User talk:NGOgo

Talk to me about NGOs.

Repressions of the Belarusian NGOs

Hallo. Just thought You would wish to translate Q107537817 which in Belarusan is named „Mass devastation of the Belarusian NGOs (2021—)”. Taravyvan Adijene (talk) 10:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Rechtsform=Non-Profit-Organisation

Hallo NGOgo,

wenn ein Verein wie z.B. der Q105194137 schon als P31:Q163740 getaggt ist – was bringt das Hinzufügen von P1454:Q163740 dann? Es gäbe (ohne dass ich mich über Zypern auskennen würde) auch eine formal korrekte Rechtsform (dürfte Σωματείο sein). Viele Grüße, -- Bernice Heiderman (talk) 11:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Wenn es eine konkretere Rechtsform mit Quelle gibt, auf jeden Fall. Für Griechenland sind die Rechtsformen aber z. B. noch nicht ordentlich angelegt (ich hätte die Liste der Rechtsformen nach ISO 20275 (Q106152815), falls du Griechisch kannst). Ich gehe aber mit Wikidata:WikiProject Nonprofit Organizations, langsam Land für Land durch und versuche dann auch die nicht landesspezifischen Rechtsformen zu ersetzen/ergänzen. Gruß NGOgo (talk) 12:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Genau, wozu die voreilige Bearbeitung?--Bernice Heiderman (talk) 12:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Technisch, weil nonprofit organization (Q163740) als instance of (P31) eine Rechtsform ist und es hier einen Match im Datensatz gibt. Inhaltlich, weil es Selektionen erleichtert, weil die Unterklassen von P31 chaotisch sind. Bei den großen Ländern wie Griechenland können wir es aber gerne rausnehmen, wenn es dich stört. Bei Ländern wie Weißrussland oder Kuba kommt man manchmal sonst nicht weiter. Schöne Grüße NGOgo (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Ich bin dir dankbar für deine Arbeit und wollte lediglich den Grund erfahren.--Bernice Heiderman (talk) 13:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Gerne. Hilft beim nochmal überdenken, gerade in so "unsauberen" Fällen in denen man entscheiden muss, ob gar nicht oder unsauber besser ist. NGOgo (talk) 13:17, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Self-referencing statements with P159

Hello. I don't think self-referencing statements like this are useful with headquarters location (P159). There was 71 such cases in Finnish municipalities (mostly) added by you, and I removed them with this batch. Kind regards, Samoasambia ✎ 10:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

There is the special issue I didn't recognise that Finland has a special legal type for its municipalities municipality of Finland (Q856076) and they are registered in the company register (Patentti- ja Rekisterihallitus), though the items have a LEI-Code i.e. Turku. Thank you for correcting this. Best NGOgo (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

No problem, mistakes sometimes happen. I searched for your contributions that got the "self-referencing" edit tag, and it looks like a couple hundred US cities and a few Belgian municipalities had the same issue too in your recent batch. Example: [1]. Samoasambia ✎ 16:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Removed the remaining ones. Best NGOgo (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Great! Samoasambia ✎ 06:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

archives at (P485)

Do you know what archives at (P485) is for Barça? Masoud.h1368 (talk) 11:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Never worked with archives at (P485), I'm not even sure it's eligible for still existing clubs. Best NGOgo (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Q124022875

Hi NGOgo. I don't understand why did you put sporting activities (Q124022875) here. It's not useful i think. Thanks. Vanbasten 23 (talk) 09:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vanbasten 23: It is a classification of non-profit-organizations to be able to select all organizations of a type by their field of work. Here is a list of all categories by the "industry classification for nonprofit organization". Since Q6073839 is a sports club (Q847017) the field of work is sport. Why do you think it's not useful? Or is there a better classification? Best NGOgo (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

First of all, if it is a classification of non-profit-organizations, why are you interpreting that all sports clubs are non-profit? Second, if we already have an instance "sports club" and sport "X", what you are putting is taken for granted, so I think you are duplicating the information. There is no need to add that information, plus each case can be different and you are assuming things. All the best. Vanbasten 23 (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

sports club (Q847017) is a subclass of NGO, so no interpretation there. But it shows a problem with instance of (P31). In that case, sporting activities (Q124022875) is also a classification for non-NGOs (International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities). I also see no assuming, when stating that a sporting association is doing sports.

But in a way you are right, it is in parts duplicating information. However, it helps enormously, when looking at a whole sector. On the one hand, because industry (P452) is standardized, unlike the use of instance of (P31). On the other hand, because it allows comparison and apportionment for whole sectors. So I guess it's two different ways of selecting inside of wikidata, like with The Coca-Cola Company (Q3295867) and other companies having a industry and a instance of. All the best NGOgo (talk) 11:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Barnstar for you

		The Wikidata Barnstar
		Thanks for your contributions related to nonprofit organizations. Keep up the good work. -- M2545 (talk) 08:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)