Sustainable Management for Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. E-Commerce Last-Mile Logistics
2.2. Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services Quality Evaluation Factors
2.3. Literature Basis and Research Hypothesis
2.3.1. The Effects of Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction
2.3.2. The Relationship between Customers’ Perceived Importance of Last-Mile Logistics Services and Customer Satisfaction
3. Methodology
3.1. Questionnaire Design and Measures
3.2. Survey Design and Administration
3.3. Analytical Method
3.4. Respondent Demographics
4. Results of the Empirical Analysis
4.1. Measurement Model Analysis
4.2. Structural Model Analysis
4.3. Verification Analysis of the Moderating Effect
4.4. Importance-Performance Analysis
5. Conclusions and Discussion
5.1. Results Summary and Discussion
5.2. Theoretical Contribution and Immediate Significance
5.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing. China Logistics Development Report (2017–2018); China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Arvidsson, N. The milk run revisited: A load factor paradox with economic and environmental implications for urban freight transport. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2013, 51, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, J.R.; Guiffrida, A.L. Carbon emissions comparison of last mile delivery versus customer pickup. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2014, 17, 503–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guritno, A.D.; Fujianti, R.; Kusumasari, D. Assessment of the Supply Chain Factors and Classification of Inventory Management in Suppliers’ Level of Fresh Vegetables. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2015, 3, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gu, W.; Kongju National University; Bao, P.; Lee, J.-H. A Study on the Continuance Intention of O2O Fresh Agricultural Products E-Commerce. J. Ind. Distrib. Bus. 2019, 10, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prajapati, D.; Harish, A.R.; Daultani, Y.; Singh, H.; Pratap, S. A Clustering Based Routing Heuristic for Last-Mile Logistics in Fresh Food E-Commerce. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maruyama, M.; Wu, L.; Huang, L. The modernization of fresh food retailing in China: The role of consumers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 30, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.; Xu, A.; Zheng, Q.; Ke, L.; Lin, J. Influence of customer perceived value on the online shopping intention of aquatic products under B2C E-commerce. J. Discret. Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 2018, 21, 1189–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Liu, P. Key Technologies and Alogrithms’ Application in Agricultural Food Supply Chain Tracking System in E-commerce. In Proceedings of the Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture VII, CCTA 2013, Beijing, China, 18–20 September 2013; Volume 420, pp. 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neghabadi, P.D.; Samuel, K.E.; Espinouse, M.-L. Systematic literature review on city logistics: Overview, classification and analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 865–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taniguchi, E.; Thompson, R.G.; Yamada, T. New Opportunities and Challenges for City Logistics. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 12, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, W.; Dong, J.; Hwang, B.-G.; Ren, R.; Chen, Z. A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Viu-Roig, M.; Alvarez-Palau, E.J. The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustain. J. Rec. 2020, 12, 6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuen, K.F.; Wang, X.; Ng, L.T.W.; Wong, Y.D. An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery. Transp. Policy 2018, 66, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, R.; Lima, R.D.S.; De Sena, D.C.; De Pinho, A.F.; Holguín-Veras, J. Agent-Based Simulation Model for Evaluating Urban Freight Policy to E-Commerce. Sustain. J. Rec. 2019, 11, 4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rai, H.B.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C. Unlocking the failed delivery problem? Opportunities and challenges for smart locks from a consumer perspective. Res. Transp. Econ. 2019, 100753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holguín-Veras, J.; Leal, J.A.; Sánchez-Diaz, I.; Browne, M.; Wojtowicz, J. State of the art and practice of urban freight management. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 137, 360–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudolph, C.; Gruber, J. Cargo cycles in commercial transport: Potentials, constraints, and recommendations. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2017, 24, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, F.; Cardenas, I.; Sörensen, K.; Dewulf, W. Simulation of B2C e-commerce distribution in Antwerp using cargo bikes and delivery points. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2017, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Hu, Q.; Mao, S.; Li, J.; Xue, J. Location selection of intra-city distribution hubs in the met-ro-integrated logistics system. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 80, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Q.; Shen, F.; Lee, L.H. Towards enhancing the last-mile delivery: An effective crowd-tasking model with scalable solutions. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 93, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kafle, N.; Zou, B.; Lin, J. Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2017, 99, 62–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kin, B.; Spoor, J.; Verlinde, S.; Macharis, C.; Van Woensel, T. Modelling alternative distribution set-ups for fragmented last mile transport: Towards more efficient and sustainable urban freight transport. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2018, 6, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; Hu, X.; Zhao, C. Order consolidation for the last-mile split delivery in online retailing. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 122, 309–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fancello, G.; Paddeu, D.; Fadda, P. Investigating last food mile deliveries: A case study approach to identify needs of food delivery demand. Res. Transp. Econ. 2017, 65, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Conway, A.; Cheng, J. Parking for residential delivery in New York City: Regulations and behavior. Transp. Policy 2017, 54, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kedia, A.; Kusumastuti, D.; Nicholson, A. Establishing Collection and Delivery Points to Encourage the Use of Active Transport: A Case Study in New Zealand Using a Consumer-Centric Approach. Sustain. J. Rec. 2019, 11, 6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Köster, F.; Ulmer, M.W.; Mattfeld, D.C.; Hasle, G. Anticipating emission-sensitive traffic management strategies for dynamic delivery routing. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 62, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alberti-Alhtaybat, L.V.; Al-Htaybat, K.; Hutaibat, K. A knowledge management and sharing business model for dealing with disruption: The case of Aramex. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 94, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.-K.; Kuo, Y.-W.; Xu, S.-W. Applying Importance-performance Analysis to Evaluate Logistics Service Quality for Online Shopping among Retailing Delivery. Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag. 2009, 7, 128–136. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, W.; Zheng, C.; Wu, L.; Pu, X. Analyzing the Relationship between Consumer Satisfaction and Fresh E-Commerce Logistics Service Using Text Mining Techniques. Sustain. J. Rec. 2019, 11, 3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- LingYu, M.; Lauren, C.; Zhijie, D. Strategic Development of Fresh E-Commerce with Respect to New Retail. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Banff, AB, Canada, 9–11 May 2019; pp. 373–378. [Google Scholar]
- Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 1988, 64, 12–40. [Google Scholar]
- Bienstock, C.C.; Royne, M.B.; Sherrell, D.; Stafford, T.F. An expanded model of logistics service quality: Incorporating logistics information technology. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 113, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bienstock, C.C.; Mentzer, J.T.; Bird, M.M. Measuring physical distribution service quality. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1997, 25, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentzer, J.T.; Flint, D.J.; Hult, G.T.M. Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process. J. Mark. 2001, 65, 82–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentzer, J.T.; Flint, D.J.; Kent, J.L. Developing a logistics service quality scale. J. Bus. Logist. 1999, 20, 9–32. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.; Luo, J.; Cai, S.; Ma, S.; Rong, K. Exploring the service quality in the e-commerce context: A triadic view. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 388–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, D.W.; Moori, R.G.; Filho, V.A.V. Logistic service quality as a mediator between logistics capabilities and customer satisfaction. Rev. Gestão 2018, 25, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, S.Y.; Lim, Y.J. Consumers’ Perceived Importance of and Satisfaction with Internet Shopping. Electron. Mark. 2001, 11, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taplin, R.H. Competitive importance-performance analysis of an Australian wildlife park. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, S.-Y.; Yang, C.-C.; Lai, P.-L. Determining inland logistics service attributes: A case study of Chinese landlocked regions. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2020, 5, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mar, R.A.; Mason, M.F.; Litvack, A. How daydreaming relates to life satisfaction, loneliness, and social support: The importance of gender and daydream content. Conscious. Cogn. 2012, 21, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolfram, H.-J.; Gratton, L. Spillover Between Work and Home, Role Importance and Life Satisfaction. Br. J. Manag. 2012, 25, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.J. A Study on the Causal Model of Waterpark Quality Evaluation Factors, Service Satisfaction, Repurchase Intention and Recommendation. Korean J. Bus. Adm. 2011, 24, 897–915. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, E. The Effects of User’s Choice and Awareness of Importance of Choice in Community Social Services on User’s Sat-isfaction-Focusing on Choice of Providing Organization and Providers. J. Soc. Serv. Study 2013, 4, 5–57. [Google Scholar]
- Amorose, A.J.; Nolan-Sellers, W. Testing the moderating effect of the perceived importance of the coach on the relationship between perceived coaching feedback and athletes’ perceptions of competence. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2016, 11, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iseke, A. The Part-Time Job Satisfaction Puzzle: Different Types of Job Discrepancies and the Moderating Effect of Family Importance. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 2013, 52, 445–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thai, V.V. Logistics service quality: Conceptual model and empirical evidence. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2013, 16, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafiq, M.; Jaafar, H.S. Measuring customers’ perceptions of logistics service quality of 3pl service providers. J. Bus. Logist. 2007, 28, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Grant, D.B.; McKinnon, A.C.; Fernie, J. Physical distribution service quality in online retailing. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2010, 40, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassim, N.M.; Abdullah, N.A. The effect of perceived service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in e-commerce settings. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2010, 22, 351–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yuen, K.F.; Wong, Y.D.; Teo, C.C. An innovation diffusion perspective of e-consumers’ initial adoption of self-collection service via automated parcel station. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2018, 29, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boley, B.B.; McGehee, N.G.; Hammett, A.T. Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of sustainable tourism initiatives: The resident perspective. Tour. Manag. 2017, 58, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kursunoglu, N.; Onder, M. Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate coal and gas outbursts. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 88, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davvetas, V.; Diamantopoulos, A.; Zaefarian, G.; Sichtmann, C. Ten basic questions about structural equations modeling you should know the answers to—But perhaps you don’t. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 90, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F. Multivariate Data Analysis; Kennesaw State University: Kennesaw, Georgia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, P.-L.; Su, D.-T.; Tai, H.-H.; Yang, C.-C. The impact of collaborative decision-making on logistics service performance for container shipping services. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2020, 5, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Construct | Item | Source |
---|---|---|
Personnel Contact Quality (PCQ) | PCQ1: Fresh food e-commerce logistics courier has a good service attitude and behavior | [49] |
PCQ2: Fresh food e-commerce logistics courier will patiently and kindly answer the customer’s inquiry | ||
PCQ3: Fresh food e-commerce logistics couriers understand my service needs | ||
PCQ4: Fresh food e-commerce logistics couriers have a sense of responsibility, will think for customers, have good business ability | ||
PCQ5: The courier service attitude of fresh food e-commerce logistics is not excellent * | ||
Delivery Quality (DLQ) | DLQ1: The fresh products I buy are distributed by cold chain logistics (such as refrigerated trucks and cold chain trucks.) | [31] |
DLQ2: The fresh products I buy will be delivered to the customer’s designated place on time and accurately | ||
DLQ3: The fresh products I buy can guarantee freshness and product quality during the delivery process | ||
DLQ4: The fresh products I buy has package intact and are clean during the delivery process | ||
Information Quality (IMQ) | IMQ1: After I buy fresh products, I can timely and accurately query the logistics distribution information | [30,49,50] |
IMQ2: After I buy fresh products, I can easily query the logistics distribution information | ||
IMQ3: After I buy fresh products, I can get complete and sufficient feedback on logistics distribution information | ||
IMQ4: After I buy fresh products, I can get complete and sufficient feedback on logistics distribution information | ||
Timeliness Quality (TLQ) | TLQ1: After I purchased fresh products, the logistics service provider took a short time from the package to the final delivery of the product | [30,36,49,51] |
TLQ2: After I buy fresh products, the logistics service provider can deliver goods quickly | ||
TLQ3: After I buy fresh products, the time for pending orders at the logistics level is short | ||
TLQ4: After I purchase fresh products, if the products are not delivered on time, the logistics service provider will quickly arrange delivery | ||
Empathy Quality (EPQ) | EPQ1: When I use fresh logistics services, I feel I have gained a gratifying sense of security | [33] |
EPQ2: When I had problems using the fresh logistics service, logistics service providers will give me sympathy and comfort, and provided good return service when necessary | ||
EPQ3: When I had problems using the fresh logistics service, logistics service providers will put themselves in a position to solve problems for me | ||
EPQ4: When I had problems using the fresh logistics service, they paid special attention | ||
EPQ5: When I had problems using the fresh logistics service, I will get full help and support; they will protect my personal information privacy | ||
Perceived Importance (PI) | PI1: In the last-mile logistics service process, I think it is important to provide detailed delivery information and to communicate with the customer about the details of the delivery. | [40] |
PI2: In the last-mile logistics service process, I think the delivery location should be safe and reliable, and the protection of personal information security is important. | ||
PI3: In the last-mile logistics service process, I think that the options for customers to pick up the goods conveniently and easily, and enjoy various services easily are important | ||
PI4: In the last-mile logistics service process, I think the speed of delivering goods and the timeliness of retrieval of delivery information are important | ||
Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT1: What is your overall evaluation of the fresh food e-commerce logistics service? | [49,52] |
SAT2: How do you feel about the service experience of fresh food e-commerce logistics? | ||
SAT3: How do you feel about the customer service of fresh food e-commerce logistics? | ||
SAT4: How do you feel about the last-mile logistics service of fresh food e-commerce logistics? | ||
SAT5: How do you feel about the delivery information provision service of fresh food e-commerce logistics? |
Construct | Item | λ | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Personnel contact quality (PCQ) | PCQ1 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.85 |
PCQ2 | 0.79 | |||
PCQ4 | 0.85 | |||
Information quality (IMQ) | IMQ1 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.88 |
IMQ2 | 0.80 | |||
IMQ3 | 0.81 | |||
IMQ4 | 0.81 | |||
Empathy quality (EPQ) | EPQ2 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
EPQ3 | 0.74 | |||
EPQ4 | 0.81 | |||
EPQ5 | 0.84 | |||
Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT1 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.84 |
SAT3 | 0.83 | |||
SAT4 | 0.81 | |||
Delivery quality (DLQ) | DLQ1 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.93 |
DLQ3 | 0.88 | |||
DLQ2 | 0.89 | |||
DLQ4 | 0.84 | |||
Timeliness quality (TLQ) | TLQ1 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.88 |
TLQ2 | 0.81 | |||
TLQ3 | 0.85 | |||
TLQ4 | 0.75 | |||
Perceived importance (PI) | PI1 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.90 |
PI2 | 0.80 | |||
PI3 | 0.84 | |||
PI4 | 0.87 |
SAT | PI | EPQ | TLQ | IMQ | DLQ | PCQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAT | 0.63 a | 0.26 c | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.35 |
PI | 0.51 b | 0.68 | 0.06 | 0.47 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.05 |
EPQ | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.04 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
TLQ | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
IMQ | 0.52 | 0.30 | 0.62 | 0.22 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.47 |
DLQ | 0.21 | 0.52 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
PCQ | 0.59 | 0.23 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.69 | −0.02 | 0.66 |
Variables (i) | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 |
---|---|---|---|
bi | bi | bi | |
Constant | 3.31 *** | 3.34 *** | 3.26 *** |
Gender | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
Age | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Education | −0.07 ** | −0.07 ** | −0.07 ** |
Job | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.02 |
Income | 0.09 *** | 0.09 *** | 0.11 *** |
Residential area | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
Personnel Contact Quality | 0.39 *** | 0.39 *** | 0.37 *** |
Delivery Quality | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
Information Quality | 0.16 *** | 0.16 *** | 0.00 |
Timeliness Quality | 0.14 *** | 0.13 *** | 0.21 *** |
Empathy Quality | 0.11 ** | 0.11 *** | 0.25 *** |
Perceived Importance | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
PCQ×PI | −0.01 | ||
DLQ×PI | 0.05 | ||
IMQ×PI | −0.14 ** | ||
TLQ×PI | 0.08 * | ||
EPQ×PI | 0.15 ** | ||
R2 | 0.514 | 0.514 | 0.541 |
∆R2 | 0.514 | 0.001 | 0.027 |
∆F | 25.066 *** | 0.369 | 3.011 ** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, Y.; Lai, P.; Chang, C.-H.; Yuen, K.F.; Li, S.; Wang, X. Sustainable Management for Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063456
Jiang Y, Lai P, Chang C-H, Yuen KF, Li S, Wang X. Sustainable Management for Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services. Sustainability. 2021; 13(6):3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063456
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Yi, Polin Lai, Chia-Hsun Chang, Kum Fai Yuen, Sihang Li, and Xinchen Wang. 2021. "Sustainable Management for Fresh Food E-Commerce Logistics Services" Sustainability 13, no. 6: 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063456