Property talk:P1533
Documentation
last name that is the same as a given first name. Use on items for given names
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Type Q202444, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Value type Q101352, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Conflicts with P3373, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Conflicts with P40, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Item P407, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Item P1705, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Target required claim P1705, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1533#Entity types
add P1533 (Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?fam WHERE { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q101352 . MINUS { ?fam ^ wdt:P1533 [] } ?fam rdfs:label ?fn . FILTER(lang(?fn)="en") ?item rdfs:label ?fn . ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q12308941 . FILTER( ?item != ?fam ) ?fam wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . ?item wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } } LIMIT 50
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P1533#Missing statements (male given name)
add P1533 (Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?fam WHERE { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q101352 . MINUS { ?fam ^ wdt:P1533 [] } ?fam rdfs:label ?fn . FILTER(lang(?fn)="en") ?item rdfs:label ?fn . ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q11879590 . FILTER( ?item != ?fam ) ?fam wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . ?item wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } } LIMIT 50
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P1533#Missing statements (female given name)
add P1533 (Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?fam WHERE { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q101352 . MINUS { ?fam ^ wdt:P1533 [] } ?fam rdfs:label ?fn . FILTER(lang(?fn)="en") ?item rdfs:label ?fn . ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q202444 . FILTER( ?item != ?fam ) ?fam wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . ?item wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } } LIMIT 50
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P1533#Missing statements (given name)
add P1533 (Help)
Violations query:
SELECT ?item ?fam WHERE { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q101352 . MINUS { ?fam ^ wdt:P1533 [] } ?fam rdfs:label ?fn . FILTER(lang(?fn)="en") ?item rdfs:label ?fn . ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q3409032 . FILTER( ?item != ?fam ) ?fam wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . ?item wdt:P282 wd:Q8229 . FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?fam wdt:P31 wd:Q4167410 } } LIMIT 50
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/P1533#Missing statements (unisex given name)
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
Constraint:Unique value disputed
editAn example at Talk:Q18177306#Property:P1533 questions validity of this constraint, because it is clear that the discussed issue may affect more items in the future. I prefer keeping the constraint and removing redundant claims. Petr Matas 11:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- I agree to keep it, but I'd just add exceptions to the list for such. --- Jura 11:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- I think that adding exceptions is unsystematic, because the list will probably get quite longer in the future. Your opposition to removing useful (though redundant) information is valid, but I think that getting rid of the exceptions outweights it. Petr Matas 11:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- If the lists gets long, one could just create a new constraint that handles it better. Constraints are just approximations that help us improve the data. They are not necessarily ideal for every property.
- BTW, I don't think you addressed the points raised on Talk:Q18177306#Property:P1533. --- Jura 07:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I did not address them because I consider them valid. I also agree that having only a few exceptions is not a problem. However, may we mark the constraint as mandatory in that case? Petr Matas 09:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. I think one can't currently combine "mandatory=true" with a list of exceptions. --- Jura 14:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I've just looked at the template doc, where I found a sample, which combines them. I'd really like to make the constraint mandatory. Petr Matas 15:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. I think one can't currently combine "mandatory=true" with a list of exceptions. --- Jura 14:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I did not address them because I consider them valid. I also agree that having only a few exceptions is not a problem. However, may we mark the constraint as mandatory in that case? Petr Matas 09:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I think that adding exceptions is unsystematic, because the list will probably get quite longer in the future. Your opposition to removing useful (though redundant) information is valid, but I think that getting rid of the exceptions outweights it. Petr Matas 11:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- This is how you can get the corresponding family name of Andrea (Q18177306) even if it is mentioned only in its superclass: Query: tree[18177306[279] and claim[1533] &props=1533]. Petr Matas 22:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Aligned English labels
editThe intermix of first and given between the main label and this can be a little confusing, so I have changed this to match the main "given name". — billinghurst sDrewth 21:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Inverse property?
editI'm wondering why there is no inverse property for this one, for linking from family names to given names. Should I propose one?
Notified participants of WikiProject Names Jon Harald Søby (talk) 09:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see why we would need one? What would a reverse property do that we can't do right now? (except creating more work, that is). --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Harmonia Amanda: In automatic infoboxes for family names, you could link automatically to the identical first names. I don't know how you can do that currently? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 09:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well with lua? You ask for the item(s) linked to this item using this property, instead of asking for the value of the property. It should work perfectly? --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Harmonia Amanda: Where, how? Special:Whatlinkshere and queries are not available through Lua yet! -- Innocent bystander (talk) 07:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well with lua? You ask for the item(s) linked to this item using this property, instead of asking for the value of the property. It should work perfectly? --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Harmonia Amanda: In automatic infoboxes for family names, you could link automatically to the identical first names. I don't know how you can do that currently? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 09:48, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jon Harald Søby: I don't see why we shouldn't! I say propose it. There's lots of precedence for symmetrical properties and automated editing would lighten most of the extra work load. --Azertus (talk) 13:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)