Talk:Q2013

Query for chart of Wikidata growth

• Items used: Wikidata (Q2013)   , Wikidata item (Q16222597)   , Wikibase lexeme (Q51885771)   

• Properties used: has part(s) (P527)   , quantity (P1114)   , point in time (P585)   

#defaultView:LineChart
# derived from [[Talk:Q38074555]]
SELECT ?date ?qid
{
# uncomment next line for Items
# wd:Q2013 p:P527 [ ps:P527 wd:Q16222597; pq:P1114 ?qid ; pq:P585 ?date ]
# uncomment next line for Lexemes
 wd:Q2013 p:P527 [ ps:P527 wd:Q51885771; pq:P1114 ?qid ; pq:P585 ?date ]
}

Try it! (Obsolete and not exact data). See Talk:Q38074555 and Talk:Q55003547 instead. --Infovarius (talk) 10:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia

How include a link from here to Wikipedia?. --Diamondland (talk) 07:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You don't. It is done automatically. If you don't see the interwikis in the target page, request a full reload from your Web browser (Ctrl-F5). They should appear on the left side of the page. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Bug tracking system

I'm concerned by the issue tracker URL (P1401) statements on this item. The property description states that it should be used for software, and I don't think Wikidata really qualifies. Should these statements perhaps be at Wikibase (Q16354758) instead? --Yair rand (talk) 22:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

owned by

data can't be owned because of CC0: anyone or no one, but not WMF d1g (talk) 11:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Then set "Wikidata" is subset of the set "CC0 data" --Fractaler (talk) 12:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

@D1gggg: Based on the other statements in the item, the topic is not the dataset/content (which is under CC0), but the website/project/brand/database, which is owned by the WMF. However, this seems to contradict the presence of the copyright license (P275) statement. --Yair rand (talk) 22:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

@Yair rand: well, I don't know license for "website" part or "owner" claims here.

Probably Q2013 is about project first, not database first:

"free knowledge database project hosted by Wikimedia and edited by volunteers" d1g (talk) 19:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

@Yair rand: I'm confused with these statements:

⟨ subject ⟩ instance of (P31) ⟨ knowledge base (Q593744)    ⟩

⟨ subject ⟩ instance of (P31) ⟨ online database (Q7094076)    ⟩

Maybe a separate item with license CC0 would be better. d1g (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

There are: 1) objects, 2) object's space. We have: 1) data (graph vertices, virtual objects in virtual space, database object/URLs) 2) "object's space" (Wikidata reference system, Wikidata's database/Wikidata's group of URLs, space in Internet now - www.wikidata.org/wiki/*). This system is created approximately like this: HDD/RAM-space -> virtual space for wiki software (Q6686945) -> wiki software (Q6686945)'s space for data representation/management). So, "owned by Wikidata's database"? --Fractaler (talk) 08:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

• For items on other WMF sites I created, I added "operated by" and skipped "owned by".
  --- Jura 07:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Google Summer of Code 2018

IMHO we could add a statement similar to this one https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q465#P1344 Source: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2018/projects/5957416260730880/

Statistics

Does it make sense to store counts of Items and Lexemes here rather than at Q38074555 in order to get plot like at right? Look query at the top. --Infovarius (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

• They are slightly different: having Q60000000 doesn't mean Wikidata has 60,000,000 items. --- Jura 16:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Good point. So Q38074555 can store maximal numbers of item by time while here we store numbers of items by time. --Infovarius (talk) 10:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

IM channel link is wrong

The link provided in property "IM channel" (t.me/wikidata) points to inactive and basically empty channel, I suggest it to be removed --A13ph (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Annoyance

Inception: 2012 Item: 2013 ...Lallint (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Country of origin?

Reː this revert by ̊@LydiaPintscher (I've added country of originː USA, but Lydia notes WD was started in Germany). Ping also @Vanbasten 23 . Lydia makes good point, but from the legal and common sense perspective, WD is owned by WMF, and therefore is an American organization. What kind of properties we can use to reflect both associations? (If you reply here, please ping me). Piotrus (talk) 05:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)