Next Article in Journal
Immune Characteristics and Immunotherapy of HIV-Associated Lymphoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Frontiers of Neuroinflammation: New Horizons in Research and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Immunolocalization of Aquaporin 1, 2, and 9 in Anuran Testis of the Neotropical Pointedbelly Frog Leptodactylus podicipinus
Previous Article in Special Issue
SARS-CoV-2-Induced Type I Interferon Signaling Dysregulation in Olfactory Networks Implications for Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Brain Ischemic Tolerance Triggered by Preconditioning Involves Modulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Stimulated Gene 6 (TSG-6) in Mice Subjected to Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

1
Section of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy
2
Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
3
Regional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(9), 9970-9983; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46090595
Submission received: 18 August 2024 / Revised: 8 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 September 2024 / Published: 10 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Neuroinflammation)

Abstract

:
Ischemic preconditioning (PC) induced by a sub-lethal cerebral insult triggers brain tolerance against a subsequent severe injury through diverse mechanisms, including the modulation of the immune system. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6), a hyaluronate (HA)-binding protein, has recently been involved in the regulation of the neuroimmune response following ischemic stroke. Thus, we aimed at assessing whether the neuroprotective effects of ischemic PC involve the modulation of TSG-6 in a murine model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo). The expression of TSG-6 was significantly elevated in the ischemic cortex of mice subjected to 1 h MCAo followed by 24 h reperfusion, while this effect was further potentiated (p < 0.05 vs. MCAo) by pre-exposure to ischemic PC (i.e., 15 min MCAo) 72 h before. By immunofluorescence analysis, we detected TSG-6 expression mainly in astrocytes and myeloid cells populating the lesioned cerebral cortex, with a more intense signal in tissue from mice pre-exposed to ischemic PC. By contrast, levels of TSG-6 were reduced after 24 h of reperfusion in plasma (p < 0.05 vs. SHAM), but were dramatically elevated when severe ischemia (1 h MCAo) was preceded by ischemic PC (p < 0.001 vs. MCAo) that also resulted in significant neuroprotection. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that neuroprotection exerted by ischemic PC is associated with the elevation of TSG-6 protein levels both in the brain and in plasma, further underscoring the beneficial effects of this endogenous modulator of the immune system.

1. Introduction

When considered separately from other cardiovascular diseases, stroke ranks fifth among all causes of death, behind heart disease, cancer, COVID-19, and unintentional injuries/accidents; moreover, it is the leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to nervous system disorders for adults aged ≥20 years [1,2]. Ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of all strokes, and its global prevalence is around 70 million cases per year [2]. The approval of intravenous pharmacological thrombolysis in the mid-1990s, the increasing availability of endovascular thrombectomy, and the growth of comprehensive stroke units, especially in high-income countries, have probably contributed to the decreased DALYs associated with ischemic stroke [2]. Nevertheless, less than 10% of patients can actually benefit from pharmacological or mechanical reperfusion [1,3,4], underscoring the urgency of developing novel therapies aimed at rescuing brain tissue. An intriguing opportunity would consist in mimicking the processes involved in endogenous ischemic tolerance, a condition that develops as a consequence of a sub-lethal ischemic episode, as demonstrated both in patients who have undergone a transient ischemic attack [5,6,7,8,9,10] and in animal models [11,12]. In fact, ischemic preconditioning (PC) in rodents activates a complex cascade of events that prompt brain resilience to an ensuing severe ischemia [13,14,15]. Ischemic tolerance involves the preservation of ionic homeostasis and mitochondrial function, the suppression of excitotoxic and inflammatory reactions, and interference with cell demise and blood–brain barrier damage, fostering brain recovery and regeneration [16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Although the adaptive responses triggered by ischemic PC were originally believed to predominantly occur in neurons [23,24,25], more recent work has originally demonstrated the crucial involvement of the immune system in the establishment of the tolerant phenotype, in both preclinical and clinical settings [26]. In particular, Toll-like receptors (TLRs)- and Type-I interferon (INF)-mediated pathways, the release of inflammatory cytokines, as well as the genomic reprogramming of microglia towards reparative and protective M2-like phenotypes have been implicated in the protective effects of ischemic PC in rodents [27,28,29,30]. Indeed, despite their inflammatory function, microglia also exert a beneficial/reparative role in cerebral ischemia and/or trigger PC-induced tolerance via the stimulation of the fractalkine receptor CXCR1 [28,31,32,33,34]. Notably, we have recently observed that neuroprotection exerted by ischemic PC in mice is associated with a complex modulation of the innate immune system that results in the potentiation of M2-like responses in myeloid cells migrating from the periphery to the lesioned brain [35]. Thus, it is now clear that an intricate neuro-immune interplay underlies tolerance induced by PC [36,37,38].
In order to further delineate these mechanisms, we have focused on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6), a hyaluronate (HA)-binding protein involved in cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions during inflammation and tumorigenesis [39,40,41]. Interestingly, by blocking the pentraxin-3/fibroblast growth factor-2 interaction, TSG-6 was found to hamper vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [42], two pivotal pathobiological mechanisms implicated in the progression of ischemic stroke and relevant co-morbidities (e.g., COVID-19), as well as in the development of long-term consequences (e.g., cognitive impairment) [43,44,45,46,47]. Most studies underscore the role of TSG-6 in the regulation of immune functions, which has recently been shown to underlie its anti-inflammatory effects in diverse neuropathological conditions [48,49,50]. Besides the evidence that TSG-6 promotes a microglial polarization shift from the M1 to M2 phenotype, there is also its ability to mediate the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in various pathological contexts by exerting immunomodulatory effects [49,51]. Notably, the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of TSG-6 were also demonstrated in acute neurological conditions, whereby the efficacy of MSCs was diminished by the siRNA knockdown of TSG-6 and/or treatment with recombinant TSG-6 exerted similar therapeutic activity [52,53,54]. In addition, in rodent models of focal cerebral ischemia, TSG-6 mediates the protective effects conferred by the systemic administration of MSCs [55], while systemic acute treatment with recombinant TSG-6 exerts neuroprotection [48]. Since neuroprotection induced by a sub-lethal ischemic insult involves the modulation of inflammatory and immune responses [35], we hypothesized that TSG-6 may represent a crucial immunoregulatory player underlying ischemic tolerance. Thus, using a murine model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo), we assess whether neuroprotection prompted by ischemic PC results in the modulation of TSG-6 in the brain and plasma.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Experiments were performed on adult C57Bl/6J male mice (Charles River, Calco, Como, Italy), weighing 25 +/− 3 g (9–11 weeks old). Animal housing occurred under standard conditions (22 °C ambient temperature, 65% relative humidity and 12 h light:12 h dark cycle), with ad libitum access to food and water.
The in vivo procedures were conducted respecting the guidelines of the Italian Ministry of Health (DL 26/2014), in conformity with the 2010/63 European Directive, and the experimental protocols (n. 975/2017-PR and 701/2020-PR) were approved by the local animal welfare organism (OBPA, University of Calabria) and by the Ministry of Health at the National Institute of Health (Rome). All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines 2.0 [56].
An a priori power analysis was used to estimate the minimum sample size, aimed at obtaining a power of 80% at a significance level of 0.05 (OpenEpi software 3.01, Open Source Statistics for Public Health). Based on our previous experience with the focal ischemia model, we hypothesized a difference in cerebral lesion between mice who have undergone MCAo and animals receiving a neuroprotective treatment of about 25 mm3 (corresponding to a 25% reduction in infarct size) and a variability (standard deviation) of 15. This led to an estimated minimum sample size of 6 animals per experimental group. Considering a 30% attrition rate, corrected sample size was calculated as estimated sample size/(1 − [% attrition/100]). Therefore, 9 mice were assigned to each experimental group requiring statistical analysis, while 3 mice were assigned to immunofluorescence experiments finalized at qualitative analysis.
Sixty mice were randomly allocated to the following experimental groups:
(1)
SHAM: SHAM surgery followed by sacrifice 24 h later (n = 9 for molecular biology analysis in plasma and brain);
(2)
PC: 15 min MCAo followed by 72 h of reperfusion (n = 9 for molecular biology analysis in plasma and brain);
(3)
MCAo: 1 h MCAo (preceded by SHAM surgery 72 h before) followed by 24 h of reperfusion (n = 9 for molecular biology analysis in plasma and brain + n = 9 for histology + n = 3 for immunofluorescence);
(4)
PC + MCAo: 15 min MCAo followed, 72 h later, by 1 h MCAo and 24 h of reperfusion (n = 9 for molecular biology analysis in plasma and brain + n = 9 for histology + n = 3 for immunofluorescence).

2.2. Surgical Procedure for MCAo

Focal brain ischemia was induced by the proximal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, using a well-established procedure [57,58,59] in mice anesthetized with 1.5–2% isoflurane vaporized in air. Briefly, a silicone-coated nylon filament (diameter: 0.23 mm, Doccol Corporation, Redlands, CA, USA) was advanced through the internal carotid artery for 10–11 mm from its bifurcation from the common carotid artery up to the origin of the middle cerebral artery in the Willis circle, proven by a mild resistance. Animals were considered ischemic, and included in the study, if presenting > 3 of the following deficits assessed after 45 min MCAo: ellipsoidal shape of the palpebral fissure, lateral extension of one or both ears, asymmetric body bending, laterally extending limbs [60]. Five animals were excluded from the study because of unsuccessful MCAo.
Ischemic PC was achieved through a previously demonstrated paradigm [11,20,28,61,62], by briefly (15 min) occluding the middle cerebral artery, 72 h before a more severe ischemia of 1 h MCAo (PC + MCAo). SHAM-operated control mice underwent the same surgical procedures without filament insertion. Four animals were excluded from the study because they died during or early after surgery.
To assess cerebral ischemic lesion, frozen brains were sectioned into 20 μm-thick coronal slices at 0.5 mm intervals from the frontal pole. Tissue slices were then stained with cresyl violet, and infarct (pale) areas were assessed by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation using an image analysis software (ImageJ, version 1.30), as previously described [63]. The percentage of infarction (infarct ratio) was calculated by dividing the infarcted tissue volume by the total volume of the ipsilateral hemisphere.

2.3. Western Blot Analysis

Animals were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and sacrificed to dissect the ipsilateral (ischemic) and contralateral frontoparietal cortices (3.2 to −3.8 mm from Bregma) [64]. Blood was collected in EDTA Vacutainer® tubes and centrifuged at 1500× g for 15 min at 4 °C to separate plasma, followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C to discard debris and insoluble particles.
Tissue samples were homogenized in ice-cold RIPA buffer supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (PI, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). After the centrifugation (for 15 min at 20,817× g at 4 °C) of the lysates, supernatants were assayed for protein quantification (Bradford protein assay, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Segrate, Italy), and 30 μg of proteins were mixed in Laemmli buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Plasma samples were diluted (1:10) in ice-cold RIPA buffer supplemented with PI and mixed (10 μL: 10 μL) in Laemmli buffer. Protein samples were then loaded onto Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Precast Protein Gels for separation in a Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Gels were finally electroblotted using the Trans-Blot Turbo transfer apparatus and Nitrocellulose Transfer kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Nitrocellulose membranes were stained with red Ponceau S solution (Sigma-Aldrich), and the image of albumin band (66 KDa) was captured using the iBright™ FL1500 Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy). Membranes were then pre-incubated in blocking buffer (5% non-fat milk in 0.05% Tween-20 TRIS-buffered saline) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated overnight, at 4 °C, with the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-TSG-6 (1:1000; MABT108, Millipore, Milan, Italy) and mouse anti-β-actin (1:3000; A3853, Sigma-Aldrich), followed by the corresponding secondary antibodies (1:3000; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature. The immunodetection of protein bands and quantification band density were performed using the iBright™ FL1500 Imaging System and ImageJ v1.51 software.

2.4. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

MicroRNAs were extracted from plasma samples (collected as described above) using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Milan, Italy), as previously reported [35]. Briefly, samples were mixed with 5 volumes of QIAzol lysis reagent and 5 pM A. Thaliana miR-159a (478411_mir, Thermo Fisher) used as spike-in control. The solution was mixed with chloroform and centrifuged (12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C) to obtain and isolate the colorless upper aqueous phase. The latter was mixed with 1.5 volumes of 100% ethanol and dispensed into an RNeasy MinElute spin column, to then be centrifuged at 8000× g for 15 s at room temperature. After washing the column with buffers (RWT and RPE) and 80% ethanol, miRNAs were eluted in 14 μL RNase-free water.
Finally, miRNAs were quantified using the TaqMan Advanced miRNA Assays Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a QuantStudio™ 3 real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). By using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method, the relative expression levels of miR-23a-3p (mmu478532_mir, Thermo Fisher), miR-23b-3p (mmu478602_mir, Thermo Fisher), and miR-744-3p (mmu482884_mir, Thermo Fisher) were calculated by normalization to the expression of miR-669c-3p (mmu483332_mir, Thermo Fisher) that was stable in all of the tested samples.

2.5. Immunofluorescence

Paraformaldehyde-fixed brains were sectioned into 40 µm-thick coronal slices obtained from the areas perfused by the middle cerebral artery (1.18 to −0.10 mm from Bregma) [64]. As previously reported [65,66], tissue sections were incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit polyclonal anti-TNFAIP6 (1:200 dilution; PA599494, Thermo Fisher), rat monoclonal anti-Ly-6B.2 (1:200 dilution; clone 7/4; AbD Serotec, Segrate, MI, Italy) to label myeloid cells (i.e., granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages); rat monoclonal anti-GFAP (1:150 dilution; clone 2.2B10, Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) to label astrocytes. Primary antibodies were labeled with AlexaFluor 488- or AlexaFluor 568-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200 dilution; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy); 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1:500; Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) was used to counterstain nuclei. Fluorescence signals were acquired with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview FV300, Olympus, Segrate, MI, Italy).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and were subjected to statistical analysis using Graph-Pad Prism software for Windows (version 6.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Comparisons between two experimental groups were performed by unpaired Student’s t test, whereas comparisons between multiple experimental groups were performed using one- or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey or Bonferroni post-tests, respectively. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

3. Results

In order to assess whether ischemic PC affects circulating TSG-6, we have measured expression levels of this protein in the plasma of mice subjected to a severe ischemic insult (24 h MCAo followed by 24 h reperfusion), preceded or not by a preconditioning challenge (15 min MCAo) 72 h before. As shown in Figure 1A, transient 1 h MCAo resulted in a significant reduction in TSG-6 protein levels in plasma as compared with the SHAM condition. By contrast, pre-exposure to ischemic PC resulted in a significant elevation of TSG-6 plasma levels as compared with MCAo or PC alone (Figure 1A). We next assessed the modulation of plasma levels of miR-23a, miR-23b, and miR-744, identified by reverse target prediction analysis based on their potential to directly or indirectly regulate TSG-6 expression. By RT-PCR, we detected that ischemic PC abolished the elevation of miR-23a in the plasma mice exposed to transient 1 h MCAo (Figure 1B), which was coincident with reduced protein levels with respect to SHAM (Figure 1A). A similar trend was observed for miR-23b (Figure 1C) and miR-744 (Figure 1D), although the latter was notably elevated by the preconditioning stimulus alone, strongly suggesting its putative upstream role in TSG-6 regulation.
In order to assess whether the peripheral modulation of TSG-6 was associated with a cerebral response, we next evaluated TSG-6 protein expression levels in brain cortical homogenates. Western blotting analysis revealed that 1 h MCAo resulted in a 1.99-fold elevation of TSG-6 protein levels in the ischemic cortex as compared to contralateral tissue (Figure 2A). This effect was further potentiated (2.25 fold vs. MCAo) in the ipsilateral cortex of mice pre-exposed to ischemic PC, strengthening the hypothesis that TSG-6 plays a role in ischemic tolerance. To characterize the specific cellular expression of this protein, we then performed immunofluorescence co-localization experiments in brain slices from mice subjected to MCAo preceded or not by ischemic PC. As shown in Figure 2B, TSG-6 was mainly detected in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of GFAP-immunopositive astrocytes populating the ipsilateral frontal cortex (ischemic penumbra). By contrast, in the ipsilateral parietal cortex (ischemic core), the expression of TSG-6 was observed in Ly6B.2-immunopositive myeloid cells (Figure 2C). Given the immunoregulatory role of TSG-6, and its ability to mediate the beneficial functions of astrocytes and myeloid cells in other pathological contexts [49,67,68], we have hypothesized that its elevation in these cell types may represent a crucial mechanism implicated in neuroprotection. Thus, we assessed brain infarct volume by staining coronal brain sections with cresyl violet and observed that ischemic PC reduced lesioned (unstained, pale) areas, especially in the penumbra regions (i.e., motor cortex and medial striatum) (Figure 3A). The quantification of infarct brain damage revealed that MCAo produced a lesion that occupies 28.5% of the ipsilateral hemisphere, while the damaged region in mice pre-exposed to ischemic PC was 20.4% of total hemisphere, corresponding to a significant 29% reduction in cerebral infarct volume provided by ischemic PC (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

The present study originally demonstrates that the immunoregulatory protein TSG-6 is involved in the establishment of tolerance triggered by ischemic PC. In particular, we have observed that the reduction in TSG-6 protein levels occurring in the plasma of mice subjected to 1 h MCAo is abolished by pre-exposure to a PC stimulus, with the latter even resulting in a dramatic elevation of the circulating protein as compared to the SHAM condition. The peripheral response coincided with a significant elevation of cerebral levels of TSG-6 detected in both astrocytes and myeloid cells populating the ipsilateral hemisphere of mice subjected to ischemia. The cerebral and peripheral modulation of TSG-6 by ischemic PC was associated with a significant reduction in cerebral infarct volume, strongly suggesting that this immunomodulatory protein takes part in the protective mechanisms implicated in ischemic tolerance. These results further support the beneficial role of TSG-6 in acute ischemic stroke.
Recent work has underscored the crucial role of TSG-6 in acute neurodegenerative diseases, including cerebral ischemia both in human and in preclinical setting [48,49,50,69,70]. TSG-6 is a hyaluronate (HA)-binding protein constitutively expressed in the brain and upregulated under inflammatory conditions in a multitude of cells, such as astrocytes, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, fibroblasts, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), and vascular smooth muscle cells [68,71,72,73,74].
TSG-6 plays a role in the modulation of stromal cell function and regulates immune responses by interacting with cell surface receptors and soluble mediators (e.g., chemokines) [51], thus playing anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive roles in various diseases, including neuroinflammation [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Accordingly, this protein protects tissues from the injurious effects caused by spinal cord injury [83] and acute cerebral injury [52,53,54,84,85,86]. Notably, in rodent models of focal and global brain ischemia, TSG-6 underlies the neuroprotective effects of systemically administered MSCs [55,86,87].
In the brain of stroke patients, the expression of TSG-6 is elevated in the peri-infarct and infarcted tissue areas [69], whereas, in non-cardioembolic acute ischemic stroke patients, the increase in plasma levels of TSG-6 was positively associated with disease severity and lesion volume [70]. Moreover, we have recently demonstrated that TSG-6 protein levels increase in the brain of mice subjected to transient 1 h MCAo from 6 to 48h after reperfusion [48]. Here, we confirm and extend this evidence by demonstrating that TSG-6 expression is further potentiated in the ipsilateral cortex of mice pre-exposed to ischemic PC, being mainly detected in astrocytes and myeloid cells populating the prefrontal and parietal cortex, namely penumbra and core regions, respectively. The expression of TSG-6 in astrocytes has previously been demonstrated both in the brain and in the spinal cord of rats, whereby it contributes to their activation after injury, being major constituents of the glial scar [68,88]. In the ischemic brain, glial scar formation by astrocytes provides a physical barrier, hampering synaptic regeneration and neuronal repair at very late stages. By contrast, during the acute phase, it plays a protective role by restricting the spread of inflammation [89]. This is consistent with the evidence that TSG-6 null mice display increased glial scar deposition and a more severe inflammatory response after traumatic brain injury when compared to littermate control mice [67]. Thus, in agreement with these previous findings, our observation of an elevated expression of TSG-6 in penumbra astrocytes of the lesioned hemisphere of mice pre-exposed to ischemic PC may actually suggest a beneficial role. In particular, the formation of a specialized HA-TSG-6 matrix has been argued to serve to stabilize the glial scar, establishing an immunosuppressive milieu that protects adjacent tissue from further damage [67,68]. In addition to astrocytes, the expression of TSG-6 was also reported to occur in neurons, microglia, and blood-borne myeloid cells, especially under neurodegenerative/inflammatory conditions [48,51,69,85,90]. Here, we observe that TSG-6 is expressed in Ly6B.2-immunopositive myeloid cells (i.e., granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages) populating the ipsilateral parietal cortex. As previously suggested, the elevation of Ly6B.2-/TSG-6-immunopositive cells may actually provide protective effects by promoting the phenotype switching of myeloid cells towards the reparative M2-like phenotype [49]. Accordingly, in models of focal cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury, the administration of recombinant TSG-6 exerts neuroprotection by promoting Ym1 brain expression while suppressing endoplasmic reticulum stress-related inflammation [48,50]. Thus, we speculate that the elevated levels of TSG-6 triggered by ischemic PC in mice subjected to MCAo may actually underlie the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of this neuroprotective paradigm in ischemic stroke [35].
The effect of ischemic PC on TSG-6 did not exclusively occur in the brain, since we observed that protein levels were also modulated in plasma. In particular, after 24 h of reperfusion, despite a reduction in plasma TSG-6 protein levels caused by 1 h MCAo, pre-exposure to the PC stimulus dramatically elevated its expression as compared to SHAM-operated mice. Thus, it could be speculated that the cerebral elevation of TSG-6 observed in the preconditioned brain may depend not only on its local release by astrocytes, but also by blood-borne infiltrating myeloid cells, likely representing a compensatory anti-inflammatory mechanism, as also underscored in other inflammatory contexts [91]. Conversely, we speculate that the reduced levels of circulating TSG-6 observed after transient MCAo may represent a trigger for a detrimental response to injury. To support this hypothesis, we have previously demonstrated that the administration of recombinant TSG-6 at the time of reperfusion caused the significant elevation of cerebral levels of the M2 marker Ym1 and a reduction in cerebral lesion and neurological deficits in mice subjected to transient MCAo [48]. In turn, the knockdown of endogenous TSG-6 by siRNA elevated the (CD86+) M1 vs. (CD163+) M2 ratio in cerebral microglia and aggravated neurological deficits 24 h after subarachnoid hemorrhage [85,92]. In fact, inflammatory stimuli prompt myeloid immune cells to produce high levels of TSG-6 [93], that, in turn, can act in an autocrine mode on macrophages triggering their transition from inflammatory to anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory phenotypes [94,95,96,97], likely through the suppression of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4/NF-κB pathways [58,76,78,95,98,99]. Thus, the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory functions of TSG-6 may be crucial for the neuroprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning. In this regard, it is important to highlight that preconditioning alone is not sufficient to modulate cerebral and peripheral TSG-6 levels, suggesting the occurrence of an upstream mechanism that combines with severe ischemia to then produce the protective effect. Using the TargetScan database (www.targetscan.org, accessed on 14 September 2021), we performed a reverse target prediction analysis to identify miR-23a and miR-23b based on their potential to regulate TSG-6. As expected, the elevation of miR-23a expression was coincident with reduced TSG-6 protein expression after 1 h MCAo followed by 24 h reperfusion. By contrast, in mice pre-exposed to ischemic PC, the elevation of TSG-6 did not correspond to a significant modulation of miR-23a, suggesting that protein increase may actually be independent from miRNA regulation. Moreover, based on previous findings, we have screened other miRNAs potentially involved in the modulation of TSG-6 to finally identify miR-744 that can induce TSG-6 expression via the inhibition of TGF-beta synthesis [100,101,102,103,104]. Interestingly, the miR-744 expression level was significantly elevated after the PC stimulus alone, arguing for its crucial role in ischemic tolerance. Accordingly, the systemic administration of miR-744 to rats subjected to focal cerebral ischemia was able to provide neuroprotection by suppressing inflammatory responses (i.e., elevation of TNF-α, IL-1-β and IL-6) in the injured brain [105]. The same authors demonstrated that cerebral miR-744 levels are decreased after ischemia–reperfusion as compared to SHAM, further supporting the beneficial role of this miRNA and its downstream pathways [105].

5. Conclusions

Although our findings provide information on TSG-6 protein levels, further work is needed to elucidate in which (specifically sorted) immune cells the modulation of its mRNA occurs. Moreover, our study only provides preliminary findings on the putative role of TSG-6 in ischemic tolerance in adult male mice, since the lack of investigation of sex differences (i.e., by including female mice), aging, co-morbidities, or long-term parameters represent important limitations.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that ischemic PC protects against a more severe ischemia by modulating cerebral and plasma levels of TSG-6, an immunomodulatory protein likely involved in ischemic tolerance. This further strengthens the crucial role of TSG-6 in the ischemic context, highlighting its potential as a promising therapy for neuroprotection in stroke.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D.S., A.S. and D.A.; methodology, C.D.S., D.L.R. and D.A.; formal analysis, D.L.R., A.S. and D.A.; resources, P.T. and G.B.; data curation, C.D.S., D.A. and P.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.D.S. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, P.T., G.B. and D.A.; supervision, P.T., G.B. and D.A.; funding acquisition, D.A., P.T. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University of Research (PRIN codes 2022ESYM4J, 2017XKJTLW_001 and 2015KRYSJN). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocols (n. 975/2017-PR and 701/2020-PR) were approved by the local animal welfare organism (OBPA, University of Calabria) and by the Ministry of Health at the National Institute of Health (Rome).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Technical support by Guido Fico is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Martin, S.S.; Aday, A.W.; Almarzooq, Z.I.; Anderson, C.A.M.; Arora, P.; Avery, C.L.; Baker-Smith, C.M.; Barone Gibbs, B.; Beaton, A.Z.; Boehme, A.K.; et al. 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024, 149, e347–e913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Steinmetz, J.D.; Seeher, K.M.; Schiess, N.; Nichols, E.; Cao, B.; Servili, C.; Cavallera, V.; Cousin, E.; Hagins, H.; Moberg, M.E.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Disorders Affecting the Nervous System, 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024, 23, 344–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mehta, A.; Fifi, J.T.; Shoirah, H.; Singh, I.P.; Shigematsu, T.; Kellner, C.P.; De Leacy, R.; Mocco, J.; Majidi, S. National Trends in Utilization and Outcome of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Elderly. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2021, 30, 105505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stein, L.; Tuhrim, S.; Fifi, J.; Mocco, J.; Dhamoon, M. National Trends in Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Utilization and Outcomes. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2020, 12, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ramos-Araque, M.E.; Rodriguez, C.; Vecino, R.; Cortijo Garcia, E.; de Lera Alfonso, M.; Sanchez Barba, M.; Colàs-Campàs, L.; Purroy, F.; Arenillas, J.F.; Almeida, A.; et al. The Neuronal Ischemic Tolerance Is Conditioned by the Tp53 Arg72Pro Polymorphism. Transl. Stroke Res. 2019, 10, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moncayo, J.; de Freitas, G.R.; Bogousslavsky, J.; Altieri, M.; van Melle, G. Do Transient Ischemic Attacks Have a Neuroprotective Effect? Neurology 2000, 54, 2089–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castillo, J.; Moro, M.Á.; Blanco, M.; Leira, R.; Serena, J.; Lizasoain, I.; Dávalos, A. The Release of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Is Associated with Ischemic Tolerance in Human Stroke. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 54, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, W.-W.; Chen, D.-Z.; Zhao, M.; Yang, X.-F.; Gong, D.-R. Prior Transient Ischemic Attacks May Have a Neuroprotective Effect in Patients with Ischemic Stroke. Arch. Med. Sci. 2017, 5, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weih, M.; Kallenberg, K.; Bergk, A.; Dirnagl, U.; Harms, L.; Wernecke, K.D.; Einhäupl, K.M. Attenuated Stroke Severity after Prodromal TIA: A Role for Ischemic Tolerance in the Brain? Stroke 1999, 30, 1851–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kim, J.G.; Choi, H.; Sohn, S.-Y.; Kim, D.-H.; Lee, S.J. Transient Ischemic Attacks Preceding Acute Lacunar Infarction. Eur. Neurol. 2016, 76, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stenzel-Poore, M.P.; Stevens, S.L.; Xiong, Z.; Lessov, N.S.; Harrington, C.A.; Mori, M.; Meller, R.; Rosenzweig, H.L.; Tobar, E.; Shaw, T.E.; et al. Effect of Ischaemic Preconditioning on Genomic Response to Cerebral Ischaemia: Similarity to Neuroprotective Strategies in Hibernation and Hypoxia-Tolerant States. Lancet 2003, 362, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dirnagl, U.; Becker, K.; Meisel, A. Preconditioning and Tolerance against Cerebral Ischaemia: From Experimental Strategies to Clinical Use. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 398–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thompson, J.W.; Dave, K.R.; Young, J.I.; Perez-Pinzon, M.A. Ischemic Preconditioning Alters the Epigenetic Profile of the Brain from Ischemic Intolerance to Ischemic Tolerance. Neurotherapeutics 2013, 10, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gidday, J.M. Cerebral Preconditioning and Ischaemic Tolerance. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stenzel-Poore, M.P.; Stevens, S.L.; King, J.S.; Simon, R.P. Preconditioning Reprograms the Response to Ischemic Injury and Primes the Emergence of Unique Endogenous Neuroprotective Phenotypes. Stroke 2007, 38, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sisalli, M.J.; Annunziato, L.; Scorziello, A. Novel Cellular Mechanisms for Neuroprotection in Ischemic Preconditioning: A View from Inside Organelles. Front. Neurol. 2015, 6, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Secondo, A.; Petrozziello, T.; Tedeschi, V.; Boscia, F.; Vinciguerra, A.; Ciccone, R.; Pannaccione, A.; Molinaro, P.; Pignataro, G.; Annunziato, L. ORAI1/STIM1 Interaction Intervenes in Stroke and in Neuroprotection Induced by Ischemic Preconditioning Through Store-Operated Calcium Entry. Stroke 2019, 50, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Obrenovitch, T.P. Molecular Physiology of Preconditioning-Induced Brain Tolerance to Ischemia. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 211–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cuomo, O.; Vinciguerra, A.; Cerullo, P.; Anzilotti, S.; Brancaccio, P.; Bilo, L.; Scorziello, A.; Molinaro, P.; Di Renzo, G.; Pignataro, G. Ionic Homeostasis in Brain Conditioning. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. La Russa, D.; Frisina, M.; Secondo, A.; Bagetta, G.; Amantea, D. Modulation of Cerebral Store-Operated Calcium Entry-Regulatory Factor (SARAF) and Peripheral Orai1 Following Focal Cerebral Ischemia and Preconditioning in Mice. Neuroscience 2020, 441, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Končekova, J.; Kotorova, K.; Gottlieb, M.; Bona, M.; Bonova, P. Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Accelerates Brain to Blood Glutamate Efflux via EAATs-Mediated Transport. Neurochem. Res. 2023, 48, 3560–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Y.-N.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, N.-N.; Chen, H.-S. Ischemic Preconditioning Alleviates Cerebral Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury by Interfering With Glycocalyx. Transl. Stroke Res. 2023, 14, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pignataro, G.; Brancaccio, P.; Laudati, G.; Valsecchi, V.; Anzilotti, S.; Casamassa, A.; Cuomo, O.; Vinciguerra, A. Sodium/Calcium Exchanger as Main Effector of Endogenous Neuroprotection Elicited by Ischemic Tolerance. Cell Calcium 2020, 87, 102183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dirnagl, U.; Simon, R.P.; Hallenbeck, J.M. Ischemic Tolerance and Endogenous Neuroprotection. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kirino, T. Ischemic Tolerance. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sol, J.; Colàs-Campàs, L.; Mauri-Capdevila, G.; Molina-Seguin, J.; Galo-Licona, J.D.; Torres-Querol, C.; Aymerich, N.; Ois, Á.; Roquer, J.; Tur, S.; et al. Ischemia Preconditioning Induces an Adaptive Response That Defines a Circulating Metabolomic Signature in Ischemic Stroke Patients. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2022, 42, 2201–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gesuete, R.; Stevens, S.L.; Stenzel-Poore, M.P. Role of Circulating Immune Cells in Stroke and Preconditioning- Induced Protection. In Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum; Springer: Wien, Austria, 2016; Volume 121, pp. 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  28. McDonough, A.; Noor, S.; Lee, R.V.; Dodge, R.; Strosnider, J.S.; Shen, J.; Davidson, S.; Möller, T.; Garden, G.A.; Weinstein, J.R. Ischemic Preconditioning Induces Cortical Microglial Proliferation and a Transcriptomic Program of Robust Cell Cycle Activation. Glia 2020, 68, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pradillo, J.M.; Fernández-López, D.; García-Yébenes, I.; Sobrado, M.; Hurtado, O.; Moro, M.A.; Lizasoain, I. Toll-like Receptor 4 Is Involved in Neuroprotection Afforded by Ischemic Preconditioning. J. Neurochem. 2009, 109, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stevens, S.L.; Leung, P.Y.; Vartanian, K.B.; Gopalan, B.; Yang, T.; Simon, R.P.; Stenzel-Poore, M.P. Multiple Preconditioning Paradigms Converge on Interferon Regulatory Factor-Dependent Signaling to Promote Tolerance to Ischemic Brain Injury. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 8456–8463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lalancette-Hebert, M.; Gowing, G.; Simard, A.; Weng, Y.C.; Kriz, J. Selective Ablation of Proliferating Microglial Cells Exacerbates Ischemic Injury in the Brain. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 2596–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hamner, M.A.; Ye, Z.; Lee, R.V.; Colman, J.R.; Le, T.; Gong, D.C.; Ransom, B.R.; Weinstein, J.R. Ischemic Preconditioning in White Matter: Magnitude and Mechanism. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 15599–15611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amantea, D.; Bagetta, G. Drug Repurposing for Immune Modulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2016, 26, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fumagalli, S.; Perego, C.; Ortolano, F.; De Simoni, M.-G. CX3CR1 Deficiency Induces an Early Protective Inflammatory Environment in Ischemic Mice. Glia 2013, 61, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Amantea, D.; La Russa, D.; Frisina, M.; Giordano, F.; Di Santo, C.; Panno, M.L.; Pignataro, G.; Bagetta, G. Ischemic Preconditioning Modulates the Peripheral Innate Immune System to Promote Anti-Inflammatory and Protective Responses in Mice Subjected to Focal Cerebral Ischemia. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 825834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hirayama, Y.; Ikeda-Matsuo, Y.; Notomi, S.; Enaida, H.; Kinouchi, H.; Koizumi, S. Astrocyte-Mediated Ischemic Tolerance. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 3794–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, L.; Cao, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, M.; Xu, X.; Ye, R.; Liu, X. Exosome-Shuttled MiR-92b-3p from Ischemic Preconditioned Astrocytes Protects Neurons against Oxygen and Glucose Deprivation. Brain Res. 2019, 1717, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Narayanan, S.V.; Perez-Pinzon, M.A. Ischemic Preconditioning Treatment of Astrocytes Transfers Ischemic Tolerance to Neurons. Cond. Med. 2017, 1, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Wisniewski, H.G.; Maier, R.; Lotz, M.; Lee, S.; Klampfer, L.; Lee, T.H.; Vilcek, J. TSG-6: A TNF-, IL-1-, and LPS-Inducible Secreted Glycoprotein Associated with Arthritis. J. Immunol. 1993, 151, 6593–6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klampfer, L.; Lee, T.H.; Hsu, W.; Vilcek, J.; Chen-Kiang, S. NF-IL6 and AP-1 Cooperatively Modulate the Activation of the TSG-6 Gene by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha and Interleukin-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 6561–6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, T.H.; Wisniewski, H.G.; Vilcek, J. A Novel Secretory Tumor Necrosis Factor-Inducible Protein (TSG-6) Is a Member of the Family of Hyaluronate Binding Proteins, Closely Related to the Adhesion Receptor CD44. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 116, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zlibut, A.; Bocsan, I.C.; Agoston-Coldea, L. Pentraxin-3 and Endothelial Dysfunction. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2019, 91, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shekhar, S.; Cunningham, M.W.; Pabbidi, M.R.; Wang, S.; Booz, G.W.; Fan, F. Targeting Vascular Inflammation in Ischemic Stroke: Recent Developments on Novel Immunomodulatory Approaches. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 833, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Larsson, S.C.; Markus, H.S. Does Treating Vascular Risk Factors Prevent Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 64, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chaurasia, B.; Chavda, V.; Lu, B.; Garg, K.; Montemurro, N. Cognitive Deficits and Memory Impairments after COVID-19 (Covishield) Vaccination. Brain Behav. Immun.-Health 2022, 22, 100463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chavda, V.; Chaurasia, B.; Fiorindi, A.; Umana, G.E.; Lu, B.; Montemurro, N. Ischemic Stroke and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Bidirectional Pathology and Risk Morbidities. Neurol. Int. 2022, 14, 391–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Giannouli, V.; Tsolaki, M. Liberating Older Adults from the Bonds of Vascular Risk Factors: What Is Their Impact on Financial Capacity in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment? Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2022, 76, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Di Santo, C.; La Russa, D.; Greco, R.; Persico, A.; Zanaboni, A.M.; Bagetta, G.; Amantea, D. Characterization of the Involvement of Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α-Stimulated Gene 6 (TSG-6) in Ischemic Brain Injury Caused by Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Mouse. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. La Russa, D.; Di Santo, C.; Lizasoain, I.; Moraga, A.; Bagetta, G.; Amantea, D. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α-Stimulated Gene 6 (TSG-6): A Promising Immunomodulatory Target in Acute Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cui, S.; Ke, L.; Wang, H.; Li, L. TSG-6 Alleviates Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Suppressing ER Stress-Mediated Inflammation. Brain Res. 2023, 1817, 148466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Day, A.J.; Milner, C.M. TSG-6: A Multifunctional Protein with Anti-Inflammatory and Tissue-Protective Properties. Matrix Biol. 2019, 78–79, 60–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Roura, S.; Monguió-Tortajada, M.; Munizaga-Larroudé, M.; Clos-Sansalvador, M.; Franquesa, M.; Rosell, A.; Borràs, F.E. Potential of Extracellular Vesicle-Associated TSG-6 from Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Watanabe, J.; Shetty, A.K.; Hattiangady, B.; Kim, D.-K.; Foraker, J.E.; Nishida, H.; Prockop, D.J. Administration of TSG-6 Improves Memory after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013, 59, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Yan, K.; Chen, L.; Chen, X.-R.; Li, P.; Chen, F.-F.; Jiang, X.-D. Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jung, H.-S.; Jeong, S.-Y.; Yang, J.; Kim, S.-D.; Zhang, B.; Yoo, H.S.; Song, S.U.; Jeon, M.-S.; Song, Y.S. Neuroprotective Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cell through Complement Component 3 Downregulation after Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 633, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Percie du Sert, N.; Hurst, V.; Ahluwalia, A.; Alam, S.; Avey, M.T.; Baker, M.; Browne, W.J.; Clark, A.; Cuthill, I.C.; Dirnagl, U.; et al. The ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research*. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020, 40, 1769–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. La Russa, D.; Montesano, D.; Pellegrino, D.; Frisina, M.; Bagetta, G.; Fallarino, F.; Amantea, D. Systemic Administration of Sunflower Oil Exerts Neuroprotection in a Mouse Model of Transient Focal Cerebral Ischaemia. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2022, 74, 1776–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Greco, R.; Mangione, A.S.; Amantea, D.; Bagetta, G.; Nappi, G.; Tassorelli, C. IkappaB-Alpha Expression Following Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia Is Modulated by Nitric Oxide. Brain Res. 2011, 1372, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Petrelli, F.; Muzzi, M.; Chiarugi, A.; Bagetta, G.; Amantea, D. Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Is Not Involved in the Neuroprotection Exerted by Azithromycin against Ischemic Stroke in Mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 791, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tettamanti, M.; Beretta, S.; Pignataro, G.; Fumagalli, S.; Perego, C.; Sironi, L.; Pedata, F.; Amantea, D.; Bacigalluppi, M. Multi-Center Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRICS). Protocol of a Multi-Center, Parallel Group, Randomized, Preclinical Trial in Female and Male Rat and Mouse from the Italian Stroke Organization (ISO) Basic. Br. Med. J. Open Sci. 2020, 44, e100063. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.-J.; Klaus, J.A.; Koehler, R.C.; Huang, J. Delayed Tolerance With Repetitive Transient Focal Ischemic Preconditioning in the Mouse. Stroke 2008, 39, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lusardi, T.A.; Farr, C.D.; Faulkner, C.L.; Pignataro, G.; Yang, T.; Lan, J.; Simon, R.P.; Saugstad, J.A. Ischemic Preconditioning Regulates Expression of MicroRNAs and a Predicted Target, MeCP2, in Mouse Cortex. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Amantea, D.; Certo, M.; Petrelli, F.; Tassorelli, C.; Micieli, G.; Corasaniti, M.T.; Puccetti, P.; Fallarino, F.; Bagetta, G. Azithromycin Protects Mice against Ischemic Stroke Injury by Promoting Macrophage Transition towards M2 Phenotype. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 275, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Paxinos, G.; Franklin, K.B.J. Paxinos and Franklin’s the Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; ISBN 9780128161609. [Google Scholar]
  65. Viscomi, M.T.; Florenzano, F.; Latini, L.; Amantea, D.; Bernardi, G.; Molinari, M. Methylprednisolone Treatment Delays Remote Cell Death after Focal Brain Lesion. Neuroscience 2008, 154, 1267–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Certo, M.; Endo, Y.; Ohta, K.; Sakurada, S.; Bagetta, G.; Amantea, D. Activation of RXR/PPARγ Underlies Neuroprotection by Bexarotene in Ischemic Stroke. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 102, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mutoji, K.N.; Sun, M.; Nash, A.; Puri, S.; Hascall, V.; Coulson-Thomas, V.J. Anti-Inflammatory Protein TNFα-Stimulated Gene-6 (TSG-6) Reduces Inflammatory Response after Brain Injury in Mice. BMC Immunol. 2021, 22, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Coulson-Thomas, V.J.; Lauer, M.E.; Soleman, S.; Zhao, C.; Hascall, V.C.; Day, A.J.; Fawcett, J.W. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Stimulated Gene-6 (TSG-6) Is Constitutively Expressed in Adult Central Nervous System (CNS) and Associated with Astrocyte-Mediated Glial Scar Formation Following Spinal Cord Injury. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 19939–19952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Al’Qteishat, A. Changes in Hyaluronan Production and Metabolism Following Ischaemic Stroke in Man. Brain 2006, 129, 2158–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qu, Y.; Yang, F.; Meng, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, T.; Wen, S.; Pan, Y. Plasma Concentration of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Stimulated Gene-6 as a Novel Diagnostic and 3-Month Prognostic Indicator in Non-Cardioembolic Acute Ischemic Stroke. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 713379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bogdani, M.; Johnson, P.Y.; Potter-Perigo, S.; Nagy, N.; Day, A.J.; Bollyky, P.L.; Wight, T.N. Hyaluronan and Hyaluronan-Binding Proteins Accumulate in Both Human Type 1 Diabetic Islets and Lymphoid Tissues and Associate With Inflammatory Cells in Insulitis. Diabetes 2014, 63, 2727–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tan, K.; McGrouther, D.; Day, A.; Milner, C.; Bayat, A. Characterization of Hyaluronan and TSG-6 in Skin Scarring: Differential Distribution in Keloid Scars, Normal Scars and Unscarred Skin. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2011, 25, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, S.; He, H.; Day, A.J.; Tseng, S.C.G. Constitutive Expression of Inter-α-Inhibitor (IαI) Family Proteins and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Stimulated Gene-6 (TSG-6) by Human Amniotic Membrane Epithelial and Stromal Cells Supporting Formation of the Heavy Chain-Hyaluronan (HC-HA) Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12433–12444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Milner, C.M.; Day, A.J. TSG-6: A Multifunctional Protein Associated with Inflammation. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1863–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lesley, J.; Gál, I.; Mahoney, D.J.; Cordell, M.R.; Rugg, M.S.; Hyman, R.; Day, A.J.; Mikecz, K. TSG-6 Modulates the Interaction between Hyaluronan and Cell Surface CD44. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25745–25754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kota, D.J.; Wiggins, L.L.; Yoon, N.; Lee, R.H. TSG-6 Produced by HMSCs Delays the Onset of Autoimmune Diabetes by Suppressing Th1 Development and Enhancing Tolerogenicity. Diabetes 2013, 62, 2048–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Baranova, N.S.; Nilebäck, E.; Haller, F.M.; Briggs, D.C.; Svedhem, S.; Day, A.J.; Richter, R.P. The Inflammation-Associated Protein TSG-6 Cross-Links Hyaluronan via Hyaluronan-Induced TSG-6 Oligomers. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 25675–25686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Choi, H.; Lee, R.H.; Bazhanov, N.; Oh, J.Y.; Prockop, D.J. Anti-Inflammatory Protein TSG-6 Secreted by Activated MSCs Attenuates Zymosan-Induced Mouse Peritonitis by Decreasing TLR2/NF-ΚB Signaling in Resident Macrophages. Blood 2011, 118, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Baranova, N.S.; Inforzato, A.; Briggs, D.C.; Tilakaratna, V.; Enghild, J.J.; Thakar, D.; Milner, C.M.; Day, A.J.; Richter, R.P. Incorporation of Pentraxin 3 into Hyaluronan Matrices Is Tightly Regulated and Promotes Matrix Cross-Linking. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 30481–30498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Baranova, N.S.; Foulcer, S.J.; Briggs, D.C.; Tilakaratna, V.; Enghild, J.J.; Milner, C.M.; Day, A.J.; Richter, R.P. Inter-α-Inhibitor Impairs TSG-6-Induced Hyaluronan Cross-Linking. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 29642–29653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Coulson-Thomas, V.J.; Gesteira, T.F.; Hascall, V.; Kao, W. Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Suppress Host Rejection. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 23465–23481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lauer, M.E.; Loftis, J.; de la Motte, C.; Hascall, V.C. Analysis of the Heavy-Chain Modification and TSG-6 Activity in Pathological Hyaluronan Matrices. In Glycosaminoglycans: Chemistry and Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 543–548. [Google Scholar]
  83. Liao, Z.; Wang, W.; Deng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Song, A.; Deng, S.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, Z. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Secreted TSG-6 Is Anti-Inflammatory and Promote Tissue Repair After Spinal Cord Injury. ASN Neuro 2021, 13, 175909142110106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tang, B.; Song, M.; Xie, X.; Le, D.; Tu, Q.; Wu, X.; Chen, M. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Stimulated Gene-6 (TSG-6) Secreted by BMSCs Regulates Activated Astrocytes by Inhibiting NF-ΚB Signaling Pathway to Ameliorate Blood Brain Barrier Damage After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 2387–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, R.; Liu, W.; Yin, J.; Chen, Y.; Guo, S.; Fan, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; He, X.; Duan, C. TSG-6 Attenuates Inflammation-Induced Brain Injury via Modulation of Microglial Polarization in SAH Rats through the SOCS3/STAT3 Pathway. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lin, Q.; Zhao, S.; Zhou, L.; Fang, X.; Fu, Y.; Huang, Z. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation Suppresses Inflammatory Responses in Global Cerebral Ischemia: Contribution of TNF-α-Induced Protein 6. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013, 34, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lin, Q.; Lin, S.; Lv, Y.; Zhou, L.; Fu, Y.; Fang, X.; Chen, F.; Huang, Z. Suppression of Inflammatory Damage to the Brain after Global Cerebral Ischemia by Transplanted Mesenchymal Stem Cells via Secretion of TSG-6. Neurol. Asia 2016, 21, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ding, M.; Jin, L.; Wei, B.; Cheng, W.; Liu, W.; Li, X.; Duan, C. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Stimulated Gene-6 Ameliorates Early Brain Injury after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage by Suppressing NLRC4 Inflammasome-Mediated Astrocyte Pyroptosis. Neural Regen. Res. 2024, 19, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Fu, R.; Hua, S.; Xu, S. Astrocytes in Ischemic Stroke: Crosstalk in Central Nervous System and Therapeutic Potential. Neuropathology 2024, 44, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Reed, M.J.; Damodarasamy, M.; Pathan, J.L.; Chan, C.K.; Spiekerman, C.; Wight, T.N.; Banks, W.A.; Day, A.J.; Vernon, R.B.; Keene, C.D. Increased Hyaluronan and TSG-6 in Association with Neuropathologic Changes of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 67, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bertling, F.; Bendix, I.; Drommelschmidt, K.; Wisniewski, H.G.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U.; Keller, M.; Prager, S. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Inducible Gene 6 Protein: A Novel Neuroprotective Factor against Inflammation-Induced Developmental Brain Injury. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 279, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Li, X.; Liu, W.; Li, R.; Guo, S.; Fan, H.; Wei, B.; Zhang, X.; He, X.; Duan, C. TSG-6 Attenuates Oxidative Stress-Induced Early Brain Injury in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Partly by the HO-1 and Nox2 Pathways. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020, 29, 104986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Maina, V.; Cotena, A.; Doni, A.; Nebuloni, M.; Pasqualini, F.; Milner, C.M.; Day, A.J.; Mantovani, A.; Garlanda, C. Coregulation in Human Leukocytes of the Long Pentraxin PTX3 and TSG-6. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2009, 86, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Xu, L.; Dong, L.; Zheng, J.; Lin, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zang, X.; et al. Cell–Cell Contact with Proinflammatory Macrophages Enhances the Immunotherapeutic Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Two Abortion Models. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 16, 908–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mittal, M.; Tiruppathi, C.; Nepal, S.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Grzych, D.; Soni, D.; Prockop, D.J.; Malik, A.B. TNFα-Stimulated Gene-6 (TSG6) Activates Macrophage Phenotype Transition to Prevent Inflammatory Lung Injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E8151–E8158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Li, C.; Li, X.; Shi, Z.; Wu, P.; Fu, J.; Tang, J.; Qing, L. Exosomes from LPS-Preconditioned Bone Marrow MSCs Accelerated Peripheral Nerve Regeneration via M2 Macrophage Polarization: Involvement of TSG-6/NF-ΚB/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway. Exp. Neurol. 2022, 356, 114139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Watanabe, R.; Watanabe, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Kojima, M.; Konii, H.; Watanabe, K.; Shirai, R.; Sato, K.; Matsuyama, T.; Ishibashi-Ueda, H.; et al. Atheroprotective Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor–Stimulated Gene-6. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2016, 1, 494–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bartosh, T.J.; Ylöstalo, J.H.; Mohammadipoor, A.; Bazhanov, N.; Coble, K.; Claypool, K.; Lee, R.H.; Choi, H.; Prockop, D.J. Aggregation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) into 3D Spheroids Enhances Their Antiinflammatory Properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13724–13729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qi, Y.; Jiang, D.; Sindrilaru, A.; Stegemann, A.; Schatz, S.; Treiber, N.; Rojewski, M.; Schrezenmeier, H.; Vander Beken, S.; Wlaschek, M.; et al. TSG-6 Released from Intradermally Injected Mesenchymal Stem Cells Accelerates Wound Healing and Reduces Tissue Fibrosis in Murine Full-Thickness Skin Wounds. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 526–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kwon, H.Y.; Yoon, Y.; Hong, J.-E.; Rhee, K.-J.; Sohn, J.H.; Jung, P.Y.; Kim, M.Y.; Baik, S.K.; Ryu, H.; Eom, Y.W. Role of TGF-β and P38 MAPK in TSG-6 Expression in Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 25, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Huang, H.; Lu, H.; Liang, L.; Zhi, Y.; Huo, B.; Wu, L.; Xu, L.; Shen, Z. MicroRNA-744 Inhibits Proliferation of Bronchial Epithelial Cells by Regulating Smad3 Pathway via Targeting Transforming Growth Factor-Β1 (TGF-Β1) in Severe Asthma. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 2159–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Huang, W.; Chen, Q.; Dai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, Y.; Wei, X.; Wu, Z. MiR-744-5p Suppresses Tumor Proliferation and Metastasis by Targeting Transforming Growth Factor-Beta 1 (TGF-Β1) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2021, 12, 1811–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, L.; Cheng, M.; Zhang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Q. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Prevent Glioma by Blocking M2 Polarization of Macrophages through a MiR-744-5p/TGFB1-Dependent Mechanism. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2022, 38, 649–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Martin, J.; Jenkins, R.H.; Bennagi, R.; Krupa, A.; Phillips, A.O.; Bowen, T.; Fraser, D.J. Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor Beta-1 by MicroRNA-744. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Jing, G.; Yin, S. Expression and Related Mechanism of MiR-744 in Ischemia-Reperfusion Rat Model. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2023, 69, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Transient MCAo and ischemic PC modulate plasma levels of TSG-6 protein and of miR-23a, miR-23b, and miR-744. (A) TSG-6 protein, (B) miR-23a, (C) miR-23b, or (D) miR-744 relative expression levels in plasma of mice who have undergone SHAM surgery (SHAM), PC (15 min MCAo), transient (1 h) MCAo, or PC + MCAo. * p < 0.05 vs. SHAM, ** p < 0.01 vs. PC and p < 0.001 vs. MCAo, # p < 0.001 vs. SHAM (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test, n = 6–8 mice per experimental group).
Figure 1. Transient MCAo and ischemic PC modulate plasma levels of TSG-6 protein and of miR-23a, miR-23b, and miR-744. (A) TSG-6 protein, (B) miR-23a, (C) miR-23b, or (D) miR-744 relative expression levels in plasma of mice who have undergone SHAM surgery (SHAM), PC (15 min MCAo), transient (1 h) MCAo, or PC + MCAo. * p < 0.05 vs. SHAM, ** p < 0.01 vs. PC and p < 0.001 vs. MCAo, # p < 0.001 vs. SHAM (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test, n = 6–8 mice per experimental group).
Cimb 46 00595 g001
Figure 2. Ischemic PC potentiates elevation of TSG-6 protein expression in the brain of mice subjected to transient MCAo. (A) TSG-6 protein expression levels detected by Western blotting in the ipsilateral (ischemic, I) and contralateral (C) cortex of mice subjected to SHAM surgery (SHAM), PC (15 min MCAo), transient (1 h) MCAo, or PC + MCAo (** p < 0.01 vs. SHAM ipsilateral, vs. PC ipsilateral and vs. corresponding contralateral, * p < 0.05 vs. PC + MCAo ipsilateral (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test, n = 6–8 animals per experimental group). (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of the ipsilateral frontal cortex showing colocalization (yellow overlapping in merge panels) of TSG6 (green fluorescence) with GFAP-immunopositive neurons (red fluorescence). (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of the ipsilateral parietal cortex showing colocalization (yellow overlapping in merge panels) of TSG-6 (green fluorescence) with Ly6B.2-immunopositive myeloid cells (i.e., granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages, red fluorescence). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue signal). Scale bars = 150 μm.
Figure 2. Ischemic PC potentiates elevation of TSG-6 protein expression in the brain of mice subjected to transient MCAo. (A) TSG-6 protein expression levels detected by Western blotting in the ipsilateral (ischemic, I) and contralateral (C) cortex of mice subjected to SHAM surgery (SHAM), PC (15 min MCAo), transient (1 h) MCAo, or PC + MCAo (** p < 0.01 vs. SHAM ipsilateral, vs. PC ipsilateral and vs. corresponding contralateral, * p < 0.05 vs. PC + MCAo ipsilateral (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test, n = 6–8 animals per experimental group). (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of the ipsilateral frontal cortex showing colocalization (yellow overlapping in merge panels) of TSG6 (green fluorescence) with GFAP-immunopositive neurons (red fluorescence). (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of the ipsilateral parietal cortex showing colocalization (yellow overlapping in merge panels) of TSG-6 (green fluorescence) with Ly6B.2-immunopositive myeloid cells (i.e., granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages, red fluorescence). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue signal). Scale bars = 150 μm.
Cimb 46 00595 g002
Figure 3. Ischemic PC reduces cerebral infarct volume caused by transient MCAo in mice. (A) Representative cresyl violet-stained coronal brain slices and (B) infarct damage expressed as percentage of ipsilateral hemisphere of mice subjected to 1 h MCAo followed by 24 h reperfusion, preceded (PC + MCAo) or not (MCAo) by 15 min MCAo, 72 h before. *** p < 0.0001 vs. MCAo (Student’s t test, n = 8 animals per experimental group).
Figure 3. Ischemic PC reduces cerebral infarct volume caused by transient MCAo in mice. (A) Representative cresyl violet-stained coronal brain slices and (B) infarct damage expressed as percentage of ipsilateral hemisphere of mice subjected to 1 h MCAo followed by 24 h reperfusion, preceded (PC + MCAo) or not (MCAo) by 15 min MCAo, 72 h before. *** p < 0.0001 vs. MCAo (Student’s t test, n = 8 animals per experimental group).
Cimb 46 00595 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Santo, C.; Siniscalchi, A.; La Russa, D.; Tonin, P.; Bagetta, G.; Amantea, D. Brain Ischemic Tolerance Triggered by Preconditioning Involves Modulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Stimulated Gene 6 (TSG-6) in Mice Subjected to Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 9970-9983. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46090595

AMA Style

Di Santo C, Siniscalchi A, La Russa D, Tonin P, Bagetta G, Amantea D. Brain Ischemic Tolerance Triggered by Preconditioning Involves Modulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Stimulated Gene 6 (TSG-6) in Mice Subjected to Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024; 46(9):9970-9983. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46090595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Santo, Chiara, Antonio Siniscalchi, Daniele La Russa, Paolo Tonin, Giacinto Bagetta, and Diana Amantea. 2024. "Brain Ischemic Tolerance Triggered by Preconditioning Involves Modulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Stimulated Gene 6 (TSG-6) in Mice Subjected to Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, no. 9: 9970-9983. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46090595

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop