User talk:Zolo/archive
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
-SieBot 20:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master ( John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) ) or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 22:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master ( John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) ) or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 22:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
|
File:Mur_pour_la_paix.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Coyau (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Your svg links to external raster file ( C:\Martin\Inkscape\.\inkscape_pasted_image_20100321_175139.png) that exist only on your computer, you need to embed it to svg Help:Inkscape#Embedding raster images --Justass (talk) 18:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
TUSC token ee4221f2185d34178952800305627ee1
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 16b39e2061309dd8418a5cffd87125ec
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Blanking
[edit]Hi Zolo,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Sculptures of the Tang by subject on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy|reason here}} and add it on top of the page; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 21:51, 11 April 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk
When changing category names, please also change the name in the media that was categorised under the old name
[edit]After changing a category name and creating a redirect to the new category from the old category (as you did with Category:Cityscapes in Thailand), you should also change the name of the category to the new name in each item which was listed under the old category name. Otherwise, the items will not show up under the new category name. For instance, the category "Cityscapes in Thailand" was empty until I had recategorised the media which was still found under "Cityscapes of Thailand": A redirect does not redirect the media categorised media to the new category. - Takeaway (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Joconde et Gallica
[edit]Bonjour ! La fondation Wikimedia, qui héberge Commons et Wikipédia, a décidé d'autoriser ici les reproductions fidèles d'œuvres en deux dimensions (typiquement les tableaux et dessins) se trouvant dans le domaine public. Le raisonnement est qu'une reproduction fidèle, par définition, ne comporte aucune créativité et n'est donc pas éligible au droit d'auteur. Il est confirmé par un arrêt de cour américaine, Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corporation. Sur Commons, on utilise la licence {{PD-art}} pour ces images.
En France, la position du juge est hésitante, voir la petite compilation que j'avais faite à ce sujet : fr:Utilisateur:Jastrow/PD-art ; les arrêts récents vont plutôt contre le PD-art. Si Commons accepte sans problème ces photos, beaucoup de contributeurs français hésitent. Par ailleurs, on ne peut pas massivement reprendre ces photos, car cela violerait le droit des bases de données. L'autorisation de Gallica citée sur fr:Wikipédia:Demandes d'autorisation images n'est pas exploitable sur Commons, car l'autorisation vaut pour Wikipédia seulement. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Personnellement, je suis assez méfiante en matière de droit des bases de données. Mieux vaudrait limiter les importations. Mais au vu des quantités présentes sur Joconde et Gallica... Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Facing
[edit]Hi Zolo, are you sure about your categorization to facing left of
- File:Brooklyn Museum - James Gooch - John Smibert - overall.jpg
- File:Anton Graff Portrait Konstancja Rzewuska 1789.jpg
- File:Brooklyn Museum - Mrs. Ebenezer Porter (Lucy "Patty" Pierce Merwin) - Ralph Eleazer Whiteside Earl - overall.jpg
- File:Brooklyn Museum - Emily Post - Emil Fuchs - overall.jpg
- File:Brooklyn Museum - Mrs. Elizabeth Smith (née Elizabeth Chew) - John Hesselius - overall.jpg?--Diwas (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
_-_Ralph_Eleazer_Whiteside_Earl_-_overall.jpg){kind=link}
_-_John_Hesselius_-_overall.jpg){kind=link}
- Thanx for checking and rework. Now I have another question: The construction of Category:Three-quarter view portraits of women, facing right (and similar Category:Three-quarter view portraits of women, facing left) looks not very transparently. If I click the subcategory, I will returned by redirect and stay in a endless circle. Only by clicking the link of the redirect hint, I get content. --Diwas (talk) 23:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Dear Commons user,
We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français ! In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français. We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC) |
You have created an essential category. Having stated that, I dare to flatter myself that you will permit me to make a request of you : to rename the category from Mythology paintings by Boucher to Mythological paintings by Boucher.--Thorvaldsson (talk) 20:11, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I am grateful to you for the courtesy you have shown me.--Thorvaldsson (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
And also File:Gaul god Sucellus.jpg, the reference you give on Joconde is false, it is not exactly the same object (see the clothes) and the inventory number is not same. Anywhere, very thanks for the goog job of referencing the picture, if I understand how to do, I will add this template on my next pictures of museum object in France. Regards, (french speaker) - Siren-Com (talk) 13:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Codex Vallardi
[edit]Bonjour. Feu vert donné. Il ne reste qu'une cinquantaine de dessins à importer. Bien cordialement. OxxO 07:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Merci pour la création du modèle. OxxO 07:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- C'est très bien ainsi ; il faut sans doute faire appel à un Bot pour une correction automatique. Pose la question sur le bistro, éventuellement. OxxO 07:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed you made newowner optional for gifts in this template. I'm assuming that has something to do with the article not showing up when you fill it out completely. What I usually do is add the article myself. For example:
