Next Article in Journal
Effects of Smart Glasses on the Visual Acuity and Eye Strain of Employees in Logistics and Picking: A Six-Month Observational Study
Next Article in Special Issue
A Self-Powered Wireless Temperature Sensor Platform for Foot Ulceration Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Wearable Sensor for Measuring Respiration Continuously and in Real Time
Previous Article in Special Issue
LP-OPTIMA: A Framework for Prescriptive Maintenance and Optimization of IoT Resources for Low-Power Embedded Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study

by
Umair Khadam
1,2,
Paul Davidsson
1,2,* and
Romina Spalazzese
1,2
1
Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
2
Internet of Things and People Research Center, Malmö University, 20506 Malmö, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 18 September 2024 / Revised: 4 October 2024 / Accepted: 8 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in the Internet of Things Section 2024)

Abstract

:
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Internet of Things (IoT) systems has gained significant attention due to its potential to improve efficiency, functionality and decision-making. To further advance research and practical implementation, it is crucial to better understand the specific roles of AI in IoT systems and identify the key application domains. In this article we aim to identify the different roles of AI in IoT systems and the application domains where AI is used most significantly. We have conducted a systematic mapping study using multiple databases, i.e., Scopus, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore and Wiley Online. Eighty-one relevant survey articles were selected after applying the selection criteria and then analyzed to extract the key information. As a result, six general tasks of AI in IoT systems were identified: pattern recognition, decision support, decision-making and acting, prediction, data management and human interaction. Moreover, 15 subtasks were identified, as well as 13 application domains, where healthcare was the most frequent. We conclude that there are several important tasks that AI can perform in IoT systems, improving efficiency, security and functionality across many important application domains.

1. Introduction

The integration of AI into IoT systems is generally referred to as the Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), representing the convergence of two rapidly evolving technologies [1]. AIoT defines how devices interact with each other in their environment, leading to significant advancements across various sectors such as smart cities, healthcare, agriculture and industrial automation. IoT devices such as sensors, actuators and appliances collect, exchange and process the data to meet user goals effectively. AI is employed to process and analyze the large volume of data generated by IoT devices to enhance the decision-making processes and overall efficiency of the IoT systems. The integration of these two technologies opens new opportunities for automation and intelligence across diverse application domains. Recently, the adoption of AIoT systems has accelerated due to the growth in demand for automation, real-time decision-making and predictive analytics. AIoT systems are receiving extensive attention for their potential to revolutionize industries by providing advanced analytics, autonomous operations and predictive maintenance. The interaction between AI components, such as machine learning algorithms, and IoT devices allows for real-time data collection, processing, analysis and decision-making. This integration not only enhances the functionality of IoT systems but also expands the application domains, spanning from smart homes and cities to healthcare and industrial automation.
In recent years, the integration of AI and IoT has emerged as a transformation approach to enhance system intelligence. One study [2] highlighted how AI plays a crucial role in IoT systems by processing large numbers of data and making smart, autonomous decisions. Similarly, ref. [3] also provides an overview of AI in IoT, highlighting how AI enhances the functionality of IoT systems by enabling intelligent decision-making, real-time data processing and autonomous operations. Although there is consensus about the potential of using AI in IoT systems, understanding the specific roles of AI in IoT systems and where it is most effectively utilized is essential for advancing both research and practical implementations of IoT. Many previous studies have investigated various aspects of the use of AI in IoT, but a comprehensive analysis that systematically identifies and analyzes the roles of AI within IoT systems is still lacking. In this study, we conduct a systematic mapping study [4] to uncover the various roles of AI in IoT systems. Moreover, we identify the specific application domains where AI has made impact. Thus, we aim to identify and categorize the critical tasks of AI in IoT systems, such as data preprocessing, pattern recognition, decision support and predictive analytics. The main contributions of this study are the following:
  • Identifying the roles of AI in IoT systems and a systematic mapping of the state of the art to these roles, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners.
  • Highlighting the application domains where the potential of using AI in IoT systems has been investigated.
The study is organized as follows: Section 2 explains the methodology used for the systematic mapping study. Section 3 presents and analyzes the results. Section 4 offers a discussion of the findings, and Section 5 provides conclusions and suggests future research directions.

2. Method

The purpose of a systematic mapping study is to give an overview of a research area and count the contributions based on certain categories, focusing on answering specific research questions, identifying gaps, highlighting research trends, gaps and patterns in the existing literature and providing a comprehensive landscape of a broader area [4]. In other words, the purpose of a systematic mapping study is to categorize and classify existing research in a particular field. It should provide a broad overview of the research landscape, identifying areas that are well studied and those that require further investigation.
This systematic mapping study aimed to identify and analyze the roles and application domains of AI in IoT systems. However, as there are several thousand scientific publications that describe the use of AI in IoT systems, making a study of the primary research was infeasible. Consequently, we studied review articles concerning different aspects of the use of AI in IoT systems.
The methodology included a detailed search strategy across multiple databases, selection criteria for the inclusion and exclusion of articles and systematic data extraction and analysis.

2.1. Review Protocol

The review protocol included a search strategy, selection criteria, research questions and selection procedure. The search strategy for this systematic mapping is defined as follows:
  • Databases: Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library and Wiley Online Library;
  • Publication Years: 2019 to 2024;
  • Search String: (“AI” OR “Artificial intelligence”) AND (“IoT” OR “Internet of Things”) AND (“Review” OR “Survey”);
  • Search Fields: article title, abstract, keywords.
The main reason for selecting these databases is that they are regarded as some of the most important databases in the field of computer science research. As shown in Figure 1, 464 records were found from the different databases. We found 363 records from Scopus, 88 from IEEE Xplore, 8 from Wiley and 5 from ACM Digital Library.

