Using one only because it’s super well known? Sure. It can be well known and scummy. But it can also be well known, trusted, vetted, etc.

And you also probably don’t want to use one that is barely known as there’s the lack of trust, getting, who runs it’s, etc.

Most people haven’t, till they have.

For security, Vanadium (only available on GrapheneOS. For privacy, Tor. Most everything else falls between on the scale.

Stremio + Torrentio is the way to go.

Torrentio has started blocking VPNs.

The sheer volume of communication data is far too large to monitor everything.

By people, sure. Run it through a magical analytical algorithm that flags stuff for people to look? Or if that’s still too much everywhere, they could focus it on a certain area’s towers and process that data. Will it catch everything or not generate false positives? No, it’s not perfect, but I could see it helping them and being done.

I doubt an agency like this would just hoard the info and not proactively use.

Even a lot of offices have moved to VoIP.

Depending on where you go to school, 70% is passing while 50% is not. While “not far off,” one is a C, the other a F.

SMS is mostly used for 2-factor authentication, transaction status.

Which they really shouldn’t as it’s still in the clear. But banks are slow to change, especially if it costs them money. As for mostly, I think it depends on the region. I think I’ve read that the US, Canada, and a few (not all) European countries still use SMS.

I use Signal, which is widely considered the gold standard for E2EE apps, with the client app of Molly specifically (a hardened version of Signal).

they overspend by millions

Because everyone needs their cut.

either way a military tank is better than a civilian grade sedan.

Because they’re two different vehicles, not two different classes of product. If you compare military grade phones to civilian phones, the civilian would be better, and probably cheaper due to not having the buzzwords attached. And I bet a tank made by a private firm for non-government entities would in fact be better and cheaper than a military tank.

I’m not downplaying it or saying it shouldn’t be fixed, but…

Effectively, due to modifications made to the standard Telephony package left the app open to abuse, allowing any installed application on an affected OnePlus device to access SMS and MMS data, along with metadata, “without permission, user interaction, or consent.”

Just another vector. SMS is already plaintext/unencrypted, so shouldn’t be used unless you’re saying something you’re comfortable with the world knowing. Switch to E2EE apps

It’s the whole “if a fine is less than the profit, the fine is just considered a cost of business.”

It’s the only open source Rumble app…

It’s Source Available, not Open Source.

I would like something in between…BTW I’m installing Bazzyte on another PC.

If you’re somewhat familiar with uBlue, Bazzite, and immutables, I’d go with Bluefin (Gnome) or Aurora (KDE). All three are uBlue / based off Fedora, so you don’t have to learn a 2nd OS while working on your current OS (Bazzite).

https://universal-blue.org/

These things will very likely not work on non-proprietary devices.

Depends on your bank. Most work on alternate OS (like GrapheneOS), and of course some don’t. https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compatibility-with-grapheneos/

If an app (especially bank) doesn’t work, I forward them this and try to ELI5 that their current method is flawed and less secure: https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide

How about the ~100 Grammer? Or even just “100 G” if you’re trying to be “hip.”

But when did you set Authy up? I don’t recall when Authy made the change, but it wouldn’t kick you out. It would, however, prevent you from signing in a new device. So if you lose your phone, you might lose access to those tokens…

I wasn’t being pedantic for its own sake, but because the Corp has the capability yet refuse to use it for people’s benefit as they value shareholder profit more. They absolutely could, but won’t. To me, this is worse than not having the ability (won’t).

We get it Corp, you would if you could. Good effort. Wait, you actually can but won’t?

That’s not worse to you?

Yes, so it’s won’t and not can’t. Words matter.

Not with that attitude…and probably will be able to change that with the upcoming administration deregulating everything. Or did you mean won’t instead of can’t?

If that’s the case, DOGE should recommend to replace her with a mirror. Think of the savings.