Shortcut: WS:AN

Wikispecies:Administrators' Noticeboard

From Wikispecies
Revision as of 05:19, 27 January 2023 by Ucucha (talk | contribs) (Possible hoax article: Murexia xenochromus)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ucucha in topic Possible hoax article: Murexia xenochromus
Jump to navigation Jump to search
User group statistics

There are archives of this Noticeboard:
The archives are searchable:

Welcome to the Administrators' Noticeboard.

This space is for anyone who needs to contact an administrator ("sysop") for actions such as protecting a page, deleting spam, or blocking vandals.
If you rather need to reach a Translation administrator, please use the Translation Administrators' Noticeboard instead. For general conversation, see Wikispecies:Village Pump.

Start a new conversation.


Speed deletion taxon pages

There are currently 6 taxon pages listed for speedy deletion: Asellus strinatii, Astrophyton panamense, Autolytus simplex, Clymenella somersi, Docophorus cancellosus and Goniocotes waterstoni. They were all added to the Speedy deletion category by User:MathXplore using TwinkleGlobal and all since they're broken redirects. This is true, however please note that all of the 6 taxon pages are also linked to from other Wikispecies taxon pages or reference templates. In most cases those links should be tended to prior to deletion. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 13:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC).Reply

Resolved. Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 05:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC).Reply

Please have a look at Template talk:Global — Guidance on using this template? if you think you have any extra or otherwise helpful information. Thanks! –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 04:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC).Reply

Block request

173.184.132.32 (talkcontribsblock logall projects) : disruptive editing, has a similar history on the English Wikivoyage too. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 01:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nikolaevna speedy delete request

Not so sure on this one I think it has some uses. For example I personally know one of the authors on the Nikolaeva page which is similar and I know she only publishes under Nikolaeva. I am thinking there could be enough confusion on these names to keep these disambiguation pages. Any comments? Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 18:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

This – unlike the mentioned Nikolaeva – is actually not a family name (in particular not a second name in Russian families as the deletion request states) but a w:patronymic, which is even less significant than a given name (and is only significant in combination with the latter at all). At least one deletion request on Wikipedia concerning a patronymic page was successful, and my point for deletion here would be even stronger since Wikispecies does not even contain disambiguation pages for given names. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
The practice is make disambiguation only for surname (the authority part of the name and the only necessary for WS scope), not first or second names. It would not be a case of setting precedents. Burmeister (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Since this does not appear to be linked anymore, I've deleted the page accordingly. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Possible hoax article: Murexia xenochromus

Murexia xenochromus does not appear to exist. I can find no references to it outside Wikipedia and Wikispecies. The cited references do not support it. Ucucha 05:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply