Salib Lothair

Sisi depan (Kaiserseite, "sisi kekaisaran") dari Salib Lothair (kiri).
Belakang salib, dengan crucifixion engravir (kanan).

Salib Lothair (bahasa Jerman: Lotharkreuz) adalah sebuah salib prosesional crux gemmata (salib berhias) yang berasal dari sekitar tahun 1000 M, meskipun dasarnya berasal dari abad ke-14. Salib tersebut dibuat di Jerman, mungkin di Koln.^[1]

Catatan

^ Calkins, p. 115; agreement on the approximate date is unanimous among the works cited, except for Lasko p. 101, who sees no need to date it later than the 980s, and also describes it as an "altar cross"

Referensi

Barasch, Moshe, The language of art: studies in interpretation, NYU Press, 1997, ISBN 0-8147-1255-X, ISBN 978-0-8147-1255-9, Google books (See also here)
Beckwith, John. Early Medieval Art: Carolingian, Ottonian, Romanesque, Thames & Hudson, 1964 (rev. 1969), ISBN 0-500-20019-X
Calkins, Robert G.; Monuments of Medieval Art, Dutton, 1979, ISBN 0-525-47561-3 Google books
Henderson, George. Early Medieval Art, 1972, rev. 1977, Penguin.
Hugh Honour and John Fleming, A World History of Art,1st edn. 1982 & later editions, Macmillan, London, page refs to 1984 Macmillan 1st edn. paperback. ISBN 0-333-37185-2
Lasko, Peter, Ars Sacra, 800-1200, Yale University Press, 1995 (2nd edn.) ISBN 978-0300060485
Legner, Anton (ed). Ornamenta Ecclesiae, Kunst und Künstler der Romanik. Catalogue of an exhibition in the Schnütgen Museum, Köln, 1985. 3 vols.
Schiller, Gertrud, Iconography of Christian Art, Vol. II, 1972 (English trans from German), Lund Humphries, London, ISBN 0-85331-324-5
Swarzenski, Hanns. Monuments of Romanesque Art; The Art of Church Treasures in North-Western Europe, Faber and Faber, 1974, ISBN 0-571-10588-2

Pranala luar

Foto

General view and close-up of the central part Diarsipkan 2018-08-03 di Wayback Machine. (at the bottom section)
Central part of the back side
Lothair's seal gem
Three Graces

50°46′30″N 6°04′58″E / 50.7751°N 6.0828°E / 50.7751; 6.0828

[1] Calkins, p. 115; agreement on the approximate date is unanimous among the works cited, except for Lasko p. 101, who sees no need to date it later than the 980s, and also describes it as an "altar cross"

[1]