Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Histidine Kinase and the Development of Its Inhibitors in the 21st Century
Previous Article in Journal
Modification and Synergistic Studies of a Novel Frog Antimicrobial Peptide against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antibacterial Activities of Phenolic Compounds in Miang Extract: Growth Inhibition and Change in Protein Expression of Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Evidence on Expansion of Essential Oil-Based Formulation’s Pharmacological Activity in Bovine Mastitis Treatment: Antifungal Potential as Added Value

1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11221 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Investigations and Quality Control, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
4
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
5
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
6
Scientific Veterinary Institute Novi Sad, Rumenački put 20, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 April 2024 / Revised: 4 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 22 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Activity of Secondary Metabolites Produced in Nature)

Abstract

:
Bovine mastitis, as a significant and prevalent health problem in dairy herds, is primarily attributed to bacterial infections. Yeasts, although considered relatively rare causative agents, have also been associated with mastitis in dairy cattle. Current mastitis treatment predominantly relies on antibiotics, with limited emphasis on antifungal treatment. However, mycotic mastitis is challenging to treat, since these fungi are often resistant to antibiotics and may even utilize them for energy. In the current research, the in vivo antimicrobial activity of the essential oil-based formulation (Phyto-Bomat), as a possible alternative mastitis treatment associated with yeasts, was studied. This study involved a total of 68 animals from two dairy farms with diagnosed mastitis, and three treatment groups were established: conventional antibiotic treatment, Phyto-Bomat treatment, and the combination of both. The findings suggest significant variations in the presence of Candida samples based on the treatment administered, and the most significant difference was noted in cows treated with the combination (Phyto-Bomat and antibiotics). Yet, it is important to note that the results reveal that, regardless of the treatment type, there are statistically significant differences in the presence of Candida samples across the examined time points. These results aim to provide valuable insights into the potential of EOs as an alternative therapy in bovine mastitis, specifically targeting yeasts. Such findings could offer new strategies in the mycotic mastitis control and reducing the occurrence of secondary infections following antibiotic treatment.

1. Introduction

Inflammation of the mammary gland is the most important health problem in bovine dairy herds [1]. Bovine mastitis is a multifactorial disease, regarded as the most prevalent and economically significant infectious condition affecting dairy cattle globally [2]. It is estimated to result in annual losses of approximately USD 35 billion in the dairy industry [3]. The etiology of bovine mastitis involves a wide range of microorganisms, mainly comprised of bacteria, viruses, mycoplasma, algae, and yeasts [2,4,5]. Bacteria are typically recognized as the primary pathogens in most cases of mastitis, with yeasts generally considered as secondary mastitis-causing agents. Despite their limited pathogenicity, yeasts can cause various infections in both humans and domestic animals [6].
Yeasts are considered as one of the bovine mastitis causative agents with increasing incidence observed lately [6,7,8,9]. Different fungal species have been associated with mastitis in dairy cattle, such as the yeasts Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Trichosporon spp.; the molds Aspergillus fumigatus, Cephalosporium spp., and Mucor spp.; and dimorphic fungi like Coccidioides spp. and Histoplasma spp. [7,10]. Moreover, fungal infections of the mammary gland are predominantly caused by yeasts of the Candida genus [1,9], with the most reported species being Candida albicans, Candida krusei, Candida rugosa, and Candida guilliermondii [7].
Mycotic mammary infections can be sporadic or outbreak-related, with severity determined by yeast quantity and species [11]. Compromised immune system of the host, imbalance of bacterial microflora, and particularly uncontrolled and excessive use of antibiotics may predispose glands to yeast infections [6,10]. Moreover, high doses of antibiotics can promote the growth of yeast, particularly Candida spp., as they can use penicillin and tetracycline as a source of nitrates [12]. The presence of yeasts in the mammary gland typically results in a subclinical form of the infection, which is mainly characterized by an increased somatic cell count [11]. Furthermore, clinical form is manifested by udder swelling, pain, and dramatically reduced milk production [1]. Rarely, they have the potential to lead to fatal consequences [6], while in recent years, higher morbidity rates caused by mycotic mastitis in cattle have been reported [13].
Routine mastitis treatment involves predominantly antibiotics, while much emphasis is not given on the antifungal therapy [8]. Additionally, mycotic mastitis treatment is challenging because these fungi often resist antibiotics and even utilize them for energy [12]. Moreover, despite promising in vitro activity, antifungal agents commonly used in clinical settings, such as Amphotericin B, Nystatin, Itraconazole, Clotrimazole, Fluconazole, or Voriconazole, can be toxic to mammary tissue, potentially causing harm in mycotic mastitis treatment [12,14]. Hence, most of the mastitis cases not only become incurable but also act as a source of infection for other lactating animals in the herd [8]. In light of the aforementioned concerns, it is necessary to develop alternative methods to control mycotic mastitis therapy [12].
Essential oils (EO) could be an interesting natural alternative to prevent teat infections and to limit antibiotic use in mastitis treatment [15]. In addition, EOs are generally considered safe, and unlike antibiotics, bacteria do not appear to develop resistance to them, even during prolonged use [16,17]. As current treatment options become increasingly ineffective against resistant bacteria, the development of alternative phytotherapy products can combat antimicrobial resistance and provide sustainable animal health solutions that ensure safe and high-quality food production [18]. Natural products are an excellent solution as they are environmentally friendly and safe and are therefore highly valued in both organic and conventional farming [3,19]. Some EOs have biologically active compounds, such as thymol and carvacrol, that are responsible for their antimicrobial properties [20]. Hence, alternative EO treatment has been assessed in vitro on the major bacterial [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] and fungal mastitis pathogens [12,16,29]. Moreover, including Candida in studies investigating natural products for the treatment of bovine mastitis is important to assess their potential efficacy against this fungal pathogen and broaden understanding of therapeutic alternatives for managing mastitis cases caused by diverse microbial agents [30].
To the best of our knowledge, in vivo evaluation of the antifungal potential of EO-based formulations in bovine mastitis treatment has not been conducted yet. Therefore, the current research will focus on in vivo testing of EO-based formulations for possible use as an alternative treatment during lactation against mastitis-associated yeasts, giving clinical evidence on the expansion of pharmacological activity of this pharmaceutical formulation. Additionally, the prevalence of yeast present in the milk samples obtained from cows diagnosed with the subclinical or clinical form of mastitis will be assessed.

2. Results

2.1. Prevalence of Mastitis-Associated Pathogens and In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Phyto-Bomat EOs

Microbiological examination of 68 milk samples from cows diagnosed with the clinical and subclinical form of mastitis revealed the presence of microorganisms in 44 samples (64.70%): monoinfection with bacteria in 28 samples (41.17%), dual infection with bacteria and yeasts in 8 samples (11.76%), and monoinfection with yeasts in 8 (11.76%) samples. Twenty-four (35.30%) samples were negative for the presence of microorganisms, while in ten samples, more than one pathogen was isolated. These results are presented in Figure 1.
The most frequently isolated bacterial species belonged to the Enterobacterales family (E. coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella spp., and Serratia marcescens), with 66.67% of the isolates, followed by Streptococcus spp. (27.78%) (S. dysgalactiae, S. uberis) and Staphylococcus spp. (5.56%) (S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial strains isolated from cows with mastitis is presented in Supplementary Materials Table S1. The antibacterial activity of Phyto-Bomat components was in the range of 1.56–6.25 mg/mL (Table 1). The MIC of Phyto-Bomat was in the range of 22.72–90.80 mg/mL and the MBC was from 45.40 to 181.60 mg/mL.
Candida spp. was isolated from all yeast-positive samples, with a low frequency of C. albicans (31.25%) compared to non-albicans species, which accounted for 68.75% of isolates: C. glabrata (37.50%), C. parapsilosis (18.75%), and C. krusei (12.50%). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of yeast strains isolated from cows with mastitis and two laboratory control strains of yeast are presented in Supplementary Materials Table S2. The antibacterial activity of Phyto-Bomat individual EOs was in the range of 0.78–6.25 mg/mL (Thymus vulgaris L.), 0.39–6.25 mg/mL (Thymus serpyllum L.), 0.39–6.25 mg/mL (Origanum vulgare L.), and 0.78–12.5 mg/mL (Satureja montana L.) (Table 1). The MIC of Phyto-Bomat was in the range of 45.40–90.80 mg/mL and the MBC was from 90.80 to 181.60 mg/mL.
Although the Phyto-Bomat formulation is based exclusively on the combination of different essential oils, a type of pharmacological interaction between the antibiotic cephalexin and EOs was investigated in preclinical in vitro studies. The MICs of the individual Phyto-Bomat EOs were two to eight times higher than their MICs in combination with cephalexin. The FICI indices were in the range of 0.288–2.455. A synergistic effect (FICI ≤ 0.5) was observed in 18.6% of strains, mainly Streptococcus spp., and an additive effect (0.5 < FICI ≤ 1) was observed in 42.7% of strains. Indifferent interactions (1 < FICI ≤ 4) were observed in 38.7% of strains from the Enterobacterales family. None of the interactions were in the range of antagonism (FICI > 4). The synergism of EOs with antifungals has not been studied in vitro because most of the antifungals used in the treatment of mycotic mastitis, such as Amphotericin B, Nystatin, Itraconazole, Clotrimazole, Fluconazole, or Voriconazole, have a toxic effect on mammary tissue [12,14].

2.2. The Treatment Efficacy Regarding Isolate Status and Type of the Applied Treatments

In order to understand the impact of different treatments on the occurrence of negative, bacteria, and Candida samples, the obtained results have demonstrated that, irrespective of the evaluated time point, there are statistically significant differences based on the type of treatment applied. This is confirmed by the Chi-square test results, which show a significant association (Chi-square = 31.03, df = 4, p = 0.00; Figure 2). The highest number of negative isolates was observed with the combination treatment, followed closely by Phyto-Bomat treatment. The combination of Phyto-Bomat and cephalexin resulted in a moderate reduction in bacterial isolates, suggesting a synergistic effect. Phyto-Bomat and cephalexin alone also reduced bacterial counts, with cephalexin showing a slightly greater effect than Phyto-Bomat.

2.3. The Treatment Efficacy Regarding Isolate Status and Observed Time Point

In order to evaluate the impact of different time points on the occurrence of negative, bacteria, and Candida samples, the obtained results have demonstrated that, regardless of the type of applied treatment, there are statistically significant differences related to the evaluated time point. This is supported by the Chi-square test results, indicating a significant association (Chi-square = 11.51, df = 4, p = 0.02; Figure 3). Moreover, when focusing on the presence of Candida, a significant reduction has been observed in the group of cows treated solely with Phyto-Bomat after the treatment was applied, as illustrated in Figure 3.

