Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = MLALR

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2950 KiB  
Article
Middle-Level Attribute-Based Language Retouching for Image Caption Generation
by Zhibin Guan, Kang Liu, Yan Ma, Xu Qian and Tongkai Ji
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(10), 1850; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8101850 - 9 Oct 2018
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2983
Abstract
Image caption generation is attractive research which focuses on generating natural language sentences to describe the visual content of a given image. It is an interdisciplinary subject combining computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP). The existing image captioning methods are mainly [...] Read more.
Image caption generation is attractive research which focuses on generating natural language sentences to describe the visual content of a given image. It is an interdisciplinary subject combining computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP). The existing image captioning methods are mainly focused on generating the final image caption directly, which may lose significant identification information of objects contained in the raw image. Therefore, we propose a new middle-level attribute-based language retouching (MLALR) method to solve this problem. Our proposed MLALR method uses the middle-level attributes predicted from the object regions to retouch the intermediate image description, which is generated by our language generation model. The advantage of our MLALR method is that it can correct descriptive errors in the intermediate image description and make the final image caption more accurate. Moreover, evaluation using benchmark datasets—MSCOCO, Flickr8K, and Flickr30K—validated the impressive performance of our MLALR method with evaluation metrics—BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE-L, CIDEr, and SPICE. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop