Ejercicios Promodel

TAREA DE
SIMULACIN AVANZADA
EDUARDO MARROQUIN PRADO
Saltillo, Coah. Mxico

2003
17 de Nov. De
LAB 5
1. Consider the operation of a fast food restaurant where
customers arrive for ordering lunch. The following is a log of the
time (minutes) between arrivals of 40 successive customers.
Use Stat::Fit to analyze the data and fit an appropriate
continuous distribution to the data. What are the parameters of
the distribution?
11
9
12
8
11
11
13
12
8
10
12
14
7
17
16
8
9
13
15
10
15
14
12
10
11
14
9
16
7
12
15
13
7
16
14
13
7
10
11
15
Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution

are shown below.
For the triangular distribution, the parameters are: a=6, b=18.1
and c=10.9.
For the uniform distribution, the parameters are a=7 y b=17.
2. The servers at the above restaurant took the following time

(minutes) to serve food to these 40 customers: Use Sata::Fit to
analyze the data and fit an appropriate continuous distribution
to the data. What are the parameters of this distribution?
11
9
12
10
11
11
13
12
8
10
12
14
11
17
13
8
10
13
12
10
15
14
12
10
11
14
9
16
7
12
15
13
11
13
14
13
12
10
11
15

are shown below.
For the beta distribution, the parameters are: =2.67 and
=2.84.
For the Weibull distribution, the parameters are : =2.55 and
=5.6.
3. The following is the number of incoming calls (each hour for 80

successive hours) to a calla center set up for serving customers
of a certain Internet service provider. Use Stat::Fit to analyze the
data fit an appropriate discrete distribution to the data. What
are the parameters of this distribution?
12
9
12
10
11
9
12
10
11
10
12
13
12
8
11
13
12
8
10
8
11
14
11
17
12
14
11
17
13
17
13
10
13
12
8
10
13
12
10
12
12
14
12
10
15
14
12
10
11
10
16
9
16
7
14
9
16
7
12
7
11
13
11
13
15
13
11
13
14
13
10
12
10
11
13
12
10
11
15
11
Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, there is only one discrete

distribution which better adjust the data. It is the binomial
distribution with n=22 and p=0.532.
The fitted distribution is shown below.
4. Observations were taken on the times to serve online customers

at stockbrokers site (STOCK.com) on the Internet. The times (in
seconds) are shown below, sorted in ascending order. Use
Stat::Fit and fit an appropriate distribution to the data. What are
the parameters of this distribution.
1.39
3.59
7.11
8.34
11.14
11.97
13.53
16.87
17.63
19.44
21.47
22.55
28.04
28.97
29.05
35.26
37.65
38.21
38.32
39.17
39.49
39.99
44.42
42.53
47.08
51.53
55.11
55.75
55.85
56.96
58.78
60.61
63.38
65.99
66
76.55
73.81
74.14
79.79
81.66
82.1
83.52
85.9
88.04
88.4
88.47
92.63
93.11
93.74
98.82

are shown below.
For the uniform distribution, the parameters are: a=1 and
b=98.8.
For the beta distribution, the parameters are : =1.06 and
=1.13.
LAB 6
1. Visitors arrive at Kids World entertainment park according to an
exponential interarrival time distribution with mean 2.5 minutes.
The travel time from the entrance to the ticket window is
normally distributed with mean of three minutes and standard
deviation of 0.5 minute. At the ticket window, visitors wait in a
single line until one of six cashiers is available to serve them.
The time for the purchase of tickets is normally distributed with
mean of five minutes and standard deviation of one minute.
After purchasing tickets, the visitors go to their respective gates
to enter the park.
Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system. Run
the simulation model for 200 hours to determine.
a) The average and maximum length of the ticketing queue.
b) The average number of customers completing ticketing
per hour.
c) The average utilization of the cashiers.
d) Do you recommended that management add more
cashiers?
Running the simulation model (LAB6.1) the results are the
following:
a) The average and maximum length of the ticketing queue
are 0.0088 and 1 visitors
b) The average number of customers completing ticketing
per hour are 16.07.
c) The average utilization of the cashiers are: 50%, 45% and
37% for cashier 1, 2 and 3.
Running the model LAB6.1. The results are according to the
following graph of locations utilization, where we can see how
the aisle o the road from the entrance to the ticket window,
becomes a queue.
.
d) Do you recommended that management add more
cashiers?
Not, this is not a good recommendation since only three
cashiers are used and the other three are idle.
2. A consultant recommended that six individual queues be formed
at the ticket window (one for each cashier) instead of the
common queue. Create a simulation model, with animation, of
this system. Run the simulation model for 200 hours to
determine.
I did not built the corresponding model since for any queue
system, no matter how the interarrivals and service time are, it
is better to attend the costumers by a single line instead of
independent lines.
3. At the Southern California Airlines traveler check-in facility,

