User talk:MrPanyGoff/Archive
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:StJohn3.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:StJohn1.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:StJohn5.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:StJohn6.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:StJohn4.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:StJohn2.jpg was uncategorized on 29 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:TsarOsvoboditelBlvd_.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 12:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EvlogiGeorgievBlvd_.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Rakovska_.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use images on Wikimedia Commons
[edit]Hello! Yesterday I made an attempt to explain you on your user talk in Bulgarian Wikipedia that a big part of your uploads are unfortunately ineligible for Wikimedia Commons, though you may transfer them in the English Wikipedia and use in accordance with the Non-free content guideline there. Wikimedia Commons, however, is designed as a resource of free multimedia content and does not host fair use images. I gave you this advice in good faith and understanding of you being an enthusiastic novice who would like to contribute to Wikipedia, and I am somehow disappointed to see that you keep ignoring it. :)
But... these images simply SHOULD NOT remain in Wikimedia Commons, as explicitly written on the official policy page Commons:Fair use. Please, try to understand this. Both Marinov and Beshkov died less than 70 years ago, which is the legally determined term of having their copyrights protected BEFORE they enter the public domain. The priest's image comes from a source with reserved rights.
As I do not want to lay waste your work over these images:
- File:Marinov1.jpg, File:Marinov2.jpg, File:Marinov3.jpg, File:Marinov4.jpg, File:Marinov5.jpg
- File:Beshkov1.jpg, File:Beshkov2.jpg, File:Beshkov3.jpg, File:Beshkov4.jpg, File:Beshkov5.jpg
- File:MitropolitAndrey.jpg
I offer you to transfer them to the English Wikipedia (using the local upload link) and carefully use them there, providing them with the en:Template:Non-free use rationale. I am optimistic that they may remain there, although I suppose that only image per article will be allowed and unused fairuse images will be deleted. Please, note that on Monday evening I will take care to delete these images from here. Thank you for your understanding, →Spiritia 20:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Own work?
[edit]Just to clarify: you describe File:CentralMarketHallSofia2.jpg as your own work. Does this mean that all five photos are your own work, as well as the arrangement of them? Assuming that's the case, could you please say so explicitly on the image page, rather than the vague claim of "own work"? Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 07:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, yes, that is what one should write on something like this. - Jmabel ! talk 17:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Dee-snider-on-his-chopper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Your Flickr uploads
[edit]Hello MrPanyGoff!
Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:
- Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
- You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the hole procedure much easier and faster for you!
Thank you for your support! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 08:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- I saw this tool but... can you tell me what to put in the ID gap?MrPanyGoff (talk) 09:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:WinonaRyder-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tabercil (talk) 12:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:BlackSabbath-concert-ticket-Sofia-BG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
QIC
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/ToolbarSignVector.png)
You know the signature-button or rather the code ~~~~
? Please use it ofr your identfication. Compare Template:Sign and en:Wikipedia:Signatures for more information. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I don't saw [1], sorry. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SvetiSedmochislenitsi-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SvetiSedmochislenitsi-church-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Bulgaria pics request
[edit]Hi PanyGoff - I was wondering, do you get any opportunity to travel round Bulgaria? If you can, it would be very nice if you could get some good photos of wild-origin specimens of Бяла мура and Черна мура better than these cultivated plant photos ;-) A good place to get both is in the Пирин in the valley around 41°46'N 23°25'E (I saw them both there a few years ago, but did not have a good camera then!); now is also a good time as the cones are just ripening. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mosta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! WhiteMahogany (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! StSophiaChurchNave-Sofia-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of Varaždin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! TheChurchofStStConstantine-and-Helena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santissima Trinità, Crema (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rich Robinson (The Black Crowes).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SvetiSedmochislenitsiChurch-Sofia-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CentralMineralBath-Sofia-8a 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! PublicMineralBaths-Sofia-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ChurchoftheHolyMother-Plovdiv-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CentralMarketHall-Sofia-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! StSophiaChurch-Sofia-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! TheChurchofStStConstantine-and-Helena-Plovdiv-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maribor Town Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File uploads
[edit]Hi, when uploading files please ensure that you use a new filename and do not overwrite an existing file, like you did at File:Bideford-Devon.jpg - the exception being when its a different version of the same image. I've reverted the upload and I suggest you upload the new image to a new title. I cannot effectively do so as the information you provided in the upload form was lost.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richard Meier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Pölten Town hall (St. Pöltner Rathaus).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sveti Sedmochislenitsi Church, Sofia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Malkovich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trieste City Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SvetiSedmochislenitsiChurch-Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chevrolet Cruze (second generation).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trakai Island Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Sofia Church, Sofia (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lemmy (Motörhead).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Judi Dench.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
![]() |
File:TadaoAndo-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elekhh (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central Market Hall, Sofia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
![]() |
File:HarrisonFord-StarWars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 08:23, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:ChristopherLloyd-DeathofaSalesman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Almería.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zograf Monastery, Mount Athos (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
TUSC token 22ba7c4ff90c88f1a20e738c2d37fa7f
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
![]() |
File:GraemeSouness-3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boris III of Bulgaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! VitoshaPlateau-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolata cove.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Geograph
[edit]When you upload Geograph images, please, please, please use Magnus' tool to upload them. This will ensure that they are properly placed in Category:Images from the Geograph British Isles project. (If nothing else, it saves having to copy the images to your machine.) Also, I don't suppose anybody really cares, but the correct licence for Geograph images is {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}, not cc-by-sa-3.0. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
In the fullness of time, I shall correct all your uploads but it would be nice if you could go through this list (slow - be patient) and carry out this edit where needed. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Given that Geograph is based on geotags, it seems criminal to strip that info when copying images here. Using Magnus' tool will add co-ordinates for you. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:06, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Sofia's Cathedral
[edit]Hello MrPanyGoff
I am a fan of your cathedral, I supported in FPC. Very nice photo, very impressive.
I've tried this for you, removing by cloning (very light) some disturbing elements (the blue crane, the yellow car, the red thing left, and the grey car right). Please feel free to use it, but no worries if not. I hope you'll enjoy. This is only a tribute to your work. Cheers from Paris--Jebulon (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sophia Loren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
[edit]![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:AlexanderNevskyCathedral-Sofia-6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AlexanderNevskyCathedral-Sofia-6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! AlexanderNevskyCathedral-Sofia-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xewkija Rotunda, Malta (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
[edit]![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Peter Ustinov black & white Allan Warren.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peter Ustinov black & white Allan Warren.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cape Shabla Lighthouse, Bulgaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sir Anthony Hopkins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. George Chapel-Mausoleum, Pleven (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rotunda of Mosta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gérard Philipe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philip Johnson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polyptyque du Jugement dernier by Rogier van der Weyden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
TUSC token 2b33051331ffc2b29078bbc412e026aa
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
José de Ribera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tzar's Palace Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Registan Square, Samarkand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Walter Gropius
[edit]Hello MrPanyGoff, That one would be very illustrative too and nice to upload but I'm afraid it isn't freely-licensed [6]... Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- And I've also found that better version of the nominee. To be uploaded? Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 08:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- An answer on my talkpage, --Myrabella (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kapellbrücke, Lucerne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Royal Palace, Sofia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roman Theatre Plovdiv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Walter Gropius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brian De Palma.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triumph Thunderbird1600 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peter Sellers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triumph Thunderbird1600 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mark Twain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Roman Theatre, Plovdiv.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlisle Cathedral (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
HotCat
[edit]Hello MrPanyGoff, Thank you so much for the huge work you are doing on VIs by country. May I suggest you the use of the tool "HotCat"? Personally, I find it very useful to easily add / remove / change a category on a page. You can activate it in your menu Preferences / Gadgets / Tools for categories. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 10:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for suggested tool "HotCat". I noticed it but I thought it would take time until I explore how it works ;) Now I'm going to try it.--MrPanyGoff 15:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Valued Images Set Promotion
[edit]Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Triumph Thunderbird 1600.
Triumph Thunderbird 1600.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations with ! With best regards --George Chernilevsky talk 14:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wassily Chair (B3) by Marcel Breuer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gabrovo Town Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tartini Square, Piran.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veliki Stol (Hochstuhl) Mountain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Friedrich-Ebert-Brücke, Duisburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hanging Church, Cairo (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macaron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ivan Vazov National Theatre, Sofia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keleti Railway Station, Budapest (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! IvanVazov National Theatre 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estonian National Opera, Tallinn (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! StGeorge the Conqueror Sofia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John McEnroe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ait Benhaddou Ksar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tallinn Town Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kadriorg Palace, Tallinn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reykjavík Cathedral (Dómkirkjan), interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Todor Kolev.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shatili, Georgia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cement works.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Parliament of Mongolia (general view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anıtkabir, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maputo Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victor Emmanuel II of Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Byzantine Tower of Ouranopolis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Battenberg Mausoleum Sofia 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phnom Penh Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maletsunyane Falls, Lesotho.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sofia University panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battenberg Mausoleum (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tampere City Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Battenberg-Mausoleum Sofia 4-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Lynch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tripoli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tzar Liberator Monument Sofia 1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katse Dam, Lesotho.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dobó Square, Eger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kursk Railway Station, (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shibam, Yemen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sofia University Rectorate (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karl May.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Earth and Man Museum Sofia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Faculty of Chemistry Sofia University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Holy-Mother-of-God Church -Plovdiv 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buzău Town Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Park Hotel Moskva Sofia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al Khazneh (Petra).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World Trade Center, New York (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sofia Synagogue 11c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kajetán Josef Tyl Theatre
[edit]I hope you do not want me to Kajetán Josef Tyl Theatre. We animate the Label VA, but I did not mean. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Itzhak Fintzi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bauska Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Culloden Viaduct.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
London Victoria Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bitola.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port of Ensenada, Baja California (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tangier Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keban Dam, Turkey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Earth and Man National Museum, Sofia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Josef Kajetán Tyl Theatre, Plzeň (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bulgarian-Academy-of-Sciences 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QI category header
[edit]Hello,
Please use a template for this sort of category headers − it makes it possible to have the message translated. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Good idea. I've considered creating a template for this kind of headers (QI and VI) but for some reason I've not proceeded to it yet.--MrPanyGoff 08:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alferaki Palace, Taganrog (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cape Cornwall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruges Town Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elizabeth Taylor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bulgarian-Academy-of-Sciences Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hans Christian Andersen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teatro Politeama, Palermo (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miñiques Lagoon, Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Classical Antiquity
[edit]Hello MrPanyGoff, Would you consider a "Classical Antiquity" VI gallery? We miss your comment here :-) Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sofia Old TV Tower edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haile Gebrselassie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turning Torso, Malmö.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dar Al Hajar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tadao Ando.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bulgarian Academy of Sciences fragment 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niihau Island, Hawaii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Old Slaveykov School Targovishte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garcilaso Stadium, Cusco (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Da Lat Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minsk City Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jellyfish Lake, Palau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dennis Hopper.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cullen Bay, Darwin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flatiron Building, New York.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beijing West Railway Station, (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torre Monumental, Buenos Aires.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Göltzschtalbrücke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polideportivo Cachamay Stadium, Guayana City (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veliko-Tarnovo-Cathedral 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cultural-Centre Sevlievo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franz Kafka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Michel Piccoli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Howick Falls, South Africa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 St Mary Axe, London.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Martin's Island, Isles of Scilly.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo Ivan Vazov street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ptuj Town Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kazan Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Liberty Sevlievo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaza de Toros, Malaga (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ilarion Makariopolski Memorial Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dr. Magalhães Pessoa Stadium, Leiria (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! G.S.Rakovski ComprehensiveSchool Sofia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bell Tower of St Iliya Church Sevlievo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Questions for VI
[edit]Hi Mr PanyGoff,
sorry, but I did not get your explanation (Toronto should be there because there is one more CN Tower). There is in fact the category CN Tower existing. --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- The existing category is not correctly named. The location (place) should be indicated in the title when the name of the structure is not unique. In Edmonton (Canada) there is a building with the same name. Probably there are even more structures in the world named CN Tower that's why we should add the name of the place so that to differentiate them - to create an unique scope (category) for each of them. For instance The Eiffel Tower in Paris is somehow unique name so there is no need to add Paris in the scope name. Pay attention that the Wikipedia and Commons are still under construction and there are considerable number of categories that are not well defined. --MrPanyGoff 13:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, but why is this so important for VI candidates? And the CN Tower is clear because it is defined here at Commons to be the tower in Toronto and not somewhere else. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I just say what is correct in my view. The so created categories in commons are not determinative. The scopes in the VI project should be more precisely defined. There is no problem, you can write only CN Tower as a title and there is a probability no one to notice that there are other buildings with the same name. Imagine that at the same time someone nominate this photo under the same scope name. Who is right then? VI is the most illustrative image in a specific scope. The scope defined by the name CN Tower includes all structures in the universe called CN Tower. This is against the rules of the project where is clearly stated ...the scope cannot be too broad. Anyway, the problem is that there is no suitable scope for your photo to be the winner. --MrPanyGoff 15:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- I see and sorry for my perpetual questions. This was my first VI-nomination and I try to find it out if this subject is just reasonable in my eyes. For sure I can create for example a category named Antennas of CN Tower or technical facilitys of CN Tower (this would be even expedient because in the main-category CN Tower are many pictures and in this way the images could be rearranged. But if I not create a category which the candidate does fit in it is already the same: the picture is valuable because helicopterflys are not common and this picture isn't it too - with or without an adapted category. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I just say what is correct in my view. The so created categories in commons are not determinative. The scopes in the VI project should be more precisely defined. There is no problem, you can write only CN Tower as a title and there is a probability no one to notice that there are other buildings with the same name. Imagine that at the same time someone nominate this photo under the same scope name. Who is right then? VI is the most illustrative image in a specific scope. The scope defined by the name CN Tower includes all structures in the universe called CN Tower. This is against the rules of the project where is clearly stated ...the scope cannot be too broad. Anyway, the problem is that there is no suitable scope for your photo to be the winner. --MrPanyGoff 15:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, but why is this so important for VI candidates? And the CN Tower is clear because it is defined here at Commons to be the tower in Toronto and not somewhere else. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vabel Church Targovishte 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikolay II of Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prapratno cove, Croatia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lobos Island Lighthouse, Uruguay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Iliya Church Sevlievo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Russian church Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! StNikolaySofiyski church Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Former Post Hall Veliko Tarnovo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Nikolay Sofiyski church, Sofia, fragment..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Town Hall Veliko Tarnovo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! StNikolaySofiyski church Sofia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Mühle im Weiler
[edit]Thanks for your comment. I changed the scope to this specific mill: "Stühlingen, Mühle im Weiler, Exterior", which I just was intending to do, then I saw your comment. I agree, this is a better scope than "gypsum mill". --Llez (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skokloster Castle (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cape Campbell, New Zealand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Paul's Cathedral, Mdina (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albany City Hall, New York (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
El Cajón Dam, Mexico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Mühle im Weiler 2
[edit]Thanks for your comments and the examples. Sorry, it is my first picture of a building I nominate as VIC. I think, now all should be correct. --Llez (talk) 11:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viola x wittrockiana (Pansy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antennae Galaxies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ritchie Blackmore.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics of the old city of Dubrovnik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maastricht Town Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cell phone tower Lozen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Black Elder Sambucus nigra flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kobe Wing Stadium (inside view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Nikolay Sofiyski church, Sofia, fragment 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sofia-Seminary main-entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grand Hotel Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (headquarters).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beatrix of the Netherlands.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.