• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 3rd, 2024

help-circle
  • The fact it doesn’t have an assembler or linker, and I am doubting it implemented its own lexical analyzer, I almost struggle to call this a compiler.

    The claim it is from scratch is misleading since it has all prior training from open source.

    Building a small compiler for a simple language (C is pretty simple, especially older versions) is a common learning exercise and not difficult. This is very much another situation where ā€œAIā€ created an over simplified version of something with hidden details on how it got there as a way to further push the propaganda that it is so capable.















  • I bump into a lot of peers/colleagues who are always ā€œya but what is intelligenceā€ or simply cannot say no to AI. For a while I’ve tried to use the example that if these ā€œAI codingā€ things are tools, why would I use a tool that’s never perfect? For example I wouldn’t reach for a 10mm wrench that wasn’t 10mm and always rounds off my bolt heads. Of course they have ā€œit could still be usefulā€ responses.

    I’m now realizing most programmers haven’t done a manual labor task that’s important. Or lab science outside of maybe high school biology. And the complete lack of ability to put oneself in the shoes of another makes my rebuttals fall flat. To them everything is a nail and anything could be a hammer if it gets them paid to say so. Moving fast and breaking things works everywhere always.

    For something not just venting I tasked a coworker with some runtime memory relocation and Gemini had this to say about ASLR: Age, Sex, Location Randomization


  • My vibes based thoughts on Quantum bubble: it’s been tried before and never stuck. It’s too science-y for the common folk to buy-in. AI sold fear, crypto sold ā€œownershipā€ and ā€œbanking freedomā€ and of course ā€œFOMO to invest early like imagine buying Apple when it was a $1!ā€, and dotcom sold anything computer.

    But now everyone has computer, crypto questions never answered so it remains in a small capacity still on the ā€œya but what ifā€, and AI isn’t able to actually replace anyone after trillions of dollars poured in so it’s going the way of crypto (will still be around but not in our faces at every turn).

    Quantum just never had and never will have those pulls. Like I remember the attempt to sell fear a decade or more ago when everyone was like ā€œpasswords and encryption become meaningless!ā€ But it was still all hypothetical. Being hardware is a huge part of the fizzle. Software you can make pretty interface and spin up a PoC that doesn’t do anything but you can have someone use the prototype to get the ā€œomggghg it’s realā€ feeling. Without hardware being accessible it just looks like nerds in lab coats and no one cares.


  • A friend at a former workplace was in a discussion with that company leadership earlier this week to understand how and what metrics are to be used for promotion candidates since the office is directed to use ā€œAIā€ tools for coding. Simply put: lots of entry and lower level engineers submit PRs that are co-authored by Claude so it is difficult to measure their actual software development skills to determine if they should get promoted.

    That leadership had no real answers just lots of abstract garbage (vibes essentially) and followed up with telling all the entry levels to reduce the code they write and use the purchased agentic tool.

    Along with this a buddy at a very famous prop shop says the firm decided to freeze all junior hiring and is leaning into only hiring senior+ and replacing juniors with AI. He asked what will happen when the current seniors leave/retire and got hit with shock that would even be considered.