three types of customers arrive: passengers with e-ticket (Type
E), passenger with paper ticket (Type T), and passengers that
need to purchase ticket (Type P)
The interaarrival distribution and the service times for these
passengers are given in the table. Create a simulation model,
with animation, of this system. Run the simulation model for
2000 hours. If each type of passenger is served by separate gate
agents, determine the following:
a) The average and maximum length of the three queues.
b) The average number of the customers of each type
completing check-in procedures per hour.
c) The average utilization of the gate agents.
d) Would you recommended one single line for check-in for
all three types of travelers? Discus the pros and cons for
such a change.
Running the simulation model LAB6.3 shown in the appendix, we

got the following fesults:
LAB6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB6.3.MOD
Date: Nov/13/2003 Time: 11:40:29 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 2000 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total
Minutes
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry
---------------- -------- ------- --------Linea1
2000
999999 21826 2.131121
Linea2
2000 999999 11301 14.263030
Linea3
2000 999999 7542 18.006205
Check1
2000
1
21826 2.996429
Check2
2000
1
11299 8.000688
Check3
2000
1
7542 11.966399
Average Maximum Current

Contents Contents Contents
---------------------0.387615
9
0
1.34322
15
2
1.13169
11
0
0.545
1
0
0.753331
1
1
0.752088
1
1
% Util
-----0.00
0.00
0.00
54.50
75.33
75.21
a) The average and maximum length of the three queues

are:.
Linea1 average 0.387615 and maximum content 9
Linea2 average 1.34322
and maximum content 15
Linea3 average 1.13169
and maximum content 11
b. The average number of the customers of each type
completing check-in procedures per hour.
For Check1 the average number per hour is =
(21826/2000)= 10.9
For Check2 the average number per hour is =
(11299 /2000)= 5.64
For Check3
the average number per hour is =
(7542/2000)= 3.77
c. The average utilization of the gate agents.
For Check1
54.50%
For Check2
75.33%
For Check3
75.21%
d. Would you recommended one single line for check-in
for all three types of travelers? Discus the pros and
cons for such a change.
No, this recommendation is not a good decision given that
for sigle lines the average time per customer is higher that
only one line for all the system.
4. Raja & Rani, a fancy restaurant in Santa Clara, Hold a maximum
of 100 diners. Customers arrive according to an exponential
distribution with a mean of 35 minutes. Customers stay in the
restaurant according to a triangular distribution with a minimum
of 30 minutes, a maximum of 60 minutes, and a mode of 45
minutes. Create a simulation model, with animation, of this
system.
a) Beginning empty, how long is it before the restaurant fills?
b) What is the total number of diners entering the restaurant
before it fills?
c) What is the utilization of the restaurant?
5. United Electronics manufactures small custom electronic

assemblies. There are four stations through which the part must
be processed: assembly, soldering, painting, and inspection.
Orders arrive with and exponential interarrival distribution
(mean 20 minutes). The process time distributions are shown in
the table.
The soldering operation can be performed on three jobs at a
time. Painting can be done on four jobs at a time. Assembly and
inspection are performed on one job at a time. Create a
simulation model, with animation, of this system. Simulate this
manufacturing system for 100 days, eight hours each day.
Collect and print statistics on the utilization of each station,
associated queues, and the total number of jobs manufactured
during each eight-hour shift (average).
All the statistics are shown in the appendix LAB6.5. However, in
order to answer part of the question I show in the following
graph the utilization of the location. It can be seen that the
painting process which is the most consuming time, has the
higher utilization.
The following table show the average length of the queues

and the average time/ part in the queue:
Parameter
Assembl
y
Average Time/Part
11.44
Average
Queue 0.64
Length
Solderin
g
0.86
0.045
Painting
Inspection
2.34
0.11
2.92
0.12
The total number of jobs manufactured for a 8 hour shift is, on

the
average: 18:27.
6. Consider the Exercise 5 with the following enhancements. Ten
percent of all finished assemblies are sent back to soldering for
rework after inspection, five percent are sent back to assembly
for rework after inspection, and one percent of all assemblies fail
to pass and are scrapped.
Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system.
Simulate this manufacturing system for 100 days, eight hours
each day. Collect and print statistics on the utilization of each
station, associated queues, total number of jobs assembled
number of assemblies sent for rework to assembly and
soldering, and the number of assemblies scrapped during each
eight-hour shift (average).
The percentages of utilization of the locations area: 72.95% for
Assembly, 65.67% for Soldering, 65.87% for Painting and 39.26
for Inspection.
The following table show the average length of the queues and
the average time/ part in the queue:
Parameter
Assembl
y
Average Time/Part
13.13
Average
Queue 0.78
Length
Solderin
g
2.53
0.14
Painting
Inspection
4.66
0.27
4.79
0.23
The total of assemblies finished per shift are: 17.49.
7. Small appliances are assembled in four stage (Centers 1,2, and

3 and Inspection) at Pomona Assembly Shop. After each
assembly step the appliance is inspected or tested and if a
defect is found, it must be corrected and then checked again.
The assemblies arrive at a constant rate of one assembly per
minute. The times to assemble, test, and correct defects are
normally distributed. The mean and standard deviation of the
times to assemble, inspect, and correct defects, as well as the
likelihood of an assembly error, are shown in the following table.
If an assembly is found defective, the defect is corrected and it
is inspected again. After a defect is corrected, the likelihood of
another defect being found is the same as during the first
inspection. We assume in this model that an assembly defect is
eventually corrected and then it is passed on to the next station.
Simulate for one year (2000 hours) and determine the number
of good appliances shipped in a year.
The corresponding simulation model is LAB6.7. The statistics of
the run are shown in appendix LAB6.7 where we can see that
the total production is 24,000 parts. It can be shown also in the
variable for counting the production of the model.
8. Salt Lake City Electronics manufactures small custom
communication equipment. To different job types are to be
processed with the following manufacturing cell. The necessary
data are given in the table. Simulate the system for 100 days,
eight hours each day, to determine the average number of jobs
waiting for different operations, number of jobs of each type
finished each day, average cycle time for each type of job, and
the average cycle time for all jobs.
9. Six dump trucks at the DumpOnMe facility in Riverside are used

to haul coal from the entrance of a small mine to the railroad.
Figure L6.39 provides a schematic of the dump truck operation.
Each truck is loaded by one of two loaders. After loading, a truck
immediately moves to the scale to be weighed as soon as
possible. Both the loaders and the scale have a firs-come, firsserved waiting line (or queue) for trucks. Travel time from a
loader to the scale is considered negligible. After being weighed,
a truck begins travel time (during which time the truck unload),
and then after ward returns to the loader queue. The
distributions of loading time, weighed time, and travel time are
shown in the table.
a) Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system.
Simulate for 100 days, eight hours each day.
b) Collect statistics to estimate the loaded and scale
utilization (percentage of time busy).
c) About how many trucks are loaded each day on average?
10.
At the Pilot Pen Company, a molding machine produces
pen barrels of three different colors-red, blue, and green- in the
ratio of 3:2:1.
The molding time is triangular (3,4,6) minutes per barrel. The
barrels go to a filling machine where ink of appropriate color is
filled at the rate of 20 pens per hour (exponentially distributed).
Another molding machine makes caps of three different colorsred, blue, and green-in the ratio of 3:2:1. The molding time is
triangular (2,3,4) minutes per cap. At the next station, caps and
filled barrels of matching colors are joined together.
Simulate for 300 hours. Find the average number of pens
produced per hour. Collect statistics on the utilization of the
molding machine and the joining equipment.
11.
Customers arrive at the NoWaitBurger hamburger stand
with an interarrival time that is exponentially distributed with a
mean of one minute. Out of 10 customers five buy a hamburger
and a drink, three buy a hamburger, and two buy just a drink.
One server handless the hamburger while another handless the
drink. A person buying both items needs to wait in line for both
serves. The time it takes to serve a customer is normally
distributed with a mean of 70 seconds for each item. Simulate
for100 days, eight hours each day. Collect statistics on the
number of customers served each day, size of the queue, and
utilization of the servers. What changes would you suggest to
make the system more efficient?
For answering this problem I used two model. One for the
original problem statement, LAB6.11.a and other for looking to
efficient the system, LAB6.11.b. The changes for this model is to
use three lines, one attended for Clerk1 who served only
customers buying hamburgers and drinks the other two lines are
attended for Clerk2 for the customers who bay Hamburger or
Drink. The results of the two models are shown in the following
table.
Parameter
Model
LAB6.11.a
1059 sec.
in 1754
Average Cycle Time/ Customer

Average
Waiting
Queue/Customer(Q1)
Average
Waiting
in
Queue/Customer(Q2)
Average
Waiting
in
Queue/Customer(Q3)
Percentage of Utilization Clerk1
Percentage of Occupation/Customer
Customers Attended /Day
Model
LAB6.11.b
1234
2398
358
51
49
44
98.22
74.25
12.02
445
98.56
57.55
9.7
438
The number shown, less waiting time, more customers