2.2. Selection Criteria

The selection criteria to review the protocol are defined as follows:
(1)
Inclusion Criteria
(a)
Published between January 2019 and March 2024.
(b)
Peer-reviewed journal article.
(c)
Literature review or survey.
(d)
Focus on the use of AI in IoT systems.
(2)
Exclusion Criteria
(a)
Not written in English language.
(b)
Articles whose full text is not available.
(c)
Conference papers, magazine articles, book chapters and newsletters.
Figure 1 presents the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram, which illustrates the identification, screening and selection of the records from the various databases for inclusion in the study. The process ensured that duplicates were removed and only relevant records, based on predefined selection criteria, were considered for detailed review. A total of 464 records were retrieved from the 4 databases, of which 78 were duplicates. After removing the duplicates, 386 records remained. Applying the exclusion criteria first, we excluded 156 records. Following this, we applied the inclusion criteria, which led to the exclusion of an additional 147 records. Finally, 81 records were included for analysis.
Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of publications per year, covering the period from 2019 to 2024. Among these, 25 studies were published in 2023, and 20 studies were published in 2022. In 2024, there were 13 studies, but, as this covers only the first 3 months until March 2024, we can assume that the number of review articles on the use of AI in IoT will continue to increase. Regarding earlier years, only 3 studies were published in 2019, 9 in 2020 and 13 in 2021.

2.3. Research Questions

The study aims to explore the general research question regarding the roles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Internet of Things (IoT) systems. In particular, it will address the following two research questions:
  • RQ1: What are the different tasks that AI carries out in IoT systems?
  • RQ2: Which are the application domains where AI has been used in IoT systems?
The first research question (RQ1) seeks to elucidate the various roles that AI plays in IoT systems. This includes understanding how AI enhances the functionality, efficiency and capabilities of IoT devices and networks through, e.g., advanced data analytics and autonomous decision-making. In order to identify the different categories of tasks, we first extracted the text describing the concrete task of the AI from the article. Then, we compared and elicited re-occurring tasks, grouping them under common more abstract labels, e.g., prediction, decision-making, etc.
The second research question (RQ2) focuses on identifying and categorizing the application domains where AIoT systems are utilized. These application domains may range from smart homes and healthcare to industrial automation, smart cities and beyond, highlighting the pervasive influence of AI in transforming IoT ecosystems across different sectors. By addressing these questions, the study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the synergies between AI and IoT, revealing both the technological impacts and practical applications of their integration.

3. Results

During the review of the survey articles, we identified six different main categories of tasks for which AI methods have been used in IoT systems. By performing further analysis, we were able to identify a number of sub-categories for these main task categories. The following main and sub-categories were identified:
  • Pattern recognition: This usually concerns the classification or identification of the current state, and subtasks include the following:
    Event recognition (e.g., the recognition and detection of activities, intrusions, faults, anomalies);
    Object recognition (e.g., the recognition and detection of humans, cars);
    Diagnosis (e.g., medical, faults, malware detection);
    Estimation (e.g., position of assets);
    Authentication (e.g., devices, humans, products/food).
  • Decision support: This is usually to help human users decide what action to take. Subtasks include the following:
    Operational decisions (e.g., irrigation in farming);
    Strategic decisions (e.g., city planning).
  • Decision-making and acting: This concerns autonomous decision and actions by the IoT system. Subtasks include the following:
    Resource allocation (e.g., task scheduling, task offloading, load balancing);
    Control (e.g., lighting, temperature, vehicles, feeding fishes);
    Planning (e.g., path planning of vehicles).
  • Data management: This includes different types of data preprocessing. Subtasks include the following:
    Reducing noise;
    Removing irrelevant or sensitive data;
    Filling in missing data.
  • Prediction: Concerns the use of historical data to make predictions about future events, e.g., earthquakes.
  • Human Interaction: This includes subtasks such as the following:
    Natural language understanding (NLU);
    Speech synthesis.
Figure 3 illustrates the various roles of Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things (IoT) systems. The chart categorizes the AI roles and indicates the number of studies that focus on each role. Through the analysis, we found that pattern recognition is one of the main roles of AI in IoT systems and decision support is the second most popular task for which AI has been used. Table 1 provides more details of the 81 analyzed research articles about the role of AI in IoT systems.
Regarding RQ2, concerning the application domains where AI has been used in IoT systems, our analysis revealed that healthcare is the top AI application domain. With respect to application domains, as shown in the Figure 4, the following were identified in the study:
  • Buildings: Includes the monitoring and management of different types of buildings like smart homes, office buildings, libraries and retail buildings.
  • Emergency response: Includes fire evacuation, natural disasters, prediction and real-time response for improving efficiency and safety.
  • Education: Includes intelligent education systems to support teachers and students, enhances personalized learning and streamlines administrative tasks through automation.
  • Energy: Includes management of smart grids, for sustainable energy distribution.
  • Environment: Includes air and water quality monitoring and control of environmental health and sustainability.
  • Farming: Includes agriculture and aquaculture through precision farming, crop monitoring and automated farming equipment.
  • Governance: Includes policy-making and public service.
  • Healthcare: Includes healthcare at home, pandemic management and patient monitoring systems.
  • Industry: Includes manufacturing processes, predictive maintenance and enhancing quality control.
  • Logistics: Includes supply chain management, improved route planning and demand forecasting to enhance efficiency.
  • Military: Includes decision-making support, surveillance and strengthening defense capabilities.
  • Public safety: Includes real-time monitoring, emergency response and crime prediction through data analysis.
  • Transportation: Includes autonomous vehicles, traffic management and route optimization.
  • Waste management: Includes waste collection, recycling processes and monitoring of waste levels to enhance environmental sustainability.
  • General: Some articles just mention potential application domains and do not refer to any particular domain.
The details of the 81 research articles pertaining to AI application domains as well as the specific focus of each study are presented in Table 2. It should be noted that, in order for a survey article to be categorized as covering a particular application domain, we required that the survey refer to at least one paper that has used AI in IoT for that domain. That is, it was not enough just to mention the application domain. Additionally, the analysis of the specific focus of each study is presented in Figure 5, which indicates that IoT security is a primary focus in the survey articles, followed by healthcare and the COVID-19 pandemic. Eighteen studies primarily focused on IoT security, making it the most prominent area of research. Healthcare is the second major focus, with 10 studies. Eight studies concentrated on IoT applications related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, three studies addressed IoT implementations in smart cities. In each of the other domains, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), Explainable AI, food safety, the environment, network management and energy management, there were two studies.
The analysis of AI task frequency across various application domains is presented in Figure 6. For instance, in emergency response applications, three articles mentioned decision-making and acting, two articles mentioned decision support and two articles mentioned pattern recognition. Please note that an article can mention multiple tasks and application domains. The distribution of AI tasks such as decision-making and acting, decision support, pattern reorganization, data management and human interaction across different application domains reveals insightful trends. Certain AI tasks are more prevalent in specific application domains. For instance, the AI tasks of decision-making and acting are extensively applied across many application domains like healthcare, farming, transportation, industry and energy. Similarly, decision support is widely used in healthcare, farming, energy, the environment, industry, transportation and buildings.
Pattern recognition is mainly used in healthcare, industry, transportation, energy and the environment. Data management is used for healthcare, energy and farming most. This chart also highlights that some tasks like human interaction are less used across all the domains; it is only used for buildings. Overall, Figure 6 provides a clear view of which AI tasks are commonly associated with the different application domains and helps to identify the trends in AI applications.

