Talk:Q68978
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Thun (Q68978)
description: town and municipality in the canton of Bern in Switzerland
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Thun” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
Geography
- Places in Thun (query)
- Map of places in Thun (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (elevation above sea level (P2044))
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (height (P2048))
- Organizations with headquarters in Thun (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Thun (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
People
- People born in Thun, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Thun (query)
- People dead in Thun, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Thun, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Thun, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
Arts and fictions
- List of items with narrative location in Thun (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Thun (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
@Jura1: When was Bern (Q11911) the most local admin territory for Thun (Q68978)? Please provide reference that there was a period when the Bern (Q11911) existed, and the Thun District (Q666313) was not. Bern (Q11911) is not valid statement for located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) here because it isn't most local.Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- In 1384-1798 Thun District (Q666313) was part of Republica Bernensis (Q2326511)[1][2], in 1798-1803 Thun District (Q666313) was part of Canton of Oberland (Q692837), since 1803 it was part of Bern (Q11911)[3][4]. So when Thun (Q68978) was part of Bern (Q11911) without Thun District (Q666313)? Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 21:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
[edit]{{Edit request}}
- Aktualisieren der Einwohnerzahlen (2020: 43'476)
- teilweise falsche Werte und nicht chronologische Reihenfolge erschweren die Kontrolle
- Datenquelle: https://www.pxweb.bfs.admin.ch/sq/71f28156-fafa-47bf-bcc5-2f4724956371
Rene.kernen (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Not done @Rene.kernen: there is some discrepancy with population (P1082). Compare e.g. year 2017, using your source (https://www.pxweb.bfs.admin.ch/sq/71f28156-fafa-47bf-bcc5-2f4724956371) and the source given at the item .--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1 Thx for your answer. Yes, there is indeed some discrepancy with Einwohnerzahl. The reason therefore is, that some values refer to the city of Thun (Q68978) (correct, as the dataset is about the city of Thun) and others refer to Thun administrative district (Q678914). My suggestion is, to delete all values referring to Thun administrative district (Q678914) and updating the values for the city of Thun (Q68978). As a local, I'd be glad to do so :-) Rene.kernen (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Rene.kernen correct solution is to move wrong data to Thun administrative district (Q678914) but due to amount, I don't want to do it. If you see your Preferences, then there is a tool called "moveClaim", it helps Estopedist1 (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1 not sure if the tool "moveClaim" does the right thing. it seems to copy the selected data, not to move them. Now they are in both objects...? Rene.kernen (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Rene.kernen OK, I gave you "autoconfirmed" status. Now I hope you can move statements Estopedist1 (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1 not sure if the tool "moveClaim" does the right thing. it seems to copy the selected data, not to move them. Now they are in both objects...? Rene.kernen (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Rene.kernen correct solution is to move wrong data to Thun administrative district (Q678914) but due to amount, I don't want to do it. If you see your Preferences, then there is a tool called "moveClaim", it helps Estopedist1 (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1 Thx for your answer. Yes, there is indeed some discrepancy with Einwohnerzahl. The reason therefore is, that some values refer to the city of Thun (Q68978) (correct, as the dataset is about the city of Thun) and others refer to Thun administrative district (Q678914). My suggestion is, to delete all values referring to Thun administrative district (Q678914) and updating the values for the city of Thun (Q68978). As a local, I'd be glad to do so :-) Rene.kernen (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
