121.214.82.14

incorrect use of Union

Please stop your current editing practice of adding many statements of union of (P2737) to items, such as what you did at rural tourism (Q367125). This is not the intended use of union of (P2737). --99of9 (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

I agree with User 99of9. Please take a look at the Wikidata property example (P1855) listed in union of (P2737). This is not intended to indiscriminately list items that are just somewhat associated. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

I blocked the IP for a month.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Items need sources

Thank you for contributing to Wikidata. I see that you recently created an item that does not clearly indicate its notability. The Wikidata project only accepts items that meet its notability criteria, and your item is therefore likely to be deleted soon. In brief, items must have an associated Wikipedia article, must be needed for statements on another notable item, or must have both identifiers and serious sources. For the last case, a good indication of notability would be multiple articles about the subject in independent publications like newspapers or magazines. You can add such sources as references to specific claims using reference URL (P854), or as top-level claims using described at URL (P973).

Also, this may not apply in this specific case, but you should know that we discourage editors from contributing on topics with which they have a strong personal connection, as this may present a conflict of interest. If you are being paid to edit here, then you are obliged to disclose this. For a longer version, you might find it useful to read the essay "How to create an item on Wikidata so that it won't get deleted".  Madamebiblio (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)