Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (197)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = TAVR

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 661 KiB  
Article
Interrater Variability of ML-Based CT-FFR in Patients without Obstructive CAD before TAVR: Influence of Image Quality, Coronary Artery Calcifications, and Location of Measurement
by Robin F. Gohmann, Adrian Schug, Christian Krieghoff, Patrick Seitz, Nicolas Majunke, Maria Buske, Fyn Kaiser, Sebastian Schaudt, Katharina Renatus, Steffen Desch, Sergey Leontyev, Thilo Noack, Philipp Kiefer, Konrad Pawelka, Christian Lücke, Ahmed Abdelhafez, Sebastian Ebel, Michael A. Borger, Holger Thiele, Christoph Panknin, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Matthias Horn and Matthias Gutberletadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5247; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175247 (registering DOI) - 4 Sep 2024
Abstract
Objectives: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) can improve the specificity of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) for ruling out relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the reproducibility of CT-FFR and the influence of [...] Read more.
Objectives: CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) can improve the specificity of coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) for ruling out relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, little is known about the reproducibility of CT-FFR and the influence of diffuse coronary artery calcifications or segment location. The objective was to assess the reliability of machine-learning (ML)-based CT-FFR prior to TAVR in patients without obstructive CAD and to assess the influence of image quality, coronary artery calcium score (CAC), and the location of measurement within the coronary tree. Methods: Patients assessed for TAVR, without obstructive CAD on cCTA were evaluated with ML-based CT-FFR by two observers with differing experience. Differences in absolute values and categorization into hemodynamically relevant CAD (CT-FFR ≤ 0.80) were compared. Results in regard to CAD were also compared against invasive coronary angiography. The influence of segment location, image quality, and CAC was evaluated. Results: Of the screened patients, 109/388 patients did not have obstructive CAD on cCTA and were included. The median (interquartile range) difference of CT-FFR values was −0.005 (−0.09 to 0.04) (p = 0.47). Differences were smaller with high values. Recategorizations were more frequent in distal segments. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR between both observers was comparable (proximal: Δ0.2%; distal: Δ0.5%) but was lower in distal segments (proximal: 98.9%/99.1%; distal: 81.1%/81.6%). Image quality and CAC had no clinically relevant influence on CT-FFR. Conclusions: ML-based CT-FFR evaluation of proximal segments was more reliable. Distal segments with CT-FFR values close to the given threshold were prone to recategorization, even if absolute differences between observers were minimal and independent of image quality or CAC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing)
18 pages, 554 KiB  
Review
Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve (VIV) Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Sutureless Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses Perceval™: A Systematic Review of Published Cases
by Tamer Owais, Osama Bisht, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Mohammad El-Garhy, Sina Stock, Evaldas Girdauskas, Thomas Kuntze, Mohamed Amer and Philipp Lauten
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5164; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175164 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Background: Valve-in-Valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a potential solution for malfunctioning surgical aortic valve prostheses, though limited data exist for its use in Perceval valves. Methods: searches were performed on PubMed and Scopus up to 31 July 2023, [...] Read more.
