User talk:HighFlyingFish
Monimokuzen's request
[edit]Hello and Konichawa high-flying fish, I seem to not realize I didnt source my edits. I read what you said about meeting up tonight and I believe I did. Remember when I read Zezenapsid002's conversation about Nigorobuna, I was certainly intrigued of this editor.. On this subject, I am continuing to loose my memorization of tracking a source by using numbers off of every paragraph or sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monimokuzen (talk • contribs) 02:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- To add a citation, click on the place you want the citation to be in the article (after the info you added). Click on the "Cite" tab above the article text in your edit window. There click the "Templates" drop down menu. If your source is a website, click "Cite Web". Put in the URL in the "URL" field and click the Magnifying Glass icon. It will auto-fill the other fields for you. Check the other fields and fix any errors the website made. Then click Insert. For journal articles, its the same, except you use the "cite journal" template and input a doi. For books, you use the Cite Book template and input an ISBN. If you can't find the DOI/ISBN of your source, just fill out the fields in the template manually. Feel free to ask me, or at the WP:Help Desk if you have more specific questions. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 02:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have reverted both edits. Cite your sources, or you will continue to be reverted. If you need help citing, please seek it out. Even just pasting in a url is better than nothing. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 02:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- To add a citation, click on the place you want the citation to be in the article (after the info you added). Click on the "Cite" tab above the article text in your edit window. There click the "Templates" drop down menu. If your source is a website, click "Cite Web". Put in the URL in the "URL" field and click the Magnifying Glass icon. It will auto-fill the other fields for you. Check the other fields and fix any errors the website made. Then click Insert. For journal articles, its the same, except you use the "cite journal" template and input a doi. For books, you use the Cite Book template and input an ISBN. If you can't find the DOI/ISBN of your source, just fill out the fields in the template manually. Feel free to ask me, or at the WP:Help Desk if you have more specific questions. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 02:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
I restored your edit to Jikin goldfish. Its visible again, and attached to the reference. The wording of the section needs improvement, as its hard to understand in English. If you could find someone who knows both the language the reference is in (Japanese?), and English, that would be really great. But for now, the section is back. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
March 2009
[edit]Hello. When you patrol new pages, acceptable articles or articles which have been tagged for deletion should be marked as "patrolled" using the link at the bottom right of the article. This saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thank you. BoomerAB (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Re. your edit,[1] please see WP:ENGVAR. This article already uses UK English throughout. Ty 04:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Your contributed article, HighFlyingFish/Sandbox/Storage
[edit]Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, HighFlyingFish/Sandbox/Storage. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Timeline of the War on Terrorism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Timeline of the War on Terrorism - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Difu Wu (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Tireless Contributor Barnstar
[edit]Hi, HighFlyingFish, I think that I didn't thank you for your Barnstar. Thank you very much for your appreciation, I have it in my user page, all the day spining. It was a pleasure to help you with the article. Flakinho (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Color-coding timelines
[edit]Please give me your thoughts on Talk:Timeline_of_country_and_capital_changes#Colors. Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 17:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
PS - You don't need to put quotes around the color code.
Speedy deletion declined: Funky caching
[edit]Hello HighFlyingFish, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Funky caching, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G1 is for random collections of characters and the like, which this article isn't. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Olaf Davis (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of TERRY GALLERY
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, TERRY GALLERY, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TERRY GALLERY. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
You stated that this article might be salvageable. I tried to find sources for it, and came up only with press releases. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 04:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]Hey. Sorry, I removed your re-addition of the SMOM to the List. It doesn't look like consensus has changed since the poll was concluded in May. I think it's best to stick to that until we can firmly agree on an idea. Regards, Night w (talk) 05:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Barnstar | ||
Thank you for re-starting the WP:AQF Newsletter! |
Newsletter
[edit]
The Aquarium Fishes WikiProject Newsletter Issue XII - May 2010 | |
|
|
Newsletter
[edit]
The Aquarium Fishes WikiProject Newsletter Issue XII - August 2010 | |
|
|
Newsletter delivery bot
[edit]I did a little more checking into this, and I think that a good way to go would be to go to User:MessageDeliveryBot, and put in a delivery request the next time you are ready, by clicking the green button link on that page. I can also suggest User:Xeno as someone who knows a lot about this kind of stuff and who is very friendly and helpful. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you!--HighFlyingFish (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Newsletter
[edit]Please remove my name from the newsletter subscription list. Thank you. Jcbutler (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Notification
[edit]A proposal to change the layout and sorting criteria of the article List of sovereign states has been finalised and submitted for consensus.
As you were previously involved in the discussion for this change, I thought I would inform you of the final proposal. Please provide comments here. Nightw 13:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
ENewsBot request
[edit]Hello HighFlyingFish, due to my inactivity, I have only just come across the request you made for the delivery of newsletters for WikiProject Aquarium Fishes. Please advise if you still require this service as I would be pleased to offer you the service. — JamesR (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- No, there is little major news to report, so I am no longer sending the newsletter on a regular basis.--HighFlyingFish (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
List of states with limited recognition at FLRC
[edit]I have nominated List of states with limited recognition for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nightw 15:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Newsletter
[edit]
The Aquarium Fishes WikiProject Newsletter Issue XII - January 2011 | |
|
|
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrej Andreevich Zolotov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Datnioides microlepis now up and running
[edit]Hi HighFlyingFish! And now over to you... ps: I've left a note on commons about the pic of D. pulcher being labelled as D. microlepis. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Peptide-RNA world for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peptide-RNA world is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peptide-RNA world until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agriculture in the Soviet Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 5 year plan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
About Republic of Crimea
[edit]Hello dear editor, there are some discussions about Republic of Crimea article. You can find it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republic_of_Crimea#Wrongful_begin . Please, if you have time join and discuss, because I think the very first sentence of the article is veru wrongful. Thanks in advance. 46.70.91.49 (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Peptide-RNA world
[edit]FYI - I've been looking at the RNA world article, and at the history of the Peptide-RNA world article which got merged, and I noticed your contributions... There's been some recent work in this area which I thought you might be interested in, if you don't already know — a research paper by John Sutherland and others in Nature Chemistry, also reported in Science Mag, which seems to demonstrate that precursors of both peptides and RNA (and of lipids as well) could have formed from a single network of chemical reactions, beginning with hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulfide... I've put a couple of lines about this on the Abiogenesis page, and also wrote a comment on Talk:RNA world. Kalidasa 777 (talk) 06:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of aquarium diseases, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Angelfish and Ick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Replicate (biology)
[edit]Thanks for creating this new article from a redirect. It would be even better if you could add references in support of the second para. Regards: Noyster (talk), 15:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The paper referenced in the first paragraph also applies for the second one, especially since it gives an example of how an illusion of statistical significance can be created using replicates. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, HighFlyingFish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Medical journal of Zambia
[edit]The article Medical journal of Zambia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Randykitty can I have at least until tomorrow to respond? I'm really swamped with University homework for the first half of today at least and will need to read up on the relevant policy. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 17:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Medical journal of Zambia for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medical journal of Zambia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical journal of Zambia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 07:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]Awesome sauce!
Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oman–Zanzibar war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pemba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Re
[edit]Thank you. 93.36.191.55 (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, HighFlyingFish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for FVB Mice
[edit]On 29 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article FVB Mice, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that FVB Mice are used for genetic research because they produce large litters and their eggs have enlarged nuclei? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/FVB Mice. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, FVB Mice), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Xenoturbella bocki
[edit]On 21 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Xenoturbella bocki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the marine paradox worm may resemble the common ancestor of humans and mollusks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Xenoturbella bocki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Xenoturbella bocki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cyclopy (birth defect)
[edit]A tag has been placed on Cyclopy (birth defect) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
{{db-r3}}
why would someone misspell a medical condition and also include a parenthetical description. This is a misspelling, not an alternate spelling.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Natureium (talk) 18:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a plausible misspelling, and when searching Cyclopy, the medical condition did not come up in the search options at all until I created this page. I did not make the redirect at Cyclopy because Cyclopy has a meaning, specifically its a song in the album Early Recordings from Kansas 1971–1973. Someone searching cyclopy may be searching for the song, or misspelling the medical condition. Prior to this redirect's creation, they would only find the song. If I made the redirect at cyclopy, they would only find the medical condition. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chas Fagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Goldman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Panagrolaimus detritophagus, Plectus parvus at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. I left a comment in the nomination page. Ping me there. Regards, MX (✉ • ✎) 14:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Sea Squirt listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sea Squirt. Since you had some involvement with the Sea Squirt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Panagrolaimus detritophagus
[edit]On 25 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Panagrolaimus detritophagus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the tiny nematodes Panagrolaimus detritophagus and Plectus parvus were revived after more than 30,000 years frozen in permafrost? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Panagrolaimus detritophagus), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Plectus parvus
[edit]On 25 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Plectus parvus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the tiny nematodes Panagrolaimus detritophagus and Plectus parvus were revived after more than 30,000 years frozen in permafrost? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Plectus parvus), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, HighFlyingFish. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Xenoturbella bocki
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xenoturbella bocki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Xenoturbella bocki
[edit]The article Xenoturbella bocki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Xenoturbella bocki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Parenthesis and species authority
[edit]The use of parathesis around authority+year is not a matter of personal preference or random, but is governed by the ICZN Code (specifically article 51.3). When a species has not changed genus compared to its original description, there is no parathesis (example: Piaractus orinoquensis), but when it has there is a parathesis (examples: Piaractus brachypomus, originally described as Myletes brachypomus, and Piaractus mesopotamicus, originally Myletes mesopotamicus). Regards, 62.107.211.90 (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Huh, good to know! Thank you. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 03:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have reverted myself. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 03:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]"Capitulation of nazi germany" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Capitulation of nazi germany. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#Capitulation of nazi germany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 20:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
"Non human language" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Non human language. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 19#Non human language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 00:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
"Expansion of the Arab empire" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Expansion of the Arab empire and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Expansion of the Arab empire until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)