#REDIRECToc:Discussion_Utilizaire:Boulaur
Soft redirect page

Bot blocked

edit

Hello, Boulaur, I'm sorry if I'm frightening you or anything (not my intention), but I've blocked your bot. It has made almost 4000 edits (according to the API), far over the suggested number of edits for bot trials. I see that you've created Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/BoulaurBot, but as it isn't transcluded onto Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot, it is unlikely to get any input. If you're still up for the task, please so so. Also, I noticed the bot was also adding labels for other languages, so it would be necessary to update the request if that is your intent. I'll be happy to unblock the bot for you after you verify that it was stopped. Thanks.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  01:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've now blocked 92.146.229.192 as being (as you declared) your bot. Please edit from the bot account. --Ricordisamoa 09:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm logged with my pywikedia bot.In the oc wikipedia, my contributions are tagged "BoulaurBot", on wikidata I'm an IP.
My user config.py contain the lines :
usernames ['wikipedia']['oc']='BoulaurBot'
usernames ['wikidata']['wikidata']='BoulaurBot'
Where is the problem?
Boulaur (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Try to trigger login by adding
pywikibot.Site('wikidata','wikidata').login()
or something similar. --Ricordisamoa 17:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the help, Tasks 1, 2 and 3 tests done, Special:Contributions/BoulaurBot, Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/BoulaurBot. Thanks to have a regard on it. Boulaur (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Civil law

edit

Hi. Re your recent edit: Consider merging oc:Drech civilista and oc:Drech civil, they are about the same thing. Littledogboy (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your bot

edit
 
link=User talk::oc:User talk:Boulaur#BoulaurBot@wikidatawiki
Hello, Boulaur. You have new messages at your talk page on Occitan Wikipedia.
You can remove this notice at any time.

--Ricordisamoa 04:34, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Geographical feature P31 object?

edit

Dude, take a look at Help:Basic membership properties. All the best Littledogboy (talk) 14:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

(Confusing to talk in two different places.) I undid a few of your statement additions for items Q3326454 Q811430 Q79782 Q9350 Q618123. I know what you meant, but we must be careful about how to create relationships between items using properties. Littledogboy (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Section in zoology / section in botany

edit

Why do you ignore the fact that these taxons are different and situated at different positions in taxonomic tree. Previous query: [1]. Infovarius (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Greek alphabet contains administrative divisions?

edit

Hi. Regarding these edits: I'm not sure whether the Wikidata items of alphabets should link to their letters or not. But if so, I think they should be as complete as possible, while you stopped in the middle of the alphabet. But first of all, contains the administrative territorial entity (P150) is obviously not the correct property for this. has part(s) (P527) would be suitable, I guess. So I think you should consider to chane (or remove) this. --YMS (talk) 18:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

GND Term

edit

Hello Boulaur,

I see you are adding GND Term to many items. I would like to point to this resolve to eliminate GND Term entirely. If you want to make a change, you would do better to delete it where you find it, rather than adding it. - Brya (talk) 10:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding GND main type. GND is going away per Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Primary_sorting_property. --Izno (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
That may be true, but Wikidata has chosen to remove the property. Until the property is deleted, please do not add it. --Izno (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

BoulaurBot

edit

Your bot has been listed at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal/Inactive bot accounts as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure it's proposed to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot should you need it again. Of course, You may request retaining your bot flag here if you need the bot flag. Regards--GZWDer (talk) 11:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply