Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/SamoaBot 29
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Approved Hazard-SJ ✈ 01:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
SamoaBot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Ricordisamoa (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: updating labels from sitelinks in recently-changed items
Function details: see [1], [2], [3]. --Ricordisamoa 09:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Some others: [4] and [5]. --Ricordisamoa 10:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- [6] and [7]. --Ricordisamoa 10:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: it uses "wbsetlabel" instead of "wbeditentity" only when there's a single missing label, to better show it in the edit summary. --Ricordisamoa 10:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- example for two missing labels --Ricordisamoa 10:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks good.--CENNOXX (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Another: [8]. --Ricordisamoa 09:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And also [9]. --Ricordisamoa 10:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- are you aware of brackets? and that the should not be stripped on categories, templates and astronomical objects? once enabled, could you run on the items listed on User:Akkakk/issues#brackets in label (bra) and sub sections (as i requested on WD:Bot requests)? --Akkakk 14:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bump. Legoktm (talk) 07:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @Legoktm: does this mean it's rejected?!? --Ricordisamoa 10:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No, not at all. I would like to see a response to Akkakk's question before approving it though. Legoktm (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ricordisamoa: Any response? Hazard-SJ ✈ 05:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- When importing interwiki links, it doesn't strip brackets at all. Could we define some general rules? --Ricordisamoa 03:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @Legoktm: does this mean it's rejected?!? --Ricordisamoa 10:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bump. Legoktm (talk) 07:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- are you aware of brackets? and that the should not be stripped on categories, templates and astronomical objects? once enabled, could you run on the items listed on User:Akkakk/issues#brackets in label (bra) and sub sections (as i requested on WD:Bot requests)? --Akkakk 14:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ I'm inclined to approve this request, unless any issue is raised soon. Also, for any general rules, feel free to start a request for comment, or even start a discussion in the project chat. Hazard-SJ ✈ 03:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]