Talk:Future Audiences

Archives /July 2023

Announcing monthly Future Audiences open "office hours"

Hi all, we're going to be kicking off a monthly hour-long "Future Audiences" video call – this will be a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input. This month, I'll be sharing some early results from the ChatGPT plugin experiment, as well as research on social video app creators that may inform some future experimentation on these platforms.

More details:

• When: 14:00-15:00 UTC Thursday August 3
• Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Looking forward to seeing/hearing from you, and if you can't make it this time, no worries – planning to make this a regular monthly meeting. MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 16:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@Waltercolor, @Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), @Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), @Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), @Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), @Bertux, @Sandizer, @Frank Schulenburg, @MJL, @Jklamo, @Sdkb, @Frostly, @Rtnf, @Count Count, @Fuzheado, @Shani (WMF), @Soni, @Theklan, @Heike Gleibs (WMDE), @Tarkowski, @AyourAchtouk, @Bluerasberry, @Adithyak1997, @Psubhashish, @Sobaka, @Alalch E., @Dyork, @Mathglot, @DancingPhilosopher, @Stevesuny, @Oceanflynn, @Kasyap

Pinging to let you know about this meeting next week (see above)! Also, that is a lot of user pinging And I know not everyone keeps up with Meta, so please do get in touch via email (futureaudienceswikimedia.org) and indicate your interest in participating in this and future calls, so that I can just send a quick email update to the group to let you know about next month's call. Thank you, and looking forward to your thoughts/questions! MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

• @MPinchuk: Thanks for the ping. I was unable to attend today's call but look forward to attending future calls. - Dyork (talk) 16:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

• UPDATE: Thanks to all who attended the call! Links to the slides, recording, and notes can all be found here. I'll go back over the notes and if there were any questions that weren't covered, will add them here and do my best to answer in the next few days. Hope to see you next month! MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 19:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

• Questions asked but not covered in the meeting:

1. Are there plans for/progress with a WMF TikTok account as part of this work? We are planning to discuss this with our Communications team in September. A WMF account could be helpful in experimentation, but there are lots of important considerations before proceeding.
2. Are there plans for further (new or assembly of existing) research as part of this work? Content formats, knowledge influencers, subject matter, platform usage? Yes, we definitely want to conduct more research on both how people interact with AI assistants for learning/general knowledge, and to learn more about how and where global youth learn. Ideas/suggestions for research questions are always appreciated!
3. Question: I saw a post by a market researcher who claimed that young people start at TikTok, but when they want more information, they travel from that platform to other (written) platforms on the Internet. How can we be sure what young people actually want? If we added more videos or entertaining content to Wikipedia, then to what extent would that satisfy users? Excellent question and something we're digging into more deeply. The initial results of testing prototypes of more media-rich content (from an admittedly small sample of around a dozen young people) suggested that they preferred the less visually-appealing, more static content because it was more readable. This is something to keep an eye on and continue to investigate as we get a larger sample of user feedback. But yes, we shouldn't assume that just because some experiences (e.g. short video) work on other platforms that they'll translate well to our projects/context.

• Question: one of the beauties of Wikipedia is the Talk page, and this is where a lot of potential engagement lies. Any thoughts on how we might surface this aspect of the tool in things like conversational AI? Great question – the short answer is, we haven't thought too much about this yet, but I'd love to talk more and hear ideas if anyone has them!

Ideas/suggestions:

1. Focus on conveying originality/authority in media contributions and all content when more and more content is being synthesized. (Provenance of media metadata; use AI to merge source information, find duplicates and identify sources; use AI to create audiovisual narratives based on well-sourced information)
2. Re the work on the approach to AI: I am wondering about the sense of interactivity that ChatGPT offers with its slight pause and “thinking” that gives it a sense of human-ness and that perception that it’s happening in real time is part of the level of interest. (Ironic, since WP is entirely created by humans…) While this is a totally inaccurate perception, it provides a sense of interactivity that is much more dynamic than Wikipedia’s pages of static comment.

• Idea: This may be pointing toward a future recommendation about providing different options about how people read WP than the straightforward single option about how people edit WP. The bars for both of these uses are different but their current approach is the same.

MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Environmental impact of ChatGPT plugin (and other AI tools)

Hi – I hope that I am in the right place to ask this question: I read that currently available AI tools such as ChatGPT use absurd amounts of energy, both during the training of the algorithm and for generating outputs. Therefore, I am wondering if and how this also applies to our new ChatGPT plugin (and any other AI-related Wikimedia 'ventures'). Has someone already started looking into this issue? How will this be factored into the WMF environmental sustainability report? Thank you, Gnom (talk) 23:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Gnom! I'm the Director of ML for Wikimedia. That is a really good question. You are right to point out that inference with large models at ChatGPT (although they aren't saying how large, but it is definitely large) is expensive in terms of energy. That said, the best way to think about would be that our plug-in doesn't use ChatGPT, instead ChatGPT uses our plug-in, meaning the only additional energy usage would be from the plug-in itself. Put another way, our plug-in doesn't actually have any AI or ML in it, it simply searches Wikipedia using the regular search API for the most relevant articles and provides those to ChatGPT. The plug-in itself is only a few hundred lines of code takes little resources to run. It would easily run on your laptop without any issues. We also haven't purchased any additional servers or anything to run the plug-in, so any energy impact is negligible for this experiment.

