Consistency of O16(n,α) cross sections

M. T. Pigni and S. Croft
Phys. Rev. C 102, 014618 – Published 27 July 2020

Abstract

The evaluated O16(n,α) cross sections in the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data library remain uncertain because of systematic discrepancies in the measured data. In the energy region below the first excited state, R-matrix analyses rely heavily on the inverse reaction, and in particular, they rely on the measured C13(α,n)O16 cross sections reported by Bair et al. in 1973 and Harissopulos et al. in 2005. The Harissopulos cross section values are systematically lower than those previously reported by Bair. Drawing on the available experimental information, this paper briefly describes and demonstrates that the two sets of measured cross sections are consistent.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 2 June 2020
  • Accepted 30 June 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014618

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

M. T. Pigni1,* and S. Croft2

  • 1Nuclear Data and Criticality Safety, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 2Safeguards and Security Technology, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 1 — July 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×