Next Article in Journal
Recurrence Rates and Patterns after Radical Resection of Lung Carcinoids
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic Role of Clinicopathological Characteristics and Serum Markers in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors
Previous Article in Special Issue
BRAFV600E Positivity-Dependent Effect of Age on Papillary Thyroid Cancer Recurrence Risk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 16
Issue 17
10.3390/cancers16172979
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pre-Operative Calcitonin and CEA Values May Predict the Extent of Metastases to the Lateral Neck Lymph Nodes in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer

by
Antonio Prinzi
1,*,
Francesco Frasca
1,
Marco Russo
1,
Gabriella Pellegriti
1,2,
Tommaso Piticchio
1,
Dario Tumino
1,
Antonino Belfiore
1 and
Pasqualino Malandrino
1
1
Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Garibaldi-Nesima Medical Center, 95122 Catania, Italy
2
Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2979; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172979
Submission received: 13 July 2024 / Revised: 24 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 27 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Total thyroidectomy and dissection of cervical lymph node compartments, depending on serum calcitonin levels and ultrasound findings, is standard treatment for patients with medullary thyroid cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre-operative calcitonin and CEA levels can be useful as biomarkers of the extent of lymph node metastases at diagnosis. Results indicate that pre-operative serum calcitonin and CEA levels can predict presence, number, and site of lymph node metastases and, more specifically, values of 90 pg/mL for calcitonin and 17 ng/mL for CEA accurately indicate the N1b status. Since surgery is the only curative treatment for medullary thyroid cancer and there is not a strong indication regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy, these findings may help in the choice of the extent of neck dissection.

Abstract

Background: In medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), lymph node metastases are often present at diagnosis and the extent of surgery is usually based upon pre-operative calcitonin and CEA levels as well as ultrasound findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of pre-operative calcitonin and CEA levels as predictive markers of the burden of lymph node metastases at diagnosis. Methods: we conducted a retrospective study analyzing 87 MTC patients. Results: The median levels of calcitonin and CEA were 88.4 pg/mL and 7.0 ng/mL, respectively, in patients with no lymph nodes metastases; 108.0 pg/mL and 9.6 ng/mL, respectively, in patients with metastases to 1–5 lymph nodes; 520.5 pg/mL and 43.2 ng/mL, respectively, in patients with metastases to >5 lymph nodes. There were no significant differences in pre-operative calcitonin and CEA values between N0 and N1a patients, whereas they were significantly higher in N1b patients. Pre-operative cut-off levels distinguishing N0/N1a from N1b patients were 90 pg/mL for calcitonin (sensitivity 100%, specificity 59.3%, AUC = 0.82) and 17 ng/mL for CEA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 75%, AUC = 0.89). Conclusions: in patients with MTC, pre-operative serum calcitonin and CEA levels may drive the decision-making process to better define the extent of surgery.

1. Introduction

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a neuroendocrine tumor derived from the C cells of the thyroid gland that produce calcitonin (Ctn) [1,2]. The overall frequency of MTC is not well established, but there was an increase from 0.14 to 0.21 per 100,000 people in the United States population between 1983 and 2012 [3]. The prevalence of MTC is ~2% of all thyroid neoplasms and 0.4–1.4% of all thyroid nodules, and this tumor is detected in approximately 0.14% of thyroid samples obtained from autopsies [3]. MTC most commonly presents as a solitary thyroid nodule in patients in the fourth to sixth decade of life [4]. MTC occurs sporadically in 75% of patients. In the other 25% of patients, MTC is hereditary, mainly in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN2A) (90–95%) and type 2B (MEN2B) (5–10%), which are autosomal dominant syndromes caused by a germline mutation in the REarranged during Transfection (RET) proto-oncogene [5].
The definitive cure of MTC is dependent on early detection and the completeness of the first surgical treatment [6]. Current guidelines recommend total thyroidectomy with central neck lymph node (CLN) dissection in patients with no evidence of neck lymph node metastases and no evidence of distant metastases. Dissection of the ipsilateral lateral compartments is recommended in patients with MTC confined to the central neck lymph nodes while contralateral lateral neck dissection should be considered if basal serum Ctn is greater than 200 pg/mL; however, the indications for prophylactic lateral neck lymph node (LLN) dissection and the recommended threshold levels of Ctn to warrant such intervention remain controversial [4]. Although the neck ultrasound (US) is a very reliable tool to detect metastatic lymph nodes, its accuracy is highly dependent on examiner’s experience [7] and micrometastases may be not correctly diagnosed. Moreover, the surgeon’s intraoperative assessment of lymph nodes may lead to misdiagnosing lymph node metastases (LNMs) in about 35% of excised nodal groups from the central or lateral compartments [8]. MTC can synthesize and secrete a variety of bioactive substances, such as Ctn and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), that, in addition to the neck US and intraoperative inspection, can be used like predictors of tumor extent in lymph nodes and eventually of the risk of recurrence [9,10,11,12]. Therefore, Ctn assay may be useful to suggest the most appropriate surgical intervention according to the pre-operative Ctn values. Previous studies reported that ipsilateral lateral LNM, contralateral lateral LNM, and distant metastasis were associated with pre-operative calcitonin thresholds of 20, 200, and 500 pg/mL, respectively [9,13]. In their study, Dr. Yip and coworkers observed that pre-operative Ctn values, but not pre-operative CEA, were correlated with tumor size [14]. At the opposite end, other studies reported that increased pre-operative CEA levels were associated with larger tumor size and the presence of lymph node and distant metastases [15,16]. Current guidelines recommend evaluating pre-operative Ctn values to consider the dissection of the ipsilateral and the contralateral lateral neck compartments [4]. However, no definitive recommendation on the usefulness of the CEA measure is provided.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre-operative Ctn and CEA levels can be useful as biomarkers to gauge the extent of lymph node metastases (LNMs) at diagnosis, thus contributing to adequate pre-operative staging and providing useful indications to the surgeon when choosing the type of neck dissection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from a series of patients diagnosed with MTC who were referred to the outpatient Thyroid Clinic at the Garibaldi-Nesima Medical Center, a tertiary referral center (Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Catania, Italy). In total, about 156 patients who were diagnosed with MTC at our Thyroid clinic between 2000 and 2022 were included in this study: of these, sufficient data were available for 123 patients. Among these, 116 patients were not affected by distant metastasis at diagnosis and only 87 underwent total thyroidectomy with neck dissection without evidence of disease recurrence for a minimum of 24 months and were selected for the purpose of this study (Figure 1). The retrospective study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional review board and Ethical Committee Catania 2 in Sicily, Italy. Signed informed consent from patients was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. We obtained the medical records of all patients from our computerized database and selected them based on the following criteria: (1) underwent total thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection; (2) histologically diagnosed with MTC; (3) availability of pre-operative measurements for Ctn and CEA; (4) pre- and post-operative imaging assessment to evaluate disease extent; (5) complete resection of the disease through surgery (details below); (6) absence of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and demonstrated no evidence of disease recurrence for a minimum of 24 months. Patients were considered free of disease after surgery if, for at least 24 months, they met the following criteria: both Ctn and CEA values remained below the normal upper limit, no lymph node metastases were identified through US features, confirmed by measuring Ctn in the washout from fine-needle aspiration biopsy of indeterminate lymph nodes, and no appearance of new lesions was suspected for distant metastases in computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

2.2. Treatment and Follow-Up

According to the guidelines of the American Thyroid Association [4], the standard surgical treatment for MTC comprises total thyroidectomy and dissection of cervical lymph node compartments, depending on both serum Ctn levels and neck US findings. Patients without evidence of neck LNM had a total thyroidectomy with dissection of the lymph nodes in the bilateral central compartments. In the presence of LNM identified through US features and confirmed by measuring Ctn in the washout from the fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lymph nodes or in cases of high Ctn values (>200 pg/mL), dissection of lymph nodes in the lateral compartments was deemed appropriate; specifically, ipsilateral lateral neck dissection was performed in patients with MTC confined to central lymph node compartment (level VI), while contralateral lateral neck dissection was performed in patients with pre-operative LNM in the ipsilateral lateral neck or in case of pre-operative Ctn values > 200 pg/mL.
The first follow-up visit was performed 3 months after primary surgery, then every 6 months for the first years and yearly thereafter. The follow-up frequency varied based on the Ctn and CEA levels and the radiological findings.

