Effects of Peanut Rust Disease (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) on Agricultural Production: Current Control Strategies and Progress in Breeding for Resistance
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Characteristics and Disease Symptoms of Peanut Rust
2.1. Life Cycle of Peanut Rust
2.2. Infection Process
2.3. Disease Symptoms of Peanut Rust
3. Epidemiology and Control Strategies for Peanut Rust
3.1. Epidemiology
3.2. Control Strategies for Peanut Rust
4. Breeding Peanuts for Rust Resistance
4.1. Genetics of Peanut Rust Resistance
4.2. Resources for Peanut Rust Resistance
Genotype | Botanical Variety/Pedigree | Source/Origin | Rust Reaction | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yinduhuapi | - | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Liang et al. [52] |
ICGV99003, ICGV99005, ICG 99051, ICG 99052, ICG 99019, ICGx950084, ICGx950166 | - - | ICRISAT | Immune | Mace et al. [35] |
ICG 13917 | - | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | |
ICG 10931, ICG 10975, ICG 11485 | - | Peru | Highly resistant | |
ICG 1185 | - | Argentina | Highly resistant | |
ICG 11312, ICG 11325, ICG 11331 | - | India | Highly resistant | |
ICG 12720 | - | Ecuador | Highly resistant | |
GBFDS 272 DTG 27 TFDRG 5 VG 9514 | - TG49 × B37c TAG 24 × VG 9514 Arachis cardenasii × CO 1 | India | Immune | Mondal et al. [53] |
NCAc 343 DTG 57 DTG 60 DTG 58 TDG 56 | NC Bunch × PI 1216067 TAG 24 × GPBD 4 TG 26 × Mutant 28-2 GPBD 4 × TG 49 | India | Highly resistant | |
PI 259747 (Tarapoto), 97x36HO2-1B2G3-1-2-2, 99x33-1-B2G-12-2-1,99x33-1-B2G-13-1-1,99x33-1-B2G-2-2-2,99x8-1-B2G-3-1-1,96x72-HO1-9-1-1-1-1-2-1, 98x116-5-1-1-1-2-1, 97x34-HO3-1-B2G-3-1-1-1, RP-97F2-B-9-2-2-1-b3-B, BOL3-7, DP-1, PT910-2-8-11, PTBOL3-3, PTBOL3-4, PI 568164, PI 562530 | - | Peru | Resistant | Power et al. [54] |
PI 568164, PI 562530 | - | India | Resistant | |
PI 298115 | - | Israel | Resistant | |
PI 540472 | - | China | Resistant | |
PI 314817, PI 478856 | - | - | Resistant | |
ISATGR 278-18 | Arachis duranesis × Arachis batizocoi | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Kumari et al. [55] |
PI 390593, PI 393527A, PI 476166, PI 393531, PI 393641, PI 468363, PI 476183, NCAc17090, 203/66W CG190, NCAC 17718, EC 35399, WCG 184 | - | India | Resistant | Gajjar et al. [56] |
ICGs 76 2925 12697 | - A. hypogaea - | India | Resistant | Upadhyaya et al. [57] |
ICG 2381, ICG 6993 | A. hypogaea | Brazil | Resistant | |
ICG 2857 | A. hypogaea | Argentina | Resistant | |
ICG 4412, ICG 7243 | A. hypogaea | USA | Resistant | |
ICG 9037 | A. hypogaea | Tanzania | Resistant | |
ICG 9842 | A. hypogaea | Tanzania | Resistant | |
ICG 9777 | A. hypogaea | Mozambique | Resistant | |
ICG 11109 | A. hypogaea | China | Resistant | |
ICG 12000 | A. hypogaea | Mali | Resistant | |
ICG 532, ICG 9961, ICG 11109, ICG 13099 | A. hypogaea | Unknown | Resistant | |
ICG 13787 | A. hypogaea | Niger | Resistant | |
ICG 14008 | A. hypogaea | Central African Republic | Resistant | |
ICGV 00064 | - | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Sudini et al. [58] |
ICG 11426 | - | India | Highly resistant | |
ICG 11088 | - | Peru | Highly resistant | |
ICG 4389 | - | India | Highly resistant | |
ICG 6022 | - | Sudan | Highly resistant | |
ICG 6993 | - | Brazil | Highly resistant | |
ICGs 6402, 6766 | - | ICRISAT | Resistant | |
92R/70-4, ICGV-SM 86021, ICGV-SM 02536, ICGV 02194, ICGV 01276, ICGV 02286, ICGV 94114 | - | ICRISAT | Resistant | Okori et al. [59] |
DTG 60 JL 776 | TG 26 × Mutant 28-2 - | India | Immune | Mondal and Badigannavar [60] |
TG 66, G 2-52 | - | India | Highly resistant | |
ICGVs 00068, 00246, 00248, 01274, 02323, 02411, 02446, 04087, 05036, 05100, 05141, 05163, 06142, 07235, 86699, 99051, 99052 00362, 03043, 99160 | A.cardenasii A. hypogaea | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Chaudhari et al. [61] |
SPS 2, SPS 8, SPS 11, SPS 20 49 M- 1-1, 49 M-16, ICG 11337 | A. villosa A. hypogaea A. cardenasii | India | Highly resistant | |
ICGV-SM 15510 | ICGV 93437 × ICGV 95342 | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Daudi et al. [62]; Daudi et al. [63] |
ICGV-SMs 05570, ICGV-SMs 06737, 15524, 15559, 15567, ICGV-SMs 08584, 08587, 15546, ICGV 94124, ICG 12725 | - - - | ICRISAT | Resistant | |
Kanyomwa | - | Tanzania | Resistant | |
DTG 60 DTG 57 GFDS 272 GPBD 5 | TG 26 × Mutant 28-2 TAG 24 × GPBD 4 - TAG 24 × VG 9514 | India | Highly resistant | Mondal et al. [64] |
B3-F3-36-5, B3-F3-36-6 TFDRG 1 | - A. vulgaris | India | Immune | Rajarathinam et al. [65]; Badigannavar et al. [66] |
ICGs NRCGs 10121, 10123, 10950, 11072, 11108, 11597, 12487, 12510, 12565, 12566, 12718, 12899, 12900, 12912, 12915, 12925, TFDRG2, JG4_81, JG4_43, JG2-3_14 | - A. vulgaris - | India | Resistant | Chuni et al. [67]; Badigannavar et al. [66]; Yeri and Bhat [71] |
ICGV 87157, ICGV99001, ICGV 86687 (CS 16–B2–B2), BC1F3-4, BC1F3-186, BC1F3-327, RBC2F5R12_13, RBC2F5R12_15, RBC2F5R12_16, RBC2F5R12_17, RBC2F5R12_18, RBC2F5R12_19, RBC2F5R12_23, RBC2F5R12_25, RBC2F5R12_29, RBC2F5R12_30, RBC2F5R12_45, RBC2F5R12_46, RBC2F5R12_78, RBC2F5R12_87, RBC2F5R12_88, RBC2F5R12_97, RBC2F5R12_138, RBC2F5R12_139, RBC2F5R12_140, RBC2F5R12_143, RBC2F5R12_103, RBC2F5R12_104, RBC2F5R12_107, RBC2F5R12_108, RBC2F5R12_114, RBC2F5R12_117, RBC2F5R12_118, RBC2F5R12_129, RBC2F5R12_130, RBC2F5R12_133 | A. fastigiata - - | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Nigam et al. [72]; Reddy et al. [33]; Mace et al. [35]; Deshmukh et al. [73]; Varshney et al. [74] |
ICGVs 13200, 13206, 13192, 13193, 13228, 13229, ICGV 87354 ICGV 92267 AB-ICGS76-7-1, AB-ICGS76-16-1, AB-ICGS76-18-4, AB-ICGS76-26-4, AB-ICGS76-40-6, AB-DH 86-47-1, AB-DH 86-8-2, AB-DH 86-8-4, BC1F3-76, BC1F3-278, BC1F3-296 | - A. fastigiata - | ICRISAT | Resistant | Reddy et al. [75]; Upadhyaya et al. [76]; Kumari et al. [55]; Pasupuleti et al. [77] |
ICGs 1697, 7296, 7630, 7886, 7890, 7893, 7895, 7896, 10014, 10020, 10021, 10022, 10025, 10030, 10031, 10032, 10034, 10037, 10039, 10042, 10047, 10048, 10049, 10051, 10052, 10053, 10054, 10057, 10058, 10059, 10060, 10061, 10062, 10063, 10064, 10065, 10067, 10068, 10069, 10073, 10074, 10888, 10915, 10918, 10925, 10927, 10928, 10932, 10933, 10935, 10937, 10939, 10940, 10943, 10945, 10954, 10962, 10963, 10964, 10966, 10969, 10974, 10978, 11073, 11080, 11088, 11108, 11182, 11183, 11285 ICGs 7891 | A. fastigiata A. hypogaea | Peru | Highly resistant | Subrahmanyam et al. [78] |