attended , etc, that the change proposed do not make better
than the actual system. Other change that efficient the system,
in terms of the service to the customers, is to reduce the
attending time of the clerks.
12.
Workers who work at the Detroit TooINDie plant must
check out tools from a tool crib. Workers arrive according to an
exponential distribution with a mean time between arrivals of
five minutes. At present, three tool crib clerks staff the tool crib.
The time to serve a worker is normally distributed with a mean
of 10 minutes and a standard deviation of two minutes.
Compare the following servicing methods. Simulate for a 24hour period and collect data.
a) Workers form a single queue, choosing the next available
tool crib clerk.
b) Workers enter the shortest queue (each clerk has his-her
own queue).
c) Workers chose one of three queues at random.
For this system I built the model LAB6.12 for a single line. After, the
model as modified to take into account three lines whit different
routing rule.
For question a I used the FIRST Available Rule.
For question b I used the MOST Rule.
For question c I used the RANDOM Rule.
The following table shown the results of running the three models:
Parameter
Av. Waiting Time/Customer
Av. Waiting Time/Customer (Q1)
Av. Waiting Time/Customer Clerk1
Av. Cycle Time/Customer
Model
LAB6.a
0.6 min.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
10.02 min.
9.9 min.
10.27 min.
10.71 min.
71
59
49
Model
LAB6.b
N.A.
7.88 min.
5.75 min.
4.44 min.
10.22 min.
9.82 min.
10.13 min.
16.47 min.
93
69
44
Model
LAB6.c
N.A.
7.44 min.
10.11 min.
11.20 min.
9.9 min.
10.18 min.
10.14 min.
19.79 min.
63
58
75
First of all, comparing the one single line model with the other three
independent lines models, looking at the average cycle time per
customer or the waiting time per customer, we found that the first one
is better than the others.
Comparing, the three lines models, the model using the MOST
available capacity location routing rule, LAB6.12.b, is better. Just
compare the cycle time of 16.47 min given by the model LAB6.12.b
vs. the cycle time of 19.79 min given by the model LAB6.12.c.
LAB6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Date: Nov/13/2003 Time: 11:40:29 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Linea1
2000 999999 21826 2.131121 0.387615
9
0 0.00
Linea2
2000 999999 11301 14.263030 1.34322
15
2 0.00
Linea3
2000 999999 7542 18.006205 1.13169
11
0 0.00
Check1
2000
1 21826 2.996429 0.545
1
0 54.50
Check2
2000
1 11299 8.000688 0.753331
1
1 75.33
Check3
2000
1 7542 11.966399 0.752088
1
1 75.21
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ----- --------- ---- | ---Linea1
2000 75.99
24.01 0.00 | 0.00
Linea2
2000 49.75
50.25 0.00 | 0.00
Linea3
2000 51.87
48.13 0.00 | 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------Check1
2000
54.50 0.00 45.50
Check2
2000
75.33 0.00 24.67
Check3
2000
75.21 0.00 24.79
%
% %
Waiting Blocked Down
------- ---0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----TypeE Linea1
0
TypeT Linea2
0
TypeP Linea3
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------TypeE 21826
0 5.127549 0.000000 0.795273 3.062429 1.269848
TypeT 11298
3 22.263362 0.000000 0.000000 8.067096 14.196266
TypeP 7541
1 29.973494 0.000000 0.000000 12.033981 17.939513
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------TypeE
0.00
15.51
59.72 24.77
TypeT 0.00
0.00
36.23 63.77
TypeP 0.00
0.00
40.15 59.85
LAB6.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB5.mod
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 12:47:58 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : Average
Period
: Final Report (0 sec to 8 hr Elapsed: 8 hr)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Location
Name
---------Arrive
Arrive
QueueA
(Average)
QueueA
(Std. Dev.)
Assembly
(Average)
Assembly
Dev.)
QueueS
(Average)
QueueS
(Std. Dev.)
S1
S1
Dev.)
S2
S2
Dev.)
S3
S3
Dev.)
QueueP
(Average)
QueueP
(Std. Dev.)
P1
P1
Dev.)
P2
P2
Dev.)
P3
P3
Dev.)
P4
P4
Dev.)
Average
Scheduled
--------- -------- ---------------- ----------------------- -----8
999999 24.89 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00 (Average)
0
0
4.7288 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
8 999999 24.89 11.449830 0.641063 3.41
0.75 0.00
0
0 4.23077 0.264583 0.119889
4.7288 7.974494 0.549325 1.51154 1.34371

24.14 13.298290 0.669068
999999
0.00
0.65 66.91
0 0.479372 11.99 (Std.
23.49 0.866597 0.0451497
1.19
0.02
0.00
0 4.21995 0.914846 0.0510483 0.394277 0.140705
0.00
8
0
1
9.97 34.714640 0.716218
0 1.35926 3.460856 0.0862923
8
0
1
7.92 35.004934 0.574425
0 1.61858 3.636963 0.116566
1
0.61 57.44 (Average)
0 0.490207 11.66 (Std.
8
0
1
0
1
0.47 40.22 (Average)
0 0.501614 15.60 (Std.
5.58 34.519376 0.402229

2.0898 5.325566 0.156005
999999
21.7 2.343168 0.116409
0.69 71.62 (Average)

