Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Kippelboy

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because substantiated concerns of repeated copyright violations from the listed contributor requires systematic review of contributions. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as Wikipedia's copyrights policy differs from international copyright policies and many inadvertently violate through misunderstandings.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text is free from copyright violations. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or use brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors with open CCIs are considered to have a history of copyright problems and are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified, and are encouraged to assist with accessing offline and paywalled sources.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. This includes CCI subjects, so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please blank the page except for the yellow box and {{NOINDEX}}, and place {{subst:Courtesy blanked}} below. Then mark the case at Template:CCIlist with completed=yes. This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

Text

Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it for copyright concerns or remove it.

Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using search engines, google books, or archives, and looking for major differences in writing style. The background should give indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, be careful about mirrors of Wikipedia. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered or using archives to eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, remove the text.
If you remove large portions of text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
If you remove large portions of the text (or revert to a previous clean version) normally, place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but do not notify the contributor.

After examining an article:

replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with one of the following and your signature (generated by four tildes ~~~~):

{{y}} if copyright problems were found. If the article is blanked, please indicate this as well.
{{n}} if no problem was found.
{{?}} if the material is no longer present or rewritten.

If a section is complete, collapse it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

Kippelboy

Kippelboy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Check requested by GreenLipstickLesbian (talk)
Multiple copyright warnings and G12 notifications on their talkpage, going back to 2012. Upon looking, I've also found multiple unattributed translations.

More evidence:

[1] Unattributed caWiki translation [2]
Lluís Farré likely from [3] ( 2024-06-02 EDIT: User claimed it was an unattributed caWiki translation, despite containing an entirely different set of facts and structure as the original page )
Nazanin Armanian unattributed translation ~~es:Nazanín Armanian~~ ca:Nazanín Armanian GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[4] from [5]
Alba Sidera- unattributed caWiki translation
[6] takes from [7]

GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've repaired 1 2 more. Everything after 15 June is okay, both for translations and regular copyright. Haven't checked earlier stuff for regular copyright but it seems like most of their new page creations are unattribed translations. Will open soon. If someone beats me to it, only survey up to 2024-06-15. Sennecaster (Chat) 02:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

Kippelboy (talk | contribs | deleted contribs | logs | block | block log)

Instructions

Text

Background

Kippelboy

Contribution survey

Pages 1 to 20

Pages 21 to 40

Pages 41 to 60

Pages 61 to 80

Pages 81 to 100

Pages 101 to 120

Pages 121 to 140

Pages 141 to 160

Pages 161 to 180

Pages 181 to 200

Pages 201 to 220

Pages 221 to 240

Pages 241 to 260

Pages 261 to 280

Pages 281 to 300

Pages 301 to 320

Pages 321 to 340

Pages 341 to 360

Pages 361 to 380

Pages 381 to 389