Raw Material Risk Assessment
Raw Material Risk Assessment
Raw Material Risk Assessment
Cross Contamination
* Product Legality or
* Variety or Species
Fraud/Substitution
* Microbiological
* Foreign Body
Requirement
* Chemical
Reference
Customer
gluten)
Food
Supplier Ingredients High Risk Factors
Flours, Toppings 10 6 8 4 10 6 5 7
Flours Admin: 0
Cho điểm theo bảng 1
Toppings Lấy Mức độ nghiêm trọng x Tần suất xảy ra 0
Improvers 0
Improvers 5 4 12 2 8 8 5 (Bio.)
Seeds/Toppings 0
Sundry/Yeast/Fats/Sugar 0
Sundry/Yeast/Fats/Sugar 0
Unishine 0
Block & Sliced Cheddar
Cheese (trial period ends 0
June 2012)
Fats 0
* All risks are considered in relation to process; e.g. microbiological risk is considered with respect to the process including ba
and gluten have been excluded as allergens as all products contain them. Quality considerations have included an assessme
likelihood, significance to the product and quantity affected if an issue were to arise.
* All risks are considered in relation to process; e.g. microbiological risk is considered with respect to the process including ba
and gluten have been excluded as allergens as all products contain them. Quality considerations have included an assessme
likelihood, significance to the product and quantity affected if an issue were to arise.
NOTES
( I now realize that this is a work-in-progress due BRC mixing apples, oranges and pears )
From a HACCP POV, A high risk RM can be interpreted as one which possesses inherent hazards which a
From a HACCP POV, a RM which is not "High-Risk" can be classifiable as Low or Medium risk.
BRC have chosen to include Raw Material Vulnerability, Quality, and Legality within the Overall Risk Asses
I have modified the original Procedure to hopefully provide (a) a highlighting of INDIVIDUAL "critical" RA d
overall risk assessment where (a) does not occur
The above tool is equivalent to specifying 2 Decision Ranking Rules –
(i) – If the Risk Score for any individual factor within the Categories (BCPAQVL) is evaluated as >= 12, the
(ii) – If event (i) does not occur, the Overall Ingredient Risk Status is determined by averaging the values fo
Table 2 above.
The net result is shown in Column P.
1 Operational
As before I assume the same basic risk matrix can be used to evaluate/average the various RM characteri
1a I suggest that If it is considered that some safety/quality characteristic will not comply with legality,
1b If the HACCP Decision tree assessment procedure as referenced earlier in the post indicates a "sensitive" B
[Table1] shown above) in the relevant BCPA cell of Column(s) H-K.
Can also enter a similar value to 1b for a raw material which is considered of "high" "significance" to the pro
1c available in some publications. Equating quality risk to safety risk is a subjective choice of course.
2 Interpretive
I have adjusted the program so that -
2a If any cell in Columns H-M contains a value >=12 this should generate (i) a blue cell fill colour, (ii) details in
2b If all cell data values are <12, the overall average risk level / Risk Status should appear in columns O,P
I have filled in a few rows to illustrate the above and (arbitrarily) adjusted the audit entries in Column U in a
12.00
8.00
0.10
Overall Ingredient Risk:
Approved Supplier
Overall Ingredient
Risk: H - M - L
H-M-L
Audit
Decision &
Frequency
0 0 to <8 LOW
0
12 to 25 HIGH
0
Table 2
0
s inherent hazards which are not eliminated within the manufacturing process or by the intended consumer of the final product.
r Medium risk.
hin the Overall Risk Assesment. Too many Cooks ……..
NDIVIDUAL "critical" RA data points for "sensitive ingredients" as well as (b) maintaining the previous
is evaluated as >= 12, the Overall Ingredient Risk Status is regarded as HIGH.
by averaging the values for (BCPAQVL) and determining the Status Levels of MEDIUM/LOW as per
h" "significance" to the product quality. Alternatively could consider a Quality Risk Matrix which are
choice of course.
cell fill colour, (ii) details in columns O and P (can "hide" Column O if only wish to show net result)
appear in columns O,P
Ing1 5 1 3 1 1 1 3
Ing2 5 1 3 1 1 1 3
Flours 1 1 3 2 2 2 3
Improvers 1 1 3 3 2 2 3
0 to <8 LOW
8 to <12 MEDIUM
12 to 25 HIGH
Matrix Zonal Parameters