Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2024-12

Add links
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiknow accounts

The 1st user has a username block due to a corporate username, and the article was made by them and deleted with QD G11 by user:Fr33kman. After the QD G11 deletion and the previous block, the 2nd user came here and attempted recreation with triggering the abuse filter (Special:AbuseLog/551606, Special:AbuseLog/551604, Special:AbuseLog/551602), possible WP:EVASION? MathXplore (talk) 14:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once confirmed, please switch the 1st user's username block to a CU-block. MathXplore (talk) 14:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed and blocked fr33kman 15:50, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 19:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Qara-Hamid accounts

Previously, the 1st and 4th user was working on this article. After the previous CU result (Special:Diff/9889010, done by user:BRPever, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd user are confirmed to each other, and the 4th and 5th user is confirmed to each other.) and blocks based on WP:3RR issues, the article has been deleted by user:Vermont. Now, the article has been recreated by the 6th user and we are seeing WP:3RR issues again. MathXplore (talk) 02:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: Already CU-blocked/locked. MathXplore (talk) 02:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already? I did a checkuser here because of the report that was on the SRG page, by the way. You could also wait before confirmations of these checks before putting it on there. --Bsadowski1 02:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sorry for the rush. MathXplore (talk) 02:57, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 19:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qajar-Wahhabi War accounts

As seen in the deleted revisions of the article and w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nuraddin_historys13/Archive#22_November_2024, the 1st, 2nd, and the 3rd user was working hard on this subject, but they were blocked based on a previous CU result (Special:Diff/9889010, done by user:BRPever) and the article was deleted by user:Vermont. Now, the article has been quickly recreated by an IP editor and the 4th/5th user has appeared to maintain it. Please note that the 4th/5th user has only made edits around this subject. Can they be related to the 1st, 2nd, and the 3rd user? MathXplore (talk) 03:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last two accounts are Red X Unrelated based on technical data.--BRP ever 13:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 19:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donovan Shavis accounts

The 1st and 2nd user is locked as xwa by user:Bsadowski1. After the previous global locks, the 3rd and 4th user appeared on this article which creation and deletion is repeated, possible LTA target. If the new users are related to the locked accounts above, can they stay in this project? MathXplore (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Special:AbuseLog/551999 and Special:AbuseLog/551995 for the relations between the 1st, 2nd and 3rd user. MathXplore (talk) 04:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All accounts have been blocked/locked by Bsadowski1.--BRP ever 13:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 11:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Openfabric AI accounts

The 1st user is the author of this article and the 2nd user uploaded File:Openfabric.png. The 3rd user removed tags from the article (special:diff/9917531) and there is also an IP editor that did the same tag removal (special:diff/9917554). I believe there is an abuse of logout edits. MathXplore (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The checks don't overlap. The data show that the user agent is the same but there is no IP overlap. Therefore we have to say it's not confirmed. fr33kman 02:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Thank you for the feedback, but I have an update for this case. A new user (Xuyna (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))) has appeared on the same page to remove maintainance tags (special:diff/9926118, special:diff/9926121). Can this be related? MathXplore (talk) 02:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the user agent is the same but there is no IP overlap. fr33kman 03:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nyanzi Martin Luther accounts

I'm seeing several users and IPs advertising the same person. The 1st user did this in their user page, etc. (User:Bobobbtt and Example article name deleted by user:Fr33kman), and the 2nd user did this in Special:DeletedContributions/Katoproo. Please also see Special:AbuseLog/552768 and Special:AbuseLog/552781 for related abuse filter logs caused by IP users. MathXplore (talk) 02:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed and blocked fr33kman 03:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 23:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting User:Nsochido

The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd user have CU-blocks based on Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-11#Editors_removing_QD/RFD_templates_from_Pamela_N._Furr (done by user:BRPever), and the 1st user is now locked based on the activity overlap with the 4th and 5th user (CU-blocked by user:Bsadowski1) at w:Bashir Y Jamoh, where more blocked/locked users can be found. I recently found another new user (6th user) around them. The 6th user's only edit in enwiki was part of a content dispute in w:Sadique Abubakar, and the similarity between w:special:diff/1259096995 and w:special:diff/1258904266 show that the 1st and 6th user share the same intent. Please also note that there is another locked user (7th user) who joined editing w:Sadique Abubakar (w:special:diff/1254298990, only edit in enwiki), and the 7th user also has a CU-block in this project. Please also note that the 6th user's only creation in this project is Prophet Israel Oladele (pastor from Nigeria), which is another popular subject for the block evaders in this project (Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive21#Isaiah4christ, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive21#Isaiah_Oghenevwegba_Ogedegbe). MathXplore (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone is blocked except for one account. I don't see what a check will accomplish here. fr33kman 16:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Thank you for the feedback. I have reported this as a possible WP:EVASION case. MathXplore (talk) 11:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MathXplore Rightw2 is  Possible, but they have shown obvious UPE behavior as other socks, so I am blocking this one. BRP ever 11:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks fr33kman 17:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BRPever and Fr33kman: Thank you very much. I have found another recent user (possible WP:EVASION, Chisomvincent (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))) who made Josiah Akinloye Gboluwaga (another Nigerian BLP with similar impression), and this user has activity overlap at Dele Kelvin Oye with Special:Contributions/Lagwai, Special:Contributions/Dele_Kelvin_Oye, and Special:Contributions/Bamalli01 (blocked/locked users with similar Nigerian BLP creation). MathXplore (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser says no overlap fr33kman 01:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 23:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Farsad (rapper) accounts

This report is related to this article, its RFD (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Farsad (rapper)), and its Wikidata item (d:Q127698895).