Background: Valve-in-Valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a potential solution for malfunctioning surgical aortic valve prostheses, though limited data exist for its use in Perceval valves. Methods: searches were performed on PubMed and Scopus up to 31 July 2023, focusing on case reports and series addressing VIV replacement for degenerated Perceval bioprostheses. Results: Our analysis included 57 patients from 27 case reports and 6 case series. Most patients (68.4%) were women, with a mean age of 76 ± 4.4 years and a mean STS score of 6.1 ± 4.3%. Follow-up averaged 9.8 ± 8.9 months, the mean gradient reduction was 15 ± 5.9 mmHg at discharge and 13 ± 4.2 mmHg at follow-up. Complications occurred in 15.7% of patients, including atrioventricular block III in four patients (7%), major bleeding or vascular complications in two patients (3.5%), an annular rupture in two patients (3.5%), and mortality in two patients (3.5%). No coronary obstruction was reported. Balloon-expanding valves were used in 61.4% of patients, predominantly the Sapien model. In the self-expanding group (38.6%), no valve migration occurred, with a permanent pacemaker implantation rate of 9%, compared to 5.7% for balloon-expanding valves. Conclusions: VIV-TAVR using both balloon-expanding and self-expanding technologies is feasible after the implantation of Perceval valves; however, it should be performed by experienced operators with experience both in TAVR and VIV procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 819 KiB  
Article
Temporal Trends in Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of TAVR: Over a Decade of Practice
by Nour Karra, Amir Sharon, Eias Massalha, Paul Fefer, Elad Maor, Victor Guetta, Sagit Ben-Zekry, Rafael Kuperstein, Shlomi Matetzky, Roy Beigel, Amit Segev and Israel M. Barbash
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5027; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175027 - 25 Aug 2024
Viewed by 410
Abstract
Background/Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is indicated for severe aortic stenosis patients with a prohibitive surgical risk. However, its use has been expanding in recent years to include intermediate- and low-risk patients. Thus, registry data describing changes in patient characteristics and outcomes [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is indicated for severe aortic stenosis patients with a prohibitive surgical risk. However, its use has been expanding in recent years to include intermediate- and low-risk patients. Thus, registry data describing changes in patient characteristics and outcomes are needed. The aim of this study was to analyse the temporal changes in patient profiles and clinical outcomes of all-comer TAVR. Methods: Baseline characteristics and VARC-3 outcomes of 1632 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR between 2008 and 2021 were analysed. Results: The annual rate of TAVR increased from 30 procedures in 2008–2009 to 398 in 2020–2021. Over the follow-up period, patient age decreased from 85 ± 4 to 80 ± 6.8 (p < 0.001) and the STS score decreased from 5.9% to 2.8% (p < 0.001). Procedural characteristics significantly changed, representing a shift into a minimally invasive approach: adoption of local anaesthesia (none to 48%, p < 0.001) and preference of transfemoral access (74% in 2011–2012 vs. 94.5% in 2020–2021, p < 0.001). The rates of almost all procedural complications decreased, including major vascular and bleeding complications, acute kidney injury (AKI) and in-hospital heart failure. There was a striking decline in rates of complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) and the need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM). PPM rates, however, remain high (17.8%). Thirty-day and one-year mortality significantly declined to 1.8% and 8.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis shows that AKI, bleeding and stroke are strong predictors of one-year mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The TAVR procedure has changed dramatically during the last 14 years in terms of patient characteristics, procedural aspects and device maturity. These shifts have led to improved procedural safety, contributing to improved short- and long-term patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1962 KiB  
Article
Quantum-Fuzzy Expert Timeframe Predictor for Post-TAVR Monitoring
by Lilia Tightiz and Joon Yoo
Mathematics 2024, 12(17), 2625; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12172625 - 24 Aug 2024
Viewed by 334
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to predicting specific monitoring timeframes for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPMI) requirements following a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). The method combines Quantum Ant Colony Optimization (QACO) with the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and incorporates expert knowledge. [...] Read more.
This paper presents a novel approach to predicting specific monitoring timeframes for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPMI) requirements following a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). The method combines Quantum Ant Colony Optimization (QACO) with the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and incorporates expert knowledge. Although this forecast is more precise, it requires a larger number of predictors to achieve this level of accuracy. Our model deploys expert-derived insights to guarantee the clinical relevance and interpretability of the predicted outcomes. Additionally, we employ quantum computing techniques to address this complex and high-dimensional problem. Through extensive assessments, we show that our quantum-enhanced model outperforms traditional methods with notable improvement in evaluation metrics, such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Furthermore, with the integration of eXplainable AI (XAI) methods, our solution enhances the transparency and reliability of medical predictive models, hence promoting improved clinical practice decision-making. The findings highlight how quantum computing has the potential to completely transform predictive analytics in the medical field, especially when it comes to improving patient care after TAVR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Quantum Computing and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7356 KiB  
Review
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment
by Odysseas Katsaros, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Theofanis Korovesis, Georgios Benetos, Anastasios Apostolos, Leonidas Koliastasis, Marios Sagris, Nikias Milaras, George Latsios, Andreas Synetos, Maria Drakopoulou, Sotirios Tsalamandris, Antonios Karanasos, Konstantinos Tsioufis and Konstantinos Toutouzas
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 4970; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13174970 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 365
Abstract
The Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) is the most common congenital anomaly in adults, with a global incidence of 1.3%. Despite being well documented, BAV presents significant clinical challenges due to its phenotypic heterogeneity, diverse clinical manifestations, and variable outcomes. Pathophysiologically, BAV differs from [...] Read more.
The Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) is the most common congenital anomaly in adults, with a global incidence of 1.3%. Despite being well documented, BAV presents significant clinical challenges due to its phenotypic heterogeneity, diverse clinical manifestations, and variable outcomes. Pathophysiologically, BAV differs from tricuspid valves in calcification patterns and hemodynamic effects, leading to increased shear stress and aortic root dilatation, while it is influenced by genetic and hemodynamic factors. This is why therapeutically, BAV presents challenges for both surgical and transcatheter interventions, with surgical approaches being traditionally preferred, especially when aortopathy is present. However, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a viable option, with studies showing comparable outcomes to surgery in selected patients, while advancements in TAVI and a better understanding of BAV’s genetic and pathophysiological nuances are expanding treatment options. The choice between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves also presents considerations, particularly regarding long-term durability and the need for anticoagulation. Future research should focus on long-term registries and genetic studies to refine therapeutic strategies and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to evaluate current approaches in the surgical and interventional management of BAV, focusing on its anatomy, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 6635 KiB  
Review
Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures: Challenges and Future Directions
by Davide Cao, Stefano Albani, Emmanuel Gall, Thomas Hovasse, Thierry Unterseeh, Patrick Seknadji, Stéphane Champagne, Philippe Garot, Neila Sayah and Mariama Akodad
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4723; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164723 - 12 Aug 2024
Viewed by 550
Abstract
Aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed for the treatment of surgical bioprosthetic valve failure in patients at intermediate to high surgical risk. Although ViV procedures offer indisputable benefits in terms of procedural time, in-hospital length of stay, and avoidance of surgical complications, [...] Read more.
Aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed for the treatment of surgical bioprosthetic valve failure in patients at intermediate to high surgical risk. Although ViV procedures offer indisputable benefits in terms of procedural time, in-hospital length of stay, and avoidance of surgical complications, they also present unique challenges. Growing awareness of the technical difficulties and potential threats associated with ViV procedures mandates careful preprocedural planning. This review article offers an overview of the current state-of-the-art ViV procedures, with focus on patient and device selection, procedural planning, potential complications, and long-term outcomes. Finally, it discusses current research efforts and future directions aimed at improving ViV procedural success and patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 4245 KiB  
Article
Non-Invasive Ultrasound Therapy for Severe Aortic Stenosis: Early Effects on the Valve, Ventricle, and Cardiac Biomarkers (A Case Series)
by Danijela Trifunović-Zamaklar, Radmila Karan, Nataša Kovačević-Kostić, Duško Terzić, Vladimir Milićević, Olga Petrović, Ivana Canić, Mathieu Pernot, Mickael Tanter, Louise Z. Wang, Guillaume Goudot, Miloš Velinović and Emmanuel Messas
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4607; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164607 - 7 Aug 2024
Viewed by 685
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was developed for inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, despite TAVR advancements, some patients remain untreated due to complex comorbidities, necessitating less-invasive approaches. Non-invasive ultrasound therapy (NIUT), a new treatment modality, has the potential to [...] Read more.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was developed for inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, despite TAVR advancements, some patients remain untreated due to complex comorbidities, necessitating less-invasive approaches. Non-invasive ultrasound therapy (NIUT), a new treatment modality, has the potential to address this treatment gap, delivering short ultrasound pulses that create cavitation bubble clouds, aimed at softening embedded calcification in stiffened valve tissue. Methods: In the prospective Valvosoft® Serbian first-in-human study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of NIUT and its impact on aortic valve hemodynamics, on the left ventricle, and on systemic inflammation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis not eligible for TAVR or surgery. Results: Ten patients were included. Significant improvements were observed in hemodynamic parameters from baseline to one month, including a 39% increase in the aortic valve area (from 0.5 cm2 to 0.7 cm2, p = 0.001) and a 23% decrease in the mean transvalvular gradient (from 54 mmHg to 38 