Common Tasks of AI for the Top Five Application Domains

The common tasks of AI for the identified top five application domains (i.e., healthcare, farming, energy, industry and transportation) are shown in Figure 7 and more details are provided in the following.
  • Healthcare: The reviewed articles indicate that AI is transforming the healthcare industry by enhancing both the efficiency and quality of the healthcare. AI IoT devices, such as wearables and smart sensors, improve diagnostics, automate routine tasks and make data-driven decisions. We found that pattern recognition is the primary AI task within healthcare, and that the most frequent subtasks mentioned in the articles are event recognition (50%), authentication (32%) and diagnosis (14%). Decision support is the second most common AI task in healthcare, where more articles focused on operational decisions (76%) than on strategic decisions (24%). The third most common task concerned decision-making and acting, mainly for resource allocation (64%) and control (36%). Finally, AI is used in healthcare also for data management, in particular for reducing noise (42%), removing sensitive data (33%) and filling in missing data (25%).
  • Farming: Based on the analyzed articles, we identified farming as the second domain where AI is driving innovation and efficiency. Decision-making and acting emerged as the primary AI tasks, with focus on resource allocation (64%), control (27%) and planning (9%). Decision support, the second most common task of AI in farming, showed a strong frequency of operational decisions (91%) and only a few mentions of strategic decisions (9%). Data management was identified as the third most common task of AI in farming, including removing sensitive data (38%), filling in missing data (37%) and reducing noise (25%). We identified pattern recognition as the fourth most common AI task, including event recognition (50%), authentication (33%) and object recognition (17%).
  • Energy: The third most prominent application domain that emerged from the analyzed articles was energy, where decision support was the main AI task and the only found subtask was operational decisions (100%). Pattern recognition is the second most common AI task, including event recognition (71%) and authentication (29%). Decision-making and acting was found to the third most common AI task, including resource allocation (83%) and control (17%). The fourth most common AI task, data management, includes the following subtasks: reducing noise (40%), removing sensitive data (40%) and filling in missing data (20%).
  • Industry: Pattern recognition is the main AI task for industry, which is the fourth main application domain. The subtasks of pattern recognition are event recognition (27%), diagnosis (27%), authentication (27%), object recognition (13%) and estimation (6%). Decision support is the second most common AI task, with subtasks including operational decisions (86%) and strategic decisions (14%). The third most common AI task is data management, and its most common subtasks are filling in missing data (43%), reducing noise (29%) and removing sensitive data (28%). We identified decision-making and acting as the fourth most common AI task, with resource allocation (83%) and control (17%) as subtasks.
  • Transportation: We identified transportation as the fifth most common application domain for AI, where pattern recognition is the primary AI task and subtasks are event recognition (40%), authentication (40%) and diagnosis (20%). Decision-making and acting is the second most common AI task here, with resource allocation (75%) and control (25%) being the subtasks. Decision support is the third most common AI task, with operational decisions (100%) being the only subtask mentioned by the analyzed articles. We identified data management as the fourth most common AI task with 33% each in reducing noise, removing sensitive data and filling in missing data.

