Danadl

Parliamentary group

Hi, I've undone some of your removals of member of political party (P102) as reading the property proposals I find the use of parliamentary group (P4100) debatable in these cases, so I think at least both should be used until a consensus is reached on whether to use one or both.

The user who proposed P4100 seems to have outlined some specific use cases where members of the European Parliament were part of a group in that assembly that was not a political party (which surely does not apply to South Australian politicians) but then the property was never used for the examples.

There is also an issue with using P4100 as a qualifier of the parliamentary membership position: see Dennis Hood (Q5258529)—has defected to the Liberals today and has been in three parties in a year. That defection cannot be represented if the parliamentary group membership is itself a qualifier (unless you split each party representation as a different position held statement).

Happy to discuss and debate this further with you—could possibly be a place for P4100 to represent the Coalition or the LNP, or "independent" members of the Tasmanian Legislative Council I guess, but I'm not comfortable with applying it exclusively, as a qualifier, to most Australian politicians, when the property proposal and definitions are so vague. --Canley (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

I guess you are using the EveryPolitician data model? Just a suggestion: instead of marking the parliamentary term to no value, you could link it to the term MP list such as Members of the South Australian House of Assembly, 2014–2018 (Q17012687). - Canley (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia

Hi Danadl, I just came across your fantastic contributions again, and wondered if you would be interested in adding your name to Wikidata:WikiProject Australia. That way you'll be notified of any Australia-related discussions. --99of9 (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Danadl,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Danadl,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Start a discussion with Danadl

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikidata the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Danadl. What you say here will be public for others to see.

Start a discussion