{{ProvenanceEvent|time={{Other date|?}}|type=gift|newowner={{LangSwitch|de=das|en=the|fr=au|nl=het}} {{Louvre}}, {{Paris}},|oldowner=John Appletree}}
This then becomes:
Unknown date: given to the Louvre Museum, Paris, by John Appletree
I know this is a little laborious, but I hope it's of some use. Maybe you even have a better idea of handling this. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
This drawing's location at the Met is clearly established by the source of the image given on the NY Times website link. Your inability to find it on the Met's website is not grounds for removing sourced information, particularly given this statement: "Due to the extremely large number of objects in the Museum's permanent collection, not all artworks are currently available in the Collection Database."[1] Cheers, Postdlf (talk) 04:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, "photo Metropolitan" doesn't mean the met owns the photo. It just took a photo, because the drawing was displayed at the Met during an exhibition. Actually, I should have found out the owner earlier: as mentionned in the article linked to the photo : the exhibition is called “Raphael to Renoir: Drawings From the Collection of Jean Bonna”--Zolo (talk) 06:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose that means we were both wrong. Postdlf (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Wildenstein Gauguin
[edit]You are doing a great job with Gauguin. I have modified {{Wildenstein Gauguin}} to include two index numbers: the first one for Georges Wildenstein, 1964, the second one for Daniel Wildenstein, 2001.--V.Riullop (talk) 07:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. User:SchlurcherBot automatically applied a similar mode for Van Gogh here (by the way I don't know what the category name should be]]. With Gauguin, I'm not sure the syntax used in the ID line is sufficiently uniform to be understood by a bot, so it may have to be applied manually. --Zolo (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Re: creators
[edit]I think your suggestion is very nice, good idea.--Fanghong (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Modèle Painting
[edit]Merci pour les précisions ! Je me suis révoquée, du coup. Avoir un modèle unique avec beaucoup de champs optionnels et *standard* est effectivement une bonne idée (je pense surtout à des utilisations de type base de données). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oui, merci ! Il faut que je regarde mieux comment il fonctionne. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je viens de voir que tu avais modifié la description d'une de mes photos. Ce modèle est intéressant et j'aimerai savoir s'il peut être utilisé par commonist sachant que j'aurais des centaines de photos du musée de l'armée à charger. Merci de ta réponse.--Thesupermat (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour, ce modèle me parait également intéressant (il est d'ailleurs en phase de restructuration si tu veux participer). En revanche, je ne sais pas du tout comment commonist fonctionne, désolé.--Zolo (talk) 11:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je viens de voir que tu avais modifié la description d'une de mes photos. Ce modèle est intéressant et j'aimerai savoir s'il peut être utilisé par commonist sachant que j'aurais des centaines de photos du musée de l'armée à charger. Merci de ta réponse.--Thesupermat (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Artwork
[edit]Voici mon premier essai
Pour mois c'est très concluant. Merci encore ; tout les futurs versements se feront sous ce format. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Cela me parait concluant aussi. Juste une petite chose, on m'a fait remarquer à propos du rhinocéros laineux que je n'aurais pas du utiliser de langSwitch dans la ligne de description : j'aurais du garder l'anglais et le français affichés en même temps (cela se justifie si on pense qu'un italien ou un espagnol aura accès par défaut à la version en anglais, même s'il comprend mieux le français). Pour les autres champs, il n'y a pas de problème, étant donné qu'une grande partie de la traduction est automatiquement assurée dans un grand nombre de langues (ou le sera bientôt). Donc, ton essai me parait concluant mais le format recommandé pour l'instant est d'afficher sur la première ligne :
- Cela dit, il existe en ce moment des projets qui permettraient d'allonger considérablement la liste des mots automatiquement traduits. Pour "grattoir double sur lame" toutefois je pense que cela devra toujours se faire à la main. Je te tiens au courant des avancées dans ce domaine.--Zolo (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Category:Color parameter used
[edit]What is the meaning and intention of Category:Color parameter used ? --Foroa (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is just a temporary category for maintenance. As color is a rather new parameter, I wanted to keep track of its use, both to know if something had to be changed in template technique and if the parameter should be renamed (to "adjective" for instance). If you find it disturbing to have a red "Color parameter used" displayed, I can create a hiddencat (but it will have to be deleted some day).--Zolo (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- No problem for me, but it appears in the wanted category list and in close to 400 red categories, so I guess that it would be better to make a (temp) cat in a documented category. --Foroa (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have created the category.--Zolo (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- No problem for me, but it appears in the wanted category list and in close to 400 red categories, so I guess that it would be better to make a (temp) cat in a documented category. --Foroa (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Problème de taille!
[edit]bonjour,
dans les légendes telles que
la taille des objet, pourtant référencée, n’apparaît pas... Merci de tes lumières --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- C'est qu'il faut écrire "dimension". Ce n'est pas très intuitif, je vais demander à ce qu'on corrige ça.--Zolo (talk) 07:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- parfait merci --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)