Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Юрий Д.К.!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Flickr2Commons

edit

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi! I prefer UploadWizard extension. It also allows to upload original-resolution files directly from Flickr (only for autopatrollers - up to 500 files) and blocks duplicate uploads (while F2C not always). But maybe I will use F2C for more massive downloads (above 500 files). Thank you! Юрий Д.К. (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


Welcome, Dear Filemover!

edit

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


 

Hi Юрий Д.К., you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Charles Patrick Ewing Flickr photostream

edit

Hi Юрий Д.К. - please be careful with uploading these; a lot of the photos (and maybe all?) are license-washed from other sites and are highly likely not the photographer's own work. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


Реклама

edit

Здравствуйте! Вот напоролся на рекламу: https://www.flickr.com/photos/197690669@N03/albums/72177720306226973 Я этот весь альбом залил. Можно её как-нибудь ботом удалить и.т.п... Да будет цвет (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


Дата

edit

Здравствуйте!

Вы можете пройтись ботом, чтобы исправить дату?

User talk:Rost.galis Да будет цвет (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Пробел

edit

В названиях этих фотографий отсутствует пробел:
File:Электропоезд Московского метро(52762302302).jpg
File:LeningradNovember 7 1976 (9585085741).jpg
File:LeningradNovember 7 1976 (9585085275).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9696516306).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9693287033).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9 1977 (10808918406).jpg
File:LeningradMay 9, 1977 (9696516144).jpg

Category:Photos by David Zhang

edit

Hi Юрий Д.К., a request: would you, where applicable, please be so kind to add the {{Watermark}} tag to the David Zhang images you upload? They alle seem to contain credits in the image, which makes their use rather limited. Thanks for your understanding and regards, Wutsje 22:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


Unfortunatelly, VFC doesn't work. I've requested bot owner's help Юрий Д.К 14:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


Congratulations, dear license reviewer

edit
 
If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Юрий Д.К., thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Killarnee (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pictures of the old building of the Parliament of Georgia

edit

Pictures of the old building of the Parliament of Georgia (https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=APwXEdcKGVKa8xPVmVo3IXyzqrlsI1aL1w:1686989582522&q=საქართველოს+პარლამენტის+ძველი+შენობა&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwir6bj27cn_AhVNVfEDHbvuCxEQ0pQJegQIChAB&biw=1920&bih=937&dpr=1#imgrc=hVi8E178Gi18mM). Wikipedia should add these pictures... Lasha-george (talk) 08:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Categorization

edit

Please remember to use the most specific categories possible when uploading images, and do not dump large numbers of files in broad categories like Category:California. Doing so creates cleanup work for other editors. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Renaming Flickr-imported files

edit

Hey, when renaming files imported from Flickr, please keep the redirect, as it will help not to create duplicates. Flickr2Commons only identifies files with the exact same name, so if the redirect is deleted someone may cluelessly upload a file that is already on Commons. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • I've noticed that F2C doesn't detect duplicates when I try to download an album (detect only if file with exact name exist on Commons) but successfully detect them when I want to download an entire user's photoset or single image from Flickr (even if Commons file has another name). I think that we really need to enable duplicate detection in case of an album downloading. I've opened the theme on Commons talk:Flickr2Commons but still no response. Юрий Д.К 13:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Flickr2Commons misuse

edit

Despite warnings, you continue to misuse Flickr2Commons by uploading poor-quality images and files with poor titles, descriptions, and categorization. A sample from the last few days:

This is your final warning that you need to add useful filenames, descriptions, and categories to every single image you upload. (The filename and description on flickr are almost never useful - just leaving them is not acceptable.) If I see you continue to misuse Flickr2Commons in this manner, I will remove your access to the tool. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vienna?

edit

Hi Юрий Д.К., any hint why this File:Poppyfield (25673110870).jpg should be in Vienna? And File:Pond (16360253634).jpg? Do you have location info? Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but Flickr is user generated content. You cannot trust. We only trust in user generated content if originated from Wikipedians :-) Maybe you could try to contact Thomas Hirsch via Flickr and clarify this with him. If you cannot clarify the location in Vienna, maybe it is better to remove this cat and assign categories on what is to be seen on the image, like poppy fields (not poppy fields in Austria, again too specific) or whatever the poles in the pond are correctly called. Regarding Category:Vienna: Vienna is a beautiful place worth visiting. Even if you only do it based on google street view or one of the numerous images well categorized and assigned to Vienna already. It is a pain to cleanup such categories like Category:Vienna full of poorly described and categorized images, a pain I would like to share with you. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Birds of Scotland - subcategories

edit

Hi Юрий Д.К. - please avoid making lots of minute subcategories Category:[Species] in Scotland, unless the species already has huge numbers of files (e.g. Cygnus olor); it is better instead to create Category:[Genus] in Scotland or Category:[Family] in Scotland, and keep the files in their relevant Category:[Species], so that {Geogroup} mapping for the species category shows the entire natural range of the species, rather than the [range - Scotland]. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • @MPF: Hi! Removing files from specific categories like "Pastor roseus in Scotland" and deleting categories with reason "Excessive subdivision of small parent category" (I don't remember such speedy deletion criteria) is not acceptable. See Modularity principle "file should be put in the most specific category". Also, I have no doubt that sooner or later we will still create categories like "Pastor roseus in Scotland" and later we will create "Pastor roseus in Glasgow", "Pastor roseus in Dumfries and Galloway" etc. due to large number of files. I think, we need to restore the categories. Regards. Юрий Д.К 20:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Eventually, yes, in about a century, when there are enough suitable files! At the moment, it just makes files very difficult to find if you have to go through dozens of subcategories to reach them. The whole point of categorisation is to make finding files easy, not to make it difficult. When a category reaches 200 files, then is the time to think about suitable subcategories. Remember too, birds are natural objects; human political boundaries mean nothing to them. So when considering new subcategories within a species, look for plumage features, or similar, rather than dividing by artificial human boundaries. MPF (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Заброшенные сады недалеко от Кургана Бессмертия 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Заболоченный берег Красивой Мечи у Стрелецкого моста2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Берег р. Красивая Меча - Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot on the right --Poco a poco 20:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agree. Fixed, thank you. Юрий Д.К. 22:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Берег р. Красивая Меча - Ефремов4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Поля у р. Красивая Меча, Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support OK. --C messier 21:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunrise in High Fläming Nature Park2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Замёрзшая Красивая Меча, Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Старый дом на ул. Комсомольская. Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Frankfurt with Ignatz-Bubis-Brücke at sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit

QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cuba - Cayo Coco.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cuba - Cayo Coco.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promoted

edit
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baths of Maria de Padilla, Alcázar of Seville.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utah Dunes Landscape - West Desert District.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Азау-Гитче-Чегет-Карабаши.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Азау-Гитче-Чегет-Карабаши.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Archiving

edit

Hi,

All FP nominations should be archived, not deleted. Your mistake has been reverted by another user. Please do not erase useful content -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2018 - May - Salzach River at night in Salzburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018 - May - Salzach River at night in Salzburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


Категоризация

edit

Пожалуйста, категоризируйте при загрузке Ваши работы точнее. Категоризация типа Крым это явно недостаточно. Спасибо.--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Раньше я так делал, теперь категоризирую лучше. Юрий Д.К 19:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Помогите разобрать фото Sergiy Galyonkin в категории Crimea. Геотегов нет, зацепок нет, я в замешательстве. Цель - в корневой категории Crimea не должно быть фото только подкатегории. Трифонов Андрей (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Хорошо, завтра гляну. Юрий Д.К 20:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Трифонов Андрей: Я исправил файлы, до которых Вы не добрались. Уже давно для всех своих загрузок, тем более для моих работ ставлю точные категории, насколько я могу это сделать. Эта партия крымских фото одна из последних с такими широкими категориями. Сейчас проверяю свои старые загрузки, чтобы добавить точные категории, имена файлов и описания (в основном анонимно). Иногда участники Фликр удаляют свои фото, поэтому раньше приходилось иногда загружать больше фото, но в ущерб категоризации. P.S. Моих работ в категории Крым нет, только загрузки. С уважением. Юрий Д.К 14:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Спасибо, с полсотни вместе растащили. Быстро захламляется после каждого лета Трифонов Андрей (talk) 14:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Красивая Меча в вечерних лучах солнца.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 15:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Усадьба Шаховских — Красильщиковой.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 16:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид Манежной площади со стороны Four Seasons Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Здание Госдумы РФ со стороны ул. Тверская.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted a bit (хорошо бы немного повернуть вправо). -- --Екатерина Борисова 15:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Екатерина Борисова: Добрый вечер, исправил, спасибо / Fixed Юрий Д.К. 15:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support A little lack of sharpness in full size view, but in general it is ОК --Екатерина Борисова 00:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ивановский пруд, Сосенское, Москва3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good, but the branches up right are disturbing. Should be easy to stamp them out --MB-one 09:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@MB-one: Agree. Done. Юрий Д.К. 19:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good work --MB-one 09:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Просьба проверить лицензии нескольких изображений

edit

Здравствуйте, коллега! Не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, проверить лицензии данных изображений, которые были взяты с официального сайта Audiovisual Service Европейского Союза?

Я сам лично немного сомневаюсь, и вправду ли свободные данные изображения, поэтому решил, что правильнее будет дать проверить лицензии человеку с нужными правами, и потом уже вырезать портреты для инфобоксов. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Лобное место, табличка2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks a bit distorted due short distance, could be fixed by using Photoshop "Spherize" with -2 or something like that. --Plozessor 03:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Plozessor: Thank for your review! I've fixed it Юрий Д.К. 19:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Four Seasons Hotel Facade 2024-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

EC images

edit

Hello, thank you for helping clear the backlog for Category:EC-Audiovisual Center review needed. The process needs a slight adjustment though.

The {{EC-Audiovisual Center}} template itself is a license template, so the reviewed information should go in that template and not in a newly added {{LicenseReview}} tag. For example, from this edit we now have two license tags on the file; one unreviewed and the other reviewed. And unfortunately even though you reviewed a bunch of EC-Audiovisual files, the files still show in the Category:EC-Audiovisual Center review needed category.

Please let me know if I can help. Best regards, // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Большой театр, вид с Театрального проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Лобное место на фоне храма Василия Блаженного.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид ул. Охотный ряд, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, but the fragment of lamp post up right is disturbing a bit, can you remove it, please? --Екатерина Борисова 03:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC).Reply
I will try to fix this. Thank. Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Екатерина Борисова: , fixed. Юрий Д.К. 19:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. Thanks! (обращайте внимание, пожалуйста, не торчат ли у вас такие вот ветки или куски чего-то по краям - вроде мелочь, а портит хороший кадр) --Екатерина Борисова 00:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Duplicates

edit

I just noticed that all the files in the series of File:Trip to Australia 2009 you uploaded in July 2023 are actually lower resolution duplicates of the same files Fæ already uploaded in 2016. See File:Trip to Australia 2009 56.jpg and File:In Kakadu Natl Park E of Darwin N.T - a roadside forest fire reddens the imminent sunset (13113319793).jpg as an example. I tagged a few but I'm not going to do all for you. As per COM:Dupe, the duplicates should be deleted. I leave it up to you as the uploader to sort this out. Calistemon (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • @Calistemon: It seems that Flickr author uploaded these files to Flickr, later deleted (by the time they have been uploaded to Commons). After deletion, he edited the files and re-uploaded them. So it is almost impossible to detect duplicates by time of the upload (July 2023) because they are only visually duplicates, not technically. Thank you for note, I will try to find all duplicates and tag it. Юрий Д.К 07:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I noticed that the image sizes are vastly different and wondered what the reason for that was. By the looks of Category:Photographs by Murray Foubister, there is a vast number of images from this Flickr author but, I think, there is only about 50 or so in the Trip to Australia 2009 group. Calistemon (talk) 07:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

IP masking scandal

edit

(Edit conflict) Hi. Would you like to copy the following back to Talk:Trust and Safety Product/Temporary Accounts#Without theme on MediaWiki as there is a massive cover-up going on?

Let's kill this canard that it is legally impossible to edit using IP addresses stone dead. It is claimed that there is "risk to users whose information is published in this way." That's like claiming that it is legally impossible for a stuntman to perform a stunt because of the risk to him personally. But he assumes the risk - to prevent him earning his living in a way he enjoys is to breach his human rights. You might as well ban boxing, cricket, football, golf, horseracing, motor racing and rugby, all of which have seen fatalities. This is why, if this ill-informed scheme ever comes to fruition, it will be challenged in the European Court on day one. It's cleverly constructed to breach consumers' human rights - there will be a little notice saying a temporary account will be created. It does not say that it will link together all the IP addresses used by the editor over the next year, which will typically run into the hundreds. Just look at the information provided when you click "account details" on your email account. That information is accessible only to you, but you have no control over who is getting the information stored in the cookie - Wikimedia couldn't tell you anyway, because they don't know! The Court has ruled the user must be given the opportunity to make "a clear and informed choice" about whether she wants a cookie or not - i.e. "yes" or "no". A dialogue box must be presented explaining EXACTLY what this cookie will do and EXACTLY WHO will be able to access the information. The user must be given the choice between accepting this privacy-invading scheme or using her IP, which will not be linked to any other IP the editor may use. 5.150.116.154 10:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.5.88.70 (talk) 07:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi. The reply has been reverted by another user so I don't want to come back it. If the IP wants to continue discussing he/she may itself re-add them. Thank for your note. Юрий Д.К 08:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Жилые дома на ул. Сосенский Стан, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 22:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Фасад Малого театра, вид с Театрального проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид ул. Тверская, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Фасад ГИМ с Манежной площади.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 13:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид на Манежную площадь с Кремлёвского проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид ул. Карасева в Москве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид жилого комплекса на ул. Карасева в Москве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Проектируемый проезд 7046 - Сосенское, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Кряквы - Ивановский пруд, Сосенское, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Жилые дома, ЖК Москвичка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на Средние торговые ряды с Красной площади.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Not quite centered, but a good image --Acroterion 02:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Автомобили Первого канала.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид Театральной площади с Театрального проезда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Манежная площадь и Центральный выставочный зал.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 18:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ГУМ (левая часть здания).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left and right sides not vertical --Mike1979 Russia 07:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Corrected Юрий Д.К. 19:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Манежная площадь, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на Храм Василия Блаженного и памятник Минину и Пожарскому.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Lacks details in the shadows (under the legs of the statue) : is it possible to get those details back ? --Benjism89 17:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Benjism89: Hi. Unfortunately, no. It seems that the cloud obscured the sun a bit when I took the photo and due to this, some small details disappeared.
Ok to me. I don'tsee any issue with details in the shadow. A shadow is a shadow. And here it represents 1 % of the image area. --Sebring12Hrs 22:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на памятник Минину и Пожарскому и Храм Василия Блаженного.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Неоконченное здание, ЖК Эко Бунино.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид Four Seasons Hotel с Охотного ряда.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид на Мавзолей Ленина и Спасскую башню.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Anidae 16:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на памятник Минину и Пожарскому и Храм Василия Блаженного.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Metropol (Moscow) - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 22:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivan Vitali Fountain - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Театральная площадь, недалеко от Метрополя.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 21:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ефремов, ул. Орловская 2024-3 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Набатная башня, Красная площадь.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 15:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Фасад ГУМа, вид со стороны ГИМ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 15:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Детали фасада Большого театра.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ремонтно-восстановительные работы ГУМ в апреле 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Moroder 14:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ул. Большая Дмитровка, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
right not vertical --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Corrected Юрий Д.К. 19:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
right side still not vertical --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Mike1979 Russia: Посмотрите пожалуйста снова, вроде теперь порядок. Если нет, то наверно проще сделать новое фото. Юрий Д.К. 21:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 05:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't cancel my vote please

edit

Don't cancel my vote --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Здание Кремлёвской больницы с поликлиникой, вид со стороны библиотеки им. Ленина.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality & composition --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид на ул. Тверская, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид Манежной площади с ул. Тверская, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivan Vitali Fountain 2024 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit dark in the shadows. Otherwise good --MB-one 08:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@MB-one: New version uploaded, thank you Юрий Д.К. 15:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Much better --MB-one 16:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Улица Зои и Александра Космодемьянских, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Детская площадка в одном из дворов на Проспекте Куприна, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 20:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Станция метро Охотный ряд, вид с Театрального проезда, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Заброшенный гараж на ул. Московская Застава - Ефремов.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image. But please give a geocode or a more precise location. --Augustgeyler 16:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Done Юрий Д.К. 19:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ул. Московская Застава - Ефремов2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 21:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид Манежной площади, гостиницы Националь и дома Жолтовского.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Деревня Ямонтово, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is it possible to do some color & brightness correction? It's nice landscape but looks quite gloomy now. (Небо в частности какое-то ненатурально серо-буроватое, будто смотришь сквозь мутное стекло). --Екатерина Борисова 02:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Загрузил новую версию, спасибо. Юрий Д.К. 16:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality (совсем другое дело!) --Екатерина Борисова 18:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Жилое здание 1959 года на ул. Большая Академическая, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Moroder 17:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Поселение Воскресенское, вид с Проектируемого проезда 7032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment A bit tilted at left, otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 13:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've made some fixes Юрий Д.К. 16:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also I'd suggest to improve the white balance (здесь бы тоже подправить, как Ямонтово) --Екатерина Борисова 22:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've uploaded new version with realistic colors. Thank. Юрий Д.К. 16:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Thanks, looks better now --Екатерина Борисова 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Газораспределительная подстанция около ул. Проектируемый проезд 7032, Москва (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs a tighter crop. Otherwise good --MB-one 13:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@MB-one: Thanks, new version uploaded Юрий Д.К. 16:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Would have preferred even tighter. But good enough --MB-one 09:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на Проектируемый проезд 7032, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment I am not sure about the white balance here. Was it such a warm light at noon there? Did you see it like it es represented now? Otherwise good image. I'd suggest adding a geolocation. --Augustgeyler 13:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Right, WB is wrong. But it has looked ok for me and I've decided not to fix this. New file uploaded with realistic colors and coords. Thanks Юрий Д.К. 16:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality.   Thank you. --Augustgeyler 17:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид с Васильевского спуска на Большой Москворецкий мост, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Technically ok but IMO not a good composition. --Plozessor 04:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид с Васильевского спуска на Большой Москворецкий мост, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид с Васильевского спуска, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Marwenwafi 04:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Барельеф памятника Минину и Пожарскому, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на 5-й Новоподмосковный переулок с ул. Зои и Александра Космодемьянских, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction needed (надо повернуть фото так, чтобы разметка на асфальте была параллельна нижнему краю снимка) --Екатерина Борисова 02:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Екатерина Борисова: Здравствуйте. Попробовал исправить. Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality, thanks. ("кирпич" немного заваливается вправо, но мне кажется, что это не критично) --Екатерина Борисова 22:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sudden deletion of your files connected to QIC process

edit

Hello Юрий Д.К., currently you nominated some of your works as Quality Images. Many users, including me, did review them by finding pros and cons during the last days. But suddenly most of them just disappeared. I've never seen such a thing at QIC before. Are you aware of these deletions? I found out that User:Túrelio was executing these deletions. Who's intetions was it to suddenly delete them while they had been in the middle of a review. August Geyler (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • @Augustgeyler: As an author I've requested speedy deletions because these files has been uploaded less than a week ago. I understan that these files had been under a review but I'm not sure that they will be promoted to QI. It will be much easier for me to visit these places in Moscow again and create new photos with better quality, rather than discuss about older ones. Юрий Д.К 21:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
    You did it again. Please stop it! It is not funny at all if you let us review your nomination and as soon as it seams to be declined you simply delete the whole image. This feels offensive to me. So please, accept that images are decline for QIC. That does not mean those image are bad. They can be very important for Wikimedia Commons and should remain within the project. August (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • @Augustgeyler: OK Юрий Д.К 18:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Средние Торговые Ряды, фасад, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Бархатцы - ГУМ, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ул. Клары Цеткин - Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Four Seasons Hotel - June 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Something is not good about the lens here. The outer left part is blured significantly. The overall sharpness could be better but is OK. Overall well composed image with OK sharpness. --Augustgeyler 20:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Manipulation of Quality images candidates/candidate list

edit

Dear User:Юрий Д.К.,
yesterday on July 16th at 15:14 (UTC) you once again simply deleted content at the Quality Images Candidate List. It is seen as manipulation of the process. I have tell you again: Please don't do this! If you want to stop the review process you can simply withdraw your nomination. Or if it is declined like in this case, you would only need to wait for another 48h until the Bot would process the nomination automatically. @George Chernilevsky reviewed your image. He invested time and effort and you just delete the whole process afterwards. This would make it impossible for anybody involved to find out what happened later or if the same image will ever nominated again.

Code deleted:
File:Пустая_Манежная_площадь,_Москва.jpg|{{/Decline|Empty Manezhnaya Square, Moscow --[[User:Юрий Д.К.|Юрий Д.К.]] 19:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)|<br />{{o}} Tilt CW --[[User:George Chernilevsky|George Chernilevsky]] 14:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)}} File:Пустая_Манежная_площадь,_Москва1.jpg|{{/Decline|Empty Manezhnaya Square, Moscow --[[User:Юрий Д.К.|Юрий Д.К.]] 19:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)|<br />{{o}} Tilt CW --[[User:George Chernilevsky|George Chernilevsky]] 14:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)}}

Why? I just don't get it. August (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Медиацентр Зарядье, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Старое жилое здание на Большой Академической в Москве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --IM3847 00:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Софийская набережная, Москва 2024-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Not the best view of location, but technically acceptable. --Екатерина Борисова 15:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eco Bunino residential complex, Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид Красной площади со стороны ГУМа, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA on the star --Mike1979 Russia 07:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Mike1979 Russia: I've made attempt to fix CA. --Юрий Д.К. 19:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Sufficient quality. Slight, not disturbing chromatic aberration on the right edge. --Michael32710 14:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Цветы в парке Зарядье.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Северные ландшафты - Зарядье, Москва.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is somehow nice, but slightly tilted. --Plozessor 04:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Plozessor: Hi, I've made some fixes. --Юрий Д.К. 16:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is the right post really curved? --Plozessor 10:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Plozessor: Yes, it is. I've not edited them. I've uploaded other file - File:Северные ландшафты, Зарядье 2024.jpg. The discussed post appears 4th on the second image, also severely curved --Юрий Д.К. 19:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Ok then! --Plozessor 08:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вид на Храм Василия Блаженного с Васильевского спуска.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
cut very tight at the top and bottom --Georgfotoart 17:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I will upload a new file --Юрий Д.К. 20:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Georgfotoart: New file uploaded with more ground. I am not sure whether more sky is needed in this case. --Юрий Д.К. 17:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. maybe a little more sky, but still good --Georgfotoart 20:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Разрисованный граффити грузовичок в Москве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very good image. IT should have a category or description for the type of truck. --Augustgeyler 21:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Agree. Category and description added --Юрий Д.К. 19:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality.   Thank you. --Augustgeyler 07:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kotelnicheskaya Embankment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Weak oppose The main building looks slightly tilted ccw. --Augustgeyler 21:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC) * Will be fixed Юрий Д.К. 03:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Augustgeyler: Fixed --Юрий Д.К. 17:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 07:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Street, Voskresenskoe Settlement - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karasev Street - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Icon of the Resurrection of Jesus - Resurrection Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the Sofiyskaya Embankment from the Kremlin Embankment, Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Общий вид на центр Москвы с Софийской набережной.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Street, Voskresenskoe Settlement - Moscow1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Street, Voskresenskoe Settlement - Moscow2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swamp near Voskresenskoe, Kommunarka, Moscow1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swamp near Voskresenskoe, Kommunarka, Moscow2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swamp near Voskresenskoe, Kommunarka, Moscow3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange Tagetes at Moscow GUM flower festival.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the Four Seasons Hotel from Manezhnaya Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klara Tsetkin St. - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorovsky Park 2024-6 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorovsky Park 2024-6 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support OK composition and technically very good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorovsky Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuprin Prospekt, Kommunarka, Moscow 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:57, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Metropol Moscow 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque - State Order of Lenin Historical Museum (Moscow) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Christ the Saviour from Bolshoy Kamenny Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red rose at Square of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Christ the Saviour 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, very good -- Spurzem 21:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolshoi Theatre - Moscow - 2024-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good image -- Spurzem 21:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senecio cineraria near Bolshoi Theatre1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senecio cineraria near Bolshoi Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 22:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Historical Museum, 2024-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Красный 00:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support I like it. --Mike1979 Russia 05:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorovsky Park 2024-6 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 04:21, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremlin wall - Red Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Marigold near Cathedral of Christ the Saviour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KAMAZ fire truck - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main dome of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiosk on Bersenevskaya embankment - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nabatnaya Tower1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support I think good. --Mike1979 Russia 13:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment - Moscow (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you crop the road so that there would be a minimum of asphalt and the building would take up a large area of ​​the photo? --Mike1979 Russia 13:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Mike1979 Russia: Hi, new file ready --Юрий Д.К. 13:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Historical Museum at sunrise v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is too distorted (it's actually leaning out on the left side) and very soft (too much NR?). --Plozessor 04:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Plozessor: Agree that it is distorted but no noise reduction has been performed. New file ready. Thank for review. Юрий Д.К. 12:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Thx. Still the building seems a bit soft but I guess it's due to the strong contrast. Good enough now for sure. --Plozessor 04:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Close view of Four Seasons Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M-24-8302 Legend (1963) - Moscow1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 21:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M-24-8302 Legend (1963) - Moscow2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Remontees 20:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M-24-8302 Legend (1963) - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Remontees 20:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - main dome of Cathedral of Christ the Saviour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serafimovich St. - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - House on the Embankment, view from the Patriarch's Bridge1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - House on the Embankment, view from the Patriarch's Bridge2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GES-2 tubes (Moscow Power Plant), view from the Patriarch's Bridge1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Bank building on Balchug 2 v1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Grand Kremlin Palace - close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Excellent --FBilula 14:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Close-up of the Bolshoi Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Very good --FBilula 14:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Columba livia - Manezhnaya Square - Moscow1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presnenskaya embankment in evening - Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
right side: white border, floors not horizontal? --Georgfotoart 21:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Georgfotoart: Hi, I've made attempt to fix perspective. Thank you --Юрий Д.К. 23:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Bank building on Balchug 2 v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good --FBilula 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Kamaz on Red Square (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 05:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Gostiny Dvor (Moscow).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Evening view of Kuprin Prospekt and the surrounding forest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Red Audi on Zatonnaya Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Lada 1500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Presnenskaya embankment at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good but please remove the invalid category. --Plozessor 04:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - main entrance to the State Historical Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - main entrance to the State Historical Museum1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Empire and Mercury Towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Nice composition, sharpness & noisyness so-so. --Kallerna 20:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:StonesUArena191017.jpg

edit
 
File:StonesUArena191017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - House with a turret on Bolshaya Polyanka2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow - Trapeznaya Lavka - Cathedral of Christ the Saviour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cat in Efremov, Russia1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good colours and focus. --Lvova 19:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply