Property talk:P65
Documentation
the place where an astronomical object was discovered (observatory, satellite)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#Type Q6999, Q751989, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#Value type Q17334923, Q1254933, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#Item P575, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P65#Scope, SPARQL
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
Clarification
[edit]should be merged with Property:P189? JAn Dudík (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- if I have understood correctly, there is a bit difference with Property:P189: Property:P65 means where the discoverer is (e.g. observatory, satellite...), not where the discovered object is. --Paperoastro (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Value type constraint
[edit]According to the property’s constraints, the value should be of physical location (Q17334923). However, astronomical observatory (Q1254933)—which looks like quite an obvious choice for places where astronomical discoveries are made—is not a subclass of physical location (Q17334923). Actually, based on a rough estimation, this probably accounts for more than 90% of the currently 33797 violations of this constraint (this is more than the half of the total usage!). This should certainly be fixed somehow as astronomical observatories are perfectly valid places of discoveries, but I’m not sure how: should the constraint be relaxed (geographic entity (Q27096213) would fit), or should astronomical observatory (Q1254933)’s class tree be changed somehow? If the latter, how? —Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- All Properties
- Properties with wikibase-item-datatype
- Properties used on 10000+ items
- Properties with single value constraints
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with qualifiers constraints
- Properties with constraints on items using them
- Properties with entity type constraints
- Properties with scope constraints