If this experiment was a big success and folks wanted to scale up then we would have to add dedicated servers, at which point we should factor it into our environmental reporting. CAlbon (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response, @CAlbon (WMF). Gnom (talk) 07:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields, the main requirement is to be interested enough in the topic that you want to spend time in the call.

More details:

• When: 14:00–15:00 UTC Thursday September 14
• Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions, and you can read more about questions asked at the last meeting above. We're looking forward to seeing/hearing from you. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Ping Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani (WMF), Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot, DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, who have previously showed interest in these calls. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

This is two days from now! Johan (WMF) (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

FYI: The presentation slides, the video recording (part 1 and part 2, and notes are now available. LWyatt (WMF) (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Getting content creators to cite Wikipedia

@MPinchuk (WMF) and @LWyatt (WMF), following up from the call earlier, I had a few thoughts on getting content creators to cite Wikipedia that I wanted to share.

Fundamentally, this is a question of incentives, since people are never going to do something en masse unless they find the pros of it outweigh the cons. Currently, the main incentives that come to mind for citing work overall (not just from Wikipedia) are:

Pros

• It increases audience trust in your content by making it seem well-researched.
• In some cases it reduces the chance that the entity you're building your work off of gets mad at you.

Cons

• It's very time-consuming
• Depending on the quality of the source, some may use it to discredit your content.
• Depending on how you use the source, some people in your audience may judge you for ripping it off (e.g. think you're lazy).

The way that this tends to work out in practice is that some of the highest-quality content cites sources, since they value audience trust and have the capacity to make citations. This is despite YouTube/TikTok having no native way to do citations, making it a clunky process. I like the approach of the Real Science YouTube channel, which has numbers pop up in the corner every time a fact is mentioned, which then leads to a link to the source in the video description. But beyond that realm, most content isn't citing sources, since they either don't have the capacity to do so or think it would reflect badly on them if they did.

Efforts to get people to cite Wikipedia could try to minimize any of the cons. For the time-consumption one, the clear path there would be to get YouTube or TikTok to introduce tools to make it easier to cite sources. This would also likely increase the number of viewers who would check out those sources (which is a plus for us as a source but not for the platforms if it takes people away from them).

For the quality issue, the big problem here is the decades-old refrain in everyone's mind about "Wikipedia is not a reliable source." Marketing to change cultural attitudes about using Wikipedia would be the (admittedly difficult) path there. It's complicated by the fact that, yes, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Personally, when I'm sharing something, sometimes in addition to citing the direct source of information, I'll also give "discovery credit," i.e. this is the person/aggregator/etc. that led me to discover the original source. That's ideally what we'd want content creators to be giving Wikipedia, and to be ultimately citing Wikipedia references rather than Wikipedia itself. But if getting people to cite sources is hard, getting them to offer discovery credit on top of that is even harder/even less common currently.

Lastly, for the ripping off concern, Wikipedia is also rather vulnerable. Because it's so easy to access, I think many people may perceive citations to it as meaning that a content creator didn't dig very deep. This has resulted in a situation where many people are embarrassed to say they used Wikipedia, since they're worried it'd make others think they're lazy. Part of the solution here might be to work to educate the world about Wikipedia's free content license.

I hope all that is helpful, and looking forward to further discussion! Thanks for hosting the monthly calls; it's really helpful to be able to touch base through them. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 23:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes indeed, these are definitely kinds of reasons that content-creators of 'edu-tainment' material say when asked about this issue. And on top of what you've said, there's also the issue that we all want people to go onwards and continue their research from the things that we cite. Which, when they do reference those academic publications and primary source material (a good thing!) they are [probably] less willing to acknowledge that they discovered those sources via Wikipedia's footnotes. It's more impressive to say "according to this 1973 patent application...." than "according to a footnote about a 1973 patent application in the Wikipedia article about this topic..."

So the question is: How do we encourage meaningful (not begrudging/forced) attribution of where video content creators are getting their ideas from - because we know they are reading Wikipedia articles as part of their research - in a way that is helpful to their audience and technically easy for them to do. It's something the Future Audience program is going to experiment with over the coming year. Keyword 'experiment' - not big/expensive/long-term investments but little tests to gather real-world proof of concept data. LWyatt (WMF) (talk) 11:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Liam and Sdkb, just seeing this old discussion: Many of the best and most popular creators are excited to share their sources and include discovery credit. There's a question of making it possible and simple to do so. Making tools that only let people cite a WP article seems like going halfway and stopping, without the real benefit we would want. Maria Popova has thought a lot about curation and discovery-credit, and even coined a pair of symbols for "discovery via" -- perhaps we could collaborate with her on a campaign. –SJ talk  16:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: October 19, 14:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields, the main requirement is to be interested enough in the topic that you want to spend time in the call.

More details:

• When: 14:00 UTC Thursday October 19
• Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda:

• 1. AI & attribution presentation & Q&A (30 min)
• 2. Engaging youth on third-party video platforms:
• a) Ikusgela presentation (15 min)
• b) WMF TikTok experiment (15 min)
• c) Wrap-up discussion/Q&A (10–15 min or as needed)

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions, and you can read more about questions asked at the last meeting above. We're looking forward to seeing/hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 16:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: December 14, 15:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields, the main requirement is to be interested enough in the topic that you want to spend time in the call.

More details:

• When: 15:00 UTC Thursday December 14
• Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda:

• A collaborative mapping of possible strategies the Wikimedia movement could pursue to ensure that Wikimedia content and communities continue to thrive in the face of changing technology and user behavior trends
• A brief recap of some conversations on this topic that began at WikiConference North America last month, then collectively map out and discuss the key features, risks, and opportunities of several potential strategies
• This mapping will inform the annual Wikimedia Foundation External Trends update

To register contact: futureaudienceswikimedia.org – we'll send you a link to the call.

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions, and you can read more about questions asked at the last meeting above. We're looking forward to seeing/hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 13:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Ending the Wikipedia ChatGPT plugin experiment

Report of the ChatGPT experiment (PDF)

Hi, I'm Mike, a Wikimedia Foundation product manager who has been working on the Wikipedia plugin on ChatGPT.

In July 2023, the WMF Future Audiences team launched a ChatGPT plugin as an experiment in learning more about the rapidly evolving Artificial Intelligence (AI) landscape, accelerated by OpenAI’s release of their ChatGPT Large Language Model (LLM). This experiment has been fruitful in helping us learn more about how we fit into this new technology. The end date for this experiment is 2 Feb 2024.

Below is a brief overview of the project background and lessons learned from the experiment.

Background

The release of ChatGPT in late 2022 was a landmark in providing an easy-to-use LLM capable of understanding and generating natural language, often performing with seemingly near-human levels of proficiency. With its rapid increase in usership, ChatGPT had the potential to become a new way for most people to get information online, potentially putting WMF projects like Wikipedia at great risk from lower traffic to our websites, where much of our donations and contributions occur. While posing risks to our existing volunteer recruitment and fundraising models, LLMs also offer the potential to increase the variety of channels and processes for reading and editing Wikipedia content.

In that context, in March 2023 the WMF Future Audiences team was invited by OpenAI to develop and release an official Wikipedia ChatGPT plugin on its new “plugin” platform, which gave a handful of organizations (e.g., Kayak, Wolfram Alpha) the ability to more narrowly tailor the ChatGPT experience. The experimental Wikipedia plugin we built allowed ChatGPT subscribers to get information directly from Wikipedia via ChatGPT, which was instructed to only use Wikipedia content to generate an answer, and with appropriate citation(s).

. Our goal in releasing the plugin was to answer two primary questions:

• User behavior. Is there a paradigm shift towards ChatGPT (or other LLM-based chat assistants) being the primary means of getting information online?
• LLM tech. How well does ChatGPT (or other comparable LLMs) generate relevant and accurate text for information seeking purposes?

Lessons learned

ChatGPT has not become the new information seeking paradigm (yet?).

After 6 months of being active, we have concluded that the ChatGPT has not significantly affected the public’s usage of the internet as a general purpose tool. Instead, we are seeing specialization of LLMs for specific tasks, as well as this technology being used to augment traditional and familiar information seeking forms, such as search. It will be good to continue to keep an eye on these trends, though the initial urgency has diminished.

We also noticed that ⅔ of users are from N. America and Europe (based on logging data), as well as being middle-ish aged men (based self-reported survey data). At this time, it doesn’t appear that chat assistants are reaching new audience demographics beyond what we typically expect to see in many of our editor communities. We should note, though, that the Wikipedia ChatGPT plugin required users to have a paid ChatGPT account, which poses a barrier of entry for the same people who have historically been underrepresented. As OpenAI shifts to being more for-profit, these fees will continue to be obstacles for wider access to Wikipedia content through ChatGPT.

LLMs

While there continue to be many problems with LLMs, including the ability to unpredictably hallucinate facts and/or reproduce biases in its input data, we have found that they are generally quite good at retrieving and summarizing Wikipedia content as answers to natural language queries. Based on a small-scale internal audit of historic queries, we found our ChatGPT plugin’s responses to be generally relevant and accurate, and are confident that with more iteration, relevance and quality could continue to improve over time.

LLMs are likely here to stay in some form, and offer a powerful toolset for well-defined tasks. We would recommend continuing to further explore using them where appropriate.

Based on self-reported survey data, we also found that users generally had more trust in ChatGPT’s responses when it was clear that the answers were coming from Wikipedia. Crucially, this was not just the content itself, but when our “brand” was associated with the answer. This implies that Wikipedia’s name and direct attribution have social capital, and we should strongly consider how to better take advantage of this fact as a sign of both knowledge integrity in a world of misinformation, and as a financially significant brand asset.

Winding down

We are ending the Wikipedia ChatGPT experiment primarily due to being now able to answer our primary questions – as a reminder, our main objectives on the WMF Future Audience team is to run quick, cheap, experiments to learn about near-term trends, not to build fully featured and permanent products.

This timing also coincides with OpenAI’s move away from the plugin marketplace for ChatGPT, and towards no/low-code customizable GPTs (i.e. AI chat assistants focused on specific tasks). This shift has made our plugin in its current form inaccessible to new users and largely redundant. While we could repurpose this functionality towards being a GPT, we don’t believe we would learn significantly more beyond how to create a product within the OpenAI ecosystem. This may be a good place for WMF to eventually have/maintain a product, and we will continue to keep an eye on developments there, but the urgency for this is not high at the moment.

For further information about the plugin’s code and functionality see this repo. To learn about and ask questions about the WMF’s Future Audiences project visit its homepage on Meta wiki. MPham (WMF) (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Besides being a paid feature, another reason for the skew in user demographics may be that this is not a Wikimedia hosted platform, but a platform where users may not feel safe for various privacy and integrity reasons. ♥Ainali ^talk_{contributions} 20:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: February 15, 15:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields, the main requirement is to be interested enough in the topic that you want to spend time in the call.

More details:

• When: 15:00 UTC Thursday February 15
• Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda: Conclusion of ChatGPT plugin experiment, and what comes next.

To register contact: futureaudienceswikimedia.org – we'll send you a link to the call.

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions, and you can read more about questions asked at the last meeting above. We're looking forward to seeing/hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 13:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Recording (& transcript)

This meeting has now occurred.

The topics covered were discussed in the meeting (video embedded here) at the following times:

• @00:00 - Welcome, context of 'future audiences'
• @14:40 - Conclusion of ChatGPT plugin experiment (report & slides);
• @35:00 - introduction of "citation needed" browser extension experiment
• @55:00 - invitation to "AI Sauna" event, Helsinki.

Sincerely, LWyatt (WMF) (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

How to propose a new domain/audience

Hi: I'm new with this Future Audiences so sorry if asking something obvious. For some time to know I'm working conceptualizing a couple domains which I see has enormous potential and with a place in the Wikimedia Movement. The question is: which is the procedure to present and develop them?

Thanks. —Ismael Olea (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey Olea: Do you mean like a new wiki project? Johan (WMF) (talk) 00:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Ideally, yes. For the moment I just want to spread a new way (for us) to describe knowledge using linked open data models. I would share some technical details but I'm actively writing them to submit a proposal for a funding call on 1st April. I'll do later. For the moment I only have this almost useless testimonial description. This particular proposal focuses in learning, but the approach can apply to any other domain.

They key point in this conversation is, as far I understand, this approach would define a new audience with a quality change, models, as we have done with metadata in Wikidata. But maybe I missed something. —Ismael Olea (talk) 10:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

This is a major conversation much bigger than the Future Audiences team. I'm honestly not sure about the best way to approach it. I would say "a new proposal on Meta", but they rarely tend to get that many eyes. I'd suggest talking about it in the community first, gaining support. Maybe in Wikipedia Weekly, the Facebook group, on Telegram, or perhaps wikimedia-l, the mailing list? Johan (WMF) (talk) 12:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: April 18, 14:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields, the main requirement is to be interested enough in the topic that you want to spend time in the call.

More details:

• When: 14:00 UTC Thursday April 18
• Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda:

• A follow-up call to talk more about Future Audiences/Experiment:Citation Needed, now that we have soft-launched it and have some preliminary data.

To register contact: futureaudienceswikimedia.org – we'll send you a link to the call.

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions, and you can read more about questions asked at the last meeting above. We're looking forward to seeing/hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 12:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Pings for people who have indicated their interest on the Future Audiences page: Aisha Khatun, Newton Kamau (AI), User:Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot. Johan (WMF) (talk) 12:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

More pings for users who have signed up: DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, Waldyrious, Doc Taxon, Lofhi, SJ, Danny Benjafield (WMDE), Hfordsa, Baltakatei, CorraleH, Doctorxgc, Lebron jay, Benoît Prieur, Alphama, Susannaanas, Zache, VisbyStar, Joalpe, Chlod, Ismael Olea, Txtdgtl (WMMX), SCP-2000, Hammunculs. Johan (WMF) (talk) 12:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Johan (WMF). Thanks for the ping. There might be a problem with the info, as on the title it states April 18 and on the text December 14 (time stamp also leads to December 14). Anyway, I cannot make it unfortunately, as this event falls during the Wikimedia Summit. Will te call be recorded? Thank you. Joalpe (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, fixed by Sdkb – I was so sure I had fixed the link, but I think I changed it in the window where I copied the template from, not the one where I posted. My apologies.

