Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 03:06, 21 December 2024 by SpBot (talk | changes) (archive 2 sections: 2 to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2024-12 (after section Accounts_around_Chris_M._Walker_and_Chris_M_Walker) - previous edit: Davey2010, 2024-12-21 01:37)
For the place to request access to the tool, see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions.
Shortcuts

CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and IP addresses). Some administrators are able to check if two or more accounts have been used from the same computer. These users also see User agents. This can help them decide if two accounts are related in the way described above. It is also possible to see if a user is editing from an open proxy.

On this page, users can request some users or IPs to be checked. Good reasons should be given for why a checkuser is needed; you should provide links which show the questionable edits, etc. Questions should usually be created so that they can be answered by yes or no. Responses will be short in order to comply with Wikipedia privacy policy. Sensitive information (like the IP addresses used by an account) are usually not reported. The results are not always clear, and a decision should not be made only on the basis of checkuser results.

Use of the tool

This tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to the project.

The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to vote more than once or to make it look like more people support an idea). Checkusers will refuse a request, if the reason for checking is not good enough to warrant the use of the tool.

Please see the CheckUser policy for all the rules related to CheckUser.

The list of users with CheckUser access can be seen at: Special:ListUsers/checkuser.



SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days. For the archive overview, see Archive.

Current requests

Recent problematic cross-namespace pagemovers

I would like to note that several users are moving non-userpages to userspace with similar tone (complicated language that may not make sense) and vice versa. The 2nd user has WP:ONESTRIKE for this reason. In w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krishan avatar, an editor pointed out similarities between the 1st and 3rd user (who is equal to the 4th-11th user, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Behgal_Jats_accounts, Special:Diff/9737930, w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Truthfindervert/Khalsajudicary). Both the 1st and 3rd user has interests in similar South Asian history topics, and have a history of problematic page moves (examples are explained in Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Behgal_Jats_accounts and Special:Diff/9737930). MathXplore (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that the users like to move pages with semi-protection (especially the 1st and 2nd users). MathXplore (talk) 05:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will also add Repulsive hegemony card (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) for doing similar page moves against semi-protected entries. MathXplore (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: The user is locked. MathXplore (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: 1st and 2nd user is locked, please see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Balakashyap/Archive#27_August_2024. MathXplore (talk) 00:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting the Battle of Qara-Hamid accounts

Possible WP:EVASION around this article. After the previous CU-blocks at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-12#Battle_of_Qara-Hamid_accounts by Bsadowski1, more new users have joined here to continue the content dispute of the previous accounts. Despite having lower edit counts, many of them were able to find this article. The 7th and 9th user made statements about casualities with similar scale ([1], [2]) trying to deny the claim of being "unknown" made by their opponents (such as the 4th user, [3]). The 1st user is the author of this article and the 6th user has tried to blank this page (see the deleted edits like [4]), and the page history is a conflict among them. I guess the 7th and 9th user is on the same of the 1st user and the 8th user who tagged this page ([5]) is on the same side with the 6th user. MathXplore (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No overlap fr33kman 16:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Thank you for the checks. I have found another user Txseen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)), who tried to blank the article (Special:AbuseLog/555728), just like the 6th user tried to do so. MathXplore (talk) 13:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm that one fr33kman 17:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. BRP ever 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fiorenzo Manganiello accounts

I'm reporting possible vote stacking at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Fiorenzo Manganiello. The 1st user is the author of the article (special:redirect/logid/2878432) and joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9928413). Then the 2nd user has appeared and also joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9943973). Please also note that the 2nd user's edits are focused around the article and the RFD, and the 1st user has a history of RFD vote stacking (w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fanalrino/Archive#08_December_2024). MathXplore (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User agents same but IPs are widely different fr33kman 17:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Please note that another new user (Amina Khan12 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))) has joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9950726) with a w:WP:ITSNOTABLE-like statement. MathXplore (talk) 08:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not related fr33kman 10:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So probably some WP:MEAT puppetry happening - always interesting to see brand new accounts magically popup at a RFD. Ravensfire (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. BRP ever 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN intolerant pusher over Jats article

Smjdcschool (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

2402:3A80:4561:8D6B:6E10:8D86:659E:93A8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

selectively making similar dispersed changing in such patern which can provoke sentimental intoxication of other user furthermore their tendency removing the same Jadgal sentence or reference and rapidly making inconvenient changes which can trigger the patrolling sanction for such disruptive behaviour regardless some other user also raged out of their behaviour and remark their insensible causing over WP:AN often seems out of contradict handling 2401:4900:5952:6FD9:460:60FF:FEDE:ED95 (talk) 12:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-checkuser observation) Not sure if there is anything for checkusers to do here, since any action could be considered linking account to IP (something that is strictly forbidden by WMF policy).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adelaideslement8723

Adelaideslement8723 (talk) had created an account named Jayden Johnson 2314 (talk) because "Incase I lose the password to my main one, I have a backup one just in case"[6], They had then confirmed this was their account on their main (Adelaide) account[7]

I was going to let this slide until I saw this which were their previous 10 accounts that were CU-blocked. Their reply over at Simple talk (Yeah, I have learned a lot ever since the incident over at the regular English Wiki... I made a terrible mistake... And I have learned a lot to not make the same) was the other reason for this report - it's obvious nothing has been learnt from their block at Enwiki and whilst mistakes do happen creating an account 7 months after your other 10 accounts were indeffed isn't a mistake ... it's a pattern. Anyway I believe this user has just used their remaining WP:ONESTRIKE life, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&oldid=9959802"