ICG 4746, ICG 7883, ICG 7884, ICG 9185 | A. hypogaea A. fastigiata | Israel | Highly resistant | |
ICG 6330 | A. hypogaea | Zimbabwe | Highly resistant | |
ICG 6340 ICG 7899, ICG 7900 | A. fastigiata A. hypogaea | Honduras | Highly resistant | |
ICG 7621 | A. hypogaea | USA | Highly resistant | |
ICG 7885 | A. fastigiata | Honduras | Highly resistant | |
ICG 7897 | A. fastigiata | Venezuela | Highly resistant | |
ICG 8044 | A. fastigiata | South Africa | Highly resistant | |
ICG 10884 | A. hypogaea | Bolivia | Highly resistant | |
QT0348, QT0368, QT0400, QT0402, QT0419, QT0458, QT0463, QT0485 | - | China | Resistant | Cheng et al. [79] |
Tifrust-5 (GP 22), Tifrust-6 (GP 23), Tifrust-7 (GP 24), Tifrust-8 (GP 25), Tifrust-9 (GP 26), Tifrust-10 (GP 27), Tifrust-11 (GP 28), Tifrust-12 (GP 29), Tifrust-13 (GP 30) | - | USA; ICRISAT | Resistant | Hammons et al. [80,81] |
ICG(FDRS)30 | - | USA; ICRISAT; Israel | Resistant | Reddy et al. [82] |
4.3. Breeding for Rust Resistance
5. Application of Molecular Marker Technology and the Mining of Rust Resistance Gene
6. Outlook
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy. 2021. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed on 18 June 2023).
- Leppik, E.E. Assumed gene centers of peanuts and soybeans. Econ. Bot. 1971, 25, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennen, J.F.; Figucredo, M.B.; Riberio, I.J.A.; Soave, J. The occurrence of teliospores of Puccinia arachidis (Uredinales) on Arachis hypogaea in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Summa Phytopathol. 1976, 2, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
- Bromfield, K.R. Peanut rust: A review of literature. J. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Assoc. 1971, 3, 111–112. [Google Scholar]
- Mondal, S.; Badigannavar, A.M. Peanut rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) disease: Its background and recent accomplishments towards disease resistance breeding. Protoplasma 2015, 252, 1409–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daudi, H.; Shimelis, H.; Mwadzingeni, L.; Laing, M.; Okori, P. Breeding peanut for rust resistance: A review. Legume Res. 2019, 42, 291–299. [Google Scholar]
- Subrahmanyam, P.; McDonald, D. Peanut rust disease: Epidemiology and control. In Peanut Rust Disease, Proceedings of the Discussion Group Meeting, Patancheru, India, 24–28 September 1984; ICRISAT: Patancheru, India, 1987; pp. 27–39. [Google Scholar]
- Kirk, P.M.; Cannon, P.F.; Minter, D.W.; Stalpers, J.A. Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Aime, M.C.; Toome, M.; McLaughlin, D.J. The Pucciniomycotina. In The Mycota VII Part A. Systematics and Evolution, 2nd ed.; McLaughlin, D., Spatafora, J.W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 271–294. [Google Scholar]
- Tashildar, C.B.; Avider, S.S.; Chattannavar, S.N.; Palakshappa, M.G.; Kenchanagaudar, P.V.; Fakruddin, B. Morphological and isozyme variations in Puccinia arachidis Speg. causing rust of peanut. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 25, 340–345. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, A.A.C.; Silva, G.S.; Moraes, F.H.R.; Silva, C.L.P. Arachis repens: Novo Hospedeiro de Puccinia arachidis. Fitopatol. Bras. 2006, 31, 410–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Raj, S.K. Temporal and spatial epidemic development of peanut rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) as a function of altered date of sowing. Trop. Agric. 1999, 76, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
- Foudin, A.S.; Macko, V. Identification of the self inhibitor and some germination characteristics of peanut rust uredospores. Phytopathology 1974, 64, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Hande, P.; Badigannavar, A.M. Identification of transposable element markers for a rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) resistance gene in cultivated peanut. J. Phytopathol. 2014, 162, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, M. Host-parasite relations in uredial infections of peanut by Puccinia arachidis. Phytopathology 1980, 70, 822–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M.; Farias, M.P.; Silva, P.T.; Guimarães, P.M.; Brasileiro, A.C.M.; Bertioli, D.J.; Araujo, A.C.G. Ultrastructure of the initial interaction of Puccinia arachidis and Cercosporidium personatum with leaves of Arachis hypogaea and Arachis stenosperma. J. Phytopathol. 2010, 158, 792–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M.; José, A.C.V.; Alves-Freitas, D.M.; Moretzsohn, M.C.; Guimarães, P.M.; Nielen, S.; Vidigal, B.S.; Pereira, R.W.; Pike, J.; Fávero, A.P.; et al. Identification of candidate genome regions controlling disease resistance in Arachis. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sunkad, G.; Kulkarni, S. Studies on perpetuation and carry over of peanut rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) in northern Karnataka. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 20, 297–300. [Google Scholar]
- Park, R.F.; Wellings, C.R. Somatic hybridization in the uredinales. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2012, 50, 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peregrene, W.T.J. Peanut rust (Puccinia arachidis) in Brunei. Pest Artic. News Summ. 1971, 19, 318–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subrahmanyam, P.; McDonald, D. Peanut rust-its survival and carry over in India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 1982, 91, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, A.S.; McDonald, D.; Reddy, K.R. Effect of temperature on rust and late leaf spot disease development in peanut. J Oilseed Res. 1997, 14, 249–255. [Google Scholar]