It will be recorded! Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I could not attend, sorry :-/ —Ismael Olea (talk) 08:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Another heads-up: AI call on May 16

We're also having a conversation in May, we're having a general AI call related to the annual plan. The page doesn't have a lot of information yet as we've just created it, but do sign up for that, too, if you're interested! Johan (WMF) (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

AI:JA! Thanks Johan. –SJ talk  14:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Future Audiences: Latin America

Hey everyone, on May 13, 14:00 UTC, we're having a Latin America-focused call. There will be interpretation into Spanish, but anyone is welcome to participate if you're interested. Agenda:

• Intro to Future Audiences – what it is and why WMF is doing it (10 min)
• Discussion: LATAM-specific traffic trends: Look at Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan/2023-2024/Reports/Core Metrics Q2/Appendix#By user region together and discuss: what may be contributing to traffic declines in Latin America? What different factors may be at play (for example: country-specific, audience-specific, demographic, technological, other)? How aware are communities of these trends and has there been any discussion/proposed actions? What could be a good next step to continue this discussion with the broader Spanish and Portuguese communities? (30 min)
• Other important trends to think about/discuss as a movement (i.e., what's happening in related sectors – i.e., education; digital literacy; advocacy, etc.) (10 min)
• Interpretation in Spanish, but anyone is welcome. We are also looking into interpretation in Portuguese.

To participate: Zoom link.

Pings for people who have indicated their interest on the Future Audiences page: Aisha Khatun, Newton Kamau (AI), User:Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

More pings for users who have signed up: DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, Waldyrious, Doc Taxon, Lofhi, SJ, Danny Benjafield (WMDE), Hfordsa, Baltakatei, CorraleH, Doctorxgc, Lebron jay, Benoît Prieur, Alphama, Susannaanas, Zache, VisbyStar, Joalpe, Chlod, Ismael Olea, Txtdgtl (WMMX), SCP-2000, Hammunculs,Jesse Lynn. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

AI call tomorrow 16 May

I gave a heads-up about a call on 16 May, 14:00 UTC above – here's a reminder for anyone following this page. This isn't specifically about Future Audiences, so I don't want to misuse the list of interested editors and ping everyone, but for anyone who has this talk apge on their watchlist:

• Zoom link – 14:00 UTC, 16 May 2024
• Meta page, agenda

Johan (WMF) (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

What's next?

Hey everyone, an update from the team: We're looking forward to Wikimania, where we're hoping to present more on AI/ML, the Wikimedia movement, and our experiments around this. We're, like others, waiting for the program to be presented.

In the meanwhile, Future Audiences/Experiment:Citation Needed is still being tested, and we're working on Future Audiences/Experiment:Add a Fact. Johan (WMF) (talk) 09:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

On experimentation

This won't be new to those of you who have kept an eye on what we're doing, but I wrote a post trying to explain experimentation in the Wikimedia setting, rather than building products: Diff: On the value of experimentation – A Future Audiences perspective Johan (WMF) (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

The next Future Audiences video call: August 1, 17:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next Future Audiences public video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields, the main requirement is to be interested enough in the topic that you want to spend time in the call.

More details: When: 17:00 UTC Thursday August 1 Where: Zoom - please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link! Recorded? Yes (published here afterwards)

Agenda: Pre-Wikimania 2024 conversation

• New fiscal year updates (team updates, OKRs, etc.) - Maryana
• Citation Needed experiment overview (what we tried, what we learned) - Maryana
• Add a Fact MVP overview - Francisco
• Q&A on Add a Fact and other possible ideas for engaging contributors in new ways/places
• Any other questions and topics arising.

To register contact: futureaudienceswikimedia.org – and we'll send you a link to the call. -- LWyatt (WMF) (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Pings for people who have indicated their interest in attending these calls on the Future Audiences page:

Aisha Khatun, Newton Kamau (AI), User:Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot, DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, Waldyrious, Doc Taxon, Lofhi, SJ, Danny Benjafield (WMDE), Hfordsa, Baltakatei, CorraleH, Doctorxgc, Lebron jay, Benoît Prieur, Alphama, Susannaanas, Zache, VisbyStar, Joalpe, Chlod, Ismael Olea, Txtdgtl (WMMX), SCP-2000, Hammunculs,Jesse Lynn, Paula (WDU), User:Eminayiden, User:AmClark472, User:Krishna13h.

