

Elon Musk doesn’t care about chatgpt killing people either. He’s just marketing.
haw


Elon Musk doesn’t care about chatgpt killing people either. He’s just marketing.


Just double checked, and no they are very much talking about LLM’s. Specifically they were testing gpt-4o, gemini-1.5, llama-3.1, sonnet-3.5, and opus-3 o1. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.04984 And the concerns raised in that paper are legit, but not indicative of consciousness or intent.


It’s wildly difficult to control the output of the black box and that’s hardly llms showing signs of self-preservation. These cries are from people in the industry trying to pretend the models are something that they are not, and cannot ever be. I do agree with the sentiment that we should be prepared to pull the plug on them though, for other reasons.


Hi fives and hugs for keeping it together! And for keeping this community going. It’s a bright light in the dark


We cleared out my hoarder parent’s room so my brother and his kids could move back in with us. My father took ill and was hospitalized for over a week during the madness. On Christmas Eve we had to call 911 for my mother. She’s got a major infection and is being treated for sepsis. I am the only adult in our family that can drive. I got the christmas dinner together (My brother helped a TON.) and kept everyone going. I’ve made dozens of trips to and from the hospital between my parents in the last 3 weeks. I AM SO TIRED. But everyone is alive and mending. I think I did ok.


“This has never been about politics,”
Coward. It absolutely was, and is, about politics. The misinformation has ALWAYS been political. Countering misinformation is inherently political. As someone who’s very existence is considered “political” I politely suggest we drop the apolitical angle and start getting fucking angry and aggressively political. I’m very glad there are organizations out there like his that are doing that work. Just be honest about it.
Thank you.


I appreciate the offer, but I don’t really want to publicly elaborate _


Brendan would never hurt a fly!


Thank you <3 I don’t feel cheerful, just anxious and tired. Oh, so tired.


To add to this, concept art is one of the places I would least like AI to be used in. It utterly fails at being creative and actually creating something fundamentally NEW and the more we use it the more our media will just devolve into remixed homogeneity.


Because the POINT of using AI is to fire all the humans you have to pay. You can’t economically hire people to correct the AI work because it would cost as much, if not more, than paying humans to do the work and then you also have to pay your AI vendor.


Ohhh I get it. So MS should make the AI use mandatory and compulsory!


Loved the censor bleep


He knows what he’s doing


I’m already sitting with the bees


No, they do not think that voters should have a say in the matter.


The title is also weirdly phrased to make it sound like science was wrong. Of course science was wrong. The whole process is based on realizing that our past assumptions were wrong. Every time scientists discover something new, it replaces an old incorrect assumption. These sorts of titles are how you get to the “Mainstream media/science is bogus” track.
of AI and telemetry in Windows 11