User talk:Amasuela

Welcome to Wikidata, Amasuela!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! --Rakás (talk) 10:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Elinor

Hello. Do not add "Elinor (cantar de Basshunter)" in "other names" field. I cancelled it already in some articles but there is many more. Just add standard label name and description separetly. Eurohunter (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Query service lag

Hello, we're currently experiencing some query service lag. It would help a lot if you would pause your QuickStatement batches for a while. Thanks! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

I've blocked your account to help the query service recover. Please contact me if needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Amasuela,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Amasuela,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

[WMF Board of Trustees - Call for feedback: Community Board seats] Meetings with the Wikidata community

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is organizing a call for feedback about community selection processes between February 1 and March 14. While the Wikimedia Foundation and the movement have grown about five times in the past ten years, the Board’s structure and processes have remained basically the same. As the Board is designed today, we have a problem of capacity, performance, and lack of representation of the movement’s diversity. Our current processes to select individual volunteer and affiliate seats have some limitations. Direct elections tend to favor candidates from the leading language communities, regardless of how relevant their skills and experience might be in serving as a Board member, or contributing to the ability of the Board to perform its specific responsibilities. It is also a fact that the current processes have favored volunteers from North America and Western Europe. In the upcoming months, we need to renew three community seats and appoint three more community members in the new seats. This call for feedback is to see what processes can we all collaboratively design to promote and choose candidates that represent our movement and are prepared with the experience, skills, and insight to perform as trustees?

In this regard, two rounds of feedback meetings are being hosted to collect feedback from the Wikidata community. Two rounds are being hosted with the same agenda, to accomodate people from various time zones across the globe. We will be discussing ideas proposed by the Board and the community to address the above mentioned problems. Please sign-up according to whatever is most comfortable to you. You are welcome to participate in both as well!

• Round 1 - Feb 24, 4:00 pm UTC
• Round 2 - Mar 3, 4:00 am UTC
• Sign-up and meeting details: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees/Call for feedback: Community Board seats/Conversations/Wikidata

Also, please share this with other volunteers who might be interested in this. Let me know if you have any questions. KCVelaga (WMF), 14:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Strange label

Hi,

Could you take a look and correct Special:Diff/1472303415 on Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women (Q39692211)?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Reply

I will try !

--Amasuela (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your work on descriptions of scholarly articles

Hi, I wonder if you are aware of the fact that Wikifuncitions is targeting to solve the issue of missing descriptions on e.g. scholarly articles by creating functions for sets of items so that 1 function for asturian could effectively replace all the data you are now adding as descriptions? See https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/abstract-wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org/thread/7FZVKYECFKBMJVMHLNP2U2N2H5IJFSV7/ I suggest you pause the bot to avoid adding a lot of redundant data of little value and play with Wikifunctions instead :)--So9q (talk) 06:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Yo said:

I suggest you pause the bot to avoid adding a lot of redundant data of little value and play with Wikifunctions instead :)--So9q (Alderique) 06:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Reply:

Lo siento, no entiendo su escrito, yo no tengo un Bot, por lo que no puedo detener el funcionamiento de algo que no tengo.

Are you calling my attention for a supposedly improper action, what have I done wrong? I can't understand it.

Disculpe las molestias Amasuela (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Wrong? I did not intend to imply that you are doing something wrong. But have you seen the messages in Project Chat about BlazeGraph having a hard time handling all the triples? (including the 2 bn descriptions, mostly on our 37M scientific items)? See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Query_Service_scaling_update_Aug_2021

Gracias por su respuesta. ¿Incorrecto? No pretendía dar a entender que estás haciendo algo mal. ¿Pero has visto los mensajes en Project Chat sobre BlazeGraph teniendo dificultades para manejar todos los triples? (incluidas las descripciones de 2.000 millones, principalmente en nuestros 37 millones de artículos científicos)? Ver https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Query_Service_scaling_update_Aug_2021--So9q (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Descriptions

Are you really want to add descriptions instead of labels?--GZWDer (talk) 09:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Descripciones

Hello, I'm Madamebiblio. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent description edits didn't meet the Wikidata description guidelines. Descriptions should appear as though they were in the middle of a sentence, typically start with a lowercase letter, and written from a neutral point of view. For example, "pop singer" would be a better description than "He is the best pop singer." If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Madamebiblio (talk) 13:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Hola @Amasuela vuelvo por el mismo tema: las descripciones comienzan con minúscula, no llevan punto final, no repiten el nombre de la etiqueta o son definiciones (ejemplo). Por favor, leer y aplicar el estilo adoptado por la comunidad. Gracias. Madamebiblio (talk) 13:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, please excuse me, I will be attentive every time you write a header,

Thank you for your notice, I appreciate it. Amasuela (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Descripciones

Good afternoon, at the time you told me that I could translate a page and I translated it into my language, now you tell me that some term in the article is not appropriate, well, could you tell me which sentence you are referring to?

Thank you very much, and have a good afternoon. @Amasuela Amasuela (talk) 14:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Excuse me, I do not see your signature or identification so I can contact you. Greetings Amasuela (talk) 09:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)