Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. A. B. Dikko

R. A. B. Dikko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Nomination withdrawn (Non-admin closure). Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced orphan that doesn't seem to meet the GNG 3gg5amp1e (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. First, being an orphan does not automatically qualify an article for deletion. The subject also does seem to satisfy GNG, since I was able to find multiple books which seem to provide enough coverage for at least a decent stub. I would also recommend that you read WP:BEFORE. --Biblioworm 02:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- Clearly notable. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn Thanks User:Biblioworm, I didn't find much in my https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22R.+A.+B.+Dikko%22&num=20 search except for blogs, wikis, social websites, passing mentions, and something that appears to be about someone else. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.