4. Discussion

This systematic study reveals significant insights into and reflections on the role of AI in IoT systems. It offers a comprehensive understanding of the current state and potential future directions in this field of research. The integration of AI in IoT systems makes significant improvements to technologies. The roles of AI in IoT systems, like pattern reorganization, decision support, autonomous decision-making, data management, prediction and human interaction, enable IoT systems to function more intelligently and efficiently. AI autonomously performs complex tasks in IoT systems, such as resource allocation, control and planning. For instance, when we consider smart agriculture, AI within IoT systems can autonomously optimize resources, schedule irrigation based on real-time soil moisture data and also enhance the crop yield. This represents a significant milestone, a shift from human to fully autonomous systems, in the advancement of IoT applications. The other important insight relates to the prominence of AI in healthcare IoT systems, where pandemic management and patient monitoring have been significant achievements. The ability of AI to predict the medical conditions of patients, detect anomalies and support operational decisions in real time highlights its transformative impact on healthcare. In addition to healthcare, AI is also being applied in fields like smart building, education, emergency response, energy management, environmental monitoring, agriculture and governance, all aimed at enhancing operational efficiency.
Furthermore, our analysis also highlights the specific focus of 81 studies, and we identified that IoT security is a top concern, discussed in 18 studies. Security is critical given the increasing reliance on IoT systems across industries, and AI’s role in identifying vulnerabilities and responding to threats is a major area of research. While healthcare is the second most frequent focus of studies, we also found AI tasks frequently across 13 application domains, where decision-making and acting, decision support and pattern recognition having higher frequency across the healthcare and farming application domains. In conclusion, the integration of AI within IoT systems is reshaping industries by enabling smarter, more efficient and secure operations. The potential for further advancements in AIoT applications suggests promising future directions. These findings represent a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in this field who are dedicated to innovating and implementing AIoT solutions, thereby fostering technological advancements and delivering societal benefits.

5. Conclusions

In this systematic mapping study, we analyzed 81 survey articles from multiple databases to identify the significant roles of AI in IoT systems. The results highlight the crucial roles of AI in IoT systems across various application domains, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in this field. We conclude that pattern recognition and decision support are the main tasks of AI in IoT systems, but also that autonomous decision-making and acting as well as data management and prediction are common tasks. Furthermore, healthcare emerged as the predominant application domain where AI is extensively employed in IoT systems. Other significant application domains are industry, farming, energy, transportation, buildings and the environment. The findings of this systematic mapping study provide a comprehensive understanding of the AI tasks and application domains in IoT systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.D., R.S. and U.K.; methodology, P.D., R.S. and U.K.; formal analysis, U.K., P.D. and R.S.; investigation, U.K.; validation, P.D. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, U.K.; writing—review and editing, U.K., P.D. and R.S.; supervision, P.D. and R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Knowledge Foundation (Stiftelsen för kunskaps- och kompetensutveckling) grant number 20220087.

Data Availability Statement

The replication package for this study includes the raw and processed data, and detailed documentation can be accessed at https://github.com/Umair1441/Role-of-AI-data (accessed on: 18 September 2024).

Acknowledgments

This work is partially funded by the Knowledge Foundation (Stiftelsen för kunskaps- och kompetensutveckling) for the project titled “Intelligent and Trustworthy IoT Systems” (grant number 20220087).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Tao, D. Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 7789–7817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghosh, A.; Chakraborty, D.; Law, A. Artificial intelligence in Internet of things. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2018, 3, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Era, C.A.A.; Rahman, M.; Alvi, S.T. Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) Technologies, Benefits and Applications. In Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA), Sana’a, Yemen, 6–7 August 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Petersen, K.; Vakkalanka, S.; Kuzniarz, L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2015, 64, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, N.; Wu, S.; Wang, X.; Yin, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, W.; Chen, F. AI for UAV-assisted IoT applications: A comprehensive review. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 14438–14461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alahi, M.E.E.; Sukkuea, A.; Tina, F.W.; Nag, A.; Kurdthongmee, W.; Suwannarat, K.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C. Integration of IoT-enabled technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) for smart city scenario: Recent advancements and future trends. Sensors 2023, 23, 5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bourechak, A.; Zedadra, O.; Kouahla, M.N.; Guerrieri, A.; Seridi, H.; Fortino, G. At the confluence of artificial intelligence and edge computing in iot-based applications: A review and new perspectives. Sensors 2023, 23, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, Y.; Ping, K.; Wu, C.; Chen, L.; Shi, H.; Chong, D. Artificial Intelligence powered Internet of Things and smart public service. Libr. Hi Tech. 2020, 38, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chamola, V.; Hassija, V.; Gupta, V.; Guizani, M. A comprehensive review of the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of IoT, drones, AI, blockchain, and 5G in managing its impact. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 90225–90265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kök, I.; Okay, F.Y.; Muyanlı, Ö.; Özdemir, S. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) for internet of things: A survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 14764–14779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mohan, D.; Al-Hamid, D.Z.; Chong, P.H.J.; Sudheera, K.L.K.; Gutierrez, J.; Chan, H.C.; Li, H. Artificial Intelligence and IoT in Elderly Fall Prevention: A Review. IEEE Sensors J. 2024, 24, 4181–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pwavodi, J.; Ibrahim, A.U.; Pwavodi, P.C.; Al-Turjman, F.; Mohand-Said, A. The role of artificial intelligence and IoT in prediction of earthquakes. Artif. Intell. Geosci. 2024, 5, 100075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, H.; Han, H.; Wang, X.; Sun, S. Research on artificial intelligence enhancing internet of things security: A survey. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 153826–153848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qazi, S.; Khawaja, B.A.; Farooq, Q.U. IoT-equipped and AI-enabled next generation smart agriculture: A critical review, current challenges and future trends. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 21219–21235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Esenogho, E.; Djouani, K.; Kurien, A.M. Integrating artificial intelligence Internet of Things and 5G for next-generation smartgrid: A survey of trends challenges and prospect. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 4794–4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jagatheesaperumal, S.K.; Pham, Q.V.; Ruby, R.; Yang, Z.; Xu, C.; Zhang, Z. Explainable AI over the Internet of Things (IoT): Overview, state-of-the-art and future directions. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 2106–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, J.I.; Khan, J.; Ali, F.; Ullah, F.; Bacha, J.; Lee, S. Artificial intelligence and internet of things (AI-IoT) technologies in response to COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 62613–62660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mustapha, U.F.; Alhassan, A.W.; Jiang, D.N.; Li, G.L. Sustainable aquaculture development: A review on the roles of cloud computing, internet of things and artificial intelligence (CIA). Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 2076–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahmood, M.R.; Matin, M.A.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Goudos, S.K. A comprehensive review on artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms for empowering the future IoT toward 6G era. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 87535–87562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Misra, N.; Dixit, Y.; Al-Mallahi, A.; Bhullar, M.S.; Upadhyay, R.; Martynenko, A. IoT, big data, and artificial intelligence in agriculture and food industry. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 9, 6305–6324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mukhopadhyay, S.C.; Tyagi, S.K.S.; Suryadevara, N.K.; Piuri, V.; Scotti, F.; Zeadally, S. Artificial intelligence-based sensors for next generation IoT applications: A review. IEEE Sensors J. 2021, 21, 24920–24932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alanhdi, A.; Toka, L. A Survey on Integrating Edge Computing With AI and Blockchain in Maritime Domain, Aerial Systems, IoT, and Industry 4.0. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 28684–28709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Walia, G.K.; Kumar, M.; Gill, S.S. AI-empowered fog/edge resource management for IoT applications: A comprehensive review, research challenges and future perspectives. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2023, 26, 619–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bokhari, S.A.A.; Myeong, S. The Impact of AI Applications on Smart Decision-Making in Smart Cities as Mediated by the Internet of Things and Smart Governance. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 120827–120844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, Y.; Samtani, S.; Guo, B.; Yu, Z. Behavioral biometrics for continuous authentication in the internet-of-things era: An artificial intelligence perspective. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 9128–9143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taimoor, N.; Rehman, S. Reliable and resilient AI and IoT-based personalised healthcare services: A survey. IEEE Access 2021, 10, 535–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Narváez, J.J.C.; Villalba, K.M.; Donado, S.A. Systematic Review for the Construction of an Architecture With Emerging IoT Technologies, Artificial Intelligence Techniques, Monitoring and Storage of Malicious Traffic. IEEE Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Aprendiz. 2022, 17, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rekkas, V.P.; Iliadis, L.A.; Sotiroudis, S.P.; Boursianis, A.D.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Plets, D.; Joseph, W.; Wan, S.; Christodoulou, C.G.