Thank you. LWyatt (WMF) (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for coming to the call and signing up to test the Add-A-Fact dev version. You should have autoconfirmation test.wiki now.

Here's the link to the chrome store in case you don't have it. @Susannaanas@Sdkb@Sj@Mike Peel@Ocaasi@Another Believer @Widdershinny FNavas-WMF (talk) 22:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@Susannaanas@Sdkb@Sj@Mike Peel@Ocaasi@Another Believer

Let us know any thoughts via the extension's feedback button, the AAF discussion page or reach out to me! I appreciate your time in advance. FNavas-WMF (talk) 22:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: September 26, 15:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields.

More details:

• When: 15:00 UTC Thursday September 26
• Where: Google Meet (works in most popular desktop browsers) – please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda:

We have been working to understand how we can create engaging short video content from existing community-curated content on Wikipedia, with the help of generative AI. Come learn and give feedback on our experimental videos!

To register contact:

futureaudienceswikimedia.org – we'll send you a link to the call.

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions. We're looking forward to seeing you or hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 19:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Pings for those who have indicated their interest in the work of Future Audiences on the Meta page:

Aisha Khatun, Newton Kamau (AI), User:Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, Waldyrious, Doc Taxon, Lofhi, SJ, Danny Benjafield (WMDE), Hfordsa, Baltakatei, CorraleH, Doctorxgc, Lebron jay, Benoît Prieur, Alphama, Susannaanas, Zache, VisbyStar, Joalpe, Chlod, Ismael Olea, Txtdgtl (WMMX), SCP-2000, Hammunculs. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 19:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

User: Jesse Lynn, Paula (WDU), Eminayiden, AmClark472, Krishna13h, Ocaasi, Bodhisattwa, Rahmot_Afolabi, User:John Broughton, PMurvar, Danysan1, bhogera, User:Iditminka, User:Mika77, User:TiagoLubiana, User:JMD8, User:MPKraft, User:ProfGray. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

• Sadly I have another commitment and will not be able to attend, but I look forward to catching up with the recording and seeing these videos. Thank you for holding these calls! - Dyork (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Blurring news articles in a recent conversation recording

See this Commons discussion I started about a potential copyright issue in the August 2024 conversation recording. Xeroctic (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up, Xeroctic, appreciated. Johan (WMF) (talk) 22:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: October 31, 16:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields.

More details:

• When: 16:00 UTC Thursday October 31
• Where: Google Meet (works in most popular desktop browsers) – please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda:

• Add a Fact – insights from testing by over 85 Wikipedians
• Short video – early launch data from TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube

To register contact:

futureaudienceswikimedia.org – we'll send you a link to the call.

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions. We're looking forward to seeing you or hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Pings for those who have indicated their interest in the work of Future Audiences on the Meta page:

Aisha Khatun, Newton Kamau (AI), User:Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, Waldyrious, Doc Taxon, Lofhi, SJ, Danny Benjafield (WMDE), Hfordsa, Baltakatei, CorraleH, Doctorxgc, Lebron jay, Benoît Prieur, Alphama, Susannaanas, Zache, VisbyStar, Joalpe, Chlod, Ismael Olea, Txtdgtl (WMMX), SCP-2000, Hammunculs. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

User: Jesse Lynn, Paula (WDU), Eminayiden, AmClark472, Krishna13h, Ocaasi, Bodhisattwa, Rahmot_Afolabi, User:John Broughton, PMurvar, Danysan1, bhogera, User:Iditminka, User:Mika77, User:TiagoLubiana, User:JMD8, User:MPKraft, User:ProfGray. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Prototyperspective, AdamSobieski, Akc2182. Johan (WMF) (talk) 15:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Commnity Wikiconference in the Czech Republic on Sat November 9th. Anyone who could have a talk?

Dear colleagues. Our member of the board @Martin Urbanec (WMF) introduced me to this initiative. As we would like to present the issue of AI in relation to Wikipedia as widely as possible there, I would like to ask, whethere there is anyone to have a 10 mins talk on activities mentioned here. Please let me know. Conference (see programme) takes place soon, Saturday November 9th. Thanks a lot! Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ) (talk) 12:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ): Thanks for reaching out to us! Very happy you want to hear more about the Future Audiences initiative (and glad that Martin is spreading the good word).

To be more clear, when exactly would this be? Is it during the 11:15–11:45 slot, CET? The reason I'm asking is that that's in the middle of the night for almost the entire team. Johan (WMF) (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Johan, exactly as you mention – starting at 11:15 CET. If this is too difficult, we can a). show some video related to this issue, or b). record a new speech for 5-10 minutes. Would this be possible please? Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ) (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ): OK, we're working on putting something together. Please get in touch with MPinchuk (WMF) about the details – I will be out of office the days just before the conference. Johan (WMF) (talk) 18:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ)! I've recorded a brief video update and uploaded it to Commons here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Czech_wikiconference_WMF_AI_activities-2.webm

Thanks for the invitation to give this update, and please let me know if there are any questions or discussions that come up! MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 18:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Dear Maryana, thanks for the effort to create this video. It is a big help with the insight of how WMF is using AI technology. I will report you about the conference and send you some pictures. All the best! Pavel Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ) (talk) 16:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

@Pavel Bednařík (WMCZ) it's my pleasure!

Question for you: a member of our design team who has been supporting on some AI projects for Future Audiences and our Android app team (@Sarah Chekfa) happens to be in Prague right now and is curious if it would be okay for her to stop by the conference? She doesn't speak Czech, so she's not sure if/how she'll be able to participate in the presentations, but would it be alright for her to come for lunch or coffee on Saturday? Please let us know what you think! MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

The next monthly Future Audiences video call: December 3, 17:00 UTC

Hi all, this is announcement of the next monthly hour-long Future Audiences video call – a space where anyone interested in this work can come learn, ask questions, and give input on the work the Future Audiences team are doing around AI or social media experiments, or talk about their own related initiatives. Please feel free to turn up – we're happy for anyone who wants to come talk or listen to us. You don't need to have done anything specific within these fields.

More details:

• When: 17:00 UTC Tuesday December 3
• Where: Google Meet (works in most popular desktop browsers) – please email futureaudienceswikimedia.org to get the link!
• Recorded? Yes

Agenda:

• Discord bot – a presentation of our upcoming experiment of a Discord bot as a way to interact with Wikipedia.
• Short video – data from our short Wikipedia videos on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube.

To register contact:

futureaudienceswikimedia.org – we'll send you a link to the call.

Slides, recordings and notes from previous meetings can be found at Future Audiences/Community discussions. We're looking forward to seeing you or hearing from you. Johan (WMF) (talk) 16:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Pings for those who have indicated their interest in the work of Future Audiences on the Meta page:

Aisha Khatun, Newton Kamau (AI), User:Waltercolor, Natalia Ćwik (WMPL), Lydia Pintscher (WMDE), Grzegorz Kopaczewski (WMPL), Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL), Bertux, Sandizer, Frank Schulenburg, MJL, Jklamo, Sdkb, Frostly, Rtnf, Count Count, Fuzheado, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Soni, Theklan, Heike Gleibs (WMDE), Tarkowski, AyourAchtouk, Bluerasberry, Adithyak1997, Psubhashish, Sobaka, Alalch E., Dyork, Mathglot. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

DancingPhilosopher, Stevesuny, Oceanflynn, Kasyap, Waldyrious, Doc Taxon, Lofhi, SJ, Danny Benjafield (WMDE), Hfordsa, Baltakatei, CorraleH, Doctorxgc, Lebron jay, Benoît Prieur, Alphama, Susannaanas, Zache, VisbyStar, Joalpe, Chlod, Ismael Olea, Txtdgtl (WMMX), SCP-2000, Hammunculs. Johan (WMF) (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

User: Jesse Lynn, Paula (WDU), Eminayiden, AmClark472, Krishna13h, Ocaasi, Bodhisattwa, Rahmot_Afolabi, User:John Broughton, PMurvar, Danysan1, bhogera, User:Iditminka, User:Mika77, User:TiagoLubiana, User:JMD8, User:MPKraft, User:ProfGray,Prototyperspective, AdamSobieski, Akc2182, Sage (Wiki Ed), TJMSmith. Johan (WMF) (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Idea: Per-article Pages for Requests or Issues

In addition to articles' Talk or Discussion pages, a new per-article page for Requests or Issues could be created for users to make requests of others with respect to modifying or revising articles.

As envisioned, a new tab could be provided atop each article. This new tab could have a number on it, the number of open requests, to-do items, or issues. This might resemble, atop each article: [Article] [Talk] [Requests (#)] or [Article] [Talk] [Issues (#)].

While requests or issues could be, potentially, a special section of existing Talk or Discussion pages, these new Requests or Issues pages would allow readers who feel that some other person should do something to improve an article to simply make a feature request or to open an issue.

A reader might think: "This article is about systems biology but has an inaccuracy. Somebody else, I guess, should correct that." Or, a reader might think: "There's an error in the article's infobox. I don't know or understand infobox syntax. Somebody should do something about that."

As envisioned, readers could use a new Requests or Issues page to add a new request or issue for an article without having to fully commit to entering a community discussion or to editing the article, at that time.

Making new requests or opening new issues should be as convenient as possible. Readers could, for example, select portions of article content in their Web browsers, (right-)click to open a context menu, and select a context menu item to “open a request” or “open an issue” about that selection of content.

This might result in a navigation to a dynamic input form for the reader to enter data into. This form might start with a drop-down menu with which to categorize the request or issue. With a category, a subsequent, simple form could be presented to the reader. A reader could indicate, via form elements, whether and how to notify them, e.g., by email, upon the processing of their item by one or more other users.

Editors could mark these requests or issues as having been read, processed, addressed, or otherwise completed. When closed, these items could, perhaps, be omitted from display on the open Requests or Issues page, though, perhaps, a hyperlink could allow navigation to view completed items.

As envisioned, readers could also socially interact with (e.g., like, share, or upvote) articles' open requests or issues.

AdamSobieski (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for dropping by here and writing up these suggestions, @AdamSobieski! This idea sounds like it might be a better fit for the WMF Reading/Web team that focuses on ways to improve the experience for current readers of Wikipedia. There is some discussion happening about ways we could support "non-editing participation" like this in the future, so it's a timely suggestion! (However, I should note that many years ago, there was an attempt to support an article feedback feature like this – that project didn't go so well, and anything in this terrain would have to be very carefully thought out to avoid the issues encountered last time, i.e., creating a moderation burden for existing editors from irrelevant or low-quality feedback.) MPinchuk (WMF) (talk) 23:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of that Article Feedback project involving a forms-based commenting system. Via an extension, it measured the engagement of new users, their entrances into the editing community, and their comment quality. Good points about mitigating vandalism (it looks like AbuseFilter was utilized, in these regards). Perhaps, into the future, AI software could be of use for detecting and filtering low-quality issues and vandalism attempts on (social) issues-based forums. Another topic worth considering would be helping readers, be they human or AI agents, opening issues to detect whether their potential issue was very similar to or identical to a previous one, either open or closed. Such features would be helpful for any issues-based forum, including those in use by software-development communities. Having these and other capabilities available for readers opening issues about articles would reduce moderation burden on editor communities. Also, editor communities might themselves choose to make use of (social) issues-based forums, were they available. Ok, I can reach out to the Reading/Web team to broach these topics. Thank you. AdamSobieski (talk) 02:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Interesting idea. I think these issues should be part of the talk pages by making/marking types of threads as 'issues' there. Please see Community Wishlist/Wishes/Do not fully archive unsolved issues on Talk pages and my feedback for add-a-fact which is a Future Audiences tool to create one type of issues on the talk pages. I suggest you leave a short comment at the Wishlist proposal, maybe you have an idea how threads could be identified and/or marked as being issues? There could also be a count of open issues next to the Talk page link at the top right and things like that. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for those links. Well, to your question, brainstorming, one idea for how wikitext-based threads could be identified and/or marked as being issues could, in an extensible manner, involve a special metadata-related template. This special template would be intended to be placed under threads' title headings. It would not result in any displayed or rendered content but could be processed by software tools.

== Thread Title ==
{{Metadata|kind=issue|status=open}}
text content

AdamSobieski (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Also, there might exist a mapping from JSON-LD to a special wiki template. The first named parameter of such a metadata-related template could be context for indicating a URI for its schema with which to validate the template instance and to semantically interpret its other named parameters. There could be special named parameters for id, type, and so forth. In theory, other templates could be defined to expand to this special Metadata template. So, indicating that a thread was an issue could be accomplished via a template which either was or was defined to expand to a special Metadata template. Such a special template could also enable other interoperation scenarios with Wikidata. What do you think of these ideas? AdamSobieski (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes it could be done with a template, similar to the {{edit protected}} template (these are also one type of issues). But that's more about the technicalities of marking a thread as issue...I was mostly referring to how to identify these and to facilitate users to mark things as issue and enable that this is actually widely done. There also is a template to mark threads as solved at {{Section resolved}} but few people use that. Likewise, if there was just a template for marking threads as issue then it would rarely be used and also not be used on past threads (on the talk page as well as in the archives), essentially nullifying their usefulness as e.g. the counter can't be displayed and the proposed personalized tasks dashboard would only include a very small subset of open issues.

Either way I don't see much of a relation to the Future Audiences team and even if there is we probably shouldn't discuss this here but e.g. at the place where I suggested (or a place linked from there). Prototyperspective (talk) 23:35, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Let's continue the fuller discussion at: Community_Wishlist/Wishes/Do_not_fully_archive_unsolved_issues_on_Talk_pages. AdamSobieski (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Or, more specifically at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist/Wishes/Issues-based_Discussion_for_Articles ! AdamSobieski (talk) 03:03, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Idea: Enhanced Social Media Integration

Users could connect their Wikimedia accounts to their social-media accounts, e.g., via the Fediverse. By doing so, users could toggle via checkboxes for their content on Talk or Discussion pages, or on Requests or Issues pages (see above) to also be copied to and posted to one or more of their connected social-media platforms. These replicated posts would, as envisioned, provide both a quote of their content and a hyperlink back into the Wikipedia article’s social discussion forum or Requests or Issues page.

AdamSobieski (talk) 19:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Can/is already done, see e.g. Template:User Mastodon. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

That's great news. Thank you. AdamSobieski (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)