This document discusses various philosophies of ethics and epistemology, principles of educational assessment and evaluation, and Stufflebeam's CIPP model of evaluation. It also provides exercises for readers to discuss and apply these concepts. Specifically, it outlines subjectivist and objectivist ethics, subjectivist and objectivist epistemology, and utilitarianism. It then lists 9 principles of educational assessment covering validity, reliability, transparency, inclusiveness, and the role of feedback. Finally, it explains the key components of Stufflebeam's CIPP model - context, input, process, and product - and provides an example of applying this model to evaluate a mathematics program.
This document discusses various philosophies of ethics and epistemology, principles of educational assessment and evaluation, and Stufflebeam's CIPP model of evaluation. It also provides exercises for readers to discuss and apply these concepts. Specifically, it outlines subjectivist and objectivist ethics, subjectivist and objectivist epistemology, and utilitarianism. It then lists 9 principles of educational assessment covering validity, reliability, transparency, inclusiveness, and the role of feedback. Finally, it explains the key components of Stufflebeam's CIPP model - context, input, process, and product - and provides an example of applying this model to evaluate a mathematics program.
This document discusses various philosophies of ethics and epistemology, principles of educational assessment and evaluation, and Stufflebeam's CIPP model of evaluation. It also provides exercises for readers to discuss and apply these concepts. Specifically, it outlines subjectivist and objectivist ethics, subjectivist and objectivist epistemology, and utilitarianism. It then lists 9 principles of educational assessment covering validity, reliability, transparency, inclusiveness, and the role of feedback. Finally, it explains the key components of Stufflebeam's CIPP model - context, input, process, and product - and provides an example of applying this model to evaluate a mathematics program.
This document discusses various philosophies of ethics and epistemology, principles of educational assessment and evaluation, and Stufflebeam's CIPP model of evaluation. It also provides exercises for readers to discuss and apply these concepts. Specifically, it outlines subjectivist and objectivist ethics, subjectivist and objectivist epistemology, and utilitarianism. It then lists 9 principles of educational assessment covering validity, reliability, transparency, inclusiveness, and the role of feedback. Finally, it explains the key components of Stufflebeam's CIPP model - context, input, process, and product - and provides an example of applying this model to evaluate a mathematics program.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
CHAPTER EXERCISES
A. Discuss the following evaluation philosophies:
- Subjectivist ethics - Ethical subjectivism is the meta-ethical view which claims that: Ethical sentences express propositions. - Objectivist ethics - The Objectivist ethics rebuilds morality from the ground up. - Subjectivist epistemology - A "subjectivist epistemology" is one that implies the standards of rational belief are those of the individual believer or those of the believer's community. - Objectivist epistemology - Objectivism holds that, in a sense, all facts are "necessary": all knowledge is knowledge of identity, i.e., a statement that an entity (or aspect, potentiality, condition etc. of an entity) is what in fact it is - Utilitarianism - is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong by focusing on outcomes. It is a form of consequentialism. B. State and discuss the basic principles in educational assessment and evaluation. - Principle 1 - Assessment should be valid Validity ensures that assessment tasks and associated criteria effectively measure student attainment of the intended learning outcomes at the appropriate level. - Principle 2 - Assessment should be reliable and consistent There is a need for assessment to be reliable and this requires clear and consistent processes for the setting, marking, grading and moderation of assignments. - Principle 3 - Information about assessment should be explicit, accessible and transparent Clear, accurate, consistent and timely information on assessment tasks and procedures should be made available to students, staff and other external assessors or examiners. - Principle 4 - Assessment should be inclusive and equitable As far as is possible without compromising academic standards, inclusive and equitable assessment should ensure that tasks and procedures do not disadvantage any group or individual. - Principle 5 - Assessment should be an integral part of programme design and should relate directly to the programme aims and learning outcomes Assessment tasks should primarily reflect the nature of the discipline or subject but should also ensure that students have the opportunity to develop a range of generic skills and capabilities. - Principle 6 - The amount of assessed work should be manageable The scheduling of assignments and the amount of assessed work required should provide a reliable and valid profile of achievement without overloading staff or students. - Principle 7 - Formative and summative assessment should be included in each programme Formative and summative assessment should be incorporated into programmes to ensure that the purposes of assessment are adequately addressed. Many programmes may also wish to include diagnostic assessment. - Principle 8 - Timely feedback that promotes learning and facilitates improvement should be an integral part of the assessment process Students are entitled to feedback on submitted formative assessment tasks, and on summative tasks, where appropriate. The nature, extent and timing of feedback for each assessment task should be made clear to students in advance. - Principle 9 - Staff development policy and strategy should include assessment All those involved in the assessment of students must be competent to undertake their roles and responsibilities. C. Consider Stufflebvisteam’s CIPP evaluation model. What are the essential components of: Context? Provides information for the development of evaluation of mission, vision, values, goals, objectives, and priorities. Input? provides information for the development of program designs through evaluation of data bases, internal and external stakeholders’ interests, WOTS UP? (Weaknesses, Strengths, Threats, and Opportunities) Process? develop ongoing evaluation of the implementation of major strategies through various tactical programs to accept, refine, or correct the program design (i.e. evaluation of recruitment, orientation, transition, and retention of first year students). Product? Evaluation of the outcome of the program to decide to accept, amend, or terminate the program, using criteria directly related to the goals and objectives (i.e. put desired student outcomes into question form and survey pre- and post-). D. Using Stufflebeams CIPP model, conduct a self-assessment to evaluate your own Mathematics program in your school. MATHEMATICS PROGRAM CONTENT INPUT PROCESS PRODUCT (GOALS) (CONTENT)
E. What are the political dimensions involved in educational evaluation?
Discuss these dimensions thoroughly. - Elitist, is the belief or attitude that individuals who form an elite—a select group of people with an intrinsic quality, high intellect, wealth, special skills, or experience—are more likely to be constructive to society as a whole, and therefore deserve influence or authority greater than that of others. - Mass Based, Mass is both a property of a physical body and a measure of its resistance to acceleration (a change in its state of motion) when a net force is applied. An object's mass also determines the strength of its gravitational attraction to other bodies. The basic SI unit of mass is the kilogram (kg).