2.3. Serum Markers and Pathological Examination

Ctn and CEA assays were performed pre-operatively in all patients. Serum Ctn was measured with the Siemens IMMULITE® 2000 automatic chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer using a standard assay kit for in vitro diagnosis (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Limited, Princeton, NJ, USA). CEA was measured with the Siemens Centaur® XP automatic chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer and its supporting reagents (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.). Reference values were <10.0 pg/mL for Ctn and <5.0 ng/mL for CEA, in both males and females.
The histological samples were evaluated by an expert pathologist. The following features were recorded: size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, presence of LNM, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes. In multifocal or bilateral tumors, the largest tumor was considered.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data were presented as either the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as the median and interquartile range (IQR) in cases of non-normally distributed variables. Qualitative data were expressed as numbers and percentages. Percentages were compared using the χ2 test. For comparing means between two groups of continuous variables, we employed the t-test, while the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparing means among more than two groups. Linear regression was employed to assess the relationship between continuous variables and other parameters, with logarithmic transformation applied to variables displaying non-normal distributions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the pre-operative Ctn and CEA cut-off levels that best predicted the presence of N1b. All analyses were performed using STATA version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics in Patients with MTC

We included 87 patients in this study. The mean age of the patients was 48.3 ± 18.6 years; 59 were women (67.8%) and 28 were men (32.2%). The median tumor size at diagnosis was 10 mm (25–75 IQR = 6–17 mm). Bilateral tumors were identified in 17 (19.5%) patients, while multifocal tumors occurred in 21 (24.1%) patients. The median follow-up duration was 91.0 months (25–75 IQR = 53.9–136.7). During this period, recurrent disease was observed in 10 patients: median time to progression = 105 months (25–75 IQR = 48–114).
A total of 60 (69%) patients received treatment with total thyroidectomy plus central lymph node dissection, while 17 (31%) patients underwent total thyroidectomy with both central and lateral ipsilateral and 10 with lateral bilateral neck dissection. We grouped the patients based on the lymph node status as follows: 70 (80.5%) patients showed no evidence of LNMs (N0), 11 (12.6%) patients had metastases in the central neck (N1a), while 6 (6.9%) patients had metastases in the lateral (N1b) neck compartments (3 ipsilateral and 3 bilateral) (Table 1). Most patients (n = 43, 49%) had sporadic MTC, negative for RET germline mutation. Additionally, 34 (39%) patients showed familial MTC due to a germline RET mutation, while in 10 (12%) patients, the RET status was unknown. Among patients with familial MTC, 22 mutations were found in exon 618, 5 in exon 804, 3 in exon 634, 1 in exon 649, 1 in exon 768, 1 in exon 791, and 1 in exon 790.

3.2. Pre-Operative Ctn and CEA Levels

Pre-operative Ctn and CEA values increased significantly as the tumor size increased (p < 0.001 by univariate linear regression) (Figure 2). According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Classification (Thyroid Cancer), cancers are classified into four groups based on their maximum diameter: ≤10 mm (T1a), 11–20 mm (T1b), 21–39 mm (T2), and >40 mm (T3). The median pre-operative Ctn levels were 60 pg/mL in the T1a group, 234 pg/mL in the T1b group, 630 pg/mL in the T2 group, and 739 pg/mL in the T3 group (Table 2). The median pre-operative CEA levels were 5.5 ng/mL in the T1a group, 17.9 ng/mL in the T1b group, 43.7 ng/mL in the T2 group, and 52.0 ng/mL in the T3 group (Table 2). Median Ctn levels were not associated with multifocality or bilaterality, and CEA values were not associated with bilaterality either. In contrast, CEA values were significantly lower in patients with multifocal MTC compared to those with unifocal MTC (2.60 vs. 14.87 ng/mL, respectively).
The median Ctn values were 88.4 (25–75 IQR = 27–282) and 118 (25–75 IQR = 68–448) pg/mL in patients without (N0) and with (N1) LNM, respectively (p = 0.043). The median CEA values were 7.0 (25–75 IQR = 1.9–28) and 17.9 (25–75 IQR = 2.6–53.8) ng/mL in N0 and N1 patients, respectively (p = 0.027). Compared to N0 patients, the median pre-operative Ctn values showed no significant difference in N1a patients (98.1 pg/mL; p = 0.59). However, the median pre-operative Ctn values were notably higher in N1b patients (520.5 pg/mL; p = 0.003). Similarly, the median pre-operative CEA values did not significantly differ in N1a patients (2.6 ng/mL; p = 0.48), but they were significantly elevated in N1b patients (53.8 ng/mL; p = 0.006). We then classified the patients according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes found at histology: 0, 1–5, >5: 70 (80.5%) patients had no LNMs, 13 (14.9%) patients had 1–5 LNMs, and 4 (4.6%) had >5 LNMs. The median Ctn and CEA levels were, respectively, 88.4 pg/mL and 7.0 ng/mL in patients with 0 LNMs, 108.0 pg/mL and 9.6 ng/mL in patients with 1–5 LNMs, and 520.5 pg/mL and 43.2 ng/mL in patients with >5 LNMs (Table 2). The difference between the three prognostic groups was statistically significant for both pre-operative Ctn levels (p = 0.017) and pre-operative CEA levels (p = 0.013).

3.3. Cut-Off Values of Pre-Operative Ctn and CEA Levels Predictive of the N1b Status

We then used ROC curve analysis to estimate the cut-off values of pre-operative Ctn and CEA levels that best predicted the N1b status. The pre-operative Ctn value that best distinguished between N0/N1a and N1b patients was 90.0 pg/mL (sensitivity 100%, specificity 59.3%, positive predictive value 13.9%, negative predictive value 100%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82) (Figure 3). The corresponding pre-operative CEA value was 17 ng/mL (sensitivity 100%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 18.2%, negative predictive value 100%, AUC = 0.89) (Figure 3). A pre-operative Ctn ≥ 90 pg/mL was observed in all patients with N1b and in 50% of patients with N0/N1a (p = 0.019). Similarly, a pre-operative CEA ≥ 17 ng/mL was observed in all patients with N1b and in only 30% of patients with N0/N1a (p = 0.016). So, no patients with pre-operative Ctn < 90 pg/mL and pre-operative CEA < 17 ng/mL had N1b metastases.

4. Discussion

Surgery is the only curative treatment in patients with MTC; it may allow a radical cure through the removal of all tumoral tissue and LNMs [17]. There is no strong indication regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy: central neck dissection is recommended because of the high frequency of occult LNMs in the central neck compartment. However, the indication for prophylactic excision of the LLN remains controversial. Patients with LNMs visible on US in the lateral compartments of the neck should undergo total thyroidectomy with central and lateral neck dissection [5]. Although a wider lymph node dissection may reduce the chance of recurrent disease, it adversely affects the patient’s quality of life. Indeed, an aggressive neck dissection can increase the risk of complications [18]. Transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury or paralysis and hematoma are more frequently observed after central neck dissection, whereas seroma, chyle fistula, Horner’s syndrome, and motor nerve injury of the neck are more frequently observed after lateral neck dissection [19]. Although repeated surgery is feasible, it is burdened by a complication rate of 5–14% even in expert hands [20].
A series of pre-operative imaging procedures are currently used to accurately stage the tumor and to decide the most suitable extent of surgery. Neck US is the most important pre-operative imaging study; however, other radiological imaging procedures are used when metastatic disease is suspected: computed tomography (CT) is the most sensitive imaging procedure for detecting lung metastases and LNMs while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive method to detect liver metastases. 2-[Fluorine18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) appears to be less sensitive and of low prognostic value in detecting metastases compared with the other imaging procedures [21], including 18F-DOPA PET [22] and 68Ga PET [23].
The aim of this study was to investigate the possible clinical application of serum Ctn and CEA values to predict the presence of metastases in the lateral neck of patients with MTC. To largely exclude the possibility that a patient who underwent thyroidectomy plus central neck dissection could have metastases to the lateral neck, we selected patients with no evidence of biochemical or structural disease within 24 months after surgery. We believe that this is a reasonable interval since, according to a recent study, the median time to recurrence in patients with MTC was approximately 2.1 years [24]. Pre-operative basal Ctn has a well-established role as a marker for pre-operative diagnosis and post-surgical follow-up [25,26,27,28]. Serum CEA is widely used as tumor marker for breast, gastrointestinal, and lung cancer [28,29,30,31]. The first study that proposed using serum CEA for follow-up in MTC dates back to more than 30 years ago [32,33]. Today, it is widely used in the post-surgical follow-up.
In this study, we found that the Ctn levels correlate with tumor size, the number of LNMs, and the presence of LNMs in the lateral neck. Likewise, the pre-operative basal CEA levels could be used as an indicator of tumor size and the number of LNMs and could predict the presence of LNMs in the lateral neck. Machens and Dralle [9] reported LNMs in the ipsilateral central and lateral neck, contralateral central neck, contralateral lateral neck, and upper mediastinum when basal Ctn levels were above the threshold levels of 20, 50, 200, and 500 pg/mL, respectively. We found that no patients had N1b metastases when pre-operative Ctn levels were <90 pg/mL (AUC = 0.82). As expected, our determined Ctn threshold varies from that identified by Machens and Dralle due to inherent challenges in Ctn measurement, particularly concerning preanalytical phases and interassay comparability. Consequently, a cut-off value established for one assay might not be universally applicable to others. In clinical practice, it is imperative to account for the specific assay employed and its validated cut-off values, rather than relying exclusively on generalized thresholds. Indeed, the current guidelines do not specify a reference range of basal or stimulated serum Ctn levels that may allow a diagnosis of MTC or exclude it and recommend using certain reference ranges established by individual laboratories [4].
Another study evaluated the role of pre-operative CEA for detecting LNM before surgery [34]. The authors reported that CEA levels are related to the presence of lateral LNM and the cut-off to predict the presence of lateral LNM was 29.68 ng/mL (AUC: 0.831). In the present study, we found that LNMs in the lateral neck were present when pre-operative CEA was ≥17.0 ng/mL (AUC = 0.89). Interestingly, no patients had N1b metastases below this value. Combining this observation with the identified Ctn cut-off, we demonstrate that both measurements may serve as a rule out test for accurately excluding the presence of N1b in patients with MTC. These cut-off values could help the surgeon during pre-operative planning to choose the correct type of surgery, avoiding aggressive neck dissection when there is no need and thus sparing patients from potential post-surgical complications.
Procalcitonin may serve as a dependable alternative tumor marker in MTC for both prognostication and treatment monitoring, exhibiting comparable performance to Ctn [35]. Interestingly, procalcitonin proved being a reliable marker to distinguish between the presence or absence of structural disease during follow-up due to a high negative predictive value [36]. However, owing to its superior preanalytical and analytical characteristics, procalcitonin holds significant potential to replace Ctn as the new standard of care in managing MTC. Another promising marker for predicting the extent of disease at diagnosis is the Calcitonin Secretory Index (CSI); in the study of Filimon et al., the authors showed that CSI may predict early disease extent and persistent disease [37].
This study has some limitations as it deals with a retrospective analysis of a series of patients recruited at a single center. For this reason, we had no data on procalcitonin values in our patients with MTC. Moreover, our results may not be generalizable to other clinical settings because a cut-off value established for one assay might not apply to another due to differences in the preanalytical phase and interassay comparability. Therefore, in clinical practice, it is crucial to consider the specific assay used and its validated cut-off values rather than relying solely on generalized cut-offs. The data appear potentially important for the clinical management of patients with MTC, but additional research involving a larger number of N1b patients is needed to validate these results. Moreover, there is a need for standardization programs and comparative studies aimed at harmonizing Ctn and CEA assays and establishing universally applicable cut-off value guidelines.

5. Conclusions

In patients with MTC, pre-operative serum Ctn and CEA levels can predict the presence, number, and site of LNMs, providing useful information that, in addition to imaging techniques, may help in the choice of the extent of neck lymph node dissection.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: A.P. and P.M.; provision of study materials or patients: A.P.; collection and assembly of data: A.P. and P.M.; data analysis and interpretation: P.M.; manuscript writing: A.P.; administrative support: A.P., P.M., M.R., A.B., T.P., D.T., F.F. and G.P.; final approval of manuscript: A.P., P.M., M.R., A.B., D.T., T.P., F.F. and G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This retrospective study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional review board and Ethical Committee Catania 2 in Sicily, Italy (n. 62/CEL).

Informed Consent Statement

Signed informed consent from patients was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the following study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

Part of this study was presented as a short lecture and poster at the 2022 Italian National Congress of Endocrine Oncology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hoff, A.O.; Hoff, P.M. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Hematol./Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 21, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leboulleux, S.; Baudin, E.; Travagli, J.; Schlumberger, M. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. 2004, 61, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ceolin, L.; Duval, M.A.D.S.; Benini, A.F.; Ferreira, C.V.; Maia, A.L. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma beyond Surgery: Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, R499–R518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wells, S.A.; Asa, S.L.; Dralle, H.; Elisei, R.; Evans, D.B.; Gagel, R.F.; Lee, N.; Machens, A.; Moley, J.F.; Pacini, F.; et al. Revised American Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2015, 25, 567–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Opsahl, E.M.; Akslen, L.A.; Schlichting, E.; Aas, T.; Brauckhoff, K.; Hagen, A.I.; Rosenlund, A.F.; Sigstad, E.; Grøholt, K.K.; Mæhle, L.; et al. Trends in Diagnostics, Surgical Treatment, and Prognostic Factors for Outcomes in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in Norway: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Eur. Thyroid J. 2019, 8, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wells, S.A.; Baylin, S.B.; Leight, G.S.; Dale, J.K.; Dilley, W.G.; Farndon, J.R. The Importance of Early Diagnosis in Patients with Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 1982, 195, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kumbhar, S.S.; O’Malley, R.B.; Robinson, T.J.; Maximin, S.; Lalwani, N.; Byrd, D.R.; Wang, C.L. Why Thyroid Surgeons Are Frustrated with Radiologists: Lessons Learned from Pre- and Postoperative US. RadioGraphics 2016, 36, 2141–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Moley, J.F.; DeBenedetti, M.K. Patterns of Nodal Metastases in Palpable Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Recommendations for Extent of Node Dissection. Ann. Surg. 1999, 229, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Machens, A.; Dralle, H. Biomarker-Based Risk Stratification for Previously Untreated Medullary Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 2655–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hajje, G.; Borget, I.; Leboulleux, S.; Chougnet, C.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Mirghani, H.; Caramella, C.; Hartl, D.; Schlumberger, M.; Baudin, E. Early Changes in Carcinoembryonic Antigen but Not in Calcitonin Levels Are Correlated with the Progression-Free Survival in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 168, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Opsahl, E.M.; Akslen, L.A.; Schlichting, E.; Aas, T.; Brauckhoff, K.; Hagen, A.I.; Rosenlund, A.F.; Sigstad, E.; Grøholt, K.K.; Jørgensen, L.H.; et al. The Role of Calcitonin in Predicting the Extent of Surgery in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Norway. Eur. Thyroid J. 2019, 8, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bae, S.Y.; Jung, S.P.; Choe, J.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.H. Prediction of Lateral Neck Lymph Node Metastasis According to Preoperative Calcitonin Level and Tumor Size for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Kaohsiung J. Med. Scie 2019, 35, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, H.; Park, J.; Choi, M.S.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, S.W.; Chung, J.H.; et al. Preoperative Serum Calcitonin and Its Correlation with Extent of Lymph Node Metastasis in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yip, D.T.; Hassan, M.; Pazaitou-Panayiotou, K.; Ruan, D.T.; Gawande, A.A.; Gaz, R.D.; Moore, F.D.; Hodin, R.A.; Stephen, A.E.; Sadow, P.M.; et al. Preoperative Basal Calcitonin and Tumor Stage Correlate with Postoperative Calcitonin Normalization in Patients Undergoing Initial Surgical Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Surgery 2011, 150, 1168–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Machens, A. Abnormal Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Medullary Thyroid Cancer Progression: A Multivariate Analysis. Arch. Surg. 2007, 142, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Turkdogan, S.; Forest, V.-I.; Hier, M.P.; Tamilia, M.; Florea, A.; Payne, R.J. Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Correlated with Advanced Disease in Medullary Thyroid Cancer. J. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2018, 47, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jin, L.X.; Moley, J.F. Surgery for Lymph Node Metastases of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Review. Cancer 2016, 122, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Papaleontiou, M.; Hughes, D.T.; Guo, C.; Banerjee, M.; Haymart, M.R. Population-Based Assessment of Complications Following Surgery for Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 2543–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, Y.S.; Nam, K.-H.; Chung, W.Y.; Chang, H.-S.; Park, C.S. Postoperative Complications of Thyroid Cancer in a Single Center Experience. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2010, 25, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kebebew, E. Long-Term Results of Reoperation and Localizing Studies in Patients with Persistent or Recurrent Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Arch. Surg. 2000, 135, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giraudet, A.L.; Vanel, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Aupérin, A.; Dromain, C.; Chami, L.; Ny Tovo, N.; Lumbroso, J.; Lassau, N.; Bonniaud, G.; et al. Imaging Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma with Persistent Elevated Calcitonin Levels. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 4185–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rasul, S.; Hartenbach, S.; Rebhan, K.; Göllner, A.; Karanikas, G.; Mayerhoefer, M.; Mazal, P.; Hacker, M.; Hartenbach, M. [18F]DOPA PET/ceCT in Diagnosis and Staging of Primary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Prior to Surgery. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 2159–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pajak, C.; Cadili, L.; Nabata, K.; Wiseman, S.M. 68Ga-DOTATATE-PET Shows Promise for Diagnosis of Recurrent or Persistent Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Surg. 2022, 224, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Papachristos, A.J.; Nicholls, L.E.; Mechera, R.; Aniss, A.M.; Robinson, B.; Clifton-Bligh, R.; Gill, A.J.; Learoyd, D.; Sidhu, S.B.; Glover, A.; et al. Management of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Patterns of Recurrence and Outcomes of Reoperative Surgery. Oncologist 2023, 28, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Elisei, R.; Bottici, V.; Luchetti, F.; Di Coscio, G.; Romei, C.; Grasso, L.; Miccoli, P.; Iacconi, P.; Basolo, F.; Pinchera, A.; et al. Impact of Routine Measurement of Serum Calcitonin on the Diagnosis and Outcome of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Experience in 10,864 Patients with Nodular Thyroid Disorders. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cohen, R.; Campos, J.-M.; Salaün, C.; Massoud Heshmati, H.; Kraimps, J.-L.; Proye, C.; Sarfati, É.; Henry, J.-F.; Niccoli-Sire, P.; Modigliani, E. Preoperative Calcitonin Levels Are Predictive of Tumor Size and Postoperative Calcitonin Normalization in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Costante, G.; Meringolo, D.; Durante, C.; Bianchi, D.; Nocera, M.; Tumino, S.; Crocetti, U.; Attard, M.; Maranghi, M.; Torlontano, M.; et al. Predictive Value of Serum Calcitonin Levels for Preoperative Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Cohort of 5817 Consecutive Patients with Thyroid Nodules. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Melvin, K.E.W.; Miller, H.H.; Tashjian, A.H. Early Diagnosis of Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid Gland by Means of Calcitonin Assay. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grunnet, M.; Sorensen, J.B. Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) as Tumor Marker in Lung Cancer. Lung Cancer 2012, 76, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Konishi, T.; Shimada, Y.; Hsu, M.; Tufts, L.; Jimenez-Rodriguez, R.; Cercek, A.; Yaeger, R.; Saltz, L.; Smith, J.J.; Nash, G.M.; et al. Association of Preoperative and Postoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Colon Cancer Outcome. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, D.Y.; Knyba, R.E.; Bulbrook, R.D.; Millis, R.R.; Hayward, J.L. Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Women with Breast Cancer. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 1984, 20, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wells, S.A.; Haagensen, D.E.; Linehan, W.M.; Farrell, R.E.; Dilley, W.G. The Detection of Elevated Plasma Levels of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Suspected or Established Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancer 1978, 42, 1498–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rougier, P.; Calmettes, C.; Laplanche, A.; Travagli, J.P.; Lefevre, M.; Parmentier, C.; Milhaud, G.; Tubiana, M. The Values of Calcitonin and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Treatment and Management of Nonfamilial Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancer 1983, 51, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ye, L.; Zhou, X.; Lu, J.; Wang, Y.; Xie, X.; Zhang, J. Combining Serum Calcitonin, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Neuron-specific Enolase to Predict Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2020, 34, e23278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Giovanella, L.; Garo, M.L.; Ceriani, L.; Paone, G.; Campenni’, A.; D’Aurizio, F. Procalcitonin as an Alternative Tumor Marker of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 3634–3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Censi, S.; Manso, J.; Benvenuti, T.; Piva, I.; Iacobone, M.; Mondin, A.; Torresan, F.; Basso, D.; Crivellari, G.; Zovato, S.; et al. The Role of Procalcitonin in the Follow-up of Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Eur. Thyroid. J. 2023, 12, e220161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Filimon, S.; Payne, R.J.; Black, M.J.; Hier, M.P.; Mlynarek, A.M.; Forest, V.-I.; Tamilia, M. Calcitonin Secretory Index and Unsuspected Nodal Disease in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Endocr. Pract. 2018, 24, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 16 02979 g001
Figure 1. Flowchart depicting the selection process of the study cohort.
Figure 1. Flowchart depicting the selection process of the study cohort.
Cancers 16 02979 g001
Cancers 16 02979 g002
Figure 2. Predicted values of calcitonin and CEA based on tumor size.
Figure 2. Predicted values of calcitonin and CEA based on tumor size.
Cancers 16 02979 g002
Cancers 16 02979 g003aCancers 16 02979 g003b
Figure 3. Comparison of pre-operative calcitonin (panel (A)) and CEA (panel (B)) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves considering patients with N1b metastases as positive controls.
Figure 3. Comparison of pre-operative calcitonin (panel (A)) and CEA (panel (B)) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves considering patients with N1b metastases as positive controls.
Cancers 16 02979 g003aCancers 16 02979 g003b
Table 1. Clinicopathological features at diagnosis of 87 patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).
Table 1. Clinicopathological features at diagnosis of 87 patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).
ParameterN = 87
Age, years (mean ± SD)48.3 ± 18.6
Gender, female n. (%)59 (67.8)
Sporadic MTC, n. (%)52 (59.8)
Tumor size (mm), median (25–75 IQR)10 (6–17)
Total thyroidectomy with central LN dissection, n. (%)60 (69)
Total thyroidectomy with both central and lateral LN dissection, n. (%)27 (31)
Bilateral tumor, n. (%)17 (19.5)
Multifocal tumor, n. (%)21 (24.1)
N0, n. (%)70 (80.5)
N1a, n. (%)11 (12.6)
N1b, n. (%)6 (6.9)
LN = lymph node
Table 2. Median value of serum calcitonin (Ctn) and CEA based on tumor size number of metastatic lymph node and N category.
Table 2. Median value of serum calcitonin (Ctn) and CEA based on tumor size number of metastatic lymph node and N category.
Tumor Size (mm)Ctn Value
(Median and IQR Range, pg/mL)		CEA Value
(Median and IQR Range, ng/mL)
≤1060 (24–94)5.5 (1.3–7)
11–20234 (125–472)17.9 (13.9–50.7)
21–39630 (503–722)43.7 (28–67.1)
≥40739 (447–1189)52.0 (37.6–59.9)
Number of metastatic lymph node
088.4 (27–282)7.0 (1.9–28)
1–5108.0 (57.4–269)9.6 (1.8–35.2)
>5520.5(272–657.5)43.2 (19.2–67.1)
Lymph node status
N088.4 (27–282)7 (1.9–28)
N1a98.1 (57.4–145)2.6 (1–16.5)
N1b520.5 (118–722)53.8 (19.2–67.1)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prinzi, A.; Frasca, F.; Russo, M.; Pellegriti, G.; Piticchio, T.; Tumino, D.; Belfiore, A.; Malandrino, P. Pre-Operative Calcitonin and CEA Values May Predict the Extent of Metastases to the Lateral Neck Lymph Nodes in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2024, 16, 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172979

AMA Style

Prinzi A, Frasca F, Russo M, Pellegriti G, Piticchio T, Tumino D, Belfiore A, Malandrino P. Pre-Operative Calcitonin and CEA Values May Predict the Extent of Metastases to the Lateral Neck Lymph Nodes in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers. 2024; 16(17):2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prinzi, Antonio, Francesco Frasca, Marco Russo, Gabriella Pellegriti, Tommaso Piticchio, Dario Tumino, Antonino Belfiore, and Pasqualino Malandrino. 2024. "Pre-Operative Calcitonin and CEA Values May Predict the Extent of Metastases to the Lateral Neck Lymph Nodes in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer" Cancers 16, no. 17: 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172979

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop