6 - 20
Embedded
Depth
Wall
Thickness
Sheet Pile
Figure 6.31
c)
Replace the backfill materials of the revetment and/or embankment material with
impermeable materials.
d)
Ensure that the required embedment depth of the foundation is provided and/or
provide water cut-off wall
e)
As shown in Figure 6.32, for construction of coastal revetment, the following should be
considered.
1.
Behind/ inside the masonry, filling materials should be compacted/ grouted well.
2.
3.
4.
6 - 21
Shoulder
Road
Figure 6.32
6 - 22
Chapter 7
Road Safety
7.1.1 Classifications
Road signs are classified as follows:
Type R
Regulatory Signs
Type W
Warning Signs
Type G
Type S
Instructional Signs
Type HM
Hazard Markers
(1)
7-1
Priority
Direction
Figure 7.1
(2)
Figure 7.2
(3)
Figure 7.3
(4)
7-2
the desired results. Also, these guide motorists of the direction or follow a course of
action.
Figure 7.4
(5)
of an obstruction.
Figure 7.5
Fulfill a need
2.
Command attention
3.
4.
Command respect
5.
7-3
7.1.3 Design
Uniformity in the design facilitates easy identification by the road user.
Standardization of shape, color, dimensions, inscriptions and illumination or reflectivity
is important so that various classes of signs can be easily recognized.
The following design principles are considered:
*
The driver should not be distracted by a road sign from his driving.
Road signs should be understood by the driver traveling at any given speed and
must have sufficient time to take appropriate response safely.
Note: For necessary details, please refer to DPWH Road Signs and Pavement Markings
Manual, February, 2012 Edition and DPWH Road Safety Manual, 2012 Edition.
Figure 7.6
Weighbridge Stations
Shown in Table 7.1 is the Maximum Allowable Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) based on
the maximum allowable axle loads of 13,500 kgs as per Republic Act No. 8794.
7-4
Table 7.1
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT (GVW) PER RA 8794 (REVISED 2012)
Note: Special Permit to Travel shall be required for vehicles loaded with inseparable/or special cargoes exceeding
the corresponding GVW and vehicles with configuration different from those shown in the above matrix.
7-5
Figure 7.7
7-6
Chapter 8
Monitoring and
Investigation
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.3
Weighing Precipitation
Rain Gauge
8-1
Weather Station
Applicable Scope
This apparatus is used for the evaluation of subgrade reaction, subbase and base
course elasticity. However, it is not applicable with foundations having gravel or stone of
size 3.3 cm. or more.
8-2
(2)
Measurement method
1)
2)
Figure 8.6
3)
Setting up of FWD
4)
5)
Figure 8.7
Display Instrument
3
6)
Push
CONDITION
Display
8-3
Table 8.1
N-Value by
standard
penetration test
(times/30cm)
0 to 8
8 to 15
15 or more
0 to 10
10 to 20
Nd-Value by
dynamic cone
penetration test
(times/10cm)
0 to 10
10 to 20
20 or more
0 to 5
15 to 30
Slightly
dense
20 to 30
30 to 45
0.35
Moderately
dense
30 to 50
45 to 75
0.30
Soft-medium
Stiff
Very Stiff
Loose
Medium
Finegrained
soil
Sand
Very dense
-
Rock
7)
Poisson's Ratio
Poissons Ratio
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.40
0.35
50 or more
75 or more
(Source: Japan Tunnel Design Standard)
0.30
0.25
5
MONITOR
/BAL (Balance).
Confirm that the Arabic numerals on the windows are almost 0 as shown below:
ESC
8)
Push
MEAS.
Figure 8.8
8-4
Modulus
of
Subgrade
Required displacement
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
100 mm
0.417
150 mm
0.625
200 mm
0.832
300 mm
1.250
9)
Find a testing drop height of weight for main test as shown inTable 8.3.
Table 8.3
Status
1st stage
2nd stage
3rd stage
X- 5cm
X cm
X+5 cm
X-10cm
X cm
X+10cm
5cm
10cm
15cm
8-5
Conduct six times drops of each stage of drop height. If you have some failures,
additionaly drop again up to you get six appropriate results.
After dropping, push
Modulus of Subgrade
reaction
of
Portable
FWD : KP.FWD
(MN/m3) and/or (pci)
a)
Modulus of Subgrade
Reaction, Equivalent to 30
inch (76.2 cm) diameter
plate static load test:
K30inch
(MN/m3) and/or (pci)
Figure 8.9
d)
Unconfined
Compression
Strength: qu
(MN/m2)
and/or (psi)
Estimation
Necessary values for design can be estimated or converted from the test data as
follows:
a)
b)
c)
d)
qu = EP.FWD/250, experimentally
qu, EP.FWD in MN/m2 and/or psi
(Source: Abe Nagato 2003, Japan Pavement Journal)
8-6
0.59
0.62
0.66
1000
Load Stress
N/m 2
900
433
475
521
0.625 mm Displacement
8448
N
Load Stress of 0.625 mm Displacement
478
kN/m2
Load of
97
101
104
800
7644
700
8397
382
MN/m3
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction,
9207
600
500
-266
400
-1
MN/m3
300
MN/m2
101
200
100
10
0
0
0.5
1
Displacementmm
1.5
0.40
Figure 8.10
MN/m2
8-7
Visual Measurement
Figure 8.11
Rough Determination
of
Slope
Figure 8.12
Figure 8.13
8-8
Many cracks
can be seen
Observation
from
a
Distance
Easy to identify
Difficult
identify
Easy to identify
to
Figure 8.15
8.3.2.2
Geophysical Feature
Figure 8.16 and 8.17 illustrate the terms and definitions utilized in Slope Investigations.
8-9
2
1
2
1
Observe swelling,
water seepage etc.
Check a void by
hammer sounding
Figure 8.18
8 - 10
strike
Surface of slope
/geological layer
Directio
n of dip
Angle of
dip
Horizontal plane
Figure 8.19
Analog type of Clinometer as shown in Figure 8.20 (Left) used to utilized but Digital
Clinomete is popularly utilized currently.
Analog Clinometer
Clinometer
Wait for a while till the oscillation of the needle of compass stops in case of Analog
Clinometer. But Strike and Dip of inclined plane are displayed instantly in case of Digital
Clinometer.
8 - 11
8.3.3.1
Name of Parts
Mainbody
Display
Figure 8.21
8.3.3.2
Usage
Figure 8.22 shows the usage of Digital Clinometer.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 1:
Step 2:
measure Strike.
Step 3:
measure Dip.
Step 3
Figure 8.22
8 - 12
(1)
Power-ON/OFF
Keep pressing "POWER Button" more than 1
second to power on.After the power is on, keep pressing
"POWER Button" more than 1 second to power off.
(2)
Mode of Measurement:
There are three modes of measurement.
PLANE
mode is to measure the strike and the dip of the bedding plane (or
any other surface) automatically by simply placing GeoClino onto
the plane.
LINEATION
MANUAL
8 - 13
(4)
data
come
up
on
display
automatically.
L shows LINEATION mode, followed by
number of measurement, then date and time in the
upper line.
Next come the strike and dip of the bedding plane on which the lineation lies,
followed by the trend and plunge of the lineation in the lower line. Read as the plane
strikes in N 24E with dip 41to W, the trend of lineation is N 68W with the plunge of
40, for example.
(5)
followed
by
number
of
8 - 14
(b)
onto the lineation, with the arrow in the upper right to the plunging direction. Read the
data on display.
On display, you see M showing MANUAL mode followed by number of
measurement, then date and time in the upper line.
In the lower line, you read the trend of the lineation, maximum dip of the plane and
plunge of the lineation.
Read as the trend of the lineation is N 30 W,
maximum dip of the plane on which the lineation lies is
72to W and the plunge of the lineation is 24, for example.
Cautions
*
Place the longer edge of GeoClino parallel to the lineation holding the arrow to the
plunging direction. If you want to measure the upward direction of the lineation, for
instance the direction of fault movement, place GeoClino with the arrow to that
direction. The plunge angle is shown with minus sign.
8 - 15
Displacement: Z
Crack
Displacement: Y
Crack
Crack
Crack
Displacement
Sticks:
5-10 m interval
Displacement Board
Displacement measurement
Z (+)
Y
X
Z (-)
Displacement
Stick
Figure 8.24
8 - 16
Figure 8.26
8 - 17
Figure 8.28
Schematic Diagram of
Handle
Penetration Test
strength
in
Shallow
575 mm
Pavement
Applications.
Anvil with
Quick-Connect Pin
Upper
Attachment
Cone
Penetrometer
is
Drive Rod
16mm dia.
Variable
(1000 mm)
Mass
Vertical
Scale
Note:
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Dual
Mass Dynamic Cone Penetrometer conform
Tip
(Reusable Hardend Point
or Disposable Cone)
Foot
Figure 8.29
respectively.
8 - 18
Dynamic Cone
Figure 8.30
8.5.2.3
Operation of DCP
Advantage
of
Simplified
Dynamic
Cone
Procedure
(1) Attach the cone to the bottom tip of the rod, attach guide rod and hammer on the top of
the rod.
(2) Set cone and rod perpendicularly on the sounding point.
(3) Confirm penetration depth by the self weight of the hammer (49 N or 5kgf)
(4) Record Nd-value: required numbers of 50 cm height free dropping to penetrate 10 cm
into the ground, The frequency of the dropping is made about once for three seconds.
(5) If penetration depth is less than 2 cm by 10 times dropping, the test should be
terminated.
(6) Friction cut (drill by auger/catch, 2 pieces shovel, or rotation rod of more than 10
times) before dropping the weight. Each 10 cm depth is recommended (especially for
soft clay, sands under ground water level).
8 - 19
Recording
(1) Intrusive depth and hammering times for every 10cm depth shall be recorded.
Nd-value are automatically calculated by the spreadsheet.
(2) In case of self weight penetration, penetration depth and dropping times = 0 are
inputted. Then Nd value = 0
Friction Cut
The rod skin friction affects DCP
Depth (m)
cut is as follows:
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Pour
oil/dope
into
the
Friction Loss on
Coefficient of friction loss = Nd-value with friction cut/ Nd-value without friction cut
Relation of Nd-value and N-value are shown in Table 8.X.
Table 8.4
Nd: Nd-value
(Value by dynamic
cone penetration test)
Gravel
Sand
Fine-grained Soil
(Clay/Silt)
or Unknown
more than 4
N0.7+0.34Nd
N1.1+0.30Nd
N1.7+0.34Nd
4 or less
N0.50Nd
N0.66Nd
N0.75Nd
N= N-value by standard penetration test
Nd= Nd-value by dynamic cone penetration test
(Source: Okada Katuya et. al 1992, Soil and Foundation, Japanese Geotechnical Bulletin)
8 - 20
Sample Graph
Figure 8.33
8 - 21
2.
3.
Schematic Diagram
of Groundwater Logging
If groundwater fluid beds exist, salt water
should be replaced with pure water between the
depths of groundwater fluid bed, so the electric
resistance of groundwater will be increased.
A sample graph of groundwater logging is
shown in Figure 8.35. Electric resistance
increase as the time passes at some depths of
water table.
Figure 8.35
Sample Graph of
Groundwater Logging
Table 8.5
Classification
Obvious groundwater
flow bed
Semi-obvious
groundwater flow bed
Potential water flow
bed
8 - 22
Geological
possibility of slip
surface
Possible
Possible
Possible
Item
Indication range
- 14.00
0.05 pH
-2000 -2000mV
5mV
1%
- 4.00%
- 40.00 (sea water salt)
0.0 - 100.0 g/L
-5.00 - 55.00
- 800.0 NTU
0.0 - 800.0 mg/L
0.1%
2g/L
Degree
3%
3) pH value appears
and sensor
8 - 23
Figure 8.36
Place marked side of PVC pipes (a side of strain gauges are attached) where the
direction of landslide moving is expected.
Be careful not to cut lead wires. Do not grasp lead wires alone, grasp PVC pipes.
8 - 24
Drilling
Log
Symbo
Depth
2000 strain
5m
10m
10m
10
15m
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Cumu
lative
move
ment
strain
10m
6000
4000
2000
0
Daily
Rainf
all
(mm)
100
50
Day
Month
10
20
4
30
10
20
30
10
20
7
30
10
20
30
10
20
9
30
10
20
30
10
10
20
30
11
10
20
12
30
10
20
30
1)
2)
10
20
3
Value of
accumulation
(/month)
More than 5,000
More than 1,000
Variability Characteristics
accumulatio
Very High
High
of slip
Status of moving
surface
n
Accumulative1)
Accumulative
Overall judgments
possibility
of existence
Tendency of
Possible
Possible
Classification of
slip surface
landslide
Determined
Semi-
Low
Intermissive/
Destabilizing/
Debris Landslide
Slowly moving creep
Impossible to conclude
Possible
Potential
Destabilizing
Need to continue
Slip surface is not existent.
None
2)
/regressive
Intermissive/
None
determined
Regressive
D
20
2
2005
Accumulative/
C
10
Table 8.7
10
Figure 8.37
of Movement
30
2004
Year
Classification
20
6
Abnormal
8 - 25
GL-3m
Semi-deter
mined slip
surface
GL-6m
Semidetermined
slip surface
Borehole BV-2
GL-2m
Determined slip
surface
GL-12m
Semi-determined
slip surface
Figure 8.38
8 - 26
GL-2m
Semi-determined
slip surface
GL-6m
Potential slip surface
GL-2m
Determined slip surface
GL-12 m
Semi-determined
slip surface
Figure 8.40
necessary
Name of Parts
to
8 - 27
Usage
The strain meter is turned on by pressing
"POWER" key.
To turn off the strain meter, press
"POWER" key again.
Every individual depth of pipe strain gauges
Normal Mode
B.
Mode changeover is quitted and former mode remains effective by pressing DEL key.
Input sensor mode number "15" for Half Bridge Type Strain monitoring.
B.
8 - 28
Sensor mode is settled and setting mode is finished by pressing ENT key.
D.
Former sensor mode remains effective and setting mode is quitted by pressing DEL
key.
Lead Wire
gauges).
Water Proof
Coverage
Strain
Gauge
PVC Pipe
Direction
Mark
Figure 8.42
Figure 8.41
Type
Connection of A and C are changed for every depth and values are recorded as Normal
and Reverse. The values measured shall be recorded into the recording sheets for Pipe Strain
Gauge Analysis.
8 - 29