Dyskusja wikipedysty:Vituzzu
Changing my username
[edytuj kod]Hi! I confirm the request tochange my username on it.wiki. Khan Tengri (dyskusja) 23:17, 25 sty 2013 (CET)
Hi. Despite your explanations, I still don't understand why you have removed the article of Santarelli from bibliography in this article. I've added this article (not a "long-term abuser") because it's useful and it is included in references (note 10). So I'll restore it again. CarlosPn (dyskusja) 23:17, 28 mar 2014 (CET)
- Hello. Can you explain once again, why did you delete Santarelli from bibliography? I don't understand why you suggest that this source is self-reffering. I saw the electronic version of this position and it has multiple references to a valuable sources. Regards, ptjackyll (zostaw wiadomość) 22:26, 30 mar 2014 (CEST)
- That's why I wrote to you in english. CarlosPn has added this source long time ago and I can assure you, that he is not a long-time abuser. Your explanation during the deleting thi source is blatantly insufficient. Regards, ptjackyll (zostaw wiadomość) 21:14, 11 kwi 2014 (CEST)
- Hello! That's not how it was. I know CarlosPn for a while and he does not work like that. He always uses a very reliable sources and always checks (personally) those sources. He does not add sources without checkicg them. And preview of Santarelli's books are available in the internet (e.g. in google books). I understand your determination in struggling with sockpuppets of Kurt4 but sometimes Santarelli's book is useful and used in good faith. Regards, ptjackyll (zostaw wiadomość) 14:34, 23 lip 2014 (CEST)
Ad: to make a matter absolutely clear, this article has been created as entirely my own work. I don't understand why you have suggested about me: he added that source because he translated the English or French version of that article where the note has been put by one of Kurt4's sockpuppets. You should have noticed, that this article HAS NO INTERWIKI!!!! THERE IS NO "ENGLISH OR FRENCH VERSION" OF THAT ARTICLE!!! I don't understand your action against Santarelli's contribution. Perhaps he failed to follow wikirules and was rightly banned from wikipedia (though I'm not sure whether he should be identified with Kurt4 or his sockpuppets), but this should not discredit his contributions created and published outside wikipedia. He is a scholar with a proper education and has published few books and articles, which meet criteria of reliability. Furthermore, you've blocked entirely the Ereticopedia portal, although it contains many reliable and valuable information and is edited by academic scholars. Daniele Santarelli is only one of its many editors. What is the reason for the total ban? I really don't understand... CarlosPn (dyskusja) 19:15, 23 lip 2014 (CEST)
- You say: I don't care about who actually is the vandal, I only saw lots of vandalisms (and grossly defaming false informations) to keep away from Wikipedia. That's fine, but what these "grossly defaming false informations" have to do with ereticopedia? What do you mean calling it "spam"? And if you really don't care about who is actually the vandal, why you had removed the reference to Santarelli's article, IMHO a move absolutely unjustified? Your explanation concerning the alleged translation was clearly false and this increased my doubts concerning the correctness of your actions. CarlosPn (dyskusja) 21:11, 7 wrz 2014 (CEST)
Odp:Spam
[edytuj kod]Hi Vituzzu, great thanks for your care of pl:wiki! The site was cited not in "Przypisy" (= "References") section but in "Bibliografia" (= "Bibliography"), which is a legal way for putting sources in pl:wiki. However, I have browsed the history and found that the shoesizeconvert* was a fake source, it was not used for confirming any information in the article. So I sighted your revision and cleared the URL from our local whitelist. Regards, Michał Sobkowski dyskusja 18:25, 12 paź 2015 (CEST)