0 0.464823 8.63 (Std.
1.7
0.11 0.00
4.0936 2.326466 0.132562 0.659047 0.345096
8
0
1
6.8 51.495696 0.727376
0 0.765414 3.634435 0.0785386
8
0
1
5.98 51.528591 0.638995
0 1.03455 4.518899 0.107292
8
0
1
4.94 51.743745 0.528009
0 1.39856 5.349709 0.146482
8
0
1
3.87 52.060951 0.416191
0 1.60589 6.956317 0.172565
0.00
0.82 72.74 (Average)

0 0.386123 7.85 (Std.
0.79 63.90 (Average)
0 0.40936 10.73 (Std.
0.6 52.80 (Average)
0 0.492366 14.65 (Std.
0.49 41.62 (Average)
0 0.502418 17.26 (Std.
QueueI
(Average)
QueueI
(Std. Dev.)
Inspection
Inspection
Dev.)
999999
18.89 2.928281 0.121818
1.87
0.22
0 3.86618 2.835096 0.136124 0.77401 0.561024
8
0
1 18.67 7.556816 0.292458

0 3.76334 1.590489 0.0787391
0.00
0.00
0.4 29.25 (Average)

0 0.492366 7.87 (Std.

%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA
8 66.03
33.97 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueA
0 16.43
16.43 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueS
8 95.64
4.36 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueS
0 4.81
4.81 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueP
8 90.26
9.74 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueP
0 9.55
9.55 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueI
8 90.88
9.12 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueI
0 6.42
6.42 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
---------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Assembly
8
66.91 0.00 33.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Assembly
0
11.99 0.00 11.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S1
8
71.62 0.00 28.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S1
0
8.63 0.00 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S2
8
57.44 0.00 42.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S2
0
11.66 0.00 11.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S3
8
40.22 0.00 59.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S3
0
15.60 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P1
8
72.74 0.00 27.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P1
0
7.85 0.00 7.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P2
8
63.90 0.00 36.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P2
0
10.73 0.00 10.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P3
8
52.80 0.00 47.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P3
0
14.65 0.00 14.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P4
8
41.62 0.00 58.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P4
Inspection
Inspection
0
8
0
17.26 0.00 17.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)

29.25 0.00 70.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
7.87 0.00 7.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----Part Arrive
0 (Average)
Part Arrive
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
Name
Exits In System
System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- --------Part
18.27
6.62 127.826108 0.000000 0.000000 112.015587 15.810522
(Average)
Part 3.75743 2.7699 11.797136 0.000000 0.000000 3.530039 11.191192 (Std.
Dev.)
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Part
0.00
0.00
88.23 11.77 (Average)
Part
0.00
0.00
6.98 6.98 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 12:58:14 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Period
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Name
---------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
8
1 26.31 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0
0 4.87769 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA
8 999999 26.31 13.135939 0.789522
3.52
0.92 0.00
(Average)
QueueA
0
0 4.87769 9.572013 0.697158 1.67862 1.56786 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Assembly
8
1 26.3 13.311732 0.72951
1
0.72 72.95 (Average)
Assembly
0
0 4.43243 0.229793 0.124646
0 0.451261 12.46 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueS
8 999999 25.58 2.537776 0.147603
1.56
0.25 0.00
(Average)
QueueS
0
0 4.37435 2.812353 0.180566 0.640707 0.609272 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Soldering
8
3 27.46 34.445471 1.96996
3
2.18 65.67 (Average)
Soldering
0
0 4.70207 1.763748 0.349082
0 0.857292 11.64 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueP
8 999999 25.28 4.663645 0.275974
2.17
0.5 0.00
(Average)
QueueP
0
0 4.42235 4.312990 0.291102 1.00559 0.870388 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Painting
8
4 24.78 51.042634 2.63468
4
3.34 65.87 (Average)
Painting
0
0 3.98882 2.242909 0.43565
0 0.95579 10.89 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueI
8 999999 21.44 4.792255 0.229366
2.13
0.39 0.00
(Average)
QueueI
(Std. Dev.)
Inspection
Inspection
Dev.)
Scrap
Scrap
Store
Store
0 3.54287 4.241065 0.223092 0.883691 0.790026
8
0
1 21.05 8.867622 0.392612

0 3.40343 2.049844 0.120159
8 999999 0.15 0.000000

0
0 0.35887 0.000000
8 999999 17.34 0.000000
0
0 3.03588 0.000000
0.00
0.52 39.26 (Average)

0 0.502117 12.02 (Std.
0.15
0 0.00 (Average)
0 0.35887
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
0
1
0 0.00 (Average)
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)