3. Discussion

While mycotic mastitis is generally considered less common in dairy herds [1], some studies indicate a rising trend in the occurrence of this type of mastitis [31,32]. Conditions that elevate the risk of mycotic mastitis include the extended and unselective use of antibiotics and steroids in intramammary mastitis treatment. Additionally, fungal proliferation during antibiotic therapy is promoted by the elimination of antagonistic bacterial flora, reduced vitamin A levels in the glandular tissue, epithelial changes, and the irritating effects of antibiotics [32]. Furthermore, clinicians often overlook mycotic mastitis during the initial treatment, and administering antibiotics can worsen fungal mastitis, especially because certain antibiotics, such as penicillin and tetracycline, can serve as a nitrogen source for various fungal species [33]. To date, there have been no in vivo studies targeting mastitis caused by fungi. Hence, the development of a novel EO-based pharmaceutical formulation could help fill this research gap in mycotic mastitis treatment.
The results in the current study indicated that yeast infections make up an important portion of all udder infections in cows (11.76%). These findings align with scientific data showing that the prevalence of bovine mycotic mastitis varies between 2% and 13% [34,35]. While information regarding the prevalence of yeast on Serbian dairy farms is scarce, the current study’s results are relatively comparable with those obtained by Milanov et al. [6], where yeasts were isolated in 20 milk samples (6.02%). Furthermore, it has been reported that yeasts were more frequently isolated at the end of winter and in spring [35] and more frequently in small herds [33]. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that, as highlighted by Zhou et al. [9], the presence of extensive production systems, environmental temperatures ranging 15–35 °C, and the duration of the disease represent significant risk factors contributing to the prevalence of mycotic mastitis. In addition, prior studies have identified several yeast species as potential causes of bovine mastitis, including Candida, Aspergillus, Rhodotorula, Trichosporon, Saccharomyces, and Cryptococcus [9,34,35]. On the other hand, the current study identified only Candida spp., confirming the prevailing understanding that Candida is the primary causative agent of yeast mastitis in dairy cows [7,9,34].
The increasing challenge of fungal disease treatment, including drug shortages, high treatment expenses, adverse side effects of the antifungal drugs, and the development of drug resistance or reduced drug efficacy against fungi, have increased focus among researchers of traditional medicinal approaches [12,36,37]. Moreover, addressing fungal infections in animals is more complex than tackling bacterial infections, as both animal and fungal cells share the characteristic of being eukaryotic [38,39]. Additionally, if the antifungal treatment targets a shared eukaryotic cell structure, it could potentially result in toxicity to animal cells, jeopardizing the safety of the host [38]. Furthermore, there are rising public concerns regarding the increased health and environmental risks linked to synthetic compounds. Consequently, there is a notable focus on exploring alternative, safe, and naturally derived approaches to develop new antifungal agents [39].
Taking into consideration the previously mentioned limitations of mycotic bovine mastitis therapy, EOs can represent one of the most promising natural products for fungal inhibition. Many EOs have demonstrated antifungal properties against a wide range of fungal species [40,41,42,43,44], as well as against mastitis-associated pathogens [12,15,16,45,46,47]. The EOs tested in our study showed notable antifungal potential in vitro (Table 1). Considerable antifungal properties of different EOs were reported by several authors [15,40,41,48,49,50]. On the contrary, Abd El Tawab et al. [51], who investigated the antifungal activity of seven EOs, reported resistance of C. albicans isolates to all of tested EOs. Interestingly, in the study conducted by Rocha et al. [52] C. albicans was resistant to oregano EO, leading to atypical colony sizes, possibly interfering with its pathogenicity. Despite the unchanged total cell count, there was a notable decrease in whole-cell concentration and growth of non-intact cells, possibly influenced by the oil’s compounds. However, it must be highlighted that the variability in antifungal potential could be related to seasonal and geographic factors [15]. When discussing the effectiveness of EOs, it is important to consider their biological source (plant species) and the composition of the oil [53]. Compounds present in the intramammary EO-based pharmaceutical formulation (Phyto-Bomat) used in the current study are well documented for antimicrobial potential against mastitis-associated pathogens [54,55,56,57]. Selected EOs have been previously tested in vitro (chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant potential) [25,26]. Moreover, the significant antioxidative and antibacterial properties were utilized in the creation of a pharmaceutical formulation, offering an alternative to traditional mastitis treatment. Considering the well-documented fungicidal properties of common thyme, wild thyme, oregano, and mountain savory in the scientific literature, and recognizing the limited treatment options available for fungal mastitis, it becomes imperative to explore the in vivo anti-Candida effects of EOs. Therefore, the potential therapeutic application of the pharmaceutical formulation containing EOs for the therapy of mycotic bovine mastitis in lactating cows was chosen to be studied in the current research. Furthermore, in vitro [58], as well as in vivo [59], antimicrobial activity of the proposed EO-based formulation (Phyto-Bomat) against mastitis-associated bacteria has been proven.
Although many studies have assessed the effectiveness of EOs in treating bovine mastitis in laboratory conditions, only a few have focused on their in vivo efficacy. A major challenge in clinical trials of herbal medicines is determining if different products, extracts, or even batches of the same extract are comparable and equivalent [60]. Standardizing these preparations is difficult because they are complex mixtures of multiple phytochemicals. Moreover, the specific functions of many phytochemicals and their interactions with other molecules are still largely unknown, complicating the standardization process [60]. Hase et al. [61] investigated the therapeutic efficacy of a plant-based spray and gel, finding that phytotherapy enhances the udder’s immune capabilities. This treatment can suppress udder infections in subclinical mastitis without causing adverse effects. Additionally, an oregano EO-based ointment shows potential as an alternative to antibiotics for controlling subclinical mastitis caused by S. aureus and/or E. coli [62]. Interesting results were obtained in studies where two commercial EO-based products (Cinnatube® and PhytoMast®) were tested on cows diagnosed with mastitis. Both products were administered intramammarily: Cinnatube® for dry cows [63] and PhytoMast® for lactating cows [64]. Both studies reported that these products were well tolerated, with no visible signs of udder irritation after use.
The results obtained in the current study indicate notable differences in the occurrence of Candida samples depending on the treatment applied, with the most remarkable distinction observed in cows subjected to a combined therapy (involving Phyto-Bomat and antibiotics). Furthermore, there is an increase in the number of negative results, indicating a reduction in microbial contamination immediately after treatment. Both Candida spp. and bacteria show a decrease in prevalence compared to the pre-treatment period, suggesting the treatment’s immediate effectiveness in reducing these microorganisms. Candida samples decreased immediately following the treatment with Phyto-Bomat and maintained this low level after 7 days, indicating the stability of Phyto-Bomat’s antifungal effect over this period. Additionally, Phyto-Bomat demonstrated a similar sustained activity against bacteria, with reduced levels observed both one day and seven days post-treatment. The antimicrobial potential of Phyto-Bomat could be attributed to its main components (i.e., terpenoids, specifically thymol and carvacrol) [58]. Terpenoids are one of the most valuable classes of natural origin compounds that are usually responsible for antimicrobial activity against disease-causing bacteria [37]. Along with this, the antifungal activity of Phyto-Bomat might be attributed to the nature of terpenoids, that—due to their high lipophilicity and low molecular weight—are capable of disrupting the cell membrane, causing cell death or inhibiting the sporulation and germination of fungi [37,38]. The literature data indicate that terpenoids show ineffective antimicrobial activity when used as singular compounds compared to the whole EO [38]. Moreover, due to high abundance of carvacrol and thymol in common thyme, wild thyme, oregano, and mountain savory, EOs have demonstrated substantial inhibitory effects against fungal pathogens by disrupting the integrity of the fungal cell membranes. The current study’s results support the possibility of an expansion of pharmacological activity of EO-based pharmaceutical formulations (Phyto-Bomat) through clinical evidence. Actually, the in vivo antifungal potential of Phyto-Bomat was proven through the significant Candida reduction after applied treatment. This could be explained by the fact that oregano, in particular, has been observed to impact spore germination and disrupt the membranes of fungal cells [37]. Furthermore, several authors have already described a strong antifungal activity of carvacrol and thymol against pathogenic strains of C. albicans isolated from the milk of cows with clinical mastitis [15,47,65]. Moreover, using antifungal drugs in combination with EOs is an effective approach to boost the efficacy of antifungal medications [66,67,68]. Furthermore, encouraging results were reported when using oregano and thyme EOs to enhance Itraconazole’s efficacy against azole Cryptococcus neoformans strains, whether they are susceptible or resistant to azole drugs [69]. The results obtained in the study by Carbone et al. [70] showed an increase in antifungal activity of nanoparticles loaded with Clotrimazole prepared with lavender or rosemary essential oil against local candidiasis.
Since EOs are complex mixtures of highly diverse secondary metabolites, they represent a rich resource of biologically active compounds that could be explored as potential candidates acting synergistically with antibiotics [71]. Therefore, EOs and their components could be used as additional therapy to antimicrobial drugs in order to reduce the development of resistance against antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral drugs [72]. Additionally, the current study results have shown that the combination of Phyto-Bomat and antibiotic therapy have had important positive outcomes, indicating a strong synergistic effect. Moreover, synergism has the potential to lower the required dosage of a single drug, increasing its effectiveness while simultaneously reducing drug-related toxicity [68]. Co-treatment by EOs and antibiotics is expected to create a powerful antimicrobial effect that targets multiple aspects, helping to reduce or reverse antimicrobial resistance [73]. In future, this finding could be used to reduce the outbreak of secondary fungal infections in mastitis, and it underscores the importance of reducing antibiotic usage to prevent the emergence of secondary fungal mastitis. Additionally, this finding suggests that Phyto-Bomat may be beneficial as an alternative to conventional antimicrobial therapy, as well as an antifungal as added value. In addition, the use of this type of phytotherapy could bring considerable economic benefits, especially with regard to subclinical mastitis, which is responsible for most financial losses and could have great potential for application not only on conventional but also on organic farms.
The major novelty of this research is the environmentally friendly approach to bovine mastitis treatment through the use of Phyto-Bomat, an essential oil-based formulation. This green and sustainable method utilizes natural plant extracts that are in line with organic farming principles and reduces the reliance on synthetic antimicrobials. This study demonstrates the broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of Phyto-Bomat and offers a safe and effective alternative that supports sustainable agriculture and combats antimicrobial resistance. Hence, further research is needed to explore how Phyto-Bomat can be integrated into veterinary practice as part of prevention programs against fungal infections in dairy cows due to its already proven antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral properties.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Development of Intramammary EO-Based Formulation (Phyto-Bomat)

EO-based intramammary formulation (Phyto-Bomat) was based on four different EOs with previously proven in vitro [58] and in vivo [59] antibacterial activity in cows with diagnosed mastitis. This EO mixture consisted of common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), wild thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.), oregano (Origanum vulgare L.), and mountain savory (Satureja montana L). The obtained EO mixture was further diluted with common marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) and St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) oil macerates (herbal drug:sunflower oil, 1:5) to a maximum volume of 15 mL for use in an intramammary injector. The assessed EOs of common thyme, wild thyme, oregano, and winter savory are available in the Serbian market from Pharmanais d.o.o., a certified Serbian manufacturer. Raw plant material (Thymi folium, Serpylli herba, Origani herba, and Saturejae herba) was sampled pre-distillation and verified for identity. Voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of Drugs, Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad.
The chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of each selected EO against bovine mastitis-associated pathogens were previously reported by Kovačević et al. [25,26]. Actually, the concentrations of EOs in the proposed formulation (Phyto-Bomat) were determined based on their minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values against the most prevalent mastitis-associated pathogens. The most dominant compounds among the EO components present in the proposed formulation were thymol and carvacrol [58].

4.2. Therapeutic Protocol

The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management-Veterinary Directorate (9000-689/2, 6 July 2020). In this study, a total of 68 animals with diagnosed mastitis were selected for in vivo testing, from two Holstein–Friesian dairy farms located in the Province of Vojvodina, Serbia, from May to July. The study involved Holstein–Friesian cows, aged 2 to 5 years, in different stages of the lactation phase, housed in a free-stall system within a commercial dairy farm. On the farm, cows were fed twice daily using total mixed ration with unrestricted access to water. The clinical form of mastitis was assessed by veterinarians performing clinical examination, while the subclinical form was confirmed by the California Mastitis Test using somatic cell count in the milk samples. Clinical signs of mastitis included symptoms such as swelling, pain, and redness. Alterations in the first milk streams, such as clot formation and changes in color and density, were present. The animals were divided into three experimental groups. The first group of cows was treated with conventional antibiotic treatment (n = 25), the second one was treated with Phyto-Bomat (108), while the third group underwent a combination therapy involving both Phyto-Bomat and antibiotics (71). For the conventional antibiotic treatment, cows were treated with the commercially available cephalexin [74], as per the manufacturer’s recommendations, following an antibiotic susceptibility test conducted according to the farm’s treatment protocol. Phyto-Bomat was applied intramammarily, twice daily after the morning and evening milking, for 5 consecutive days. Cows treated with the combination were initially treated with cephalexin [74] administered intramuscularly, in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, followed by the application of Phyto-Bomat twice a day for 5 consecutive days. The treatment efficacy was evaluated by microbiological examination, taking milk samples from each animal before the treatment, one day and seven days after the end of the therapy.

4.3. Isolation and Identification of the Pathogens and In Vitro Studies of EO Antimicrobial Activity

Cows were hand-milked twice daily, in the morning and evening. Samples for microbiological examination were collected during the morning milking. Prior to milking, the udder and teats were washed with water, and the teats were then disinfected and dried with tissue paper. The tip of each teat was disinfected using a 70% ethanol, after which milk samples were taken. These samples were taken using sterile gloves and placed in sterile bottles. The first few streams of milk were discarded and approximately 10 mL of milk was collected in labeled sterile tubes and stored in an ice container at 4 °C during transport to the Laboratory for testing biological material, food, and animal feed, “In vitro LAB” DOO Šabac, Republic of Serbia. Standard bacteriological diagnostic methods were employed for bacteriological isolation, determination, and identification of mastitis-causing pathogens [25,26]. Yeast strains were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates, which were then incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. Isolates were subsequently identified, using the “API 20 C AUX” (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
Antibacterial activity of EO mixture and its individual components T. vulgaris L., T. serpyllum L., O. vulgare L., and S. montana L. was investigated by broth microdilution method in accordance with previously described protocols [25,26].
Antifungal activity was tested by broth microdilution method against clinical isolates and two ATCC laboratory control strains of yeasts (KWIK-STIK™, Microbiologics, Saint Cloud, MN, USA): Candida albicans ATCC 24433 and C. krusei ATCC 6258. Lyophilized microorganisms were hydrated before experiments, inoculated onto Sabouraud dextrose agar/broth (SDA/SDB, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK), and cultivated in aerobic conditions for 24–48 h at 35 ± 1 °C. The suspension of microorganisms used as inoculum was prepared from fresh cultures in a saline solution to a density of 0.5 per McFarland standard (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France).
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution test in flat-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates according to the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [75,76]. EOs were prepared in fresh SDB, in concentrations ranging from 0.048 to 12.50 mg/mL; each concentration was set in duplicate and inoculated with 1 × 104 CFU/mL of yeasts. For detection of cell growth and metabolism, broths were supplemented with redox indicator resazurin (7-Hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one 10-oxide) (Sigma-Aldrich-Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), which is a blue non-fluorescent dye that is reduced to pink metabolite resorufin (7-Hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one) if microorganisms are viable. MICs of samples were determined after the incubation for 20–48 h at 35 °C in aerobic conditions as the lowest concentration that inhibited the growth of yeasts. Minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) was determined after subcultivation of all wells without visible growth of yeasts onto SDA and incubation for additional 20–48 h at 35 °C in aerobic conditions. Positive controls (microorganisms in medium) and negative controls (only medium with EOs) were included in experiments. Each test was repeated three times.
The type of the pharmacological interaction (synergism, additive effect, indifferent effect, antagonism) between each Phyto-Bomat EO and the antibiotic cephalexin was investigated using the checkerboard method [77]. The synergistic effect of the EO–cephalexin combination was investigated at a concentration above the MIC (2 × MIC) and at four concentrations below the MIC (1/2–1/16) of the individual compounds. The effect was estimated by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) and the fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs). The FIC of each compound was calculated by dividing the concentration of the compound in the effective MIC of the combination, by the MIC of the compound alone (e.g., FICEO = MICEO-cephalexin combination/MICEO). The FICI values were calculated as the sum of the FICEO and FICcephalexin and interpreted as follows: FICI ≤ 0.5 synergy; 0.5 < FICI ≤ 1 additive effect; 1 < FICI ≤ 4 indifference (no interaction) and FICI > 4.0 antagonism [78].

