Rwanda_hero_map
Flag of Rwanda

Rwanda

Freedom at a Glance
Global Freedom
23 / 100
Not Free
Internet Freedom
37 / 100
Not Free

The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), led by President Paul Kagame, has ruled the country since it ousted forces responsible for the 1994 genocide, ending the civil war that began in 1990. While the regime has maintained stability and economic growth, it has also suppressed political dissent through pervasive surveillance, intimidation, arbitrary detention, torture, and renditions or suspected assassinations of exiled dissidents.

Research & Recommendations

Rwanda

Not Free
23
100
PR Political Rights 8 40
CL Civil Liberties 15 60
Last Year's Score & Status
23 100 Not Free
Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology.

Overview

The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), led by President Paul Kagame, has ruled the country since it ousted forces responsible for the 1994 genocide, ending the civil war that began in 1990. While the regime has maintained stability and economic growth, it has also suppressed political dissent through pervasive surveillance, intimidation, arbitrary detention, torture, and renditions or suspected assassinations of exiled dissidents.

Previous Reports: 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024
Freedom in the World 2024 Policy Recommendations

Rwanda

Not Free
37
100
A Obstacles to Access 13 25
B Limits on Content 11 35
C Violations of User Rights 13 40
Last Year's Score & Status
37 100 Not Free
Scores are based on a scale of 0 (least free) to 100 (most free). See the research methodology and report acknowledgements.

Overview

Internet freedoms remained highly restricted in Rwanda during the coverage period: the government continued imprisoning and intimidating online journalists and critics, as well as subjecting them to harassment and violence while in detention. Self-censorship online remains common as the government increasingly tightens its control of the online media environment. Over the past several years, evidence has implicated Rwandan authorities in the widespread use of commercial surveillance tools against journalists, activists, and opposition leaders.

Previous Reports: 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023
Freedom on the Net 2023 Policy Recommendations
Freedom on the Net 2023

Election Watch for the Digital Age equips technology companies, civil society organizations, and policymakers with a data-driven resource for evaluating the human rights impact of internet platforms on a country’s electoral process.

Our Election Vulnerability Index consists of key election-related indicators regarding a country’s political rights and internet freedom. Derived from our annual Freedom in the World and Freedom on the Net reports, the data and accompanying analysis allows users to identify specific areas of concern ahead of a country’s election, including online influence operations, internet shutdowns, or intercommunal tensions fanned by social media. 

Previous Reports: 2024

Rwandan transnational repression is exceptionally broad in terms of tactics, targets, and geographic reach. Rwandans abroad experience digital threats, spyware attacks, family intimidation and harassment, mobility controls, physical intimidation, assault, detention, rendition, and assassination. The government has physically targeted Rwandans in at least seven countries since 2014, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Kenya, as well as farther afield in South Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Germany. Rwandans as far-flung as the United States, Canada, and Australia report intense fears of surveillance and retribution. 

The cases documented by Freedom House represent a small fraction of alleged incidents, but provide a useful window into the extent and methods of the Rwandan government’s campaign, especially when taken into consideration alongside interviews, existing research, and the broader pattern of allegations.

News and Updates

Freedom House Perspectives

Members of the Belarusian diaspora in Ukraine hold their passports at a rally outside the Belarusian embassy in Kyiv in August 2021 to mark the first anniversary of the fraudulent 2020 presidential election in Belarus.

Mobility Restrictions as a Form of Repression

Authoritarian governments use a variety of restrictions on travel to make life harder for those living under their rule and for exiled dissidents. Democratic countries that host exiles can do more to defend their freedom of movement and ensure their safety.
by Mina Loldj and Grady Vaughan on August 22, 2024

News Releases & Media Coverage

Policy & Advocacy

Freedom House

Coalition Letter Urging Biden Administration to Protect Free and Open Internet

As global leaders meet at the 13th ministerial conference of the World Trade Organization, civil rights, civil liberties, open Internet advocates, and digital trade experts, sent a letter to top Biden administration officials urging them to support a free and open global internet, while allowing for critical public policy objectives to support privacy and equity.
February 26, 2024
Freedom House Default Card Image

India: Spyware Use Violates Supreme Court Privacy Ruling

Freedom House joined ten rights groups in calling on Indian authorities to investigate the government's alleged use of advanced spyware for political purposes and to establish proper oversight of government surveillance measures to protect privacy rights and other civil liberties.
August 27, 2021

Country Facts

Basic Facts

Global Freedom Score
23
/ 100
Not Free
Internet Freedom Score
37
/ 100
Not Free
Population: 13,780,000

Internet Facts

Status
Not Free
Networks Restricted
No
Social Media Blocked
No
Websites Blocked
Yes
Pro-government Commentators
Yes
Users Arrested
Yes

Election Facts

Status
Currently Tracking
Date of Election
July 1516, 2024
Type of Election
General
Internet Penetration
30.50%
Election Year
2024
Vulnerability Index
27
/ 100

Transnational Repression

Status
Origin Country
Tactics
Assassination, Rendition, Spyware, Family Intimidation, Digital Threat, Mobility Controls
Targets
Members of the diaspora, especially those that challenge the government politically or question its version of Rwandan history