mmHg, p = 0.01). Additionally, left ventricular global longitudinal strain significantly rose, while global wasted work significantly declined at one month. A dose–response relationship was observed between treatment parameters (peak acoustic power, intensity spatial-peak pulse-average, and mean acoustic energy) and hemodynamic outcomes. NIUT was safely applied, with no clinically relevant changes in high-sensitivity troponin T or C-reactive protein and with a numerical, but not statistically significant, reduction in brain natriuretic peptide (from 471 pg/mL at baseline to 251 pg/mL at one month). Conclusions: This first-in-human study demonstrates that NIUT is safe and confers statistically significant hemodynamic benefits both on the valve and ventricle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heart Valve Disease: Recent Advances in Therapeutic Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 741 KiB  
Article
Failure of Surgical Aortic Valve Prostheses: An Analysis of Heart Team Decisions and Postoperative Outcomes
by Philipp Schnackenburg, Shekhar Saha, Ahmad Ali, Konstanze Maria Horke, Joscha Buech, Christoph S. Mueller, Sebastian Sadoni, Martin Orban, Rainer Kaiser, Philipp Maximilian Doldi, Konstantinos Rizas, Steffen Massberg, Christian Hagl and Dominik Joskowiak
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4461; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154461 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 605
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze Heart Team decisions and outcomes following failure of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) prostheses. Methods: Patients undergoing re-operations following index SAVR (Redo-SAVR) and those undergoing valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) following SAVR were included in this study. Patients who [...] Read more.
Objectives: To analyze Heart Team decisions and outcomes following failure of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) prostheses. Methods: Patients undergoing re-operations following index SAVR (Redo-SAVR) and those undergoing valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) following SAVR were included in this study. Patients who underwent index SAVR and/or Redo-SAVR for endocarditis were excluded. Data are presented as medians and 25th–75th percentiles, or absolute numbers and percentages. Outcomes were analyzed in accordance to the VARC-3 criteria. Results: Between 01/2015 and 03/2021, 53 patients underwent Redo-SAVR, 103 patients ViV-TAVR. Mean EuroSCORE II was 5.7% (3.5–8.5) in the Redo-SAVR group and 9.2% (5.4–13.6) in the ViV group. In the Redo-SAVR group, 12 patients received aortic root enlargement (22.6%). Length of hospital and ICU stay was longer in the Redo-SAVR group (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), PGmax and PGmean were lower in the Redo-SAVR group as compared to the ViV-TAVR group (18 mmHg (10–30) vs. 26 mmHg (19–38), p < 0.001) (9 mmHg (6–15) vs. 15 mmHg (9–21), p < 0.001). A higher rate of paravalvular leakage was seen in the ViV-TAVR group (p = 0.013). VARC-3 Early Safety were comparable between the two populations (p = 0.343). Survival at 1 year and 5 years was 82% and 36% in the ViV-TAVR cohort and 84% and 77% in the Redo-SAVR cohort. The variables were patient age (OR 1.061; [95% CI 1.020–1.104], p = 0.004), coronary heart disease (OR 2.648; [95% CI 1.160–6.048], p = 0.021), and chronic renal insufficiency (OR 2.711; [95% CI 1.160–6.048], p = 0.021) showed a significant correlation to ViV-TAVR. Conclusions: Heart Team decisions are crucial in the treatment of patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses and lead to a low mortality in both treatment paths thanks to patient-specific therapy planning. ViV-TAVR offers a treatment for elderly or intermediate-risk profile patients with comparable short-term mortality. However, this therapy is associated with increased pressure gradients and a high prevalence of paravalvular leakage. Redo-SAVR enables the surgical treatment of concomitant cardiac pathologies and allows anticipation for later VIV-TAVR by implanting the largest possible valve prostheses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heart Valve Disease: Recent Advances in Therapeutic Approaches)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 3251 KiB  
Article
Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 2 in Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Gender-Based Perspective
by Elke Boxhammer, Vera Paar, Kristen Kopp, Sarah X. Gharibeh, Evelyn Bovenkamp-Aberger, Richard Rezar, Michael Lichtenauer, Uta C. Hoppe and Moritz Mirna
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158220 - 27 Jul 2024
Viewed by 650
Abstract
Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are life-threatening cardiovascular conditions, necessitating early detection and intervention. Recent studies have explored the role of Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 2 (IGF-BP2) in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Understanding its involvement may offer novel insights into disease [...] Read more.
Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are life-threatening cardiovascular conditions, necessitating early detection and intervention. Recent studies have explored the role of Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 2 (IGF-BP2) in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Understanding its involvement may offer novel insights into disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets for these conditions. A total of 102 patients (46 female, 56 male) with severe AS undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a single-center study were classified using echocardiography tests to determine systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) and the presence (sPAP ≥ 40 mmHg) or absence (sPAP < 40 mmHg) of PH. Additionally, serial laboratory determinations of IGF-BP2 before, and at 24 h, 96 h, and 3 months after intervention were conducted in all study participants. Considering the entire cohort, patients with PH had significant and continuously higher serum IGF-BP2 concentrations over time than patients without PH. After subdivision by sex, it could be demonstrated that the above-mentioned results were only verifiable in males, but not in females. In the male patients, baseline IGF-BP2 levels before the TAVR was an isolated risk factor for premature death after intervention and at 1, 3, and 5 years post-intervention. The same was valid for the combination of male and echocardiographically established PH patients. The predictive role of IGF-BP2 in severe AS and concurrent PH remains unknown. A more profound comprehension of IGF-BP2 mechanisms, particularly in males, could facilitate the earlier consideration of the TAVR as a more effective and successful treatment strategy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 928 KiB  
Article
Von Willebrand Factor Dynamics in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Surgical and Transcatheter Valve Replacement
by Andrei Emanuel Grigorescu, Andrei Anghel, Claudia Koch, Florin George Horhat, Delia Savescu and Horea Feier
Life 2024, 14(8), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14080934 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 390
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a prevalent valvular disorder that poses a significant burden on healthcare systems due to its debilitating symptoms and high mortality rates if left untreated. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are the primary interventions [...] Read more.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a prevalent valvular disorder that poses a significant burden on healthcare systems due to its debilitating symptoms and high mortality rates if left untreated. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are the primary interventions for severe AS, but perioperative complications such as bleeding remain a concern. Von Willebrand factor (VWF), a crucial player in hemostasis, is known to be altered in AS and may contribute to the hemostatic imbalance observed in these patients. This prospective study aimed to investigate the association between prosthetic valve type, size, and postprocedural VWF levels in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AS. This study involved 39 consecutive patients diagnosed with severe AS who underwent SAVR or TAVR. By elucidating the VWF dynamics associated with different prosthetic valves, this study sought to provide valuable insights into personalized valve selection and perioperative management strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crosstalk between Cardiovascular Disease and Its Comorbidities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1067 KiB  
Article
Impaired Gastrointestinal Motility and Worsening Heart Failure in Patients Receiving Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement
by Teruhiko Imamura, Nikhil Narang, Ryuichi Ushijima, Mitsuo Sobajima, Nobuyuki Fukuda, Hiroshi Ueno and Koichiro Kinugawa
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4301; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154301 - 23 Jul 2024
Viewed by 496
Abstract
Background: Impaired gastric motility in the form of constipation may often occur in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Candidates for trans-catheter aortic replacement (TAVR) are of old age and have multiple comorbidities, probably including constipation. However, the clinical implication of a history [...] Read more.