- Pivonia, S.; Yang, X. Relating epidemic progress from a general disease model to seasonal appearance time of rusts in the United States: Implications for soybean rust. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savary, S.; Janeau, J.L. Rain-induced dispersal in Puccinia arachidis, studied by means of a rainfall simulator. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 1986, 92, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulbule, S.; Mayee, C. Influence of weather parameters on the deposition pattern of urediniospores of peanut rust. Indian J. Mycol. Pl. Path. 1997, 27, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
- Kokalis-Burelle, N.; Porter, D.M.; Rodriguez-Kabana, R.; Smith, D.; Subrahmanyam, P. Compendium of peanut diseases. Am. Phytopathol. 1997, 2, 31–333. [Google Scholar]
- NARI. Annual Report 2000; NARI: Naliendele, Tanzania, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Gowdu, B.J.; Balasubramanian, R. Biocontrol potential of rust of peanut by Acremonium obclavatum. Can. J. Bot. 1993, 71, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manjula, K.; Kishore, G.K.; Podile, A.R. Whole cells of Bacillus subtilis AF 1 proved more effective than cell-free and chitinase-based formulations in biological control of citrus fruit rot and peanut rust. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Podile, A.R.; Kishore, G.K. Biological control of peanut diseases. In Biological Control of Crop Diseases; Gnanamanickam, S.S., Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 131–160. [Google Scholar]
- Gowda, M.V.C.; Motagi, B.N.; Naidu, G.K.; Diddimani, S.B.; Sheshagiri, R. GPBD 4: A Spanish bunch peanut genotype resistant to rust and late leaf spot. Int. Arachis Newsl. 2002, 22, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, B.; Lei, Y. A black seed coat peanut cultivar Zhonghua 9 released in China. Int. Arachis Newsl. 2004, 24, 29. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, L.J.; Nigma, S.N.; Moss, J.P.; Singh, A.K.; Subrahmanyam, P.; Mcdonald, D.; Reddy, A.G.S. Registration of ICGV 86699 peanut germplasm line with multiple disease and insect resistance. Crop Sci. 1996, 36, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.K.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Pande, S.; Moss, J.P. Registration of rust and late leaf spot resistant peanut germplasm lines. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mace, E.S.; Phong, D.T.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Chandra, S.; Crouch, J.H. SSR analysis of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm resistant to rust and late leaf spot diseases. Euphytica 2006, 152, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stalker, H. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Field Crop Res. 1997, 53, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasupuleti, J.; Nigam, S.; Pandey, M.K.; Nagesh, P.; Varshney, R.K. Peanut improvement: Use of genetic and genomic tools. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 23. [Google Scholar]
- Bromfield, K.R.; Bailey, W.K. Inheritance of resistance to Puccinia arachidis in peanut. Phytopathology 1972, 62, 748–760. [Google Scholar]
- Nigam, S.N.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Gibbons, R.W. Grounnut Breeding at ICRISAT; International Workshop on Peanuts; ICRISAT Center: Patancheru, India, 1980; Volume 1, pp. 62–68. [Google Scholar]
- Kishore, B. Rust Inheritance Studies in Peanut (Arachls hypogaea L.). Master’s Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Guntur, India, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari, S.P.; Ghewande, M.P.; Misra, D.P. Inheritance of resistance to rust and late leaf spot in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Cytol. Genet. 1984, 19, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
- Paramasivam, K.; Jayasekhar, M.; Rajasekharan, R.; Veerabadhiran, P. Inheritance of rust resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agric. J. 1990, 77, 50–52. [Google Scholar]
- Joel, A.; Sumathi, P.; Raveendran, T. Genetics of rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) and its association with rust related traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Arch. 2006, 6, 553–556. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.K.; Moss, J.P. Utilization of wild relatives in the genetic improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1984, 68, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wynne, J.C.; Beute, M.K.; Nigam, S.N. Breeding for disease resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 1991, 29, 279–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayman, B.I. The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 1958, 12, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghewande, M.P. Rust of peanut-an overview. In Integrated Pest and Disease Management; Upadhyay, R.K., Mukherji, K.G., Chamola, B.P., Dubey, O.P., Eds.; APH Publishing Corp: New Delhi, India, 2009; pp. 326–334. [Google Scholar]
- Subrahmanyam, P.; Moss, J.P.; Rao, V.R. Resistance to peanut rust in wild Arachis species. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pande, S.; Rao, N.J. Resistance of wild Arachis species to late leaf spot and rust in greenhouse trials. Plant Dis. 2001, 85, 851–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fávero, A.P.; Moraes, S.A.; Garcia, A.A.F.; Valls, J.F.M.; Vello, N.A. Characterization of rust, early and late leaf spot resistance in wild and cultivated peanut germplasm. Sci. Agric. 2009, 66, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal-Bertioli, S.C.M.; Cavalcante, U.; Cavalcante, E.G.; Ballén-Taborda, C.; Shirasawa, K.; Guimarães, P.M.; Jackson, S.A.; Bertioli, D.J.; Moretzsohn, M.C. Identification of QTLs for rust resistance in the peanut wild species Arachis magna and the development of KASP markers for marker assisted selection. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2015, 5, 1403–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.Q.; Li, S.X.; Li, Y.C.; Zhou, G.Y. Release of cultivars Yueyou 5 and Yueyou 79 in Guangdong, China. Int. Arachis Newsl. 1999, 19, 15–16. [Google Scholar]
- Mondal, S.; Badigannavar, A.M.; D’Souza, S.F. Molecular tagging of a rust resistance gene in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) introgressed from Arachis cardenasii. Mol. Breed. 2012, 29, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Power, I.L.; Culbreath, A.K.; Tillman, B.L. Characterization of resistance of peanut to Puccinia arachidis. Plant Health Prog. 2013, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari, V.; Gowda, M.; Tasiwal, V.; Pandey, M.K.; Bhat, R.S.; Mallikarjuna, N.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Varshney, R.K. Diversification of primary gene pool through introgression of resistance to foliar diseases from synthetic amphidiploids to cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop J. 2014, 2, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajjar, K.N.; Mishra, G.P.; Radhakrishnan, T.; Dodia, S.M.; Rathnakumar, A.L.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, S.; Dobaria, J.R.; Kumar, A. Validation of SSR markers linked to the rust and late leaf spot diseases resistance in diverse peanut genotypes. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 927–936. [Google Scholar]
- Upadhyaya, H.D.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Vadez, V.; Hamidou, F.; Singh, S.; Varshney, R.K.; Liao, B. Multiple resistant and nutritionally dense germplasm identified from Mini Core Collection in peanut. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sudini, H.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Reddy, S.V.; Mangala, U.N.; Rathore, A.; Kumar, K.V.K. Resistance to late leaf spot and rust diseases in ICRISAT’s mini core collection of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Australas. Plant Pathol. 2015, 44, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okori, P.; Monyo, E.S.; Okello, D.K.; Mponda, O.K.; Chamango, A.; Chintu, J.; Amane, M.; Mausch, K. Enhancing peanut productivity and production in Eastern and Southern Africa. In Seven Seasons of Learning and Engaging Smallholder Farmers in the Drought-Prone Areas of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia through Tropical Legumes, 2007–2014; Monyo, E.S., Varshney, R.K., Eds.; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: Patancheru, India, 2016; pp. 11–27. [Google Scholar]
- Mondal, S.; Badigannavar, A.M. Mapping of a dominant rust resistance gene revealed two R genes around the major Rust_QTL in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1671–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhari, S.; Khare, D.; Patil, S.C.; Sundravadana, S.; Variath, M.T.; Sudini, H.K.; Manohar, S.S.; Bhat, R.S.; Pasupuleti, J. Genotype × Environment Studies on Resistance to Late Leaf Spot and Rust in Genomic Selection Training Population of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daudi, H.; Shimelis, H.; Mathew, I.; Oteng-Frimpong, R.; Ojiewo, C.; Varshney, R.K. Genetic diversity and population structure of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) accessions using phenotypic traits and SSR markers: Implications for rust resistance breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2020, 68, 581–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daudi, H.; Shimelis, H.; Mathew, I.; Rathore, A.; Ojiewo, C.O. Combining ability and gene action controlling rust resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Mohamed Shafi, K.; Raizada, A.; Song, H.; Badigannavar, A.M.; Sowdhamini, R. Development of candidate gene-based markers and map-based cloning of a dominant rust resistance gene in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Gene 2022, 827, 146474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajarathinam, P.; Palanisamy, G.P.R.; Narayana, M.; Alagirisamy, M. Marker assisted backcross to introgress late leaf spot and rust resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 2411–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Badigannavar, A.M.; Kale, D.M.; Mondal, S.; Murty, G.S.S. Trombay peanut recombinants resistant to foliar diseases. Mutat. Breed. Newsl. Rev. 2005, 1, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
- Chuni, L.; Basu, M.S.; Hariprasanna, K. Breeding peanut for biotic stresses. In Peanut Research in India; Basu, M.S., Singh, N.B., Eds.; National Research Centre for Peanut (Now, Directorate of Peanut Research): Junagadh, India, 2014; pp. 24–37. [Google Scholar]
- Kalaimani, S.; Manoharan, V.; Varman, P.V.; Sridharan, C.S.; Thangavelu, S.; Dharmalingam, V. An interspecific cross derivative-a new source of foliar disease resistance. Int. Arachis Newsl. 1996, 16, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Kolekar, R.M.; Sukruth, M.; Shirasawa, K.; Nadaf, H.L.; Motagi, B.N.; Lingaraju, S.; Patil, P.V.; Bhat, R.S.; Varshney, R. Marker-assisted backcrossing to develop foliar disease-resistant genotypes in TMV 2 variety of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Breed. 2017, 136, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shasidhar, Y.; Variatha, M.T.; Vishwakarma, M.K.; Manohar, S.S.; Gangurde, S.S.; Sriswathi, M.; Sudini, H.K.; Dobariya, K.L.; Bera, S.K.; Radhakrishnan, T. Improvement of three popular Indian peanut varieties for foliar disease resistance and high oleic acid using SSR markers and SNP array in marker assisted backcrossing. Crop J. 2020, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeri, S.B.; Bhat, R.S. Development of late leaf spot and rust resistant backcross lines in JL 24 variety of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Electron. J. Plant Breed. 2016, 71, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nigam, S.N.; Reddy, L.; Subrahmanyam, P.; Reddy, A.G.S.; McDonald, D.; Gibbons, R.W. Registration of ICGV 87157, An Elite Peanut Germplasm with Multiple Resistance to Diseases. Crop Sci. 1992, 36, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshmukh, D.B.; Marathi, B.; Sudini, H.K.; Variath, M.T.; Chaudhari, S.; Manohar, S.S.; Rani, C.V.D.; Pandey, M.K.; Pasupuleti, J. Combining high oleic acid trait and resistance to late leaf spot and rust diseases in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varshney, R.K.; Pandey, M.K.; Janila, P.; Nigam, S.N.; Sudini, H.; Gowda, M.V.C.; Sriswathi, M.; Radhakrishnan, T.; Manohar, S.S.; Nagesh, P. Marker-assisted introgression of a QTL region to improve rust resistance in three elite and popular varieties of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 1771–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reddy, L.J.; Nigam, S.N.; Rao, R.C.N.; Reddy, N.S. Registration of ICGV 87354 peanut germplasm with drought tolerance and rust resistance. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 274–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyaya, H.D.; Nigam, S.N.; Reddy, A.G.S. Registration of early maturing, rust, late leaf spot, and low temperature tolerant peanut germplasm line ICGV 92267. Crop Sci. 2002, 42, 2220–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasupuleti, J.; Pandey, M.K.; Manohar, S.S.; Variath, M.T.; Nallathambi, P.; Nadaf, H.L.; Sudini, H.; Varshney, R.K.; Singh, R. Foliar fungal disease-resistant introgression lines of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) record higher pod and haulm yield in multilocation testing. Plant Breed. 2016, 135, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subrahmanyam, P.; McDonald, D.; Waliyar, F.; Reddy, L.J.; Nigam, S.N.; Gibbons, R.W.; Rao, V.R.; Singh, A.K.; Pande, S.; Reddy, P.M.; et al. Screening Methods and Sources of Resistance to Rust and Late Leaf Spot of Peanut; ICRISAT Information Bulletin No. 47; ICRISAT: Hyderabad, India, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, L.; Guo, J.; Li, W.; Huang, L.; Luo, H.; Liu, N.; Zhou, X.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Lyu, J.; et al. Novel genotypes and quantitative trait locus for rust resistance in peanut. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2022, 44, 1074–1080. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Hammons, R.O.; Branch, W.D.; Bromfield, K.R.; Subrahmanyam, P.; Rao, V.R.; Nigam, S.N.; Gibbons, R.W.; Goldin, E. Registration of Tifrust-13 peanut germplasm. Crop Sci. 1982, 22, 697. [Google Scholar]
- Hammons, R.O.; Branch, W.D.; Bromfield, K.R.; Subrahmanyam, P.; Rao, V.R.; Nigam, S.N.; Gibbons, R.W. Registration of Tifrust-14 peanut germplasm (Reg. No. GP31). Crop Sci. 1982, 22, 697–698. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, L.J.; Nigam, S.N.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Gibbons, R.W. Breeding peanut cultivars resistant to rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.). In Peanut Rust Disease; ICRISAT: Patanchcru, India, 1987; pp. 17–25. [Google Scholar]
- Gowda, M.V.C.; Motagi, B.N.; Sheshagiri, R.; Naidu, G.K.; Rajendraprasad, M.N. Mutant 28-2: A bold-seeded disease and pest resistant peanut genotype for Karnataka, India. Int. Arachis Newsl. 2002, 22, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
- Gorbet, D.W.; Norden, A.J.; Shokes, F.M.; Knauft, D.A. Registration of Southern Runner peanut. Crop Sci. 1987, 27, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, L.J.; Nigam, S.N.; Subrahmanyam, P.; Reddy, A.G.S.; McDonald, D.; Gibbons, R.W.; Pentaiah, V. Registration of “ICGV 86590” peanut cultivar. Crop Sci. 1993, 33, 357–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorbet, D.W.; Shokes, F.M. Registration of ‘C-99R’ peanut. Crop Sci. 2002, 42, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorbet, D.W.; Shokes, F.M. Registration of ‘Florida MDR 98′ peanut. Crop Sci. 2002, 42, 2207–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorbet, D.W. Registration of ‘Hull’ peanut. J. Plant Regist. 2007, 1, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorbet, D.W.; Tillman, B.L. Registration of ‘York’ peanut. J. Plant Regist. 2011, 5, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, Y.; Chen, X. Study on breeding of high-yield and rust-resistant peanut variety Shanyou 523. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 1996, 32, 19–20. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liang, X.Q.; Li, Y.C.; Li, S.X.; Zhou, G.Y. Yueyou 223: A high yielding Chinese cultivar with good resistance to rust. Int. Arachis Newsl. 1999, 19, 16–17. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y.; Chen, X.; Lin, C. Breeding and production application of a peanut variety, Shanyou 27. Peanut Sci. Technol. 1999, 28, 185–188. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y.; Chen, X. Breeding of a new peanut variety Shanyou 71. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2000, 22, 9–11. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, R.; Han, Z.; Jin, H.; Zhou, C. Breeding and application of a new peanut variety Guihua 23 with high yield and multiple resistance. J. Peanut Sci. 2003, 32, 230–232. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Zhou, S.; Guan, H.; Liu, S. A new little peanut variety Yuanza 9102. China Seed Ind. 2003, 22, 56. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, A.; Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Feng, X.; Yang, W. Breeding of a new peanut variety Zhanyou 30 with high yield. J. Peanut Sci. 2003, 32, 26–28. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Feng, X.; Chen, A.; Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Jiang, R. Breeding of a new peanut variety Zhanyou 62. J. Peanut Sci. 2004, 33, 23–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y.; Huang, W.; Chen, X.; Liang, J.; Qi, G.; Huang, Y.; Chen, F. Multiple resistance, high yield and fine quality new peanut variety Shanyou 162. J. South. Agric. 2005, 36, 379. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Fang, X.; Liao, W.; Xiao, L.; Zhou, G.; Li, D.; Cai, S. A primary report on the introduction and demonstration of super high-yield peanut variety Yueyou 7. J. Peanut Sci. 2007, 36, 38–40. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.; Zhou, G.; Liang, X.; Li, S.; Lin, K.; Hong, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, H. Breeding of a new peanut variety Yueyou 114 and its cultivation technologies. J. Peanut Sci. 2007, 36, 34–37. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Han, T.; Wang, F. Shangyan 9658: A new peanut variety with high yield, multi-resistance and high oil. Crops 2008, 24, 116. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; Luo, W.; Chen, R.; Zhuang, M. Breeding of a new peanut variety Quanhua 7. J. Peanut Sci. 2008, 37, 41–44. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z.; Xu, R.; Lan, X.; Lin, Y.; Shi, G. Breeding and cultivation of a new rust-resistant peanut variety, Fuhua 6. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 26, 729–732. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, K. Breeding and cultivation of a new peanut variety, Shanyou 65. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2011, 38, 47–58. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, A.; Feng, X.; Lin, W.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y. Breeding of high-yield, good quality and disease-resistant new peanut variety Zhanyou 75 and its cultivation technologies. J. Peanut Sci. 2011, 40, 34–36. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X. Breeding of a new peanut variety Shanyou 12. Fujian Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 41, 43. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Sun, C.; Yang, Y. Characteristics and high-yield cultivation techniques of Kainongheihuasheng. Bull. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 27, 164. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Su, Y.; Huang, T. A new peanut variety Yueyou 93. Fujian Agric. 2012, 27, 12–13. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, R.; Xu, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Cheng, Y.; Zeng, L.; Fang, L.; Lin, Y.; He, S. Cultivation technology research and application of new peanut variety Zhongkaihua 1. Trop. Agric. Eng. 2014, 38, 10–15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Tang, F.; Dong, W.; Zang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Han, S.; Qin, L. Breeding of a new peanut variety Yuanza 9847 and its enlightenments. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2014, 43, 38–41. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tang, G.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Liao, B.; Li, D.; Xia, X.M.; Duan, N.X.; Wang, Z.Z. Breeding a high-yielding and rust-resistant peanut cultivar, Zhonghua No. 4, and its application. In Achieving High Peanut Yields; Gowda, C.L.L., Nigam, S.N., Johansen, C., Renard, C., Eds.; Proc Intl Workshop: Shandong, China, 1996; pp. 199–202. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, B.; Lei, Y. Zhonghua No. 12 with high oil and red skin. Farmer’s Consult. 2007, 12, 67. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Xiao, Z.; Su, Y.; Ma, Q.; Liu, S. Yuhua 15: A new peanut variety with early maturity, high yield and high oil. China Seed Ind. 2005, 24, 65. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Su, R.; Wu, J.; Li, K.; Ma, Q. A new peanut variety Shangyan 9938 and its high-yield cultivation technology. China Seed Ind. 2010, 29, 73. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Mao, R.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, W.; Wu, L.; Chen, J. A new high quality and high yield big peanut variety Huayu 18 and its high yield cultivation technology. J. Peanut Sci. 2003, 32, 470–471. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ye, M. Yueyou 92: A new peanut variety with high resistance to bacterial wilt. Crops 1986, 2, 18. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, G. An introduction of a new peanut variety-Guihua 21. Peanut Sci. Technol. 2001, 30, 4–6. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhuang, M. Quanhua 327: A new peanut variety with high yield and high quality. Bull. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2003, 19, 37–38. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Sugui, F.P. A new peanut variety NSIC Pn 12 released in Philippines. Int. Arachis Newsl. 2004, 24, 27–29. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, H.; Liao, B.; Lei, Y.; Ren, X.; Wang, S.; Li, D.; Jiang, H.; Huang, J.; Chen, B. Identification of AFLP markers for resistance to peanut rust. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2007, 29, 89–92. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Mondal, S.; Badigannavar, A.M.; Murty, G. RAPD markers linked to a rust resistance gene in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 2007, 159, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varma, T.S.N.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Pande, S.; Gowda, M.V.C. SSR markers associated with resistance to rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 2005, 37, 107–119. [Google Scholar]
- Khedikar, Y.P.; Gowda, M.V.C.; Sarvamangala, C.; Patgar, K.V.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Varshney, R.K. A QTL study on late leaf spot and rust revealed one major QTL for molecular breeding for rust resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 971–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujay, V.; Gowda, M.V.C.; Pandey, M.K.; Bhat, R.S.; Khedikar, Y.P.; Nadaf, H.L.; Gautami, B.; Sarvamangala, C.; Lingaraju, S.; Radhakrishan, T.; et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis and construction of consensus genetic map for foliar disease resistance based on two recombinant inbred line populations in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Mol. Breed. 2012, 30, 773–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolekar, R.M.; Sujay, V.; Shirasawa, K.; Sukruth, M.; Khedikar, Y.P.; Gowda, M.V.C.; Pandey, M.K.; Varshney, R.K.; Bhat, R.S. QTL mapping for late leaf spot and rust resistance using an improved genetic map and extensive phenotypic data on a recombinant inbred line population in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 2016, 209, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, M.K.; Khan, A.W.; Singh, V.K.; Vishwakarma, M.K.; Shasidhar, Y.; Kumar, V.; Garg, V.; Bhat, R.S.; Chitikineni, A.; Varshney, R.K.; et al. QTL-seq approach identified genomic regions and diagnostic markers for rust and late leaf spot resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 927–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shirasawa, K.; Bhat, R.S.; Khedikar, Y.P.; Sujay, V.; Kolekar, R.M.; Yeri, S.B.; Sukruth, M.; Cholin, S.; Asha, B.; Pandey, M.K.; et al. Sequencing analysis of genetic loci for resistance for late leaf spot and rust in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, S.; Nawade, B.; Sangh, C.; Mishra, G.P.; Bosamia, T.C.T.R.; Kumar, N.; Dobaria, J.R.; Gajera, H.P. Identification of novel QTLs for late leaf spot resistance and validation of a major rust QTL in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 458. [Google Scholar]
- Bertioli, D.J.; Cannon, S.B.; Froenicke, L.; Huang, G.D.; Farmer, A.D.; Cannon, E.K.S.; Liu, X.; Gao, D.Y.; Clevenger, J.; Dash, S.; et al. The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, W.J.; Chen, H.; Yang, M.; Wang, J.P.; Pandey, M.K.; Zhang, C.; Chang, W.C.; Zhang, L.S.; Zhang, X.T.; Tang, R.H.; et al. The genome of cultivated peanut provides insight into legume karyotypes, polyploid evolution and crop domestication. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Species | Genotype | Source/Origin | Rust Reaction | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
A. batizocoi | ICG 8124 | ICRISAT | Immune | Subrahmanyam et al. [48] |
A.correntina a | ICGs 4984, 8134, 8132, 8140 | |||
A.chacoense a | ICG 4983 | |||
A.villosa | ICG 8144 | |||
Arachis sp. b | ICG 8918 | |||
Arachis sp. | ICGs 8193, 8127, 8128, 8145, 8148, 8152, 8154, 8155, 8156, 8158, 8929, 8159, 8160, 8161, 8162, 8165, 8166, 8933, 8167, 8168, 8170, 8171, 8941, 4984, 8937 | |||
A.apressipila a | ICG 8129 | |||
A.paraguariensis | ICG 8130 | |||
A.pusilla | ICG 8131 | |||
A.villosulicarpa | ICG 8142 | |||
A.hagenbeckii | ICGs 8922, 8146 | |||
A.glabrata | ICGs 8149, 8150, 8151, 8153, 8935, 8936, 8902 | |||
- | ICGs 8172, 8916 | |||
A. stenosperma a | ICGs 8126, 8137, 8952, 8954, GKP9893 | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Subrahmanyam et al. [48] |
A.glabrata A.villosulicarpa | PIs 118457, 231318, 262287, 262141, 262801, PI 336985 | - | Immune | |
A.monticola | PI 263393 | - | Immune | |
A. duranensis | ICGs 8123, 8138, 8139, 8195, 8196, 8199, 8200, 8201, 8202, 8204, 8205, 8957, 11550, 11552, 11553, 11554, 11555, 12162, 13161, 13174, 13175, 13176, 13183, 13184, 13185, 13186, 13189, 13190, 13191, 13192, 13194, 13195, 13197, 13199, 13200, 13201, 13202, 13203, 13205, 13206, 13207, 13217, 13242, 15179 | ICRISAT | Highly resistant | Pande and Rao [49] |
A. hoehnei | 8190, 14867 | |||
A. kretschmeri | 8191 | |||
A. cardenasii | 8216, 11558, 11566 | |||
A. batizogaea | 8901, 13208 | |||
A. stenosperma | 8906, 13173, 13233, 14868, 14872 | |||
A. kempff-Mercadoi | 8959 | |||
A. magna | 8960 | |||
A. valida | 11548 | |||
A. benensis | 11551 | |||
A. chiquitana | 11560 | |||
A. decora | 14939 | |||
A. kuhlmannii | 15144 | |||
A. stenosperma A. villosa | ICG 8125 ICG 8144 | ICRISAT | Resistant | Pande and Rao [49] |
A. aff. diogoi A. helodes A. simpsonii A. kuhlmannii A. gregoryi A. kuhlmannii | VSPmSv 13774 Pa s/n, VK 12083 VSPmSv 13710 VPoJSv 10506 VSGr 6389 VPoBi 9230 | Brazil | Immune | Fávero et al. [50] |
A. cardenasii | GKP 10017, 1 | Brazil | Highly resistant | |
A. helodes | CoSzSv 6862, VPoJSv 10470, VMPzW 13985, KG 30006, VPoBi 9094, VSGr 6325, VPoBi 9146 | |||
A. linearifolia | VPoBi 9401 | |||
A. stenosperma | VGaRoSv 12488, HLK 408, Lm 5, VSStGdW 7762, Jt 2, Lm 3, SvW 3755, VKSSv 9010, VMiSv 10229, VSPmSv 13832, WPz 422, Lm 1, VSSv 7382, VSv 10309, VSPmSv 13670, VKSSv 9017, WPz 421, SvPzSz 3042, VGaSv 12646, VSPmWiSv 13262, VSPmSv 13693, VSPmW 13844, VSSv 13258 | |||
A. diogoi | GK 10602 | |||
A. duranensis | VNvEv 14167, K 7988 | |||
A. kempff-mercadoi | V 13250 | |||
A. kuhlmannii | VRGeSv 7639, VPoBi 9235, VSGr 6344, VSGr 6352, VSGr 6380, VKSSv 8916a, VPoBi 9470, VPoBi 9479, VSW 9912, VSPmSv 13721, VSGr 6351, VKSSv 8979, VPoBi 9394, VSGr 6413, VPoBi 9375, VPoBi 9214, VPoBi 9243 | |||
A. microsperma | VRGeSv 13545, VMPzW 14042 | |||
A. magna | KGSSc 30097, VSPmSv 13751, VSPmSv 13765, VSPmSv 13748 | |||
A. villosa | VGoMrOv 12812 | |||
A. batizocoi | K 9484 mut | |||
A. cruziana | WiSVg 1302 | |||
A. simpsonii | VSPmSv 13716, VSPmSv 13728, VSPmSv 13745 | |||
A. schininii | VSW 9923 | |||
A. valida | VPzRcSgSv 13514 | |||
A. magna | K 30097 | Brazil | Highly resistant | Leal-bertioli et al. [51] |
Genotype | Source/Origin | Rust Reaction | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
GPBD 4, Mutant 28-2 | India | Highly resistant | Gowda et al. [31,83]; Mondal et al. [53] |
Ah 6, ALR 1, ALR 2, ALR 3, BSR 1, Chitala White, CSMG 84-1, Girnar 1, ICG FDRS 10, ICGS 76, JGN 3, KRG 1, R2001-2, R2001-3, VG0401, VG0411, VG0430, VG0437, VG0438, VG09405, VG09406, VRIGn 5 | India | Resistant | Chuni et al. [67]; Gajjar et al. [56] |
ICGV 86590; ICGV 86855 | ICRISAT | Resistant | Gowda et al. [31,83]; Power et al. [54] |
Southern Runner, Florida MDR 98, C-99R, Hull, York | USA | Resistant | Gorbet et al. [85]; Gorbet and Shokes [86,87]; Gorbet [88]; Gorbet and Tillman [89] |
Fuhua 6, Guihua 23, Kainongheihuasheng, Quanhua 7, Shangyan 9658, Shanyou 27, Shanyou 65, Shanyou 71, Shanyou 162, Shanyou 212, Shanyou 523, Yuanza 9102, Yuanza 9847, Yueyou 7, Yueyou 9 *, Yueyou 14 *, Yueyou 93, Yueyou 114, Yueyou 223, Yuhua 9840 *, Zhanyou 30, Zhanyou 62, Zhanyou 75, Zhongkaihua No. 1 | China | Highly resistant | Zhen and Chen [90]; Liang et al. [91]; Zheng et al. [92]; Zheng and Chen [93]; Zhong et al. [94]; Wu et al. [95]; Chen et al. [96]; Feng et al. [97]; Zheng et al. [98]; Fang et al. [99]; Li et al. [100]; Wu et al. [101]; Chen et al. [102]; Tang et al. [103]; Chen et al. [104]; Wang et al. [105]; Li et al. [106]; Li et al. [107]; Su and Huang [108]; Chen et al. [109]; Xu et al. [110] |
Yueyou 5, Yueyou 79, Zhonghua No. 4, Zhonghua No. 9, Zhonghua No. 12, Yuhua No. 15, Shangyan 9938, Huayu 18, Yueyou 92, Guihua 21, Quanhua 327, Tianfu 22 | China | Resistant | Liang et al. [52]; Tang et al. [111]; Liao and Lei [32]; Liao and Lei [112]; Wu et al. [113]; Su et al. [114]; Mao et al. [115]; Ye [116]; Zhou [117]; Chen et al. [118] |
NSIC Pn 12 | Philippines | Resistant | Sugui [119] |
Narinut 15, Narinut | Tanzania | Resistant | Daudi et al. [62]; Daudi et al. [63] |
Major QTL | Linkage Group/Chromosome | Marker Interval | Position (cM) | LOD Value | Phenotypic Variance Explained (PVE%) | Population | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTL01 * | AhXV (B03) | AhTE0498–GM2009 | 0.0–17.8 | 21.4–30.9 | 62.7–70.4 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | Kolekar et al. [124] |
QTL02 * | AhXV (B03) | GM2079–AhTE0928 | 34.0–40.3 | 14.3–56.0 | 19.4–64.6 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL03 * | AhXV (B03) | GM2009–IPAHM103 | 17.8–26.8 | 31.3–54.5 | 30.0–53.7 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL04 * | AhXV (B03) | IPAHM103–GM2301 | 26.8–29.3 | 40.9–42.3 | 34.7–35.9 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL05 * | AhXV (B03) | GM2301–GM1536 | 29.3–31.7 | 35.3 | 34 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL06 * | AhV (A05) | GM1989–AhTE0839 | 65.8–80.5 | 2.3 | 10.2 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust80D_06 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 36.1 | 83.6 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | Pandey et al. [125] |
qRust90D_06 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 30.6 | 24.1 | 75.4 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust80D_07 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 49.9 | 65.4 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust90D_07 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 47.2 | 73.1 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust80D_08 | A03 | GMRQ843–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 35.2 | 69.7 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust90D_08 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 49.2 | 63.7 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust80D_09 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 16 | 48.9 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
qRust90D_09 | A03 | GMRQ517–Seq2B10 | 31.6 | 14.6 | 42.7 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-1 * | AhXV (A03) | GM2009–GM2079 | 7.77–13.89 | 4.05–4.96 | 7.59–11.77 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | Shirasawa et al. [126] |
QTL-2 * | AhXV (A03) | IPAHM103–Aradu.A03_AhTE0498 | 19.49–26.66 | 6.78–26.14 | 14.86–35.72 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-3 * | AhXV (A03) | GM1954–Aradu.A03_134423742 | 28.74–30.99 | 5.2 | 8.33 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-4 * | AhXV (A03) | Aradu.A03_133094130–Aradu.A03_132351805 | 33.65–33.76 | 5.61 | 8.71 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-5 * | AhXV (A03) | Aradu.A03_132351826–Aradu.A03_132071793 | 33.80–33.91 | 2.91 | 3.94 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-6 * | AhXV (A03) | Aradu.A03_132071793–Aradu.A03_132512710 | 33.91–33.96 | 7.34–15.94 | 8.99–22.06 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-7 * | AhXV (A03) | Aradu.A03_133038951–Aradu.A03_133449043 | 34.06–34.09 | 6.22 | 6.81 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-8 * | AhXV (A03) | Aradu.A03_133398903–Aradu.A03_132771430 | 34.42–34.50 | 9.45 | 14 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
QTL-9 * | AhXV (A03) | Aradu.A03_131792747–Aradu.A03_133997678 | 35.69–35.86 | 8.25 | 12.42 | TAG 24 × GPBD 4 | |
Rust_QTL | A03 | FRS72–SSR_GO340445 | 109.8-111.0 | 68.0–88.4 | 68.0–95.3 | VG 9514 × TAG 24 | Mondal and Badigannavar [60] |
RustQTL | A03 | FRS72–SSR_GO340445 | 133 | 87.81 | 70.52 | GJG17× GPBD4 | Ahmad et al. [127] |
CDS_ID/ Gene ID | Chromosome | Gene Position Start | Gene Position End | Annotation | Amino Acid Sequence Mutation | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Araip.RV63R | Araip.B08 | 127081618 | 127106493 | Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class) | - | Bertioli et al. [129] |
Aradu.C88Z1 | Aradu.A03 | 133033579 | 133038386 | Seed linoleate 9S-lipoxygenase | His307Arg, Gly49Arg, and Leu34Ser | Shirasawa et al. [127] |
Aradu.YL3ZN | Aradu.A03 | 134333421 | 134335845 | Receptor-like kinase 1 | Arg47Ser | Shirasawa et al. [127] |
AH13G54010.1 | Chr13(B03) | 143852400 | 143858431 | Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class) | - | Zhuang et al. [130] |
Aradu.RW91L | Aradu.A03 | 133933250 | 133935646 | Lipase/lipooxygenase, PLAT/LH2 family protein | Glu344Ala | Shirasawa et al. [127]; Ahmad et al. [128] |
Aradu.T44NR | Aradu.A03 | 133870461 | 133871403 | Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase-like protein 3-like [Glycine max] | - | Mondal and Badigannavar [60]; Ahmad et al. [128] |
Aradu.RKA6 M | Aradu.A03 | 133868497 | 133869566 | Glucan endo-1,3 β glucosidase like protein-3 like [Glycine max] | - | Mondal and Badigannavar [60]; Ahmad et al. [128] |
Aradu.1WV86 | Aradu.A03 | 133878019 | 133879319 | Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase-like protein 2-like [Glycine max] | Cys8Tyr | Shirasawa et al. [127]; Mondal and Badigannavar [60]; Ahmad et al. [128] |
Aradu.NG5IQ | Aradu.A03 | 133995919 | 133999850 | Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase 4-like [Glycine max] | Lys127Glu, Pro116Leu, Ser72Cys, and Gly69Cys | Shirasawa et al. [127]; Mondal and Badigannavar [60]; Ahmad et al. [128] |
Aradu.Z87JB | Aradu.A03 | 133776796 | 133780539 | Disease resistance protein (TIR-NBS-LRR class), putative | Ile27Val | Bertioli et al. [129]; Shirasawa et al. [127]; Mondal and Badigannavar [60]; Ahmad et al. [128] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
You, Y.; Liao, J.; He, Z.; Khurshid, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Mao, J.; Xia, Y. Effects of Peanut Rust Disease (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) on Agricultural Production: Current Control Strategies and Progress in Breeding for Resistance. Genes 2024, 15, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010102
You Y, Liao J, He Z, Khurshid M, Wang C, Zhang Z, Mao J, Xia Y. Effects of Peanut Rust Disease (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) on Agricultural Production: Current Control Strategies and Progress in Breeding for Resistance. Genes. 2024; 15(1):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010102
Chicago/Turabian StyleYou, Yu, Junhua Liao, Zemin He, Muhammad Khurshid, Chaohuan Wang, Zhenzhen Zhang, Jinxiong Mao, and Youlin Xia. 2024. "Effects of Peanut Rust Disease (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) on Agricultural Production: Current Control Strategies and Progress in Breeding for Resistance" Genes 15, no. 1: 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15010102