Commons:Valued image candidates

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.

Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
replace the review parameter with

|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}

Save the page.
There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

How to review an image

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
- If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
- If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:

You type	You get	When
`*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~`	Comment My comment. -- Example	You have a comment.
`*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~`	Info My information. -- Example	You have information.
`*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~`	Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example	You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
`*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~`	Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example	You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
`*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~`	Question My question. -- Example	You have a question.
`*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~`	Support Reason for supporting. -- Example	You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.

If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.

Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.

Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
- status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
- status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
- status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
- status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).

Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

56,593 closed valued image candidates
Closed as		Nominations
Promoted	50,946 (90%)
Undecided	3,134 (5.5%)
Declined	2,513 (4.4%)

New valued image nominations

View promotion
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-05 14:26 (UTC)
Scope: Mosque of Al-Ghamama in Medina from south-western side.
Reason: It is the best visual of the Mosque of Al-Ghamama found in Wikimedia commons -- Inu06 (talk)
Comment This is still not correct. Look at the other nominations to see how the scope should be written. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done -- Inu06 (talk) 04:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment Ok the scope works; but as there are several images of the building we must add the direction of the shot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done -- Inu06 (talk) 03:45, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Ok now! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-06 05:44 (UTC)
Scope: Tomb of the Mother of Zain-ul-Abidin from south-west
Comment This is still not correct. Look at the other nominations to see how the scope should be written. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done Is it correct now? -- Inu06 (talk) 04:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment Ok the scope works; but as there are several images of the building we must add the direction of the shot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done - added direction of shot -- Inu06 (talk) 05:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: TonyTheTiger (talk) on 2024-10-06 15:00 (UTC)
Scope: Category:Hollywood and Vine
Used in: Articles in 5 different languages, the bios of several of the star subjects and prominently as noted in the reason area of this nomination.
Reason: Other editors have decided to move this into the main image position at w:Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District. It is the main image at w:Broadway Hollywood Building. It depicts the main intersection of the w:Hollywood Walk of Fame. Unlike many images from this building at that intersection that focus on the nearby w:Capitol Records Building, this image actually depicts the Hollywood and Vine intersection. -- TonyTheTiger (talk)
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-08 05:01 (UTC)
Scope: Ritratto della contessa Carlotta Aloisi Papudoff (Portrait of Countess Carlotta Aloisi Papudoff) - Giovanni Boldini
Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-08 05:02 (UTC)
Scope: I Parlatori by Adolfo Wildt - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-08 05:05 (UTC)
Scope: Corpus. Sortida de la processó de l'església de Santa Maria by Ramon Casas at Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-10-08 09:44 (UTC)
Scope: Church of the Ascension (Cadenabbia), view from Lake Como (Italy)
Used in: Global usage
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-10-08 10:30 (UTC)
Scope: Joseph Karl Stieler, Beethoven with the manuscript of the Missa solemnis, 1820 - Beethoven House
Used in: en:Ludwig van Beethoven, en:Romantic music, en:History of music
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Mile (talk) on 2024-10-08 12:04 (UTC)
Scope: Saint Mark church, Belgrade, North view
Used in: en:St. Mark's Church, Belgrade
Reason: best photo by now (as i can see), church covered without trees, good quality -- Mile (talk)
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Grunpfnul (talk) on 2024-10-08 13:40 (UTC)
Scope: Statue of David Hansemann in Aachen
Used in: Aachen David Hansemann Liste der Denkmäler, Brunnen und Skulpturen in Aachen Heinz Hoffmeister (Bildhauer) Liste der Baudenkmäler in Aachen-Mitte (M)
Support Good quality, used in articles. --Thi (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-10-08 14:28 (UTC)
Scope: Juan de Flandes, Temptation of Christ in the Wilderness, circa 1500 – National Gallery of Art, Washington
Used in: en:Juan de Flandes, en:Matthew 4:4, nl:Duivel, fi:Saatana, pl:Kuszenie Chrystusa (obraz Juana de Flandes)
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Msb (talk) on 2024-10-08 14:27 (UTC)
Scope: Hotel Miramar Singapore
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-10-08 16:53 (UTC)
Scope: Hôtel de Roaldès from quai Champollion (Cahors)
Oppose Cahors Hotel Roaldes.jpg is better--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-10-08 17:05 (UTC)
Scope: Venus (Aphrodite) and Mars, by Luigi Acquisti in Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo) Italy
Comment This photo is smaller but has better perspective. A bit tight crop at the top. --Thi (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Edit: wikilink fixed. --Thi (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Thi: Thanks for your advice. this own image has been cropped as close as possible to leave only the two statues, which explains a slightly tight cut at the top. ~~On the other hand, I don't see the one you are referring to.~~ Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2024-10-08 20:51 (UTC)
Scope: Oued Ansegmir
Used in: آيت عياش, واد أنسكمير, Ait Ayach, واد أنسڭمير, Ait Ayach (munisipyo sa Moroko)Aït Ayach, Ait Ayach Q2876451, Q120132305,