Background: Impaired gastric motility in the form of constipation may often occur in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Candidates for trans-catheter aortic replacement (TAVR) are of old age and have multiple comorbidities, probably including constipation. However, the clinical implication of a history of constipation in patients receiving TAVR remains unknown. Methods: Patients who underwent TAVR at our large academic center between 2015 and 2022 were eligible. The prognostic impact of the prescribed laxative type and number, which was assumed as the severity of constipation, on the incidence of death or heart failure readmission two years after index discharge was investigated. Results: A total of 344 patients were included. Median age was 85 years, and 99 patients were men. Patients with any laxatives (N = 166) had higher systolic blood pressure, higher plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and a lower prescription rate of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors at the time of index discharge after TAVR (p < 0.05 for all). The number of laxative types was independently associated with the composite primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% confidence interval 1.27–2.63, p = 0.001) with a cutoff of one type of laxative used, which significantly stratified the 2-year cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (18% versus 7%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The presence of constipation was associated with worse clinical outcomes following TAVR. The prognostic impact of an aggressive intervention for constipation remains a future concern in this cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1578 KiB  
Review
A Comprehensive Geriatric Workup and Frailty Assessment in Older Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis
by Enrico Brunetti, Fabiana Lucà, Roberto Presta, Niccolò Marchionni, Alessandro Boccanelli, Andrea Ungar, Carmelo Massimiliano Rao, Nadia Ingianni, Maddalena Lettino, Donatella Del Sindaco, Adriano Murrone, Carmine Riccio, Furio Colivicchi, Massimo Grimaldi, Michele Massimo Gulizia, Fabrizio Oliva, Mario Bo and Iris Parrini
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4169; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144169 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 678
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) represents a notable paradigm for cardiovascular (CV) and geriatric disorders owing to comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was initially considered a therapeutic strategy in elderly individuals deemed unsuitable for or at high risk of surgical valve replacement. The progressive [...] Read more.
Aortic stenosis (AS) represents a notable paradigm for cardiovascular (CV) and geriatric disorders owing to comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was initially considered a therapeutic strategy in elderly individuals deemed unsuitable for or at high risk of surgical valve replacement. The progressive improvement in TAVR technology has led to the need to refine older patients’ stratification, progressively incorporating the concept of frailty and other geriatric vulnerabilities. Recognizing the intricate nature of the aging process, reliance exclusively on chronological age for stratification resulted in an initial but inadequate tool to assess both CV and non-CV risks effectively. A comprehensive geriatric evaluation should be performed before TAVR procedures, taking into account both physical and cognitive capabilities and post-procedural outcomes through a multidisciplinary framework. This review adopts a multidisciplinary perspective to delve into the diagnosis and holistic management of AS in elderly populations in order to facilitate decision-making, thereby optimizing outcomes centered around patient well-being. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 2185 KiB  
Review
Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research—A Narrative Review
by Paweł Gać, Arkadiusz Jaworski, Filip Grajnert, Katarzyna Kicman, Agnieszka Trejtowicz-Sutor, Konrad Witkowski, Małgorzata Poręba and Rafał Poręba
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4064; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144064 - 11 Jul 2024
Viewed by 964
Abstract
In this narrative review, we investigate the essential role played by the computed tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Score (AVCS) in the cardiovascular diagnostic landscape, with a special focus on its implications for clinical practice and scientific research. Calcific aortic valve stenosis is the [...] Read more.