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; et al. Artificial Intelligence in Visible Light Positioning for Indoor IoT: A Methodological Review. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2023, 4, 2838–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zaman, S.; Alhazmi, K.; Aseeri, M.A.; Ahmed, M.R.; Khan, R.T.; Kaiser, M.S.; Mahmud, M. Security threats and artificial intelligence based countermeasures for internet of things networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 94668–94690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alshehri, F.; Muhammad, G. A comprehensive survey of the Internet of Things (IoT) and AI-based smart healthcare. IEEE Access 2020, 9, 3660–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Salau, B.A.; Rawal, A.; Rawat, D.B. Recent advances in artificial intelligence for wireless internet of things and cyber–physical systems: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 12916–12930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Humayun, M.; Tariq, N.; Alfayad, M.; Zakwan, M.; Alwakid, G.; Assiri, M. Securing the Internet of Things in Artificial Intelligence Era: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 25469–25490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baccour, E.; Mhaisen, N.; Abdellatif, A.A.; Erbad, A.; Mohamed, A.; Hamdi, M.; Guizani, M. Pervasive AI for IoT applications: A survey on resource-efficient distributed artificial intelligence. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2022, 24, 2366–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, S.; Raut, R.D.; Narkhede, B.E. A proposed collaborative framework by using artificial intelligence-internet of things (AI-IoT) in COVID-19 pandemic situation for healthcare workers. Int. J. Healthc. Manag. 2020, 13, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mohanta, B.K.; Jena, D.; Satapathy, U.; Patnaik, S. Survey on IoT security: Challenges and solution using machine learning, artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. Internet Things 2020, 11, 100227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stadnicka, D.; Sęp, J.; Amadio, R.; Mazzei, D.; Tyrovolas, M.; Stylios, C.; Carreras-Coch, A.; Merino, J.A.; Żabiński, T.; Navarro, J. Industrial needs in the fields of artificial intelligence, Internet of Things and edge computing. Sensors 2022, 22, 4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Orchi, H.; Sadik, M.; Khaldoun, M. On using artificial intelligence and the internet of things for crop disease detection: A contemporary survey. Agriculture 2021, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rodriguez-Garcia, P.; Li, Y.; Lopez-Lopez, D.; Juan, A.A. Strategic decision making in smart home ecosystems: A review on the use of artificial intelligence and Internet of things. Internet Things 2023, 22, 100772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Greco, C.; Fortino, G.; Crispo, B.; Choo, K.K.R. AI-enabled IoT penetration testing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2023, 17, 2130014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Nabulsi, J.; Turab, N.; Owida, H.A.; Al-Naami, B.; De Fazio, R.; Visconti, P. IoT Solutions and AI-Based Frameworks for Masked-Face and Face Recognition to Fight the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sensors 2023, 23, 7193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, S.R.; Shirkey, G.; Celik, I.; Shao, C.; Chen, J. A Review on the Adoption of AI, BC, and IoT in Sustainability Research. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maurya, M.R.; Riyaz, N.U.S.; Reddy, M.S.B.; Yalcin, H.C.; Ouakad, H.M.; Bahadur, I.; Al-Maadeed, S.; Sadasivuni, K.K. A review of smart sensors coupled with Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence approach for heart failure monitoring. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2021, 59, 2185–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, I.; Rodriguez, J.V.; Shirvanizadeh, N.; Ortiz, A.; Pardo-Quiles, D.J. Applications of artificial intelligence, machine learning, big data and the internet of things to the COVID-19 pandemic: A scientometric review using text mining. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lutz, É.; Coradi, P.C. Applications of new technologies for monitoring and predicting grains quality stored: Sensors, internet of things, and artificial intelligence. Measurement 2022, 188, 110609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vilas-Boas, J.L.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Alberti, A.M. Convergence of Distributed Ledger Technologies with Digital Twins, IoT, and AI for fresh food logistics: Challenges and opportunities. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2023, 31, 100393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aneja, N.; Aneja, S.; Bhargava, B. AI-enabled learning architecture using network Traffic Traces over IoT network: A comprehensive review. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2023, 2023, 8658278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaginalkar, A.; Kumar, S.; Gargava, P.; Niyogi, D. Review of urban computing in air quality management as smart city service: An integrated IoT, AI, and cloud technology perspective. Urban Clim. 2021, 39, 100972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Edakulathur, G.F.; Sheeja, S. Intrusion detection system and mitigation of threats in IoT networks using AI techniques: A review. Eng. Appl. Sci. Res. 2023, 50, 633–645. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pandurangan, P.; Dinesh, R.A.; MohanaSundaram, A.; Samrat, A.V.; Meenambika, S.; Vedanarayanan, V.; Meena, R.; Namasivayam, S.K.R.; Moovendhan, M. Integrating cutting-edge technologies: AI, IoT, blockchain and nanotechnology for enhanced diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer-A review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 91, 105197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yazid, Y.; Ez-Zazi, I.; Guerrero-Gonzalez, A.; El Oualkadi, A.; Arioua, M. UAV-enabled mobile edge-computing for IoT based on AI: A comprehensive review. Drones 2021, 5, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. M. Bublitz, F.; Oetomo, A.; S. Sahu, K.; Kuang, A.; X. Fadrique, L.; E. Velmovitsky, P.; M. Nobrega, R.; P. Morita, P. Disruptive technologies for environment and health research: An overview of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and internet of things. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Butt, M.J.; Malik, A.K.; Qamar, N.; Yar, S.; Malik, A.J.; Rauf, U. A survey on COVID-19 data analysis using AI, IoT, and social media. Sensors 2023, 23, 5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mu, W.; Kleter, G.A.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Dupouy, E.; Frewer, L.J.; Radwan Al Natour, F.N.; Marvin, H. Making food systems more resilient to food safety risks by including artificial intelligence, big data, and internet of things into food safety early warning and emerging risk identification tools. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e13296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chang, H.; Choi, J.Y.; Shim, J.; Kim, M.; Choi, M. Benefits of Information Technology in Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Personal Health Records. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2023, 29, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Osifeko, M.O.; Hancke, G.P.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. Artificial intelligence techniques for cognitive sensing in future IoT: State-of-the-Art, potentials, and challenges. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2020, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abdullahi, M.; Baashar, Y.; Alhussian, H.; Alwadain, A.; Aziz, N.; Capretz, L.F.; Abdulkadir, S.J. Detecting cybersecurity attacks in internet of things using artificial intelligence methods: A systematic literature review. Electronics 2022, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Popescu, S.M.; Mansoor, S.; Wani, O.A.; Kumar, S.S.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, A.; Arya, V.M.; Kirkham, M.; Hou, D.; Bolan, N.; et al. Artificial intelligence and IoT driven technologies for environmental pollution monitoring and management. Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1336088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Uță, C.; Ștefănescu, R.; Cocoșatu, M. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, internet of things sensing networks, and deep learning-assisted smart process management in cyber-physical production systems. Electronics 2021, 10, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bi, S.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.; Wu, B.; Gong, Y.; Ni, W. A survey on artificial intelligence aided internet-of-things technologies in emerging smart libraries. Sensors 2022, 22, 2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qinxia, H.; Nazir, S.; Li, M.; Ullah Khan, H.; Lianlian, W.; Ahmad, S. AI-Enabled Sensing and Decision-Making for IoT Systems. Complexity 2021, 2021, 6616279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kasera, R.K.; Gour, S.; Acharjee, T. A comprehensive survey on IoT and AI based applications in different pre-harvest, during-harvest and post-harvest activities of smart agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 216, 108522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Alotaibi, B. A survey on industrial Internet of Things security: Requirements, attacks, AI-based solutions, and edge computing opportunities. Sensors 2023, 23, 7470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kim, D.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Jeon, E.R.; Kim, K.J. Present and Future of AI-IoT-Based Healthcare Services for Senior Citizens in Local Communities: A Review of a South Korean Government Digital Healthcare Initiatives. Healthcare 2024, 12, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, L.; Kuang, X.; Zhu, F.; Lai, L.; Fan, D. A Survey on the AI and Spectrum Management for Cache-Enabled Internet of Things in Smart Cities. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021, 2021, 4477596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kollu, P.K.; Kumar, K.; Kshirsagar, P.R.; Islam, S.; Naveed, Q.N.; Hussain, M.R.; Sundramurthy, V.P. Development of Advanced Artificial Intelligence and IoT Automation in the Crisis of COVID-19 Detection. J. Healthc. Eng. 2022, 2022, 1987917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mazhar, T.; Talpur, D.B.; Shloul, T.A.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Haq, I.; Ullah, I.; Ouahada, K.; Hamam, H. Analysis of IoT security challenges and its solutions using artificial intelligence. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alshamrani, M. IoT and artificial intelligence implementations for remote healthcare monitoring systems: A survey. J. King Saud-Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 2022, 34, 4687–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seng, K.P.; Ang, L.M.; Ngharamike, E. Artificial intelligence Internet of Things: A new paradigm of distributed sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2022, 18, 15501477211062835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bala, B.; Behal, S. AI techniques for IoT-based DDoS attack detection: Taxonomies, comprehensive review and research challenges. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2024, 52, 100631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kumar, N.M.; Chand, A.A.; Malvoni, M.; Prasad, K.A.; Mamun, K.A.; Islam, F.; Chopra, S.S. Distributed energy resources and the application of AI, IoT, and blockchain in smart grids. Energies 2020, 13, 5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, J.; Herdem, M.S.; Nathwani, J.; Wen, J.Z. Methods and applications for Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Internet of Things, and Blockchain in smart energy management. Energy AI 2023, 11, 100208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Giannakidou, S.; Radoglou-Grammatikis, P.; Lagkas, T.; Argyriou, V.; Goudos, S.; Markakis, E.K.; Sarigiannidis, P. Leveraging the power of internet of things and artificial intelligence in forest fire prevention, detection, and restoration: A comprehensive survey. Internet Things 2024, 26, 101171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alwahedi, F.; Aldhaheri, A.; Ferrag, M.A.; Battah, A.; Tihanyi, N. Machine learning techniques for IoT security: Current research and future vision with generative AI and large language models. Internet Things-Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2024, 4, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Abir, S.A.A.; Islam, S.N.; Anwar, A.; Mahmood, A.N.; Oo, A.M.T. Building resilience against COVID-19 pandemic using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and IoT: A survey of recent progress. IoT 2020, 1, 506–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rodriguez-Conde, I.; Campos, C.; Fdez-Riverola, F. Horizontally distributed inference of deep neural networks for AI-enabled IoT. Sensors 2023, 23, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shi, Q.; Dong, B.; He, T.; Sun, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lee, C. Progress in wearable electronics/photonics—Moving toward the era of artificial intelligence and internet of things. InfoMat 2020, 2, 1131–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nam, K.H.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, B.K.; Han, I.H. Internet of things, digital biomarker, and artificial intelligence in spine: Current and future perspectives. Neurospine 2019, 16, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Septiyanaa, D.; Rahmana, M.A.; Ariffa, T.F.M.; Sukindara, N.A.; Adestac, E.Y.T. Enhancing Water Sustainability Index Assessment through Risk Management, IoT, and Artificial Intelligence in Water Operation: A Review. Water Conserv. Manag. 2023, 7, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bibri, S.E.; Alexandre, A.; Sharifi, A.; Krogstie, J. Environmentally sustainable smart cities and their converging AI, IoT, and big data technologies and solutions: An integrated approach to an extensive literature review. Energy Inform. 2023, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sharma, D.; Singh Aujla, G.; Bajaj, R. Evolution from ancient medication to human-centered Healthcare 4.0: A review on health care recommender systems. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2023, 36, e4058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dixit, P.; Bhattacharya, P.; Tanwar, S.; Gupta, R. Anomaly detection in autonomous electric vehicles using AI techniques: A comprehensive survey. Expert Syst. 2022, 39, e12754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nanda, S.; Panigrahi, C.R.; Pati, B. Emergency management systems using mobile cloud computing: A survey. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2023, 36, e4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Souri, A.; Hussien, A.; Hoseyninezhad, M.; Norouzi, M. A systematic review of IoT communication strategies for an efficient smart environment. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2022, 33, e3736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Abed, A.K.; Anupam, A. Review of security issues in Internet of Things and artificial intelligence-driven solutions. Secur. Priv. 2023, 6, e285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Soltani, N.; Rahmani, A.M.; Bohlouli, M.; Hosseinzadeh, M. Artificial intelligence empowered threat detection in the Internet of Things: A systematic review. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2022, 34, e6894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Sensors 24 06511 g001
Figure 2. Publications per year.
Figure 2. Publications per year.
Sensors 24 06511 g002
Figure 3. Role of AI in IoT systems.
Figure 3. Role of AI in IoT systems.
Sensors 24 06511 g003
Figure 4. Applications domains of AI in IoT systems.
Figure 4. Applications domains of AI in IoT systems.
Sensors 24 06511 g004
Figure 5. Specific focus of the studies.
Figure 5. Specific focus of the studies.
Sensors 24 06511 g005
Figure 6. AI task frequency across different applications.
Figure 6. AI task frequency across different applications.
Sensors 24 06511 g006
Figure 7. AI subtasks of the top five application domains.
Figure 7. AI subtasks of the top five application domains.
Sensors 24 06511 g007
Table 1. Role of AI in IoT systems.
Table 1. Role of AI in IoT systems.
Ref.Decision-Making and ActingDecision Support Pattern RecognitionData ManagementHuman Interaction
Resource Allocation Control Planning Operational Decisions Strategic Decisions Prediction Event Recognition Object Recognition Diagnosis Estimation Authentication Reducing Noise Removing Sensitive Data   Filling in Missing Data NLU Speech Synthesis
[5]--------------
[6]------------
[7]----------
[8]------------
[9]------------
[10]--------------
[11]-------------
[12]---------------
[13]--------------
[14]-------------
[15]-------------
[16]---------------
[17]--------------
[18]-------------
[19]--------------
[20]-------------
[21]-------------
[22]--------------
[23]---------------
[24]---------------
[25]-------------
[26]------------
[27]--------------
[28]---------------
[29]--------------
[30]-------------
[31]-------------
[32]--------------
[33]---------------
[34]--------------
[35]--------------
[36]---------------
[37]---------------
[38]---------------
[39]--------------
[40]---------------
[41]--------------
[42]---------------
[43]---------------
[44]---------------
[45]---------------
[46]--------------
[47]-------------
[48]---------------
[49]---------------
[50]--------------
[51]--------------
[52]---------------
[53]--------------
[54]---------------
[55]-------------
[56]--------------
[57]--------------
[58]---------------
[59]-------------
[60]---------------
[61]--------------
[62]---------------
[63]---------------
[64]---------------
[65]---------------
[66]---------------
[67]--------------
[68]---------------
[69]---------------
[70]---------------
[71]--------------
[72]-------------
[73]--------------
[74]---------------
[75]---------------
[76]---------------
[77]--------------
[78]---------------
[79]---------------
[80]--------------
[81]---------------
[82]--------------
[83]-------------
[84]--------------
[85]---------------
Table 2. AI application domains in IoT systems.
Table 2. AI application domains in IoT systems.
ReferenceBuildingsEmergency Response EducationEnergyEnvironmentFarmingHealthcareIndustryLogisticsMilitaryPublic SafetyTransportationWaste ManagementGeneralSpecific Focus
[5]----------Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
[6]-------Smart Cities (SC)
[7]--------Edge Computing
[8]----------Public Service
[9]------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[10]---------Explainable AI
[11]-------------Fall Prevention
[12]-------------Prediction of Earthquakes
[13]-------------IoT Security
[14]-------------Agriculture
[15]-------------Smart Grid
[16]------------Explainable AI
[17]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[18]-------------Aquaculture
[19]----------IoT Networks
[20]-------------Agriculture and Food Industry
[21]---------Smart Sensors
[22]------------Maritime, Aerial Systems and Industry 4.0
[23]-------------Fog/Edge Resource Management
[24]------------Smart Cities
[25]-------------IoT Security
[26]-------------Personalized Healthcare Services
[27]-------------IoT Security
[28]-------------Indoor Positioning
[29]----------IoT Security
[30]-------------Healthcare
[31]---------Wireless networks
[32]-------------IoT Security
[33]---------Resource Efficiency
[34]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[35]--------IoT Security
[36]-------------Industrial Needs
[37]-------------Crop Disease Detection
[38]-------------Strategic Decisions for Smart Homes
[39]-----------IoT Security
[40]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[41]-----------Sustainability
[42]-------------Heart Failure Monitoring
[43]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[44]-------------Grain Quality
[45]-------------Fresh Food Logistics
[46]-------------IoT Network Traffic Analysis
[47]------------Air Quality
[48]-------------IoT Security
[49]-------------Diagnosis and Treatment Of Colorectal Cancer
[50]-------UAV
[51]------------Environment and Health
[52]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[53]-------------Food Safety
[54]-------------Healthcare
[55]-------------Cognitive Sensing
[56]-------------IoT Security
[57]------------Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Management
[58]-------------Process Management in Cyber-Physical Production Systems
[59]-------------Libraries
[60]-------------Sensing and Decision-Making
[61]-------------Harvesting
[62]------------Industrial IoT Security
[63]-------------Healthcare Services for SC
[64]-------------Network Management for SC
[65]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[66]-------------IoT Security
[67]-------------Remote Healthcare Monitoring
[68]----------Sensor Networks
[69]-------------IoT Security
[70]-----------Energy Management
[71]-------------Energy Management
[72]-------------Forest Fires
[73]-------------IoT Security
[74]-------------COVID-19 Pandemic
[75]-------------Distributed Neural Networks
[76]-------------Wearable Devices
[77]-------------Spine Injuries
[78]-------------Water Management
[79]------------Smart Cities (SC)
[80]-------------Healthcare Recommender Systems
[81]-----------IoT Security
[82]-------------Emergency Management
[83]-----------Networking
[84]-----------IoT Security
[85]-------------IoT Security
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khadam, U.; Davidsson, P.; Spalazzese, R. Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study. Sensors 2024, 24, 6511. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206511

AMA Style

Khadam U, Davidsson P, Spalazzese R. Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study. Sensors. 2024; 24(20):6511. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khadam, Umair, Paul Davidsson, and Romina Spalazzese. 2024. "Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study" Sensors 24, no. 20: 6511. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop