old profile: /u/[email protected]

  • 223 Posts
  • 1.22K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2023

help-circle




  • Fighting over Simple Article Summaries is just the latest fumble by the leadership, a sizable commitment of resources that’s tossed in the dump almost as soon as its off the press.

    It wasn’t off the press, it was announced and in the works but still not close to shipping. Maybe Wikimedia could’ve talked about this great innovative project with the actual Wikipedia community before investing so much money into it.

    International language support is… meh (one area where AI would be a huge benefit, as LLMs really shine in this field).

    What would international language support entail? Translating articles into other languages?



  • Article is not available without registering. As for the title, “destructive” book scanning means you cut off the binding and put the pages in a scanner which easily flips through them and takes the pictures. If you’re not scanning rare old books, this is a perfectly reasonable way to do it, because setting up a scanner for a normal book and manually turning each page to scan it takes a long time (Internet Archive has videos on how they do it, very nice and impressive, and logical since their original mission was scanning old public domain stuff, i.e. published before 1930 or so). If Anthropic will actually legally buy all those thousands upon thousands of books, that will be a pleasant precedent for an AI company.

    Although I very much doubt that random uncritically gathered textual material can “teach their AI tool how to write well”. They’re still pushing for more and more training data, even though it’s clear actual advancement will have to happen (if it can happen) through more refined usage of / training on the data.


  • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    She “clears air” simply with this tweet:

    This is beyond silly. Neither I, nor anybody on my team, ever met, communicated with or invited Jeffrey Epstein to anything.

    (The rest of the article is just irrelevant context to make it longer.)

    Neither informative nor particularly convincing.












  • Sonic is designed to be highly recognisable and interacting with Sonic media necessary means you see Sonic a whole lot, even seeing just a few adverts for the franchise is already enough to make you remember it. Shakespeare’s looks are known only on the basis of a couple of portraits, most of which are probably not even based on Shakespeare’s looks directly, and they’re all completely irrelevant for interacting with Shakespeare’s work.