The 1st user is the author of the article, and the 4th user is named after the subject. The 4th user is mainly focused on RFDs, and while many of their opinions are w:WP:PERNOM-like comments, Special:Diff/9931930 shows a stronger interest than other RFDs. The 4th user also promoted the same subject in en:n:Special:Diff/4686264. In addition, the 1st and 4th user has activity overlaps at w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadaei (please see w:special:diff/1254060000 for example). Also, the 4th user made the same subject in enwiki (w:special:permalink/1254216483, w:special:redirect/logid/97419798, w:special:redirect/logid/122132706).

The 2nd user is another new participant that appeared in the RFD (Special:Diff/9910765), and this is their only one vote in RFDs as of today. The 2nd user recently requested assistance for page creation (User_talk:MathXplore/2024/11#25_November_2024), but in my opinion their RFD comment is very unusual for a user who may need assistance.

The 3rd user has a similar name to the 2nd user, they edited d:Q127698895 (Wikidata item for the article, d:special:diff/2280730600), and the 3rd user is locked as a LTA. MathXplore (talk) 12:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see special:diff/9909050 for the activity overlaps between the first and second users in the article. MathXplore (talk) 13:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed plus one more which is globally blocked fr33kman 17:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Tito11 years" and "Luisraimundotito"

Hi, I believe the users Tito11 years and Luisraimundotito are the same person, Both have made the exact same edits to articles and both have created fish bites, Tito11 is CU indeffed on enwiki too,

Both are quacking at this point however as of writing this SRG haven't done anything so I assume I need to come here first ? (which seems a whole waste of time if they're CU blocked on enwiki?, Am I doing this backwards? feels like I am but seems like I'm the only person at SRG that sees the quacking here?), If I'm being impatient then I apologise but usually when SRG ignores a report it 9/10 means they don't see a problem, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, they quack like a duck... a closer look revealed... a duck... so rejoice... free blocks for everyone... Eptalon (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Eptalon Brilliant thanks so much for your extremely quick actions, I'll add this to the report in the hope something happens, Suspect not but it's worth a bash, Thanks again, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 22:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Crime Break editing

Cyber Crime Break was an article recreated multiple times by two now globally locked editors. Cyber Crime Break Org was created by an IP but then significant edits from AERCTANGE. They've removed QD and RFD tags multiple times [1], [2]. Same with Jaydatt Mahendra Khodave, [3]. There's also some promotional editing by Jaydatt Mahendra Khodave around The Blaze Times. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-checkuser observation) The bottom user is now globally locked and the middle user has been blocked by MathXplore indefinitely.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AERCTANGE and Technial kukar are  Confirmed. Jaydatt Mahendra Khodave is between possible and likely technically but it's already locked/blocked.--BRP ever 11:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @BRPever, Ajmal V Mohammed has popped up and randomly removed the RFD tag from PRXDUM (an article AERCTANGE created), I assume this is another sock?, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed with AERCTANGE.--BRP ever 16:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BRPever, got a new customer for ya. RefferenceGurU recreated Radar Chronicle [4], originally created by AERCTANGE [5].Ravensfire (talk) 00:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already blocked and globally locked. BRP ever 11:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 15:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts around Chris M. Walker and Chris M Walker

I previously deleted Chris M. Walker per QD G5 by the 1st user. The article has been recreated as Chris M Walker, and a new user quickly joined Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Chris M Walker (Special:Diff/9936069). MathXplore (talk) 12:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at both users, and no, they don't overlap; they use diffewnt browsers and are from different countries, so CU-wise this likely isn't the same user. Eptalon (talk) 22:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 04:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Williams

There's a long term spammer who creates articles about "Sam Williams" (sometimes "Joseph Williams") which use incorrect sources about other people with similar names. Several of their accounts were blocked at RFCU in November. The first one listed here is a new account that appeared today.

Depextual (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already cu-blocked and locked.-- BRP ever 04:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 04:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting the Battle of Qara-Hamid accounts

Possible WP:EVASION around this article. After the previous CU-blocks at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-12#Battle_of_Qara-Hamid_accounts by Bsadowski1, more new users have joined here to continue the content dispute of the previous accounts. Despite having lower edit counts, many of them were able to find this article. The 7th and 9th user made statements about casualities with similar scale ([6], [7]) trying to deny the claim of being "unknown" made by their opponents (such as the 4th user, [8]). The 1st user is the author of this article and the 6th user has tried to blank this page (see the deleted edits like [9]), and the page history is a conflict among them. I guess the 7th and 9th user is on the same of the 1st user and the 8th user who tagged this page ([10]) is on the same side with the 6th user. MathXplore (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No overlap fr33kman 16:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Thank you for the checks. I have found another user Txseen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)), who tried to blank the article (Special:AbuseLog/555728), just like the 6th user tried to do so. MathXplore (talk) 13:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm that one fr33kman 17:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fiorenzo Manganiello accounts

I'm reporting possible vote stacking at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Fiorenzo Manganiello. The 1st user is the author of the article (special:redirect/logid/2878432) and joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9928413). Then the 2nd user has appeared and also joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9943973). Please also note that the 2nd user's edits are focused around the article and the RFD, and the 1st user has a history of RFD vote stacking (w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fanalrino/Archive#08_December_2024). MathXplore (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User agents same but IPs are widely different fr33kman 17:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Please note that another new user (Amina Khan12 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))) has joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9950726) with a w:WP:ITSNOTABLE-like statement. MathXplore (talk) 08:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not related fr33kman 10:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So probably some WP:MEAT puppetry happening - always interesting to see brand new accounts magically popup at a RFD. Ravensfire (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adelaideslement8723


Adelaideslement8723 (talk) had created an account named Jayden Johnson 2314 (talk) because "Incase I lose the password to my main one, I have a backup one just in case"[11], They had then confirmed this was their account on their main (Adelaide) account[12]

I was going to let this slide until I saw this which were their previous 10 accounts that were CU-blocked. Their reply over at Simple talk (Yeah, I have learned a lot ever since the incident over at the regular English Wiki... I made a terrible mistake... And I have learned a lot to not make the same) was the other reason for this report - it's obvious nothing has been learnt from their block at Enwiki and whilst mistakes do happen creating an account 7 months after your other 10 accounts were indeffed isn't a mistake ... it's a pattern. Anyway I believe this user has just used their remaining WP:ONESTRIKE life, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No please don't! Please don't block me! I cant deal with blocking anymore! :( ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
II REALLY HAVE LEARNED A LOT!! Just please... don't.. don't do it... ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please know that Adelaide has completely blanked their username page and replaced it with “retired” as their latest diff on their user page, most likely of the chance of their being blocked/locked. I also don’t really see the purpose of them using Adelaide and using JJ 2314. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 03:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why just why... I cant believe this... ALL BECAUSE OF ONE RULE!! ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I JUST WANTED TO HAVE AN ALT JUST IN CASE I LOSE MY PASSWROD... BUT YOU JUST DONT LISTEN DO YOU?! ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The rules are very important. And please do not all-caps people, thank you very much. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 03:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I KNOW THAT! Its just... I don't want to get blocked ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is SRG for LTA?? ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, I don't think that running a checkuser is required; the user admitted to having two accounts. Let me just stress that it might be good to look at Wikipedia:Competence is required. As far as I can tell, blocks/bans are currently not required. When you edit though, try to do changes that are helpful. Eptalon (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Eptalon, My apologies, I searched WP:SPI and didn't think much beyond that - Of course this is Requests for checkuser and as such a CU isn't needed, That being said I'm disappointed they've not been blocked as as of writing this they've still been using both accounts, I'll request a block at ANI, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN intolerant pusher over Jats article

Smjdcschool (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

2402:3A80:4561:8D6B:6E10:8D86:659E:93A8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

selectively making similar dispersed changing in such patern which can provoke sentimental intoxication of other user furthermore their tendency removing the same Jadgal sentence or reference and rapidly making inconvenient changes which can trigger the patrolling sanction for such disruptive behaviour regardless some other user also raged out of their behaviour and remark their insensible causing over WP:AN often seems out of contradict handling 2401:4900:5952:6FD9:460:60FF:FEDE:ED95 (talk) 12:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-checkuser observation) Not sure if there is anything for checkusers to do here, since any action could be considered linking account to IP (something that is strictly forbidden by WMF policy).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's true; I cannot publicly link an IP address and an account. When it comes to blocking, any admin can do that, based on the behaviour of the respective user (or UP). Eptalon (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 03:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Channel i Music Awards accounts

I'm reporting possible WP:EVASION around here. The 1st user has made many QD A3 cases and then they have been blocked by Fr33kman. After the block, the 1st user has been identified as LTA by a steward. Recently, the 2nd user picked up their remaining page creations and started working on it with logged-in and logged-out mode (special:diff/9961841, special:diff/9961844). MathXplore (talk) 08:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the 2nd user has recreated Channel i, which was originally made by the 1st user. MathXplore (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed by user agent and ISP plus found one more account, now blocked. Thx fr33kman 20:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-12&oldid=9972413"