Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Earlier diffNewer diff →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 107: Line 107:
*{{checkuser|Wikicommonsmr}}
*{{checkuser|Wikicommonsmr}}
I'm reporting possible [[WP:EVASION]] around here. The 1st user has made many QD A3 cases and then they have been blocked by {{u|Fr33kman}}. After the block, the 1st user has been identified as LTA by a steward. Recently, the 2nd user picked up their remaining page creations and started working on it with logged-in and logged-out mode ([[special:diff/9961841]], [[special:diff/9961844]]). [[User:MathXplore|MathXplore]] ([[User talk:MathXplore|talk]]) 08:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm reporting possible [[WP:EVASION]] around here. The 1st user has made many QD A3 cases and then they have been blocked by {{u|Fr33kman}}. After the block, the 1st user has been identified as LTA by a steward. Recently, the 2nd user picked up their remaining page creations and started working on it with logged-in and logged-out mode ([[special:diff/9961841]], [[special:diff/9961844]]). [[User:MathXplore|MathXplore]] ([[User talk:MathXplore|talk]]) 08:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
: In addition, the 2nd user has recreated [[Channel i]], which was originally made by the 1st user. [[User:MathXplore|MathXplore]] ([[User talk:MathXplore|talk]]) 08:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:29, 22 December 2024

For the place to request access to the tool, see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions.
Shortcuts

CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and IP addresses). Some administrators are able to check if two or more accounts have been used from the same computer. These users also see User agents. This can help them decide if two accounts are related in the way described above. It is also possible to see if a user is editing from an open proxy.

On this page, users can request some users or IPs to be checked. Good reasons should be given for why a checkuser is needed; you should provide links which show the questionable edits, etc. Questions should usually be created so that they can be answered by yes or no. Responses will be short in order to comply with Wikipedia privacy policy. Sensitive information (like the IP addresses used by an account) are usually not reported. The results are not always clear, and a decision should not be made only on the basis of checkuser results.

Use of the tool

This tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to the project.

The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to vote more than once or to make it look like more people support an idea). Checkusers will refuse a request, if the reason for checking is not good enough to warrant the use of the tool.

Please see the CheckUser policy for all the rules related to CheckUser.

The list of users with CheckUser access can be seen at: Special:ListUsers/checkuser.



SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days. For the archive overview, see Archive.

Current requests

Recent problematic cross-namespace pagemovers

I would like to note that several users are moving non-userpages to userspace with similar tone (complicated language that may not make sense) and vice versa. The 2nd user has WP:ONESTRIKE for this reason. In w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krishan avatar, an editor pointed out similarities between the 1st and 3rd user (who is equal to the 4th-11th user, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Behgal_Jats_accounts, Special:Diff/9737930, w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Truthfindervert/Khalsajudicary). Both the 1st and 3rd user has interests in similar South Asian history topics, and have a history of problematic page moves (examples are explained in Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive22#Behgal_Jats_accounts and Special:Diff/9737930). MathXplore (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that the users like to move pages with semi-protection (especially the 1st and 2nd users). MathXplore (talk) 05:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will also add Repulsive hegemony card (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) for doing similar page moves against semi-protected entries. MathXplore (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: The user is locked. MathXplore (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: 1st and 2nd user is locked, please see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Balakashyap/Archive#27_August_2024. MathXplore (talk) 00:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting the Battle of Qara-Hamid accounts

Possible WP:EVASION around this article. After the previous CU-blocks at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-12#Battle_of_Qara-Hamid_accounts by Bsadowski1, more new users have joined here to continue the content dispute of the previous accounts. Despite having lower edit counts, many of them were able to find this article. The 7th and 9th user made statements about casualities with similar scale ([1], [2]) trying to deny the claim of being "unknown" made by their opponents (such as the 4th user, [3]). The 1st user is the author of this article and the 6th user has tried to blank this page (see the deleted edits like [4]), and the page history is a conflict among them. I guess the 7th and 9th user is on the same of the 1st user and the 8th user who tagged this page ([5]) is on the same side with the 6th user. MathXplore (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No overlap fr33kman 16:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Thank you for the checks. I have found another user Txseen (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)), who tried to blank the article (Special:AbuseLog/555728), just like the 6th user tried to do so. MathXplore (talk) 13:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can't confirm that one fr33kman 17:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. BRP ever 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fiorenzo Manganiello accounts

I'm reporting possible vote stacking at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Fiorenzo Manganiello. The 1st user is the author of the article (special:redirect/logid/2878432) and joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9928413). Then the 2nd user has appeared and also joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9943973). Please also note that the 2nd user's edits are focused around the article and the RFD, and the 1st user has a history of RFD vote stacking (w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fanalrino/Archive#08_December_2024). MathXplore (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User agents same but IPs are widely different fr33kman 17:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: Please note that another new user (Amina Khan12 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))) has joined the RFD (Special:Diff/9950726) with a w:WP:ITSNOTABLE-like statement. MathXplore (talk) 08:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not related fr33kman 10:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So probably some WP:MEAT puppetry happening - always interesting to see brand new accounts magically popup at a RFD. Ravensfire (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. BRP ever 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN intolerant pusher over Jats article

Smjdcschool (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

2402:3A80:4561:8D6B:6E10:8D86:659E:93A8 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

selectively making similar dispersed changing in such patern which can provoke sentimental intoxication of other user furthermore their tendency removing the same Jadgal sentence or reference and rapidly making inconvenient changes which can trigger the patrolling sanction for such disruptive behaviour regardless some other user also raged out of their behaviour and remark their insensible causing over WP:AN often seems out of contradict handling 2401:4900:5952:6FD9:460:60FF:FEDE:ED95 (talk) 12:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-checkuser observation) Not sure if there is anything for checkusers to do here, since any action could be considered linking account to IP (something that is strictly forbidden by WMF policy).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's true; I cannot publicly link an IP address and an account. When it comes to blocking, any admin can do that, based on the behaviour of the respective user (or UP). Eptalon (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. BRP ever 03:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adelaideslement8723


Adelaideslement8723 (talk) had created an account named Jayden Johnson 2314 (talk) because "Incase I lose the password to my main one, I have a backup one just in case"[6], They had then confirmed this was their account on their main (Adelaide) account[7]

I was going to let this slide until I saw this which were their previous 10 accounts that were CU-blocked. Their reply over at Simple talk (Yeah, I have learned a lot ever since the incident over at the regular English Wiki... I made a terrible mistake... And I have learned a lot to not make the same) was the other reason for this report - it's obvious nothing has been learnt from their block at Enwiki and whilst mistakes do happen creating an account 7 months after your other 10 accounts were indeffed isn't a mistake ... it's a pattern. Anyway I believe this user has just used their remaining WP:ONESTRIKE life, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No please don't! Please don't block me! I cant deal with blocking anymore! :( ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
II REALLY HAVE LEARNED A LOT!! Just please... don't.. don't do it... ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please know that Adelaide has completely blanked their username page and replaced it with “retired” as their latest diff on their user page, most likely of the chance of their being blocked/locked. I also don’t really see the purpose of them using Adelaide and using JJ 2314. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 03:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why just why... I cant believe this... ALL BECAUSE OF ONE RULE!! ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I JUST WANTED TO HAVE AN ALT JUST IN CASE I LOSE MY PASSWROD... BUT YOU JUST DONT LISTEN DO YOU?! ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The rules are very important. And please do not all-caps people, thank you very much. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 03:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I KNOW THAT! Its just... I don't want to get blocked ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is SRG for LTA?? ✿༺ 𝒜𝒹𝑒𝓁𝒶𝒾𝒹𝑒 ༻✿🆃🅰🅻🅺 💌 03:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, I don't think that running a checkuser is required; the user admitted to having two accounts. Let me just stress that it might be good to look at Wikipedia:Competence is required. As far as I can tell, blocks/bans are currently not required. When you edit though, try to do changes that are helpful. Eptalon (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Eptalon, My apologies, I searched WP:SPI and didn't think much beyond that - Of course this is Requests for checkuser and as such a CU isn't needed, That being said I'm disappointed they've not been blocked as as of writing this they've still been using both accounts, I'll request a block at ANI, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Eptalon (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts around WikiAlpha and David Balondemu

I would like to report a possible successor of locked LTAs based on LWCU results (1st and 2nd user, both are locked by Yahya). The 1st user is the author of WikiAlpha (special:redirect/logid/2884364, listed up for Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/WikiAlpha), and the 3rd user removed RFD tag from the page (special:diff/9959053). The 1st and 2nd user has activity overlap at d:Q131412851 (Wikidata item for David Balondemu which is deleted by Eptalon). Making a possibly non-notable subject and removing RFD tag are issues, and doing these with several accounts is an incident that should be reviewed by our CUs. Also, any further movement by LTA followers should be seized. MathXplore (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Channel i Music Awards accounts

I'm reporting possible WP:EVASION around here. The 1st user has made many QD A3 cases and then they have been blocked by Fr33kman. After the block, the 1st user has been identified as LTA by a steward. Recently, the 2nd user picked up their remaining page creations and started working on it with logged-in and logged-out mode (special:diff/9961841, special:diff/9961844). MathXplore (talk) 08:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the 2nd user has recreated Channel i, which was originally made by the 1st user. MathXplore (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&oldid=9961859"