4.4. Data Analysis

The obtained data were built into a dataset by application of Microsoft Office Excel and statistically analyzed by Tibco Statistica® software v. 13.5 (TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Statistica™ 13.5.0. 2018. TIBCO® Data Science—Statistica™ 13.5.0). Data were evaluated by descriptive statistics, while differences between evaluated categorical variables regarding the frequency of obtained results were evaluated by application of Chi-square test, whereas the level of significance was kept at p = 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics13070575/s1. Supplementary Table S1: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial strains isolated from cows with mastitis; Supplementary Table S2: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of yeast strains isolated from cows with mastitis and two laboratory control strains of yeast.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.T. and Z.K.; methodology, D.D.B.; validation, M.S. and J.B.; formal analysis, N.K.; investigation, D.T., Z.K. and M.S.; resources, D.T. and Z.K.; data curation, J.B. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.T., D.D.B., J.A. and Z.K.; writing—review and editing, N.K., D.D.B., J.A. and Z.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia; PROMIS, #GRANT No 6066966; InfoBomat; and the Ministry of Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia [Grant Number 451-03-47/2023-01/200117].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management-Veterinary Directorate (9000-689/2, 6 July 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available in the present manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Krukowski, H.; Saba, L. Bovine mycotic mastitis. Folia Vet 2003, 47, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Benić, M.; Maćešić, N.; Cvetnić, L.; Habrun, B.; Cvetnić, Ž.; Turk, R.; Đuričić, D.; Lojkić, M.; Dobranić, V.; Valpotić, H. Bovine mastitis: A persistent and evolving problem requiring novel approaches for its control-a review. Vet. Arh. 2018, 88, 535–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Caneschi, A.; Bardhi, A.; Barbarossa, A.; Zaghini, A. Plant Essential Oils as a Tool in the Control of Bovine Mastitis: An Update. Molecules 2023, 28, 3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cvetnić, L.; Samardžija, M.; Habrun, B.; Kompes, G.; Benić, M. Microbiological monitoring of mastitis pathogens in the control of udder health in dairy cows. Slov. Vet. Res. 2016, 53, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huilca-Ibarra, M.P.; Vasco-Julio, D.; Ledesma, Y.; Guerrero-Freire, S.; Zurita, J.; Castillejo, P.; Barceló Blasco, F.; Yanez, L.; Changoluisa, D.; Echeverría, G. High prevalence of prototheca Bovis infection in dairy cattle with chronic mastitis in Ecuador. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Milanov, D.; Prunic, B.; Velhner, M.; Bojkovski, J. Diagnosis of yeast mastitis in dairy cows. Lucr. Stiintifice Med. Vet. 2014, 47, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zaragoza, C.S.; Olivares, R.A.C.; Watty, A.E.D.; de la Peña Moctezuma, A.; Tanaca, L.V. Yeasts isolation from bovine mammary glands under different mastitis status in the Mexican High Plateu. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2011, 28, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pachauri, S.; Varshney, P.; Dash, S.; Gupta, M. Involvement of fungal species in bovine mastitis in and around Mathura India. Vet World 2013, 6, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, Y.; Ren, Y.; Fan, C.; Shao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, W.; Wei, C.; Ni, H.; Zhu, Z.; Hou, X. Survey of mycotic mastitis in dairy cows from Heilongjiang Province, China. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2013, 45, 1709–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Du, J.; Wang, X.; Luo, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X. Epidemiological investigation of non-albicans Candida species recovered from mycotic mastitis of cows in Yinchuan, Ningxia of China. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moretti, A.; Pasquali, P.; Mencaroni, G.; Boncio, L.; Fioretti, D.P. Relationship between cell counts in bovine milk and the presence of mastitis pathogens (yeasts and bacteria). J. Vet. Med. Ser. B 1998, 45, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Benbelkacem, I.; Selles, S.M.A.; Aissi, M.; Khaldi, F.; Ghazi, K. In vitro assessment of antifungal and antistaphylococcal activities of Cinnamomum aromaticum essential oil against subclinical mastitis pathogens. Veterinaria 2019, 68, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  13. Morales-Ubaldo, A.L.; Rivero-Perez, N.; Valladares-Carranza, B.; Velázquez-Ordoñez, V.; Delgadillo-Ruiz, L.; Zaragoza-Bastida, A. Bovine mastitis, a worldwide impact disease: Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and viable alternative approaches. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2023, 21, 100306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Al-Said, A.A.; Marwa, A.; Elfadadny, A.; Bantun, F.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. In vitro utility of zinc oxide nanoparticles and antifungal drugs for the treatment of mycotic mastitis in dairy cows in Egypt. Preprint 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ksouri, S.; Djebir, S.; Bentorki, A.; Gouri, A.; Hadef, Y.; Benakhla, A. Antifungal activity of essential oils extract from Origanum floribundum Munby, Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Thymus ciliatus Desf. against Candida albicans isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. J. Mycol. Médicale 2017, 27, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barreiros, Y.; de Meneses, A.C.; Alves, J.L.F.; Mumbach, G.D.; Ferreira, F.A.; Machado, R.A.F.; Bolzan, A.; de Araujo, P.H.H. Xanthan gum-based film-forming suspension containing essential oils: Production and in vitro antimicrobial activity evaluation against mastitis-causing microorganisms. LWT 2022, 153, 112470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tomanić, D.Z.; Stanojević, J.B.; Galić, I.M.; Ružić, Z.N.; Kukurić, T.B.; Tešin, N.B.; Prpa, B.P.; Kovačević, Z.R. Review of trends in essential oils as alternatives to antibiotics in bovine mastitis treatment. Zb. Matice Srp. Prir. Nauk. 2022, 142, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Neculai-Valeanu, A.S.; Ariton, A.M.; Mădescu, B.M.; Rîmbu, C.M.; Creangă, Ş. Nanomaterials and essential oils as candidates for developing novel treatment options for bovine mastitis. Animals 2021, 11, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bellache, M.; Torres-Pagan, N.; Verdeguer, M.; Benfekih, L.A.; Vicente, O.; Sestras, R.E.; Sestras, A.F.; Boscaiu, M. Essential oils of three aromatic plant species as natural herbicides for environmentally friendly agriculture. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cho, T.J.; Park, S.M.; Yu, H.; Seo, G.H.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.A.; Rhee, M.S. Recent advances in the application of antibacterial complexes using essential oils. Molecules 2020, 25, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Budri, P.E.; Silva, N.C.; Bonsaglia, E.C.; Júnior, A.F.; Júnior, J.A.; Doyama, J.T.; Gonçalves, J.L.; Santos, M.V.d.; Fitzgerald-Hughes, D.; Rall, V.L. Effect of essential oils of Syzygium aromaticum and Cinnamomum zeylanicum and their major components on biofilm production in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from milk of cows with mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 5899–5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pașca, C.; Mărghitaș, L.; Dezmirean, D.; Bobiș, O.; Bonta, V.; Chirilă, F.; Matei, I.; Fiț, N. Medicinal plants based products tested on pathogens isolated from mastitis milk. Molecules 2017, 22, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cerioli, M.F.; Moliva, M.V.; Cariddi, L.N.; Reinoso, E.B. Effect of the essential oil of Minthostachys verticillata (Griseb.) epling and limonene on biofilm production in pathogens causing bovine mastitis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Szweda, P.; Zalewska, M.; Pilch, J.; Kot, B.; Milewski, S. Essential oils as potential anti-staphylococcal agents. Acta Vet.-Beogr. 2018, 68, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kovačević, Z.; Kladar, N.; Čabarkapa, I.; Radinović, M.; Maletić, M.; Erdeljan, M.; Božin, B. New perspective of Origanum vulg L. and Satureja montana L. essential oils as bovine mastitis treatment alternatives. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kovačević, Z.; Radinović, M.; Čabarkapa, I.; Kladar, N.; Božin, B. Natural agents against bovine mastitis pathogens. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tomanić, D.; Božin, B.; Kladar, N.; Stanojević, J.; Čabarkapa, I.; Stilinović, N.; Apić, J.; Božić, D.D.; Kovačević, Z. Environmental bovine mastitis pathogens: Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and sensitivity to Thymus vulgaris L., Thymus serpyllum L., and Origanum vulgare L. essential oils. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tomanić, D.; Božin, B.; Čabarkapa, I.; Kladar, N.; Radinović, M.; Maletić, M.; Kovačević, Z. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of two different essential oils against mastitis associated pathogens. Acta Vet. 2022, 72, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pereira, A.M.S.; de Castro Franca, S.; Fachin, A.L.; Bertoni, B.W.; Pina, E.S.; da Silva Coppede, J. Phytotherapic Pharmaceutical Combination of Lippia salviifolia and Lippia sidoides, Phytotherapic Pharmaceutical Composition, Process for Preparing a Phytotherapic Pharmaceutical Composition and Veterinary Uses Thereof. U.S. Patent 9,295,706, 29 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ucella-Filho, J.G.M.; Ferreira, N.S.; Alves, M.R.; Ignacchiti, M.D.C.; Júnior, A.F.D.; Resende, J.A. Evaluation of natural products as therapeutic alternatives for bovine mastitis and implications for future research. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 167, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Malinowski, E.; Lassa, H.; Klossowska, A.; Markiewicz, H.; Kaczmarowski, M.; Smulski, S. Relationship between mastitis agents and somatic cell count in foremilk samples. Bull.-Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2006, 50, 349. [Google Scholar]
  32. Abd El-Razik, K.A.; Abdelrahman, K.A.; Abd El-Moez, S.I.; Danial, E.N. New approach in diagnosis and treatment of bovine mycotic mastitis in Egypt. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 5725–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tesfaye, B.; Matios, L.; Getachew, T.; Tafesse, K.; Abebe, O.; Letebrihan, Y.; Mekdes, T.; Tilaye, D. Study on bovine mastitis with isolation of bacterial and fungal causal agents and assessing antimicrobial resistance patterns of isolated Staphylococcus species in and around Sebeta town, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 13, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Krukowski, H.; Tietze, M.; Majewski, T.; Różański, P. Survey of yeast mastitis in dairy herds of small-type farms in the Lublin region, Poland. Mycopathologia 2001, 150, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wawron, W.; Bochniarz, M.; Piech, T. Yeast mastitis in dairy cows in the middle-eastern part of Poland. Bull.-Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2010, 54, 201–204. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bakr, E.M.; El-Tawab, A.E.-k.M.A.; Elshemey, T.M.; Abd-Elrhman, A.H. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Studies on Mycotic Mastitis in Cattle. Alex. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 46, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aljaafari, M.N.; AlAli, A.O.; Baqais, L.; Alqubaisy, M.; AlAli, M.; Molouki, A.; Ong-Abdullah, J.; Abushelaibi, A.; Lai, K.-S.; Lim, S.-H.E. An overview of the potential therapeutic applications of essential oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; De Feo, V. Essential oils and antifungal activity. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmad, A.; Khan, A.; Akhtar, F.; Yousuf, S.; Xess, I.; Khan, L.; Manzoor, N. Fungicidal activity of thymol and carvacrol by disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane integrity against Candida. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 30, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mugnaini, L.; Nardoni, S.; Pinto, L.; Pistelli, L.; Leonardi, M.; Pisseri, F.; Mancianti, F. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of some essential oils against feline isolates of Microsporum canis. J. Mycol. Medicale 2012, 22, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ebani, V.V.; Nardoni, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Giovanelli, S.; Rocchigiani, G.; Pistelli, L.; Mancianti, F. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of essential oils against some pathogenic bacteria and yeasts shed from poultry. Flavour Fragr. J. 2016, 31, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, F.; Tu, X.-F.; Thakur, K.; Hu, F.; Li, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Zhang, J.-G.; Wei, Z.-J. Comparison of antifungal activity of essential oils from different plants against three fungi. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 134, 110821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mutlu-Ingok, A.; Devecioglu, D.; Dikmetas, D.N.; Karbancioglu-Guler, F.; Capanoglu, E. Antibacterial, antifungal, antimycotoxigenic, and antioxidant activities of essential oils: An updated review. Molecules 2020, 25, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abd Rashed, A.; Rathi, D.-N.G.; Ahmad Nasir, N.A.H.; Abd Rahman, A.Z. Antifungal properties of essential oils and their compounds for application in skin fungal infections: Conventional and nonconventional approaches. Molecules 2021, 26, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tortorano, A.M.; Prigitano, A.; Dho, G.; Piccinini, R.; Dapra, V.; Viviani, M.A. In vitro activity of conventional antifungal drugs and natural essences against the yeast-like alga Prototheca. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 1312–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nardoni, S.; Pisseri, F.; Pistelli, L.; Najar, B.; Luini, M.; Mancianti, F. In vitro activity of 30 essential oils against bovine clinical isolates of Prototheca zopfii and Prototheca blaschkeae. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Corona-Gómez, L.; Hernández-Andrade, L.; Mendoza-Elvira, S.; Suazo, F.M.; Ricardo-González, D.I.; Quintanar-Guerrero, D. In vitro antimicrobial effect of essential tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia), thymol, and carvacrol on microorganisms isolated from cases of bovine clinical mastitis. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2022, 10, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Raheel, I.A.; Hassan, W.H.; Salam, H.S.; Abed, A.H.; Salem, S.S. Antifungal Effect of Some Natural Substances on Fluconazole-resistant Candida species Recovered from Mastitis. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2023, 13, 1583–1587. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schroder, T.; Gaskin, S.; Ross, K.; Whiley, H. Antifungal activity of essential oils against fungi isolated from air. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2017, 23, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tang, X.; Shao, Y.-L.; Tang, Y.-J.; Zhou, W.-W. Antifungal activity of essential oil compounds (geraniol and citral) and inhibitory mechanisms on grain pathogens (Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus ochraceus). Molecules 2018, 23, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ashraf, A.; Fatma, I.; Tamer, F.; Wedad, A. Antimicrobial activity of some essential oils against S. Aureus and Candida Albicans with mastitic relevance. Behna Vet. Med. J. 2015, 28, 281–288. [Google Scholar]
  52. da Silva Rocha, A.R.F.; da Costa Santos, J.V.; Moura, R.H.; Lago, E.C.; de Lima, F.L. Prospecting of anti-Candida bioactive in Origanum vulgare L. artisanal essential oil. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10, e220101421758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hammer, K.A.; Carson, C.F. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of essential oils. In Lipids and Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 255–306. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bozin, B.; Mimica-Dukic, N.; Simin, N.; Anackov, G. Characterization of the volatile composition of essential oils of some Lamiaceae spices and the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the entire oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nikolić, M.; Glamočlija, J.; Ferreira, I.C.; Calhelha, R.C.; Fernandes, Â.; Marković, T.; Marković, D.; Giweli, A.; Soković, M. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, antioxidant and antitumor activity of Thymus serpyllum L., Thymus algeriensis Boiss. and Reut and Thymus vulgaris L. essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gavaric, N.; Mozina, S.S.; Kladar, N.; Bozin, B. Chemical profile, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of thyme and oregano essential oils, thymol and carvacrol and their possible synergism. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lemos, M.F.; Lemos, M.F.; Pacheco, H.P.; Guimarães, A.C.; Fronza, M.; Endringer, D.C.; Scherer, R. Seasonal variation affects the composition and antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Thymus vulgaris. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 95, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kovačević, Z.; Tomanić, D.; Čabarkapa, I.; Šarić, L.; Stanojević, J.; Bijelić, K.; Galić, I.; Ružić, Z.; Erdeljan, M.; Kladar, N. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial Activity, and Withdrawal Period of Essential Oil-Based Pharmaceutical Formulation in Bovine Mastitis Treatment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Tomanić, D.; Kladar, N.; Radinović, M.; Stančić, I.; Erdeljan, M.; Stanojević, J.; Galić, I.; Bijelić, K.; Kovačević, Z. Intramammary Ethno-Veterinary Formulation in Bovine Mastitis Treatment for Optimization of Antibiotic Use. Pathogens 2023, 12, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tamminen, L.-M.; Emanuelson, U.; Blanco-Penedo, I. Systematic review of phytotherapeutic treatments for different farm animals under European conditions. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hase, P.; Digraskar, S.; Ravikanth, K.; Dandale, M.; Maini, S. Management of subclinical mastitis with mastilep gel and herbal spray (AV/AMS/15). Int. J. Pharm. Pharmacol 2013, 4, 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cho, B.-W.; Cha, C.-N.; Lee, S.-M.; Kim, M.-J.; Park, J.-Y.; Yoo, C.-Y.; Son, S.-E.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.-J. Therapeutic effect of oregano essential oil on subclinical bovine mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Korean J. Vet. Res. 2015, 55, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mullen, K.; Lee, A.; Lyman, R.; Mason, S.; Washburn, S.; Anderson, K. An in vitro assessment of the antibacterial activity of plant-derived oils. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 5587–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pinedo, P.; Karreman, H.; Bothe, H.; Velez, J.; Risco, C. Efficacy of a botanical preparation for the intramammary treatment of clinical mastitis on an organic dairy farm. Can. Vet. J. 2013, 54, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ebani, V.V.; Mancianti, F. Use of essential oils in veterinary medicine to combat bacterial and fungal infections. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rosato, A.; Vitali, C.; Gallo, D.; Balenzano, L.; Mallamaci, R. The inhibition of Candida species by selected essential oils and their synergism with amphotericin B. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 635–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rosato, A.; Vitali, C.; Piarulli, M.; Mazzotta, M.; Argentieri, M.P.; Mallamaci, R. In vitro synergic efficacy of the combination of Nystatin with the essential oils of Origanum vulgare and Pelargonium graveolens against some Candida species. Phytomedicine 2009, 16, 972–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bhattacharya, R.; Rolta, R.; Dev, K.; Sourirajan, A. Synergistic potential of essential oils with antibiotics to combat fungal pathogens: Present status and future perspectives. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 6089–6100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Scalas, D.; Mandras, N.; Roana, J.; Tardugno, R.; Cuffini, A.M.; Ghisetti, V.; Benvenuti, S.; Tullio, V. Use of Pinus sylvestris L.(Pinaceae), Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae), and Thymus vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae) essential oils and their main components to enhance itraconazole activity against azole susceptible/not-susceptible Cryptococcus neoformans strains. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Carbone, C.; Teixeira, M.d.C.; Sousa, M.d.C.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.M.B.; Musumeci, T. Clotrimazole-loaded mediterranean essential oils NLC: A synergic treatment of Candida skin infections. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Willcox, J.K.; Ash, S.L.; Catignani, G.L. Antioxidants and prevention of chronic disease. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 275–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vaou, N.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Tsigalou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Towards advances in medicinal plant antimicrobial activity: A review study on challenges and future perspectives. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Langeveld, W.T.; Veldhuizen, E.J.; Burt, S.A. Synergy between essential oil components and antibiotics: A review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. ALIMS. Summary of Product Characteristics-RILEXINE 200 LC. Available online: https://www.alims.gov.rs/doc_file/lekovi_veterina/smpc/323-01-00317-19-001.pdf (accessed on 10th October 2023.).
  75. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters; Version V.13.11. June 2023. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/mic_and_zone_distributions_and_ecoffs (accessed on 23rd June 2023).
  76. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Media Preparation for EUCAST Disk Diffusion Testing and for Determination of MIC Values by the Broth Microdilution Method; V.6.0. January 2020. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 23rd June 2023).
  77. Garcia, L. Synergism testing: Broth microdilution checkerboard and broth macrodilution methods. In Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, 3rd ed.; Leber, A.L., Ed.; American Society of Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, Z.Q.; Zhao, W.H.; Asano, N.; Yoda, Y.; Hara, Y.; Shimamura, T. Epigallocatechin gallate synergistically enhances the activity of carbapenems against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 558–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Prevalence of mastitis-associated pathogens.
Figure 1. Prevalence of mastitis-associated pathogens.
Antibiotics 13 00575 g001
Figure 2. The prevalence of milk microbial contamination status (positive for bacteria, Candida spp., or negative) among studied animals in relation to the administered agent (Phyto-Bomat, cephalexin, and combination of the aforementioned), disregarding the time point of study in which the milk samples were obtained.
Figure 2. The prevalence of milk microbial contamination status (positive for bacteria, Candida spp., or negative) among studied animals in relation to the administered agent (Phyto-Bomat, cephalexin, and combination of the aforementioned), disregarding the time point of study in which the milk samples were obtained.
Antibiotics 13 00575 g002
Figure 3. The prevalence of milk microbial contamination (presence of bacteria, Candida spp., and negative results) in studied animals before start of applied treatment (denoted as: before), one day after the end of treatment (denoted as: isolate_after), and seven days after the end of therapy (denoted as: isolate_after_7days).
Figure 3. The prevalence of milk microbial contamination (presence of bacteria, Candida spp., and negative results) in studied animals before start of applied treatment (denoted as: before), one day after the end of treatment (denoted as: isolate_after), and seven days after the end of therapy (denoted as: isolate_after_7days).
Antibiotics 13 00575 g003
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory (MIC), bactericidal (MBC), and fungicidal (MFC) concentrations of Phyto-Bomat individual EOs Thymus vulgaris L., Thymus serpyllum L., Origanum vulgare L., and Satureja montana L.
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory (MIC), bactericidal (MBC), and fungicidal (MFC) concentrations of Phyto-Bomat individual EOs Thymus vulgaris L., Thymus serpyllum L., Origanum vulgare L., and Satureja montana L.
MicroorganismsTV
(mg/mL)
TS
(mg/mL)
OV
(mg/mL)
SM
(mg/mL)
BacteriaMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBC
Streptococcus spp.3.12–6.256.25–12.50.39–3.120.78–12.53.12–6.256.25–12.50.39–6.250.78->12.5
Staphylococcus spp.6.2512.51.56–3.123.12–6.253.126.256.2512.5
Enterobacterales1.56–3.123.12–6.251.56–3.123.12–6.250.78–3.121.56–6.253.126.25
YeastsMICMFCMICMFCMICMFCMICMFC
C. albicans1.56–3.123.12–6.250.78–3.123.12–12.51.56–3.123.12–6.251.56–3.123.12–6.25
C. glabrata1.56–6.253.12–12.50.78–3.121.56–6.250.78–1.561.56–3.123.12–6.256.25–12.5
C. parapsilosis6.2512.51.563.121.563.126.2512.5
C. krusei3.126.251.563.121.566.256.2512.5
Candida albicans ATCC 244330.781.560.390.780.390.780.781.56
C. krusei
ATCC 6258
1.563.120.783.120.783.121.563.12
TV—Thymus vulgaris L.; TS—Thymus serpyllum L.; OV—Origanum vulgare L.; SM—Satureja montana L. MIC—minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC—minimum bactericidal concentration; MFC—minimum fungicidal concentration.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tomanić, D.; Božić, D.D.; Kladar, N.; Samardžija, M.; Apić, J.; Baljak, J.; Kovačević, Z. Clinical Evidence on Expansion of Essential Oil-Based Formulation’s Pharmacological Activity in Bovine Mastitis Treatment: Antifungal Potential as Added Value. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13070575

AMA Style

Tomanić D, Božić DD, Kladar N, Samardžija M, Apić J, Baljak J, Kovačević Z. Clinical Evidence on Expansion of Essential Oil-Based Formulation’s Pharmacological Activity in Bovine Mastitis Treatment: Antifungal Potential as Added Value. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(7):575. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13070575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tomanić, Dragana, Dragana D. Božić, Nebojša Kladar, Marko Samardžija, Jelena Apić, Jovan Baljak, and Zorana Kovačević. 2024. "Clinical Evidence on Expansion of Essential Oil-Based Formulation’s Pharmacological Activity in Bovine Mastitis Treatment: Antifungal Potential as Added Value" Antibiotics 13, no. 7: 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13070575

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop