Disputatio:Mumbai

Heptanesia

Ad en:Heptanesia legimus Mumbai antiquitus a Claudio Ptolemaeo (Geographia 7.1.95) Heptanesiam vocatam esse. Propono hanc paginam Heptanesiam renominare. --Fabullus 21:16, 6 Martii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In dubio sum. Heptanesia est nomen Graecum; nobis oportet nomen Latinum praeferre. Et Heptanesia nomen est insularum, minime urbis. Igitur credo versionem aliquam Latinam nominis urbis praeferendam. Apud "dioeceses Catholicas" "Archidioecesis Bombayensis" reperio, sed quomodo verbum substantivum ex hoc nomine extrahere? Sine dubio fontes Latinitatis recentiores possumus reperire. -- [PS: Fortasse pagina nova Heptanesia debet nexum praebere ad paginam Anglicam en:Seven islands of Bombay?] [PPS: Dormi bene!] Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:43, 6 Martii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vicipaedia Graeca el:Βομβάη habet, ita fortasse Bombae, -es vel Bombaa, -ae secundum regulas nostras? --Gabriel Svoboda 07:18, 7 Martii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bombaya, -ae a Vaticano usurpatur: [1]. --Gabriel Svoboda 07:38, 7 Martii 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page now below 30K characters

As a result of the deletion of the old "capsa coloniae" formula, this page has lost some ground in the 1000 Pages listing. Not a crisis -- I'm just recording the observation here so we know what happened. A. Mahoney (disputatio) 14:14, 17 Iunii 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of months before, IIRC, Bellum Indosinense II also fell below 30K as a result of similar tidying, which in the long run will be useful, but in the short sun causes these little blips. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:35, 17 Iunii 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it was this one. Sorry. But I'm working on oriental cities right now and will build Mumbai up again, I promise. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:48, 17 Iunii 2016 (UTC)[reply]