%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially
%| %
Name
--------- --------- ------ --------- ----- | ---QueueA
8 59.85
40.15 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueA
0 19.19
19.19 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueS
8 87.86
12.14 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueS
0 11.73
11.73 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Soldering
8 8.81
54.28 36.91 | 0.00 (Average)
Soldering
0 5.92
13.73 16.88 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueP
8 80.62
19.38 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueP
0 15.81
15.81 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Painting
8 11.82
49.99 38.19 | 0.00 (Average)
Painting
0 3.16
17.47 18.71 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueI
8 83.96
16.04 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueI
0 11.21
11.21 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Scrap
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Scrap
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Store
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Store
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
---------- --------- --------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ---Arrive
8
0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Assembly
8
72.95 0.00 27.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Assembly
0
12.47 0.00 12.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Inspection
8
34.39 0.00 60.74 0.00 4.87 0.00 (Average)
Inspection
0
9.40 0.00 12.02 0.00 5.23 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----Part Arrive
0 (Average)
Part Arrive
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System
------ ------ --------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- --------Part 17.49
8.82 145.191634 0.000000 4.458791 122.900501 17.832342
(Average)
Part 3.0268 3.75346 19.738890 0.000000 5.261344 9.364318 10.927411 (Std.
Dev.)
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Part
0.00
2.83
85.56 11.61 (Average)
Part
0.00
3.11
8.06 5.73 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB7.mod
Date: Nov/16/2003 Time: 04:19:03 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Name
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
2000 999999 24001 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00
Ass1
2000
1 24001 0.701020
0.14021
1
1 14.02
Ins1
2000
1 26667 0.200305 0.0445129
1
0 4.45
Cor1
2000
1 2667 0.200410 0.00445412
1
0 0.45
Ass2
2000
1 24000 0.751316 0.150263
1
0 15.03
Ins2
2000
1 25249 0.199760 0.0420311
1
0 4.20
Cor2
2000
1 1249 0.150327 0.00156465
1
0 0.16
Ass3
2000
1 24000 0.799959 0.159992
1
0 16.00
Ins3
2000
1 24730 0.150268 0.0309677
1
0 3.10
Cor3
2000
1
730 0.099484 0.000605192
1
0 0.06
Stock
2000 999999 24000 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00
Store
2000
1
0 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
2000 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Stock
2000 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
-------- --------- --------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ---Ass1
2000
14.02 0.00 85.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ins1
2000
4.45 0.00 95.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cor1
Ass2
Ins2
Cor2
Ass3
Ins3
Cor3
Store
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
0.45 0.00 99.55 0.00 0.00 0.00

15.03 0.00 84.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.20 0.00 95.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.16 0.00 99.84 0.00 0.00 0.00
16.00 0.00 84.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.10 0.00 96.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.06 0.00 99.94 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----Part Arrive
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
------ ----- --------- -------- -------- --------- --------- -------Part 24000
1 2.873002 0.000000 0.000000 2.873002 0.000000
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Part
0.00
0.00
100.00 0.00
VARIABLES
Average
Variable
Total Minutes Minimum Maximum Current Average
Name
Changes Per Change Value Value Value Value
------------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------- ------Part Per Year 24000 4.999889
0 24000 24000 11999.9
LAB6.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Date: Nov/16/2003 Time: 06:32:40 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Period
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents %
Util
----------- --------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- -------- -------- -----Arrive1
8 999999
75 0.000000
0
5
0 0.00 (Average)
Arrive1
0
0
0 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA1
8 999999
150 280.695209
87.7173 120.76 95.09 0.01
(Average)
QueueA1
0
0
0 19.766918
6.17716 5.33924 2.80366 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Assembly1
8
1 54.91 8.763523 0.999917
1
1 99.99
(Average)
Assembly1
0
0 2.80366 0.449480 1.78531e-15
0
0 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
QueueS1
8 999999 53.91 175.958953
19.7685 40.29 40.17 0.00
(Average)
QueueS1
0
0 2.80366 8.378575
1.47165 2.99931 2.95438 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
S1
8
1 13.74 34.596103 0.984449
1
1 98.44 (Average)
S1
0
0 1.0695 2.669630 0.00264208
0
0 0.26 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueP1
8 999999 12.74 65.941946
1.7803
3.63
2.92 0.00
(Average)
QueueP1
0
0 1.0695 20.052607 0.640333 1.08855 1.22003 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
P1
8
1
9.82 44.593302 0.908627
1
1 90.86 (Average)
P1
0
0 0.657206 2.856355 0.0187881
0
0 1.88 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueI1
(Average)
QueueI1
Dev.)
Inspection1
Inspection1
Dev.)
Arrive2
Arrive2
8.82
0.065937 0.00121156
0.01
0 0.657206
0.000633 9.08164e-05
0.1
8
0
1
8.81 0.000000
0 0.662029 0.000000
8
0
999999
999999
0
75 0.000000
0 0.000000
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.00 (Average)
0.00 (Std.
0 0.00 (Average)
0.00 (Std. Dev.)

%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive1
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive1
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA1
8 0.00 100.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueA1
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueS1
8 3.05
96.95 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueS1
0 0.36
0.36 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueP1
8 21.80
78.20 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueP1
0 8.84
8.84 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueI1
8 99.88
0.12 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueI1
0 0.01
0.01 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Arrive2
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive2
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
----------- --------- --------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ---Assembly1
8
99.99 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Assembly1
0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S1
8
98.44 0.00 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S1
0
0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P1
8
90.86 0.00 9.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P1
0
1.88 0.00 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Inspection1
8
0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Inspection1
0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
0.00 (Std.
3
0
0.00

Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----Parte1 Arrive1
0 (Average)
Parte1 Arrive1
0 (Std. Dev.)
Parte2 Arrive2
0 (Average)
Parte2 Arrive2
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
Name
Exits In System
------ -------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- --------- ---------Parte1
5.17
69.83 217.225750 0.000000 0.000000 98.040432 119.185318
(Average)
Parte1 0.403395 0.403395 17.814737 0.000000 0.000000 5.365111 16.980916
(Std. Dev.)
Parte2
3.64
71.36 401.033407 0.000000 0.000000 82.412344 318.621063
(Average)
Parte2 0.703814 0.703814 17.842516 0.000000 0.000000 6.015702 19.267259
(Std. Dev.)
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Parte1 0.00
0.00
45.37 54.63 (Average)
Parte1 0.00
0.00
3.69 3.69 (Std. Dev.)
Parte2 0.00
0.00
20.60 79.40 (Average)
Parte2 0.00
0.00
1.88 1.88 (Std. Dev.)
VARIABLES
Average
Variable
Total Minutes Minimum Maximum Current Average
Name
Changes Per Change Value Value Value Value
---------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- -------- -------Total Job1
5.17 66.761178
0
5.17
5.17 2.81837 (Average)
Total Job1 0.403395 5.945749
0 0.403395 0.403395 0.171004 (Std. Dev.)
Total Job2
3.64 126.760062
Total Job2 0.703814 19.400069
3.64
3.64 0.587893 (Average)
0 0.703814 0.703814 0.159661 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.11.a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB11.a.MOD
Date: Nov/16/2003 Time: 01:55:08 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Period
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total
Seconds Average Maximum Current
Name
-------- --------- -------- ------- ----------- --------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
8 999999 477.6 0.000000
0
1.03
0 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0
0 22.5545 0.000000
0 0.171447
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
HandD
8 999999 241.15 1754.140135 15.1085 33.02 28.25 0.00
(Average)
HandD
0
0 17.3708 907.085855 8.6405 15.0628 16.9464 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
H
8 999999 142.54 358.636432 1.80611 7.49
1.82 0.00
(Average)
H
0
0 11.3835 122.357207 0.741175 2.34626 2.03197 0.00 (Std.
Dev.)
D
8 999999 93.91 49.608401 0.162746
2.95
0.2 0.00
(Average)
D
0
0 9.94946 7.671334 0.0353061 0.687184 0.471405 0.00 (Std.
Dev.)
Clerk1
8
1 353.62 80.019063 0.982164
1
0.99 98.22
(Average)
Clerk1
0
0 8.93837 1.611320 0.0176794
0
0.1 1.77 (Std.
Dev.)
Clerk2
8
1 305.86 69.912714 0.742485
1
0.64 74.25
(Average)
Clerk2
0
0 8.79051 0.299301 0.0216684
0 0.482418 2.17 (Std.
Dev.)

%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
HandD
8 6.43
93.57 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
HandD
0 5.50
5.50 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
H
8 29.69
70.31 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
H
0 7.44
7.44 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
D
8 86.02
13.98 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
D
0 2.47
2.47 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
8
85.87 0.00 1.78 0.00 12.34 0.00 (Average)
Clerk1
0
2.16 0.00 1.77 0.00 1.73 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Clerk2
8
74.25 0.00 25.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Clerk2
0
2.17 0.00 2.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name
Name
Failed
-------- -------- -----Customer Arrive
0 (Average)
Customer Arrive
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Current
Seconds Seconds Seconds Seconds Seconds
In In Move Wait For
In
Name
Exits In System
-------- ------- --------- ----------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------Customer 445.7
31.9 1059.947725 0.000000 830.552937 107.284489
122.110299 (Average)
Customer 9.70525 16.9911 428.010894 0.000000 424.199628

6.665223 (Std. Dev.)
1.847473

%
%
%
%
Name
-------- ------- --------- ------------ ------Customer 0.00
74.54
12.02 13.44 (Average)
Customer 0.00
10.47
5.27 5.22 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.12.a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB12.a.mod
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 01:41:22 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Name
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Queue
24 999999
260 0.601554 0.108614
1
0 10.64
Clerk1
24
1
103 10.022359 0.716877
1
1 71.69
Clerk2
24
1
87 9.902644 0.598285
1
1 59.83
Clerk3
24
1
70 10.277486 0.4996
1
1 49.96
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ----- --------- ---- | ---Queue
24 89.14
10.86 0.00 | 0.00

Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
24
71.69 0.00 28.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk2
24
59.83 0.00 40.17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk3
24
49.96 0.00 50.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----Worker Queue
33
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------Worker 257
3 10.711887 0.000000 0.000000 10.123545 0.588342
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00
0.00
94.51 5.49
LAB6.12.b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB12.b.MOD
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 02:05:14 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Name
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
24 999999
296 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00
Queue1
24 999999
132 7.889568 0.72321
3
1 7.29
Queue2
24 999999
101 5.756465 0.403752
3
0 4.04
Queue3
24 999999
63 4.445683 0.194499
2
0 0.00
Clerk1
24
1
131 10.226573 0.930334
1
1 93.03
Clerk2
24
1
101 9.891921 0.693808
1
0 69.38
Clerk3
24
1
63 10.133762 0.443352
1
1 44.34
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
24 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Queue1
24 38.03
61.97 0.00 | 0.00
Queue2
24 63.12
36.88 0.00 | 0.00
Queue3
24 81.65
18.35 0.00 | 0.00
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
24
93.03 0.00 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk2
24
69.38 0.00 30.62 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk3
24
44.34 0.00 55.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- ------
Worker Arrive
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------Worker 293
3 16.481328 0.000000 0.000000 11.286345 5.194983
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00
0.00
68.48 31.52
LAB6.12.c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB12.b.MOD
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 01:46:27 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Name
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
24 999999
282 0.000018 3.47222e-06
1
0 0.00
Queue1
24 999999
92 7.445859 0.475708
4
0 4.80
Queue2
24 999999
83 10.199675 0.587898
6
0 5.88
Queue3
24 999999
107 11.206224 0.832685
6
0 0.00
Clerk1
24
1
92 9.900793 0.632551
1
1 63.26
Clerk2
24
1
83 10.180747 0.586807
1
1 58.68
Clerk3
24
1
107 10.143028 0.753683
1
0 75.37

%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
24 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Queue1
24 66.70
33.30 0.00 | 0.00
Queue2
24 67.42
32.58 0.00 | 0.00
Queue3
24 53.79
46.21 0.00 | 0.00
Location Scheduled
%
%
%
%
% %
Name
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
24
63.26 0.00 36.74 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk2
24
58.68 0.00 41.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk3
24
75.37 0.00 24.63 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Name Name
Failed
------ -------- -----Worker Arrive
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
In In Move Wait For
In
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------Worker 280
2 19.794539 0.000000 0.000000 12.504414 7.290125
%
%
%
%
Name
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00

0.00
63.17 36.83

Ejercicios Promodel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ejercicios Promodel

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ejercicios Promodel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TAREA DE

EDUARDO MARROQUIN PRADO

Saltillo, Coah. Mxico

Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution

2. The servers at the above restaurant took the following time

Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution

3. The following is the number of incoming calls (each hour for 80

Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, there is only one discrete

4. Observations were taken on the times to serve online customers

Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution

3. At the Southern California Airlines traveler check-in facility,

Running the simulation model LAB6.3 shown in the appendix, we

Average Maximum Current

a) The average and maximum length of the three queues

5. United Electronics manufactures small custom electronic

The following table show the average length of the queues

The total number of jobs manufactured for a 8 hour shift is, on

The total of assemblies finished per shift are: 17.49.

7. Small appliances are assembled in four stage (Centers 1,2, and

9. Six dump trucks at the DumpOnMe facility in Riverside are used

Average Cycle Time/ Customer

The number shown, less waiting time, more customers

0 4.23077 0.264583 0.119889

4.7288 7.974494 0.549325 1.51154 1.34371

0 0.479372 11.99 (Std.

23.49 0.866597 0.0451497

0 4.21995 0.914846 0.0510483 0.394277 0.140705

5.58 34.519376 0.402229

21.7 2.343168 0.116409

0.69 71.62 (Average)

4.0936 2.326466 0.132562 0.659047 0.345096

0.82 72.74 (Average)

18.89 2.928281 0.121818

0 3.86618 2.835096 0.136124 0.77401 0.561024

1 18.67 7.556816 0.292458

0.4 29.25 (Average)

LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)

17.26 0.00 17.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)

0 3.54287 4.241065 0.223092 0.883691 0.790026

1 21.05 8.867622 0.392612

8 999999 0.15 0.000000

0.52 39.26 (Average)

LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)

0.45 0.00 99.55 0.00 0.00 0.00

LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)

Entity Location Total

LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)

Customer 9.70525 16.9911 428.010894 0.000000 424.199628

ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE

LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)

LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)

------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00

You might also like