In this narrative review, we investigate the essential role played by the computed tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Score (AVCS) in the cardiovascular diagnostic landscape, with a special focus on its implications for clinical practice and scientific research. Calcific aortic valve stenosis is the most prevalent type of aortic stenosis (AS) in industrialized countries, and due to the aging population, its prevalence is increasing. While transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the gold standard, AVCS stands out as an essential complementary tool in evaluating patients with AS. The advantage of AVCS is its independence from flow; this allows for a more precise evaluation of patients with discordant findings in TTE. Further clinical applications of AVCS include in the assessment of patients before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), as it helps in predicting outcomes and provides prognostic information post-TAVR. Additionally, we describe different AVCS thresholds regarding gender and the anatomical variations of the aortic valve. Finally, we discuss various scientific studies where AVCS was applied. As AVCS has some limitations, due to the pathophysiologies of AS extending beyond calcification and gender differences, scientists strive to validate contrast-enhanced AVCS. Furthermore, research on developing radiation-free methods of measuring calcium content is ongoing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1842 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
by Jakob Johannes Reichl, Thorald Stolte, Shihui Tang, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Max Wagener, Gregor Leibundgut, Christoph Ado Kaiser and Thomas Nestelberger
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3639; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133639 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 842
Abstract
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an efficient and safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While severe aortic stenosis as well as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) are known to negatively impact left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prior studies [...] Read more.
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an efficient and safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While severe aortic stenosis as well as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) are known to negatively impact left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prior studies have shown that TAVR can lead to an improvement in LVEF. Thus far, little is known about the prognostic implication of LVEF improvement as a sole predictor of outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of LVEF impairment before TAVR, as well as early LVEF improvement in patients undergoing TAVR. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR in a large tertiary university hospital were consecutively included in a prospective registry. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, after 1 month and annually thereafter. Significant LVEF improvement was defined as a relative increase of ≥10% in LVEF at 30 days compared to baseline LVEF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and unplanned re-interventions of the aortic valve at 5 years. Results: Among 1655 patients who underwent TAVR between September 2011 and April 2024, the LVEF at baseline was available for 1556 patients. Of these, 1031 patients (66.2%) had preserved LVEF at baseline (LVEF ≥ 53%), whereas 303 patients (19.5%) had moderately reduced LVEF (40–52%) and 222 patients (14.3%) had severely reduced LVEF (<40%). Out of the patients with impaired LVEF, 155 (40.4%) patients showed a significant improvement in LVEF ≥10% after 30 days, while 229 (60.6%) patients showed no significant LVEF improvement (<10%). Patients with preserved LVEF at baseline had significantly better mortality outcomes than those with severely reduced LVEF (p < 0.001). LVEF improvement was associated with a survival benefit after 1 year (p = 0.009, HR 2.68, 0.95 CI 1.23–5.85) which diminished after 5 years (p = 0.058), but patients with LVEF improvement showed lower MACE rates at 5 years (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Preserved LVEF before TAVR is an independent predictor for improved outcomes. Additionally, early improvement in LVEF is associated with beneficial outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancement in Aortic Valve Stenosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 524 KiB  
Review
Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
by Francesco Pallante, Francesco Costa, Victoria Garcia Ruiz, Giampiero Vizzari, Pietro Iannello, Lucio Teresi, Gabriele Carciotto, Stefania Lo Giudice, Giustina Iuvara, Giulia Laterra, Ander Regueiro, Gennaro Giustino, Juan Horacio Alonso Briales, Jose Maria Hernandez, Marco Barbanti, Antonio Micari and Francesco Patanè
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3636; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133636 - 21 Jun 2024
Viewed by 620
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) now represents the mainstay of treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Owing to its exceptional procedural efficacy and safety, TAVI has been extended to include patients at lower surgical risk, thus now encompassing a diverse patient population receiving this [...] Read more.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) now represents the mainstay of treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Owing to its exceptional procedural efficacy and safety, TAVI has been extended to include patients at lower surgical risk, thus now encompassing a diverse patient population receiving this treatment. Yet, long-term outcomes also depend on optimal medical therapy for secondary vascular prevention, with antithrombotic therapy serving as the cornerstone. Leveraging data from multiple randomized controlled trials, the current guidelines generally recommend single antithrombotic therapy, with either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone in those patients without or with atrial fibrillation, respectively. Yet, individualization of this pattern, as well as specific case uses, may be needed based on individual patient characteristics and concurrent procedures. This review aims to discuss the evidence supporting antithrombotic treatments in patients treated with TAVI, indications for a standardized treatment, as well as specific considerations for an individualized approach to treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Good Clinical Practice in Aortic Valve Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop