User talk:Zppix

I need your help in labelling!

ORES needs many edits to be classified, so please go here to help. Thank-you, _{Adotchar| reply here} 22:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of that IP's changes

I don't see what's wrong with that IP's edits. Unless you can be specific about what's wrong with them, please stop reverting them. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that they are removing wiki-links, and then immediately re-adding them. They are deliberately making mass edits. --Zppix (talk) 03:20, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the over-all changes, they are constructive. They have corrected some incorrect information, for example. Please stop reverting their edits, although, you might want to ask that they try to consolidate their edits. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will do the aforementioned. I apologise. --Zppix (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted your request for the ability to “roll-back”. Please hold responsibility for your actions. -- Enfcer (talk) 17:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Enfcer: I will take extra pre-cautions; thank-you! --Zppix (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, Zppix. When you revert a user's changes, like you did earlier, don't forget to leave the user a message on their talk page, especially when reverting vandalism or a test edit. You may find Template:User talk page warnings/table useful when doing this, to let them know that the change was considered inappropriate, and to direct them to the sandbox. Thank you. The templates are also in Twinkle and will allow the proper notifications so that we may eventually block if needed but policy requires us to give notices (with few exceptions) PotsdamLamb (talk) 20:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PotsdamLamb: this was a revert assuming good faith, therefore a UW is not needed, also, please do not template the regulars. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 22:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry about that. PotsdamLamb (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to note that this was an editing test, and IMO you should let them know that you reverted it. There is a uw template for editing tests {{uw-test1}}.
Also, en:WP:DTR is an essay, not a guideline. —Belwine (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History of horror films article on English Wikipedia

Dear Zppix I need your help on English Wikipedia can you restore the 2010s section and the 2020s section for the history of horror films article and make sure you move the list of horror films of the 2020s link back underneath the 2020s section. 2600:1700:EA00:51A0:5CB4:23FA:5C8D:C946 (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]