Reason: This valley (in green) alone produces more than 80 percent of Morocco's apples. It makes Morocco the second largest apple producer in the Arab region. This valley is located in the center of the Ait Ayach commune. To take a picture of this commune, you must climb the summit of Mount Ayachi in the eastern High Atlas, at an altitude of about 3,800 meters above sea level. -- Mounir Neddi (talk)
Support Useful and used. -- Inu06 (talk) 03:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-09 05:44 (UTC)
Scope: L'iris - série Nature - "Pâte de Verre" by Daum - Nancy France
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-09 05:41 (UTC)
Scope: Choir of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) – Tomb of the Doge Marco Corner
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-09 05:28 (UTC)
Scope: Ca' Pesaro - Portego - view from the entrance on the grand canal towards the inner courtyard
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:05, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-09 09:38 (UTC)
Scope: Façade of Nishat Bagh
Oppose this one is better Façade of Nishat Bagh (14545925441).jpg.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-09 09:53 (UTC)
Scope: "Ali" and "Husayn" Medallions in Hagia Sophia
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-09 15:18 (UTC)
Scope: BMW F39 X2 M35i - right rear view
Used in: de:BMW F39
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-10-09 18:14 (UTC)
Scope: Organ in Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk, Zaltbommel
Used in: Grote of Sint-Maartenskerk (Zaltbommel), Matthijs Verhofstadt
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2024-10-09 21:22 (UTC)
Scope: Ahidous...
Used in: إفران, أحيدوس
Reason: The highest quality image in the category of Ahidous art. -- Mounir Neddi (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-10-09 22:11 (UTC)
Scope: Virgil reading the Aeneid in front of Augustus and Livia ,in Sommariva room, of Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo), by Jean-Baptiste Wicar (Italy)
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-10-10 04:49 (UTC)
Scope: Pecten maximus forma maculata (Great Scallop), left valve
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-10 05:04 (UTC)
Scope: La Divina (The divine) - Giovanni Boldini
Support --Thi (talk) 11:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-10 05:06 (UTC)
Scope: City by Joaquim Torres-Garcia - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 11:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-10 05:07 (UTC)
Scope: Entrata di Vittorio Emanuele II in Venezia by Ettore Ferrari
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Civvì (talk) on 2024-10-10 12:41 (UTC)
Scope: Euthria cornea (spindle euthria ) laying eggs
Comment We must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you for your comment. This will not be easy, there is a Category:Laying eggs and a Category:Gastropoda eggs but only a handful of pictures of "Gastropoda laying eggs"..., it's the only picture of a living Euthria cornea but probably not even the best picture in the category (being an underwater picture). Should I withdraw this? Civvì (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Ok I made your scope. Check the syntax for your next nominations! For this to be perfectly in order you must put a geocoding in the caption.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-10 13:48 (UTC)
Scope: Kaaba in 1886
Reason: An old and valuable visual of Masjid al-Haram during Hajj in the year 1886 -- Inu06 (talk)
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: MB-one (talk) on 2024-10-10 15:34 (UTC)
Scope: Ascension Cathedral, Almaty at night
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-10 15:43 (UTC)
Scope: Bitter Grandland X - right front view
Used in: en:Bitter Automotive, no:Bitter (bil), sv:Bitter (biltillverkare)
Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Mounir Neddi (talk) on 2024-10-10 19:27 (UTC)
Scope: Yagour mountain
Used in: تغدوين, جبل ياكور, أكدال, جبل ياڭور, جبل ياجور, Jebel Yagour, جبل یاکور Adrar Yagour, Q6172527
Reason: This area contains prehistoric rock carvings. It was inhabited by the Amazighs in ancient times. Today, an ancient pastoral custom called Agdal is practiced there. -- Mounir Neddi (talk)
Comment The scope is too broad. It would be enough to add the name of the lake to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-10-10 19:14 (UTC)
Scope: Soolai Well and its Well head
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-10-10 19:19 (UTC)
Scope: Sri Yantrodharaka Hanuman Temple at Hampi
Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-10 21:08 (UTC)
Scope: Porsche Macan 4 - left front view
Used in: de:Porsche, de:Porsche Macan (Typ XAB), en:Porsche Macan
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-10 21:08 (UTC)
Scope: Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid GR Sport - right front view
Used in: de:Toyota Yaris Cross, de:Toyota Gazoo Racing
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-11 02:54 (UTC)
Scope: Ophthalmology of the Islamic Golden Age by Hunayn ibn Ishaq in Cairo National Library
Used in: Diagrams by period Medieval diagram
Comment The scope is too broad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done improved the scope -- Inu06 (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Ok with localization added. Ok with localization added.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-11 02:59 (UTC)
Scope: close-up of Astrolabes of the Islamic Golden Age
Used in: en:Islamic Golden Age
Oppose The previous image is much better than this one. -- David Osipov (talk) 09:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose The following image is much better and this one does not add anything more. On the other hand the image of the back face is interesting --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-11 03:06 (UTC)
Scope: 17th-century Planispheric astrolabe AI 86-45 displayed in museum of the Arab World Institute, Paris
Comment The scope is too broad. It is also necessary to give the name of the museum and the geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done -- improved the scope -- Inu06 (talk) 04:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-10-11 04:50 (UTC)
Scope: Arctica islandica (Ocean Quahog), right valve
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-11 04:57 (UTC)
Scope: Lino Selvatico - Nudo femminile disteso (Nudo allo specchio)
Support Satisfies all criteria -- David Osipov (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-11 04:59 (UTC)
Scope: The Path to Granollers by Ramon Martí i Alsina in MNAC
Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 11:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-11 05:00 (UTC)
Scope: 'Goethe's House' - Commemorative plaque of Goethe's stay in Venice
Best in Scope --Thi (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)

Nominated by:
David Osipov (talk) on 2024-10-11 05:41 (UTC)

Scope:
100 Ruble Commemorative Coin "History of Monetary Circulation in Russia" (2009) - Obverse

Used in:

List of commemorative coins of Russia (2009)
قائمة العملات التذكارية لروسيا (2009)
Список памятных монет России 2009 года
Список памятных монет России (1992—2009)
Списак комеморативних кованица Русије (2009)

Wikidata has entry 100 Ruble "History of Monetary Circulation of Russia" commemorative coin (2009) (Q130480335) with data related to this item.

Reason:
A single hi-res photo of a contemporary Russian single gold coin the category, photographed and uploaded by a Wikimedia volunteer -- David Osipov (talk)

Support OK with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)

Nominated by:
David Osipov (talk) on 2024-10-11 10:51 (UTC)

Scope:
100 Ruble Commemorative Coin "History of Monetary Circulation in Russia" (2009) - Back

Used in:

List of commemorative coins of Russia (2009)
قائمة العملات التذكارية لروسيا (2009)
Список памятных монет России 2009 года
Список памятных монет России (1992—2009)
Списак комеморативних кованица Русије (2009)

Wikidata has entry 100 Ruble "History of Monetary Circulation of Russia" commemorative coin (2009) (Q130480335) with data related to this item.

Reason:
A single hi-res photo of a contemporary Russian single gold coin the category, photographed and uploaded by a Wikimedia volunteer -- David Osipov (talk)

Support OK with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-10-11 14:44 (UTC)
Scope: James Tissot: Jesus Walks on the Sea - Brooklyn Museum
Used in: eo:Supernaturo, fi:Yliluonnollinen, fi:Jezus chodzi po jeziorze
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-10-11 15:43 (UTC)
Scope: Psyche revived by the kiss of Love (Tremezzo), (Italy)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Svetlana borealis (talk) on 2024-10-12 01:19 (UTC)
Scope: Category:Verkhoyansk Range
Reason: Valley and small river in Siberian mountains -- Svetlana borealis (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-10-12 04:53 (UTC)
Scope: Arctica islandica (Ocean Quahog), left valve
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-12 04:57 (UTC)
Scope: Ritratto della sorella by Umberto Moggioli in Museo d'arte moderna Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-12 04:58 (UTC)
Scope: **Salvia microphylla (var.'Royal Bumble') - Inflorescence**
Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-10-12 05:09 (UTC)
Scope: Portrait of the Art Critic and Writer Raimon Casellas by Lluís Graner - MNAC
Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-12 07:41 (UTC)
Scope: Micro Microlino Pioneer Series - left front view
Used in: de:EG-Fahrzeugklasse L7e, en:Microlino
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-12 07:43 (UTC)
Scope: Porsche Macan 4 - right rear view
Used in: de:Porsche Macan (Typ XAB), uk:Porsche Macan
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-10-12 07:42 (UTC)
Scope: Nissan NV250 - right rear view
Used in: de:Renault Kangoo, en:Renault Kangoo
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-12 10:07 (UTC)
Scope: Courtyard of Jamia Masjid, Srinagar
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-10-12 10:20 (UTC)
Scope: Madonna and Child with the Infant Saint John the Baptist in the Villa Carlotta (Tremezzo), by Pietro Perugino (Italy)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Inu06 (talk) on 2024-10-12 10:26 (UTC)
Scope: DITIB-Zentralmoschee Köln in April 2015, from south-east
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: EUPBR (talk) on 2024-10-12 11:38 (UTC)
Scope: Grand Port Battle Memorial in Mahébourg, general view
Used in: wikidata, dewiki
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: EUPBR (talk) on 2024-10-12 11:43 (UTC)
Scope: Saint François d‘Assise church in Pamplemousses, main façade
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: EUPBR (talk) on 2024-10-12 12:03 (UTC)
Scope: Luxembourg City Hall, view from Place Guillaume II
Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope: Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)`[reply] Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope: Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Oppose This one has less representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Lower Square (Piazza Inferiore) of St. Francis, Assisi, Italy

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.