Talk:Q97362583
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Charlie Nicholson (Q97362583)
description: video game reviewer
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Charlie Nicholson” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for authors
This section is generated with {{Generic queries for authors}}.
- List of works written by Charlie Nicholson (query)
- List of works authored by Charlie Nicholson, ordered by sitelinks (query)
- List of works written by Charlie Nicholson with instance of property (query)
- List of written works he/she has authored with genre property (query)
- Timeline of Charlie Nicholson (query)
- Narrative location of works written by Charlie Nicholson (query)
- Map of narrative location of works written by Charlie Nicholson (query)
- List of co-authors, sorted by number of collaborations (query)
- Graph of co-authors (query)
- See also : Synia#author : Charlie Nicholson
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
What do you think about my use of qualifiers in Special:Diff/1239853232? @Dexxor: --Trade (talk) 09:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- subject named as (P1810) and point in time (P585) are fine.
- number of reviews/ratings (P7887) is not indented to be used like that but I do not see a problem: The English label “number of reviews/ratings” and presumably the other labels still make sense. Related discussion: Property_talk:P444#Usage_on_the_review_items_itself?.
- Using the English strings (average score), (median score), and of games recommended does not align with Wikidata’s goal to be multilingual, though.
- If this information is important to you, propose the new properties mean review score given, median review score given, and percentage of games recommended. If we use these as properties instead of qualifiers, we would only need an average review score given which can be specified more precisely using determination method or standard (P459)arithmetic mean (Q19033) and determination method or standard (P459)median (Q226995). I do not like this, however, because then the information from OpenCritic would be scattered across the whole item. Additionally we cannot be sure that OpenCritic keeps track of every review the critic has written so it makes more sense as a qualifier on OpenCritic critic ID (P8487). —Dexxor (talk) 11:36, 27 July 2020 (UTC)