• BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I hate this lazy coding approach. I see it at my work all the time where people keep proposing agents that do exactly what some of our tools already do, just slower, with more resources, and nondeterministic.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I thought this would be about the Ai generated games, that has no code and runs like a video. Can we speak about software, if there is no code?

  • tocano@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    a relative time formatting library that contains no code

    The library is two text files (code) that are processed by an LLM (interpreter) to generate code of another type. This is not that new in terms of workflow.

    I think what makes this the worst is the fact that the author admits that you can’t be sure the library will work until you generate the code and test it. Even then you cannot guarantee the security of the generated code and as you do not understand the code you also cannot give support or patch it.

    When Performance Matters

    If performance of a datetime processor is not relevant, what is? The author mentions they would like a browser implementation to be fast, documentable, fixable. However, operative systems, browsers, and other complex systems are made of little utilities like this that have very well documented functionalities and side effects.

    But the above isn’t fully baked. Our models will get better, our agents more capable.

    The whole assumption is that instead of creating a good stable base that anyone can use we should be just shtting out code until it works.

    Eventually the hardware will be good enough to support a shitty bloated browser so we don’t need to optimize it.

    Eventually people will harden their PC enough so we shouldn’t care about security.