Jump to content

User talk:Jcbutler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Festinger.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Festinger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Bergen Toy & Novelty Company. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you! --Jcbutler (talk) 14:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Southeast, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO this should be merged into Saint Paul. IMO not suitable for a separate article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: This neighborhood article is a stub, one of a group of articles on Saint Paul neighborhoods. They all began as stubs and have been developing nicely, some of them into quite detailed and interesting articles. Given that this is a relatively new stub, I hope we can give it some time to grow before making a decision about its notability. –Jcbutler (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you had some with similar titles which were more developed. If we look at the subject being planning districts, then I think it would fail wp:notability both short term and long term and under both wp:Ngeo (being an abstract type district and not a primary area of governance) and GNG coverage that is about the topic which is the planning district as an entity. But all of them state that they are also a neighborhood and some of the more well developed articles seem to bear out that they are also a well-established neighborhood with source and material that are about it. Those I'd be inclined to pass for those reasons and with some extra consideration for being a sub-article/ branch from the Saint Paul article, when the planning district being just a way to define what are already sort of entities. But these stub ones have nothing establishing that they similar situations. You mentioned giving them more time but keep in mind that these are in the New Page Patrol Que and are already about 8 months old. I don't plan on any action on the stub ones in the near future but that doesn't mean that nobody else will. If you do build them a bit to establish they are an established neighborhood with sourcing on them as such and car to ping me I'd be happy to review those. Happy editing! Sincerely,North8000 (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Summit Hill, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO this should be merged into Saint Paul. IMO Under wp:notability, not suitable for a separate article. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: This neighborhood article is a stub, one of a group of articles on Saint Paul neighborhoods. They all began as stubs and have been developing nicely, some of them into quite detailed and interesting articles. Given that this is a relatively new stub, I hope we can give it some time to grow before making a decision about its notability. –Jcbutler (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you had some with similar titles which were more developed. If we look at the subject being planning districts, then I think it would fail wp:notability both short term and long term and under both wp:Ngeo (being an abstract type district and not a primary area of governance) and GNG coverage that is about the topic which is the planning district as an entity. But all of them state that they are also a neighborhood and some of the more well developed articles seem to bear out that they are also a well-established neighborhood with source and material that are about it. Those I'd be inclined to pass for those reasons and with some extra consideration for being a sub-article/ branch from the Saint Paul article, when the planning district being just a way to define what are already sort of entities. But these stub ones have nothing establishing that they similar situations. You mentioned giving them more time but keep in mind that these are in the New Page Patrol Que and are already about 8 months old. I don't plan on any action on the stub ones in the near future but that doesn't mean that nobody else will. If you do build them a bit to establish they are an established neighborhood with sourcing on them as such and car to ping me I'd be happy to review those. Happy editing! Sincerely,North8000 (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Payne-Phalen, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! I reviewed this as a neighborhood article which may be merely delineated by being a planning district. Because IMO "planning district" would not meet wp:notability criteria under either GNG or the SNG.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Como Park, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! I reviewed this as a neighborhood article which may be merely delineated by being a planning district. Also because 2 items within it also probably mee wp:notability. Because IMO "planning district" would not meet wp:notability criteria under either GNG or the SNG.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Hamline-Midway, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! I reviewed this as a neighborhood article which may be merely delineated by being a planning district. Because IMO "planning district" would not meet wp:notability criteria under either GNG or the SNG.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Southeast, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

See prior discussions. IMO has been expanded into an edge case and I'm marking it as reviewed. Thanks for your work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Jcbutler. Thank you for your work on Summit Hill, Saint Paul. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

See prior discussions. IMO has been expanded into an edge case and I'm marking it as reviewed. Thanks for your work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]